臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

三品種小白菜播種後在72、128及288格穴盤，播種後9-12天，其單株鮮重、乾重、本葉數、葉面積、根鮮重、乾重及根長等，在不同穴盤中並無顯著差異。隨著播種後天數增加，差異逐漸加大，以在72格方型穴盤有最佳生育。大東京小白菜之根/莖比以288穴格者較72及128穴格者高。鮮重及乾重之相對生長速率，在播種後初期呈最高值，隨播種後天數增加相對生長速率逐漸降低。288穴格苗株在播種後21天之相對生長速率較72及128穴格者小，其後差異減少不顯著。根部活力表現，以128穴格者其根部TTC在單位鮮重含量最高，72穴格者最低。PI值計算定植苗齡及穴格容積之表現，以72及128穴格PI值相似且較288穴格高。
定植田間後，品種、苗齡及穴格容積在單株鮮重、乾重、本葉數及株高均呈顯著性差異，以鳳京小白菜之單株鮮重、乾重及株高最佳。苗齡12、15及18天苗株之比較，隨著苗齡愈大，其定植時或定植後採收，均以苗齡18天苗表現最佳。穴格容積以72穴格苗定植後其單株鮮重、乾重、本葉數及株高最佳，以128四孔子母套格最差。但定植後12天初期採收，以18格穴盤者最低，隨著定植後天數的增加，生育速率加大至18天採收其單株產量僅較72穴格低。其相對生長速率以土白菜最高，苗齡之間以18天苗齡最低，隨著定植後天數增加，相對生長速率隨之增加，以128穴格苗直接定植最高，顯示幼苗活性較高，而18格穴盤苗最低。調查最大葉片之鮮重、葉面積及葉片之位置，顯示品種、苗齡及穴格容積均呈顯著性差異，而最大葉片之單葉鮮重及葉面積結果，與單株鮮重相似，呈顯著相關關係，可供作單株鮮重或產量之指標。

Three cultivars of Pak-choi were sown in 72,128 and 288-cell plug trays, their plant fresh weight, dry weight, leaf number, leaf area, root fresh weight, root dry weight and root length showed no significant difference among different cell size after 9 to 12 days of sowing. However, the difference would increase gradually as days after sowing increased. Seedlings in 72-cell plug showed best growth. The root shoot ratio of cultivar ‘Dai Tokyo’ in 288-cell was higher than seedlings sowed in 72 and 128 cell plug. Relative growth rate of fresh weight and dry weight had the highest value in early seedling growth, but gradually increased as sowing days increased. Plants sowed in 288-cell showed less in relative growth rate at 21 days after sowing in comparison to seedlings in 72 and 128-cell but difference become less in later growth. Testing of root vigor indicated that seedling in 128-cell had higher TTC in fresh weight unit and seedlings in 72-cell were the lowest. Using PI value for measuring vigor affected by seedling age and cell size in plant growth after transplanting showed that both plants in 128 and 72-cell had higher PI value than the 288-cell.
There were significant difference among cultivars, seedling age and cell size on fresh weight, dry weight, leaf number and plant height after transplanting into field. Cultivar ‘Feng Jing’ had the highest shoot fresh weight, dry weight and plant height. Among seedling age of 12, 15 and 18 days, the higher seedling age of the 18 day seedling had the best growth after transplanting. Plants in difference cell size showed that 72-cell plug seedling had the best shoot fresh weight, dry weight, leaf number and plant height, but the 4-unit of 128 cell was the lowest. Plants in 18-cell plug showed lower growth rate at 12 days after transplanting but growth rate increased with number of planting days. It was only less than plant in 72-cell when harvested at the 18th day. Relative growth rate after transplanting was highest in cultivar ‘To Pak-choi’ or those directly transplanting from 128-cell plug and 18 day seedling were lower in early growth than increased later which indicated that young seedlings had higher vigor. There were significant differences on fresh weight of the largest leaf, leaf area, position of leaf among cultivars, seedling age and plug size. The single leaf fresh weight and leaf area were positive correlated with single plant fresh weight which can be used as index for predicting yield.

