(54.236.62.49) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/08 03:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳蜂灝
研究生(外文):Feng-Haw Chen
論文名稱:組織學習經驗對策略聯盟價值創造之影響
論文名稱(外文):When do experiences create value in domestic strategic alliance
指導教授:張紹基張紹基引用關係邱正仁邱正仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shao-Chi ChangJeng-Ren Chiou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:財務金融研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:52
中文關鍵詞:經驗組織學習策略聯盟水平策略聯盟科技策略聯盟
外文關鍵詞:strategic allianceorganization learningexperience
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:2799
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:968
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:9
本研究以組織學習經驗觀點為基礎,由於以前的研究都著重在公司之前策略聯盟次數的多寡來當作主要影響學習效果的變數,可是卻都忽略了探討經驗的內涵與品質,正所謂重質不重量,此外學習效果的好壞更會受過去經驗對象產業的種類型態、過去績效好壞與時間間隔的影響。所以本研究主要依照之前策略聯盟對象的產業類別的相似度、過去策略聯盟績效的好壞以及聯盟案的間隔時間三方面來探討與公司累積異常報酬之間的關係,讓企業知道如何藉由以前的經驗獲得學習效果以幫助在下一次選擇更好的策略聯盟案件以及對象。
  根據針對1990-1998年,912件美國上市公司宣告的策略聯盟案所進行的實證結果,本研究發現各種影響經驗學習效果因素對策略聯盟價值的影響如下:
1. 此次策略聯盟和上一次策略聯盟時間間隔長度與此次策略聯盟績效呈現倒U的關係。
2. 以前策略聯盟所有時間間隔的平均和此次策略聯盟績效呈現倒U的關係。
3. 輕微的損失次數多寡對公司價值所造成的影響,研究結果證據支持薄弱,只有在加入某些變數時才能獲得顯著支持。
4. 策略聯盟對象所屬的產業種類以及與公司本身產業的異同,對公司價值的影響並不顯著。
I use an organizational learning perspective to examine how the nature, performance and timing of a firm’s strategic alliance experience help it to learn how to select the right strategic alliance. I predict the performance of 587 strategic alliances made by 96 firms in several industries between 1994 and 1998.
Results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the time elapsed between prior strategic alliances and focal strategic alliance performance. There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the time elapsed between the focal strategic alliance and the one before it and focal strategic alliance performance. Besides, the presence of small losses in prior strategic alliances has a positive impact on focal strategic alliance performance, while the impact is marginal significant. However, the effects of the similarity of prior strategic alliances are not significant.
目錄

壹、緒論……………………………………………………………………………………1
第一節、研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………………1
第二節、研究目的…………………………………………………………………………3
第三節、研究特色與貢獻…………………………………………………………………4
第四節、研究內容概要……………………………………………………………………5
貳、文獻回顧與探討………………………………………………………………………7
第一節、策略聯盟相關探討………………………………………………………………7
第二節、組織學習理論……………………………………………………………………11
參、研究設計………………………………………………………………………………17
第一節、研究假設…………………………………………………………………………17
第二節、資料來源與樣本選擇……………………………………………………………20
第三節、實證分析方法……………………………………………………………………22
第四節、變數定義說明與設定……………………………………………………………24
第五節、研究限制…………………………………………………………………………33
肆、實證結果分析…………………………………………………………………………34
第一節、樣本資料敘述說明………………………………………………………………34
第二節、實證結果…………………………………………………………………………38
伍、結論與建議……………………………………………………………………………45
第一節、結論………………………………………………………………………………45
第二節、建議………………………………………………………………………………46
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………48
  中文部分………………………………………………………………………………48
  英文部分………………………………………………………………………………48

表目錄

表3-1 迴歸式各變數定義及預期結果………………………………………………32
表4-1 樣本年度分佈情形……………………………………………………………34
表4-2 樣本產業分佈情形……………………………………………………………35
表4-3 各變數之基本敘述統計量……………………………………………………36
表4-4 主要變數之相關係數矩陣……………………………………………………37
表4-5 宣告期間財富效果之橫斷面迴歸分析………………………………………43
表4-5 宣告期間財富效果之橫斷面迴歸分析………………………………………44
參考文獻
中文部分
1.吳美勳,“組織記憶與學習機制關係之研究”, 國立政治大學企管學系碩士論文,民88年7月。
2.林義屏,“市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究—以科學園區資訊電子產業為例”,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文,民90年5月。
3.林家煒,“美國上市公司國際策略聯盟宣告對股東財富影響之研究”,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,民90年6月。
4.施懿玲,“組織間學習行為與制度同形現象之研究”,國立政治大學企管學系碩士論文,民89年7月。
5.陳義清,“國際策略聯盟資源組合類型影響因素之研究”,國立濟南國際大學國際企業學系碩士論文,民87年6月。

