臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　在網際網路快速成長之際，網路購物似乎已蔚為趨勢。近年來政府更致力於生鮮食品網路購物的推動，但消費者上網購買生鮮食品的意願，卻還是撲朔迷離，因此有必要調查消費者上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊的意願。網路生鮮超市業者逐漸重視網路行銷，有意願上網購買生鮮食品消費者的特性，是業者所極欲知道的重要資訊。
　　本研究以消費者特性為基礎，探討探索性購買行為傾向（EBBT）、知覺風險、生活型態與網際網路購買生鮮食品意願之關係，調查的對象為三大都會區（台北都會區、台中都會區、高雄都會區）的上班族，研究結果有以下發現：
1.三大都會區上班族母體有意願上網購買生鮮食品的95%信賴區間為6.63%　~12.09%。有意願上網查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願的95%信賴區間為　51.97%~61.27%。
2.探索性購買行為傾向較高的消費者，較有意願上網購買與查詢生鮮食品　銷售相關資訊。
3.知覺風險較低的消費者，較有意願上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資　訊。
4.利用因素分析萃取生活型態變數八個，分別是注重流行時尚、有自信、　有影響力、網路活動、注重家庭生活、重視休閒生活、價格知覺、重視　傳統等。並以這八個因素為基礎，採二階段集群分析，區隔為四個集　　群﹔「傳統內斂型」、「前衛精明型」、「自信型」與「節儉低信心　　型」。
5.不同生活型態族群在上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願上有顯　著差異。三大都會區上班族最有意願上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關　資訊者為集群二的「前衛精明型」，次有意願上網購買生鮮食品者為集　群四的「節儉低信心型」。
關鍵字：網際網路購物、消費者特性、探索性購買行為傾向、知覺風險、生活型態

　　　　　　　　　　　　　目　　　錄
摘要…………………………………………………………………………i
目錄…………………………………………………………………………ii
表目錄………………………………………………………………………vi
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………viii
第一章　緒論………………………………………………………………1
第一節　研究背景…………………………………………………………1
第二節　研究動機…………………………………………………………3
一、網路業者開始重視網路行銷面………………………………………3
二、目前生鮮食品結合網際網路購物之相關研究較少…………………3
第三節　研究目的…………………………………………………………4
第四節　研究流程…………………………………………………………5
第二章　文獻探討…………………………………………………………7
第一節　網際網路購物……………………………………………………7
一、網路購物的定義………………………………………………………7
二、網路行銷的重要性……………………………………………………8
三、網路購物通路與傳統通路之比較……………………………………9
第二節　消費者探索性購買行為傾向……………………………………11
一、創新性定義……………………………………………………………11
二、創新類型………………………………………………………………11
三、探索性購買行為定義…………………………………………………12
四、探索性購買行為的構面………………………………………………12
五、探索性購買行為傾向的衡量方法……………………………………13
第三節　知覺風險理論……………………………………………………16
一、知覺風險概念…………………………………………………………16
二、知覺風險構面…………………………………………………………17
三、知覺風險與購買意願之關係…………………………………………19
四、國內知覺風險相關研究………………………………………………21
第四節　生活型態理論……………………………………………………23
一、生活型態的概念………………………………………………………23
二、生活型態的定義………………………………………………………23
三、生活型態研究架構……………………………………………………25
四、生活型態衡量方法……………………………………………………27
五、生活型態研究的優點…………………………………………………28
六、生活型態相關研究……………………………………………………28
第五節　本研究之觀念性架構……………………………………………31
一、本研究觀念性架構之推導……………………………………………31
二、本研究各研究變項構面之選擇………………………………………32
第三章　研究方法…………………………………………………………34
第一節　研究架構…………………………………………………………34
第二節　研究假說…………………………………………………………35
第三節　研究變數與操作性定義…………………………………………37
一、意願……………………………………………………………………37
二、探索性購買行為傾向…………………………………………………37
三、知覺風險………………………………………………………………38
四、生活型態………………………………………………………………38
五、人口統計變數…………………………………………………………40
第四節　問卷設計…………………………………………………………41
一、前測……………………………………………………………………41
二、正式問卷………………………………………………………………41
第五節　研究對象與資料蒐集……………………………………………44
一、研究產業………………………………………………………………44
二、研究對象………………………………………………………………44
三、資料蒐集………………………………………………………………44
四、抽樣方法………………………………………………………………45
五、問卷回收狀況…………………………………………………………45
第六節　信度與效度之分析………………………………………………47
一、信度分析………………………………………………………………47
二、效度分析………………………………………………………………50
第七節　資料分析方法……………………………………………………55
　　　　一、量表信度分析………………………………………………55
二、量表效度分析…………………………………………………………55
三、敘述統計………………………………………………………………56
四、母體比例的區間估計…………………………………………………56
五、Spearman等級相關……………………………………………………56
六、因素分析………………………………………………………………57