目錄
壹、 前 言………………………………………………………1
貳、 前人研究……………………………………………………3
一、 植物根的功能……………………………………………..3
二、 根域限制對植物生育之影響……………………………..3
三、 穴盤育苗對蔬菜作物生育之影響……………………… 6
四、 穴格容積與苗齡對蔬菜作物生育之影響……………… .8
參、 試驗材料及方法………………………………………… 12
一、 試驗材料………………………………………………….12
二、 試驗方法………………………………………………….12
肆、 試驗結果………………………………………………… 16
一、 穴格容積對小白菜穴盤苗生育之影響………………….16
（一） 小白菜生育性狀……………………………………… 16
（二） 根部/地上部乾重比…………………………………..26
（三） 相對生長速率………………………………………… 26
（四） 根部活性……………………………………………… 32
（五） Plastochron Index（PI）值…………………………32
二、 品種、苗齡及穴格容積對小白菜穴盤苗移植後生育之影響
………...................................... 37
（一） 單株鮮重……………………………………………….37
（二） 乾重…………………………………………………….37
（三） 株高…………………………………………………….39
（四） 最大單葉鮮重………………………………………….39
（五） 最大單葉之葉面積…………………………………….42
（六） 本葉數………………………………………………….42
（七） 最大葉片之葉數位置………………………………….46
（八） 相對生長速率………………………………………….46
三、 品種、苗齡及穴格容積對小白菜定植後生育性狀之相
關關係…………………………………………………… 46
伍、 討論……………………………………………………… 54
一、 穴格容積對小白菜穴盤苗生育之影響………………….54
（一） 生育性狀之影響……………………………………….54
（二） 穴格容積對小白菜根部活性之影響………………….57
（三） 穴格容積對小白菜Plastochron Index之影響…… 58
二、 品種、定植苗齡及穴格容積對小白菜穴盤苗移植後田
間生育之影響…................................ 58
（一） 生育性狀之影響……………………………………….58
（二） 相對生長速率……………………………………….. 62
（三） 小白菜相關性………………………………………. .63
陸、 中文摘要………………………………………………… 65
柒、 英文摘要………………………………………………… 66
捌、 參考文獻………………………………………………… 67

王小華、黃玉梅、黃少鵬. 1996. 甘藍穴盤苗與土播苗生育之比較. 台灣之種苗25: 5-8。
林孟輝、許苑培、張學琨. 1995. 氣象因子對桃園地區小白菜生育之影響. 中華農業氣象 2: 121-128.
林智良、張惠群、張簡秀容. 1999. 有機栽培小白菜穴盤育苗與直播之生產成本比較. 蔬菜作物試驗研究彙報(第九輯). 鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所印. p. 212-218.
邱輝龍. 1994. 苗齡對番茄生育與早期產量之影響. 中興大學園藝系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 77pp.
高景輝. 1988. 淹水與植物發育. 科學農業叢書第三十號. 科學農業社編 印. 57pp.
高景輝. 1993. 根之生長與分化. 植物生長與分化. 國立編譯館主編.
p.333-364。
陳秉訓、林金和. 2000. Plastochron Index在植物生理學上之意義與其應用. 科學農業 48(9,10): 249-253.
許福星. 1977. 作物生長分析及其應用. 科學農業25(11-12): 334-341.
翁仁憲. 1994. 玻璃溫室微氣候對水耕蔬菜生育之影響. 中華農業氣象 1: 35-39.
張蓉茜. 1996. 缺氧逆境對植物水分生理之影響. 國立中興大學植物系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 66pp.
程新君. 1994. 育苗穴格容積和苗齡對洋蔥苗株品質與早熟性的影響. 中興大學園藝系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 109 pp.
黃玉梅. 1998. 穴格構型改善番茄甘藍種苗盤根及其生育之研究. 中興大學園藝系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 102 pp.
黃亮白. 2000. 穴盤型式及穴格構型改善甘藍結球白菜種苗盤根及其生育之研究. 中興大學園藝系研究所碩士論文. 台中. 80 pp.
楊紹榮、余合. 1996. 穴盤格子大小及栽植株數對小白菜生育及產量之影
響. 設施園藝之研究與技術開發計畫執行成果報告(八十三及八十四年
度). p. 286-290.
楊紹榮. 1997. 另類蔬菜栽培-穴盤蔬菜. 鄉間小路 23(5): 86-88.
楊紹榮、鄭榮瑞. 1997. 穴盤蔬菜栽培. 台南區農業改良場技術專刊 86-2(No. 68).台灣省台南區農業改良場印行. 台南. 7pp.
