跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.87.250.158) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/01/25 19:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳冠位
研究生(外文):Kuan-Wei Chen
論文名稱:城市競爭優勢評量系統之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on the Evaluation System of City Competitiveness
指導教授:施鴻志施鴻志引用關係鄒克萬鄒克萬引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hung-Chih ShihKo-Wan Tsou
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:都市計劃學系碩博士班
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:都市規劃學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:249
中文關鍵詞:城市競爭優勢城市競爭力地區行銷城市永續發展全球化
外文關鍵詞:Urban Competitive AdvantageCity CompetitivenessUrban Sustainable DevelopmentGlobalizationPlace Marketing
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:126
  • 點閱點閱:4398
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1217
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:19
「城市競爭優勢評量系統之研究」主要係著眼於廿一世紀全球化發展對城市經營管理所產生之衝擊,研究透過理論與發展趨勢的回顧,掌握新世紀城市發展走向,使面對蛻變世紀的城市得以調整其發展步調,更具備全球競爭的適應能力。研究理論基礎主要是延伸IMD(International Management Development)與WEF(World Economic Forum)國家競爭力評比之「現代經濟成長理論」(Modern Economic Growth Theory)至「都市均衡成長理論」(Urban Balance Growth Theory)的基本論點,即當某一都市能帶給經濟個體最大之效用水準時,經濟個體就會選擇座落於該都市。創新技術的發展加速全球經濟網絡的鍊結,跨越國界的城市競爭已成為廿一世紀全球城市發展所必須共同面對的挑戰,,哪一個城市能帶給經濟個體較大的滿足,便具有相對的競爭優勢。城市競爭優勢的評量系統之研究,旨在建構一可適度回應理論與發展趨勢的競爭優勢評量體系,修正傳統競爭力的量測只是「產業經濟的生產績效」之不合時宜之概念。研究的貢獻在於建構出能回應全球化與永續觀的城市競爭優勢評量體系,使城市競爭優勢的量測能更契合時勢的需要,藉此為城市尋求足以營造永續競爭優勢的發展策略走向。研究透過全球化發展脈絡的解構、產業經濟全球化、城市永續發展之制約、國家與城市競爭發展演變及地區行銷與城市競爭力之探討,將城市競爭優勢之評量建構在生活、生產與生態三大環境面向之上,並經由相關領域之專家學者進行指標的萃取與權重的決定,建構競爭優勢評量體系,並分二階段進行實證探討,第一階段:進行台灣四大都會中心都市競爭優勢的診斷,提出台灣城市廿一世紀競爭策略;第二階段:進行東亞主要經貿城市全球化發展策略之比較,為台北市尋求合宜之亞太城市競爭定位,同時藉此驗證修正國內城市競爭優勢策略方針。評量體系建構之目的在為面對全球競爭發展的台灣城市進行診斷,藉以提供城市因應全球化發展之經營管理策略,以營造城市之永續競爭優勢。
The study on the urban competitive advantage evaluation system is mainly focused on the impact of urban management in the globalization era. Through reviewing the relative theories and trends, this research intends to master the new developing tendency, to make suggestions for the changing cities’ and to equip their adaptability in the globalization. The research frameworks are derived from the “Modern Economic Growth Theory” and the “Urban Balance Growth Theory” developed by IMD and WEF. This study, therefore, proposes that when a city is able to maximize its efficiency, the individual economic unit will decide to locate in the city. Technology innovation accelerates the linkage of global economy; non-boundary city competitiveness has become an evitable challenge in the 21st century globalization. The more needs to economy unit are made by a city, the best competitive advantage does the city possess. The intention