七、集群分析………………………………………………………………59
八、變異數分析……………………………………………………………60
第四章　資料分析…………………………………………………………61
第一節　基本資料分析……………………………………………………61
一、基本人口統計變數分析………………………………………………61
二、三大都會區上班族上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊人口比
例……………………………………………………………………………63
三、三大都會區上班族有意願上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊
比例…………………………………………………………………………64
四、三大都會區上班族有意願上網購買與查尋生鮮食品銷售相關資訊者之人口統計變數分析…………………………………………………………65
第二節　相關分析…………………………………………………………66
一、EBBT與上網查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願之關係（假說一）…66
二、EBBT與上網購買意願之關係（假說二）……………………………67
三、知覺風險與上網查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願之關係(假說三)67
四、知覺風險與上網購買生鮮食品意願之關係（假說四）……………68
第三節　生活型態因素分析………………………………………………69
一、適合度檢定……………………………………………………………69
二、因素分析………………………………………………………………69
三、因素命名………………………………………………………………70
第四節　生活型態集群分析………………………………………………74
一、以華德法決定集群數目………………………………………………74
二、集群數測試……………………………………………………………75
三、K平均數法集群分析…………………………………………………78
四、集群命名………………………………………………………………78
第五節　不同生活型態族群之差異分析…………………………………82
第五章　結論與建議………………………………………………………83
第一節　研究結果…………………………………………………………83
一、上網購買與查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊人口比例…………………83
二、EBBT與上網購買和查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願之關係………84
三、知覺風險與上網購買和查詢生鮮食品銷售相關資訊意願之關係…85
四、網路生鮮食品之目標市場……………………………………………85
五、研究假說檢定結果彙整………………………………………………86
第二節　行銷策略建議……………………………………………………87
第三節　研究限制…………………………………………………………88
一、研究對象限制…………………………………………………………88
二、樣本數未達理想目標…………………………………………………88
第四節　後續研究建議……………………………………………………89
一、知覺風險研究…………………………………………………………89
二、生活型態研究…………………………………………………………89
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………90
附錄一：問卷初稿…………………………………………………………98
附錄二：正式問卷…………………………………………………………101

中文部份
李文生（1997），「全球資訊網使用者之區隔及其使用型態之研究－以　台北市大學學生為例」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
李定家（2000），「網路購物之降低風險策略之研究」，國立中央大學　資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
吳靜宜（2000），「購買過程中運用網際網路與實體商店之比較研　　　究」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
張紹勳，林秀娟(1994)，SPSS For Windows 統計分析：初等統計與高　等統計下冊，松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司，第二版。
張紹勳(2000)，研究方法，滄海書局，初版。
張裕淵（2000），「以生活型態觀點探討台灣地區銀行網路金融服務市　場區隔之研究」，中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
張雅清（2000），「無線網際網路市場區隔之研究」，國立政治大學資　訊管理研究所碩士論文。
張毅志（1998），「網際網路交易潛在消費者特性之研究」，國立中興　大學(台北)　企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳盈德（1998），「WWW電子商店之市場區隔研究」，東吳大學企業管　理研究所碩士論文。
陳廣山（2000），「人格特質與人口統計變數對網路購物知覺風險、　 降低知覺風險策略之影響」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
11詹智翔（1999），「由消費者觀點探討高科技產品特性、知覺風險與購買決策過程之研究」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞等編(1989)，社會及行為科學研究法上冊，東華書局，第十三版。
蔡東峻，李奇勳（1999），「消費者特性與網際網路購物意願關係之研究」，管理學報，第十六卷、第四期，pp.557-580。
劉怡君(1999)，「製藥業中高階管理者”管理才能”評鑑量表之建立」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
羅進明（1998），「網際網路使用者的市場區隔－以清、交大學生為例」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
顏月珠(1994)，高階統計方法，台北三民書局，初版。
欒斌，羅凱揚 (1999)，電子商務，滄海書局，初版。
英文部份
Akaah, I. P. and P. K. Korgaonkar (1988), “A Conjoint Investigation of the Relative Importance of Risk Relievers in Direct Marketing”, Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 38-44.