楊紹榮、鄭榮瑞. 1998. 穴盤蔬菜栽培技術之研發與應用. 台南區農業改良場技術專刊 87-2(No.74). 台灣省台南區農業改良場印行. 台南. 26pp.
戴振洋. 1997. 蔬菜育苗之穴盤種類與特性. 種苗科技專訊 20: 20-33.
蕭吉雄、王三太、曾明懋. 1999. 小白菜品種抽苔性評估. 蔬菜作物試驗研究彙報(第九輯). 鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印. p. 204-210.
Bar-Tal, A., B. Bar-Yosef, and U. Kafkafi. 1990. Pepper
transplant response to root volume and nutrition in the
nursery. Agron. J. 82: 989-995.
Bar-Tal, A., A. Feigin, S. Sheinfeld, R. Rosenberg, B.
Sternbaum, I. Rylski, and E. Pressman. 1995. Root restriction
and N-NO3 solution concentration effects on nutrient uptake,
transpiration and dry matter production of tomato. Scientia
Hort. 63: 195-208.
Carmi, A. and B. Heuer. 1981. The role of roots in control of
bean shoot growth. Ann. Bot. 48: 519-527.
Carmi, A., J. D. Hesketh, W. T. Enos, and D. B. Peters. 1983.
Interrelationships between shoot growth and photosynthesis,
as affected by root growth restriction. Photosynthetica 17
(2): 240-245.
Carmi, A. 1986. Effects of cytokinins and root pruning on
photosynthesis and growth. Photosynthetica 20(1): 1-8.
Carmi, A. 1993. Effects of root zone restriction on amino acid
status and bean plant growth. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 1161-1166.
Carmi, A. 1995. Growth, water transport and transpiration in
root-restricted plants of bean, and their relation to
abscisic acid accumulation. Plant Sci. 107: 69-76.
Choi, J. H., G. C. Chung, S. R. Suh, J. A. Yu, J. H. Sung, and
K. J. Choi. 1997. Suppression of calcium transport to shoots
by root restriction in tomato plant. Plant Cell Physiol. 38
(4): 495-498.
Damato, G., L. Trotta, and A. Elia. 1994. Cell size, transplant
age and cultivars effects on timing field production of
broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. Italica plenck) for
processing. Acta. Hort. 371: 53-57.
Dufault, R. J. and L. Waters. 1985. Container size influence
broccoli and cauliflower transplant growth but not yield.
HortScience 20(4): 682-684.
Duval, J. R. and D. S. NeSmith. 1999. Stand survival,
establishment, and yield of diploid and triploid watermelon
transplants of different ages and sizes. HortTechnology 9(4):
651-654.
Erickson, R. O. and F. J. Michelini. 1957. The Plastochron
Index. Amer. J. Bot. 44(4): 297-304.
Fitter, A. H. 1991a. Characteristics and functions of root
systems. In Y. Waisel, A. Eshel, and U. Kafkafi (eds). Plant
Roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York. p. 3-24.
Fitter, A. H. 1991b. Root-shoot relationships. In Y. Waisel, A.
Eshel, and U. Kafkafi (eds). Plant Roots: the hidden half.
Marcel Dekker, New York. p. 265-286.
Fukuchi, N. and S. Aoyagi. 1996. Studies on the plug seedlings
in cabbage, lettuce and parsley effect of nursing period,
compost and coated fertilizer on the growth. Bull. Chiba.
Agric. Exp. Stn. 37:73-84.
Hall, M. R. 1989. Cell size of seedling containers influences
early vine growth and yield of transplanted watermelon.
HortScience 24(5): 771-773.
Hameed, M. A., J. B. Reid, and R. H. Rowe. 1987. Root
confinement and its effects on the water relation growth, and
assimilate partitioning of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill). Ann. Bot. 59: 685-692.
Harmon, R. H., L. A. Weston, and T. Jones. 1991. Effect of root
cell size and transplant age on yield of transplanted
eggplant. HortScience 26(6): 689(Abst.).
Hartmann, H. T., D. E. Kester, F. T. Davies, and R. L. Geneve.
1997. Propagation by specialized stems and roots. In Plant
propagation: principles and practices sixth edition. Prentice-
Hall, Inc. p.520-543.
Herison, C., J. G. Masabni, and B. H. Zandstra. 1993.
Increasing seedling density, age, and nitrogen fertilization
increases onion yield. HortScience 28(1): 23-25.