英文部分
1.Alliance Analyst. 1998. Measuring alliance performance. August 1998. NewCap Communications: Philadelphia, PA.
2.Amburgey TL, Miner AS. 1992. Strategic momentum: the effects of repetitive, positional and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal 13(5): 335-348.
3.Anand J., Singh H. 1997 Asset re-deployment, acquisitions and corporate strategies in declining industries. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 99-118.
4.Anand B. and T. Khanna 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliance. Strategic Management Journal 21: 295-315.
5.Argote L, Beckman S, Epple D. 1990. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial setting. Management Science, 36: 140-154.
6.Argyris C, Schon D. 1978. Organizational Learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
7.Baker G. 1992. Beatrice: a study in the creation and destruction of value. Journal of Finance 47: 1081.
8.Bleeke J., Ernst D(eds). 1993. Collaborating to Compete. John Wiley: New York.
9.Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. 1997. The art of continuous change. Linking complexity theory and time paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 1-34.
10.Chang SJ. 1996. An evolutionary perspective on diversification and competitive restructuring: timing, exit and economic performance, 1981-1989. Strategic Management Journal 17(8): 587-611.
11.Chan, S., J. Kensinger, A. Keown, and J. Martin 1997. Do Strategic Alliances Create Value? Journal of Financial Economics. 46: 199-221.
12.Chen S.S., K.W., Ho C.F., Lee and G.H.H. Yeo, 2000. Investment Opportunities, Free Cash Flow and Market Reaction to International Joint Ventures. Journal of Banking and Finance 24, No. 11: 1747-1765.
13.Child J., Yan Y. 1999. Predicting the performance of international joint ventures: an investigation in China. Working paper, University of Cambrige, UK.
14.Chung I.Y., K.J. Koford, and I. Lee, 1993. Stock Market Views of Corporate Multinationalism: Some Evidence from Announcements of International Joint Ventures. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 33: 275-293
15.Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quartely 35: 128-152.
16.Contractor F.J. and P. Lorange 1988. Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. In F.J. & P. Contractor & Lorange (ed.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business. 3-30.
17.Cyert RM, March JG, 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18.Das, S., Son, P.K., and Sengupta, S. Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation. Academy of Management Journal. 41: 27-41.
19.Dyer, JH. and H. Singh 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review. 23(4): 660-679.
20.Dyer JH. & Nobeoka K. 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 345-368.
21.Fama, E. 1976. Foundations of Finance. Basic Books, New York.
22.Fama, E. F., Jensen, M. C. 1983. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics. 26: 327-349.
23.Fiol C. Marlene and Marjorie A. Lyles 1985. Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review. 10,Iss4.: 803-813.
24.Garvin, David A. 1993. Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, July/August. 78-91.
25.Gersick C. 1994. Pacing strategic change: the case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal 37: 9-45
26.Haleblian J., Finkelstein S. 1999. The influence of organizational acquisition experience. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 29-56.
27.Harrigan K. 1985. Managing for Joint Venture Success.
28.Haspeslagh P, Jemison DB. 1991. Managing Acquisitions. Free Press: New York.
29.Haunschild PR, Davis-Blake A, Fichman M. 1994. Mangerial overcommitment in corporate acquisition process. Organization Science 5: 528-540.
30.Hayward MLA. 2002. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strategic Management Journal 23: 21-39.
31.Huber GP. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organizational Science 2: 88-115.
32.Jensen, M., Meckling, B., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3: 305-360.
33.Kale P., Dyer J. & Singh H. 2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal forthcoming.
34.Kogut, B. 1988. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9: 319-332.
35.Kogut, B. 1989. The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. Journal of Industrial Economics. 38: 183-198.
36.Koh J, Venkatraman N. 1991. Joint venture formations and stock market reactions: an assessment in the information technology sector. Academy of Management Journal 34: 869-892.
37.Lee I. and S.B. Wyatt, 1990. The Effects of International Joint Ventures on Shareholder Wealth. Financial Review 25: 641-649.
38.Lewis J.D. 1990. Making Strategic Alliance Work. Research Technology Management 33(6): 12-15
39.Levinthal DA. March JG. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 95-112.
40.Levitt B, March JG. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319-340.
41.March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science. 2: 71-87.
42.McConnell J., Nantel T. 1985. Corporate combinations and common stock returns: the case of joint ventures. Journal of Finance. 40(2): 519-536.
43.McGrath R. 2001. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 44: 118-131.
44.Meyers P. W. 1990. Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms. Research Policy. 19:97-115
45.Nevis E. C., Dibella A. J. and Gould J. M. 1995. Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review. Winter 22-28.
46.Penrose ET. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Wiely: New York.
47.Pfeffer J. & G.R. Salancik 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
48.Porter M.E. & Fuller M.B. 1986. Coalitions and Global Strategic Competition in Global Industries Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
49.Selznick P. 1996. Institutionalism “Old” and “New”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41: 270-277.
50.Shrivastava, Paul 1983. A Typology of Organizational Systems. The Journal of Management Studies. 20: 7-28.
51.Simonin B. 1997. The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Manangement Journal 40(5): 1150-1174.
52.Sitkin SM. 1992. Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 231-266.
53.Smith, C.W., Jr., R.L. Watts, 1992. The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation Polices. Journal of Financial Economics. 32: 263-292.
54.Staw BM. 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review 6: 577-587.
55.Williamson, O.E. 1975. Market and Hierachies. New York: Free Press.
56.Weick KE. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. (2nd edn). Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
57.Yelle LE. 1979. The learning curve: historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sciences 10: 302-328.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