of the urban competitive advantage evaluation system is to construct an applicable evaluation system instead of following the traditional one that merely explains the productive efficiency of industries. The contribution of this research is to establish a globalization and consecutive urban competitive advantage evaluation system so that the system can satisfy the tendency and explore proper strategies for consecutive cities. By reviewing the literature on (1) the developing tendency of globalization and of industrial economy, (2) the regulations of urban sustainable development, (3) the construction and exploration of urban competitive idea, and (4) the strategies of place marketing management, I constructed the competitiveness evaluation system, in which three elements are taken into consideration – life, production, and ecology as well as the evaluation ratios are examined and decided by related scholars and experts. This urban competitive advantage evaluation system is applied to the two following research agendas. First, I diagnose the competitiveness of four metropolises in Taiwan, and propose the competitive strategies in the 21st century. Second, I evaluate the competitive advantages of the major capitals in the East Asia to identify the suitable direction for Taipei City and modify competitive advantage for other domestic cities. The purpose of this evaluation system is to diagnose all the Taiwan cities under global competitiveness and, by this means, to suggest applicable management strategies for urban sustainability.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機及目的………………………………...1-1
第二節 研究內容及範疇………………………………...1-3
第三節 理論與研究方法………………………………...1-6
第二章 文獻回顧與分析
第一節 全球化發展脈絡之解構………………………...2-1
第二節 產業經濟全球化……………………………….2-13
第三節 城市永續發展之制約………………………….2-17
第四節 國家與城市競爭發展演變…………………….2-40
第三章 地區競爭優勢評量
第一節 城市發展指標分析…………………………...…3-1
第二節 評量指標體系建構……………………………...3-8
第三節 指標權重分析……………………………….…3-13
第四章 城市競爭優勢分析
第一節 城市國際化定位與條件…….…………….….…4-1
第二節 城市相對競爭優勢分析……….………………4-10
第三節 城市優勢競爭策略……………………….……4-24
第四節 台北市全球化競爭策略…….…………………4-27
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 理論與趨勢的回應……………………………...5-1
第二節 研究價值與貢獻………………………………...5-5
第三節 後續研究建議…………………………………...5-7
參考文獻
附錄
附錄一 專家問卷
附錄二 評比城市原始資料
附錄三 國家鑽石競爭優勢理論
附錄四 國家競爭優勢評比相關指標
附錄五 東亞四國基本國勢與城市發展優劣勢
(一)中文部份
1.大島高志,1994,歐洲聯盟的經濟成長、競爭立即雇用白皮書:邁向二十一世紀之挑戰與前進的道路,工業技術,35(4),pp.22-23。
2.大島高志,1995,歐洲聯合產業競爭力政策,工業技術36(2)。
3.中華民國都市計劃學會,2000,2000年全球城市發展調查報告,台北市政府都市發展局。
4.牛毅仲,1995,產業結構對國際競爭力的影響,文化大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
5.王志弘譯自Castells, Manuel,1997,流動空間:資訊化社會的空間理論,城市與設計學報第一期。
6.王淑姿,1993,發展台灣成為多國籍企業亞太區域營運中心-從吸引外人投資談起,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第十六卷第二期,pp61~64.。
7.史美強,1993,「美國競爭力之決定因素:理論探討」,中國行政評論,Vol.2(4), pp. 73-118.。