Ismail, M. R. and W. J. Davies. 1998. Root restriction affects
leaf growth and stomatal response: the role of xylem sap ABA.
Scientia Hort. 74: 257-268.
Itai, C. and H. Birnbaum. 1991. Synthesis of plant growth
regulators by roots. In Y. Waisel, A. Eshel, and U. Kafkafi
(eds). Plant Roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York.
p.163-178.
Jackson, M. B. 1979. Is the diageotropic tomato ethylene
deficient? Physiol. Plant. 46: 347-351.
Jones, R. T., L. A. Weston, and R. Harmon. 1991. Effect of root
cell size and transplant age on cole crop yields. HortScience
26(6): 688(Abst.).
Joslin, J. D. and G. S. Hendweson. 1984. The determination of
percentages of living tissue in woody fine root samples using
triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Forest Sci. 30(4): 965-970.
Keller, E. and K. L. Steffen. 1995. Increased chilling
tolerance and altered carbon metabolism tomato leaves
following application of mechanical stress. Physiol. Plant.
93: 519-525.
Kemble, J. M., J. M. Davis, R. G. Gardner, and D. C. Sanders.
1994. Spacing, root cell volume, and age affect production
and economics of compact-growth —habit tomatoes. HortScience
29(12): 1460-1464.
Kharkina, T. G., C. O. Ottosen, and E. Rosenqvist. 1999.
Effects of root restriction on the growth and physiology of
cucumber plants. Physiol. Plant. 105: 434-441.
Koller, H. R., W. E. Nyquist, and I. S. Chorush. 1970. Growth
analysis of the soybean community. Crop Sci. 10: 407-412.
Koller, H. R. 1971. Analysis growth within distinct strata of
the soybean community. Crop Sci. 11: 400-402.
Kratky, B. A., J. K. Wang, and K. Kubojiri. 1982. Effects of
container size, transplant age, and plant spacing on chinese
cabbage. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107(2): 345-347.
Krizek, D. T., A. Carmi, R. M. Mirecki, F. W. Snyder, and J. A.
Bunce. 1985. Comparative effects of soil moisture stress and
restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and
physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.).
J. Exp. Bot. 36: 25-38.
Lamont, W. J. 1992. Transplant age has little effect on
broccoli head weight and diameter. HortScience 27(7): 848.
Leskovar, D. I., D. J. Cantliffe, and P. J. Stoffella. 1991.
Growth and yield of tomato plants in response to age of
transplants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116(3): 416-420.
Leskovar, D. I. and P. J. Stoffella. 1995. Vegetable seedling
root systems: morphology development and importance.
HortScience 30(6): 1153-1159.
Leskovar, D. I. and C. S. Vavrina. 1999. Onion growth and yield
are influenced by transplant tray cell size and age. Scientia
Hort. 80: 133-143.
Liptay, A. 1987. Field survival and establishment of tomato
transplants of various age and size. Acta. Hort. 220: 203-209.
Liptay, A. and C. Vavirna. 1999. Cell shape impacts on
transplant root and shoot expression- a review. Acta. Hort.
504: 33-39.
Liu, A. and J. G. Latimer. 1995a. Root cell volume in the
planter flat affects watermelon seedling development and
fruit yield. HortScience 30(2): 242-246.
Liu, A. and J. G. Latimer. 1995b. Water relations and abscisic
acid levels of watermelon as affected by rooting volume
restriction. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 1011-1015.
Marr, C. W. and M. Jirak. 1990. Holding tomato transplants in
plug trays. HortScience 25(2): 173-176.
Marsh, D. B. and K. B. Paul. 1988. Influence of container type
and cell size on cabbage transplant development and field
performance. HortScience 23(2): 310-311.
Maynard, E. T., C. S. Vavrina, and W. D. Scott. 1996.
Containerized muskmelon transplants: cell volume effects on
pretransplant development and subsequent yield. HortScience 31
(1): 58-61.
McCraw B. D. and J. K. Greig. 1986. Effect of transplant age
and pruning procedure on yield and fruit-set of bell pepper.
HortScience 21(3): 430- 431.
Miller, D. E. 1986. Root systems in relation to stress
tolerance. HortScience 21(4): 963-970.
Mugnai, S., P. Vernieri, and F. Tognoni. 2000. Container volume
effects on morphology and physiology of tomato seedlings.
Acta. Hort. 516: 49-56.
NeSmith, D. S. 1993a. Influence of root restriction on two
cultivars of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). J. Plant.