Anderberg, M.(1973), Cluster Analysis for Applications (New York: Academic Press), pp. 185-190.
Baird, I. S. and T. Howard (1985), “Toward A Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 230-243.
Ball, G. and D. Hall (1963), Background Information on Clustering Techniques (Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute)
Bauer, R. A. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking”, in R. S. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp.389-398.
Baumgartner, H. and Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkampy (1996), “Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.13, pp.121-137.
Berlyne, D. E. (1978), “Curiosity and Learning”, Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 2, pp. 97-175.
Bettman, J. R. (1973), “Perceived Risk and Its Components : A Model and Empirical Test”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 10, pp.184-190.
Blackwell, R. D., P. W. Winiard and J. F. Engel (2001), Consumer Behavior, Harcourt College Publishers, 9th ed., p219.
Brooker, G. (1984), “ An Assessment of an Expended Measure of Perceived Risk”, in Advances in Consumer Research, 11, ed. Thomas C. Kinnear, Urbana, IL : Association for Consumer Research, pp.439-441.
Cattell, R. (1966), ”The Scree Test for the Number of Factors”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, p. 245.
Comas, S.C. (1982), “Life style and consumption patterns”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, pp.453-455.
Cox, D. F. (1967), “Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior — an Intensive Study of Two Cases”, in Donald F. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston : Harvard University Press, pp.34-81.
Cunningham, S. M. (1967), “The Major Dimension of Perceived Risk”, in Donald F. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston : Harvard University Press, pp.82-108.
Guttman, L. (1954), ”Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis”, Psychometrica, Vol. 19, pp. 149-161.
Derbaix, C. (1983), “Perceived Risk and Risk Relievers : An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 19-38.
Easingwood, C. and C. Beard (1989), “High Technology Launch Strategies in the U.K.”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 18, pp. 125-138.
Engel, J. F., R. D. Blackwell and D. T. Kollat (1980), Consumer Behaveior, 3rd ed., p175.
Festervand, T. A., D. R. Synder and J. D. Tsalikis (1986), “Influence of Catalog vs. Store Shopping and Prior Satisfaction on Perceived Risk”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, Winter, pp. 28-36.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black (1995), Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., pp.100-111, p506.
Hall, R. J. (1992), “The Capital(s) of Cultures : A Nonholistic Approach to Status Situations, CLASS, Gender, and Ethnicity,” in Cultivating Differences : Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, ed. Michele Lamont and Marcel Fournier, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, pp.257-285.
Hawkins, D. I., R. J. Best and K.A. Coney (1992), Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, 5th ed., p326, Chicago: Richard D Irwin.
Haynes, T. (1995), The Electronic Commerce Dictionary. Menlo Park, Robleda Company.
Hirschman, E. C. (1980), ”Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, pp.283-295.
Hoffman, D. L., T. P. Novak and P. Chatterjee (1995), “Internet Use in the United States: 1995 Baseline Estimates and Preliminary Market Segments”, working paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University (April)
Hoffman, D. L. and T. P. Novak (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations”, Journal of Marketing, pp.50-68.
Holt, B. D. (1997), “Poststructuralist Lifestyle Analysis: Conceptualizing the Social Patterning of Consumption in Postmodernity”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, pp. 326-349.
Hoover, R. J., R. T. Green and Joel Saegert (1978), “A Cross - National Study of Perceived”, Journal of Marketing, pp.102-108.
Joseph, and Ronald (1987), Multivariate Data and Analysis with Reading, Mac Millan Publishing Company.
Kalakota, R. and A. B. Whinston (1997), Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kaplan, L. B. and J. Jacoby (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk”, in Proceedings, Third Annual Conference, ed. M. Venkatesan, Urbans, IL : Association for Consumer Research.
Kaplan, L. B., G. J. Szybillo and J. Jacoby (1974), Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross — validation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, No.3, pp. 287-291.
Kelly, G. A. (1955), The Psychology of Personal Constructs (New York: W. W. Norton).
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986), Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3th ed., Chicago: Holt, Rinchart and Winston, Inc., pp. 404-434.
Kiang, M. Y., T. S. Raghu and K. Huei-Min Shang (2000), “Marketing on the Internet — Who Can Benefit from an Online Marketing Approach? ”, Decision Support System, Vol. 27, pp. 383-393.
Kolter, P. (1997), Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lazer, W. (1963), “Life Style Concepts and Marketing”, Toward Scientific Marketing, Stephen Greyser, ed. (Chicago: American Marketing Assn., 1963), pp. 140-151.
Lesser, J. A. and M. A. Hughes (1986),“The Generalizability of Psychographic Market Segments Across Geographic Locations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, pp.18-27.
McAlister, L. and E. Pessemier (1982), “ Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, pp. 311-322.
Mitchell, V. W. and M. Greatorex (1994), “Modelling Consumer Risk Reduction Preferences from Perceived Loss Data”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 69-685.
Murray, K. B. and J. L. Schlacter (1990), “ The Impact of Services versus Goods on Consumers’ Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 51-65.
Nunnally, J. C.(1967), Psychometric Theory, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Peter, J. P. and L. X. Tarpey, SR. (1975), “A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2.
Peterson, R. A., S. Balasubramanian and B. J. Bronnenberg (1997), “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25, pp. 329-346.
Plummer, J. T.(1974), “The Concept and Application of Life Style Segmentation”, Journal of Marketing, pp.33-37.
Punj Girish and D. W. Stewart (1983), “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application”, Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 134-184.
Raju, P. S. (1980), “Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, pp. 272-282.
Reynolds, F. D. and W. R. Darden (1974), “Constructing Life Style and Psychographics”, in Williams D. Well ed., Life Style and Psychographics, (Chicago : AMA, pp74-96.)
Robert, M. L. and L. Wortzel (1979), “New Life — Style Determinants of Women’s Food Shopping Behavior”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43, pp. 43-60.
Robertson, T. S.(1967), “The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, pp.14-19.
Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35, pp. 56-61.
Rothman, J. T. (1989), Using Multivariate Statistics for the Behavior Science, 2nd ed., Harper and Row Inc.
Shimp, T. A. and W. O. Bearden (1982), “Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers’ Risk Perception”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, pp.38-46.
Stone, R. N. and K. Gronhaug (1993), “Perceived risk : Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, pp. 39-50.
Subramaniam, M. and N. Venkatraman (2001), “Determinants of transnational new product development capability : Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overse knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 359-378.
Sudman, S. (1976), Applied Sampling, (New York: Academic Press), p. 87.
Tan, S. J. (1999), “Strategies for Reducing Consumers’ Risk Aversion in Internet Shopping”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 163-180.
Taylor, J. W. (1974), “The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, pp. 54-60.
Wells, W. D. (1975), “Psychographics: A Critical Review”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 12, pp.196-213.
Wells, W. D. and D. J. Tigert (1971), “Activities, Interests, and Opinions”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.11 pp.27-35.
Wignad, R. T. (1997), “Electronic Commerce, Theory, and Context”, The Information Society, Vol. 13, pp. 1-16.
Wind, Y. and P. E. Green (1974), “Some Conceptual Measurement and Analytical Problem in Life Style Research”, in William D. Well ed., Life Style and Psychographics, (Chicago : AMA, pp99-126.)
Woodside, A. G. (1968), “Group Influence and Consumer risk Taking : An Experimental Study”, Unpublished Doctoral Disserration The Pennsylvania State University.
URL:http://www.find.org.tw/focus_disp.asp?focus_id=131