Nutr. 16(3): 421-431.
NeSmith, D. S. 1993b. Transplant age influences summer squash
growth and yield. HortScience 28(6): 618-620.
NeSmith, D. S. 1994. Transplant age has little influence on
yield of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) HortScience 29(8): 916.
NeSmith D. S. and J. R. Duval. 1998. The effect of container
size. HortTechnology 8(4): 495-498.
Neuman, D. S. and B. A. Smit. 1991. The influence of leaf water
status and ABA on leaf growth and stomata of phaseolus
seedlings with hypoxic roots. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 1499-1506.
Nicola, S. and D. J. Cantliffe. 1996. Increasing cell size and
reducing medium compression enhance lettuce transplant
quality and field production. HortScience 31(2): 184-189.
Olson, S. M. and S. J. Locascio. 1990. Influence of transplant
age and container size on broccoli production. HortScience 25
(9): 1120.
Peterson, T. A., M. D. Reinsel, and D. T. Krizek. 1991a. Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. ''Better Bush'') plant
response to root restriction. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 1233-1240.
Peterson, T. A., M. D. Reinsel, and D. T. Krizek. 1991b. Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. ''Better Bush'') plant
response to root restriction. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 1241-1249.
Pressman, E., A. Bar-tal, R. Shaked, and K. Rosenfeld. 1997.
The development of tomato root system in relation to the
carbohydrate statue of the whole plant. Ann. Bot. 80: 533-538.
Robbins, N. S. and D. M. Pharr. 1988. Effect of restricted root
growth on carbohydrate metabolism and whole plant growth of
Cucumis sativus L. Plant Physiol. 87: 409-413.
Ruff, M. S., D. T. Krizek, R. M. Mirecki, and D. W. Inouge.
1987. Restricted root zone volume: influence on growth and
development of tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112(5): 763-
769.
Styer, R. C. and D. S. Koranski. 1997a. Introduction. In Plug
and Transplant Production. Ball Publishing. p. 1-13.
Styer, R. C. and D. S. Koranski. 1997b. Controlling shoot and
root growth. In Plug and Transplant Production. Ball
Publishing. p. 229-239.
Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 1998. Stress physiology. In Plant
Physiology. p. 747-750.
Towill, L. E. and P. Mazur. 1975. Studies on the reduction of
2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chlorides as a viability assay for
plant tissue cultures. Can. J. Bot. 53: 1097-1102.
Vavrina, C. S. and M. D. Orzolek. 1993. Tomato transplant age:
a-review. HortTechnology 3(3): 313-316.
Vavrina, C. S., S. Olson, and J. A. Cornell. 1993. Watermelon
transplant age: influence on fruit yield. HortScience 28(8):
789-790.
Vavrina, C. S. 1997. Bigger is actually better. Amer. Veg.
Grower 45(4): 36-37.
Vavrina, C. S. 1998. Transplant age in vegetable crops.
HortTechnology 8(4): 550-555.
Weston, L. A. and B. H. Zandstra. 1986. Effect of root
container size and location of production on growth and yield
of tomato transplants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111(4): 498-
501.
Weston, L. A. 1988. Effect of flat cell size transplant age,
and production site on growth and yield of pepper
transplants. HortScience 23(4): 709-711.
Weston L. A. and B. H. Zandstra. 1989. Transplant age and N and
P nutrition effects on growth and yield of tomatoes.
HortScience 24(1): 88-90.
Wurr, D. C. E. and J. R. Fellows. 1986. The influence of
transplant age and raising conditions on the growth of crisp
lettuce plants raised in techniculture plugs. J. Hort. Sci. 61
(1): 81-87.
Yourstone, K. S. and D. H. Wallace. 1990a. Application of
plastochron index to common bean grown in controlled
environments. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115(5): 820-823.
Yourstone, K. S. and D. H. Wallace. 1990b. Effect of
photoperiod and temperature on rate of node development in
indeterminate bean. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115(5): 824-828.
Yukihiko, Y., T. Ono, and S. Mametsuka. 1994. Improvement of
vegetable cultivation by rasing seedling with cell-tray cell
size and cropping times in leaf vegetable cultivation. Bull.
Fukuoka Agric. Res. Cent. B-13: 15-20.
Zobel, R. W. 1995. Genetic and environmental aspects of roots
and seedling stress. HortScience 30(6): 1189-1192.