8.台北市政府,1996,21世紀國際台北,城市國際化策略會議文集。
9.台北市政府,1996,21世紀國際台北,城市國際化策略會議論文集。
10.平本一雄,1995,全球都市東京。
11.全球城市發展調查報告,2000,台北市政府都市發展局,中華民國都市計畫學會。
12.成露茜、夏鑄九,1997,亞太區域城際網絡計畫,台北市政府都市發展局。
13.早瀨隆司,1995,1995年世界競爭力報告,工業技術,36(11)。
14.行政院永續發展策員會,2001,永續台灣的評量系統研討會。
15.行政院國科會,1997,中華民國科技白皮書-科技化國家宏圖。
16.行政院經濟建設委員會,1995,發展台灣成為亞太營運中心計畫。
17.行政院經濟建設委員會,1999,亞太營運中心簡訊第二十七期。
18.行政院經濟建設委員會,2000,亞太營運中心簡訊第三十八期。
19.何東波,1993,都市經濟學講義。
20.吳迎春,1997,什麼是競爭力?天下雜誌,pp50~54.。
21.吳濟華,1999,高雄市國際化策略之研究-外資企業投資環境分析,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
22.李永展,1995,環境態度與環保行為-理論與實證,台北:胡氏圖書有限公司。
23.李永展,1996,區域總體土地資源綜合利用之研究(一),行政院國科會大型整合研究計畫第一年研究成果報告報告(NSC85-2621-P-004-005)。
24.李永展,1997a,農地釋出對城鄉發展影響之評估準則-從永續發展的觀點出發,規劃學報。
25.李永展,1997b,區域總體土地資源綜合利用之研究(二),行政院國科會大型整合研究計畫第二年研究計畫期中報告(NSC85-2621-P-004-005)。
26.李永展,1997c,國土綜開計畫-城鄉發展,「國家永續發展論壇第三次圓桌會議」引言資料,1997年4月12日,台灣大學思亮館。
27.李永展,1998,永續性指標架構之芻議,1998 中華民國區域科學學會,pp.235-258。
28.李永展,1998,區域總體土地資源綜合利用之研究(III),國科會研究計畫成果報告。
29.李永展,2000,社區產業經營與民眾參與-以水里上安社區為例。0
30.李永展、蕭文君,1997,區域土地資源永續性指標之建立,中華民國區域科學學會八十六年度會員大會及論文研討會,台北:中華民國區域科學學會。
31.李庚,1996,國際城市趨勢與北京建設思考,第三屆兩岸都市發展變遷與展望研討會論文集,中華民國都市計劃學會,pp3-12。
32.李明軒、邱如美,1997,國家競爭優勢—上、下,天下出版股份有限公司。
33.李明軒、徐中孟、邱如美,1999,競爭優勢—上、下,天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
34.李翠萍、張世杰,2001,城市的社會福利政策與其全球競爭力之分析,義守大學城市外交與全球治理研究中心,城市外交與全球治理研討會,高雄,義守大學。
35.沈宗瑞、高少凡、許湘濤、陳淑鈴譯,2001,全球化大轉變,韋伯文化事業出版社。
36.沈開豔、屠啟宇、楊亞琴,2001,提高公共管理績效優化城市綜合競爭力要素配置,上海社會科學院出版社。
37.東京都社會指標-個別指標,東京都,平成11年3月。
38.林漢昌,1997,企業國際競爭力評估指標及其內涵之研究:以臺灣資訊電子業為例,成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
39.邱麗珠,1998,結合城市行銷理念之規劃程序研究,成功大學都市計畫研究所碩論。
40.金家禾,2001,全球化與台灣都會區生產者服務業之發展,都市與計劃,Vol.28, No4。
41.姜守危、許宏濤,2001,行銷中國,商周出版。
42.施鴻志,1992,區域性科技產業研發環境之研究,行政院國科會。
43.施鴻志,1994,科技園區與區域發展,跨世紀台灣運輸與區域發展研討會論文集。
44.施鴻志,1995,區域多功能成長中心發展策略之研究-南部區域產業成長中心之發展,行政院國科會。
45.施鴻志,1997,廿一世紀集居環境規劃與建築型態塑造之研究,內政部建築研究所。
46.施鴻志,2000,地區經營管理,台北,建都文化出版。
47.施鴻志,2000,地區競爭力指標體系建構之研究,國科會專題研究,NSC89-2415-H-006-014。
48.施鴻志、陳冠位,1997,台灣發展亞太營運中心集居環境規劃策略之探討,第四屆海峽兩岸城市發展研討會,中國大陸成都。
49.施鴻志、陳冠位、歐陽宇,1997,地區行銷與都市永續發展—台南市國際化發展策略,海峽兩岸永續發展技術交流研討會,工業技術研究院能源與資源研究所。
50.施鴻志、陳冠位、歐陽宇,1998,The Study of International Technology Metropolitan Development Strategy in Tainan Area,亞太地區國家環境規劃、土地開發與管理國際學術研討會,中國土地經濟學會。
51.洪綾君,1997,公私協力推動地區行銷之研究—以高雄市84及85年都市行銷事件為例,中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩論。
52.候芊芙,1986,「生產力、匯率與外銷能力」,臺灣經濟。
53.徐小波,1998,如何使台灣企業成為亞太經濟體系中之整合者,民進黨產業政策研討會書面資料彙編,ppⅠ25-30。
54.高希均、石滋宜編著,1997,競爭力手冊,天下文化出版社。
55.國科會,1998,科技發展政策報導,科學技術資料中心編印,ISSN-1013-2570。
56.張嘉祐,1999,高雄市都市發展指標之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
57.張懷谷,1999,產業國際競爭力指標之構建與其績效評估-以台灣、日本、韓國、香港、新加坡之民生產業為例,成功大學碩士論文。
58.張懷谷,1999,產業國際競爭力指標之構建與其績效評估-以台灣、日本、韓國、香港、新加坡之民生產業為例,國立成功大學工業管理學系碩士論文。
59.許士軍、湯明哲、于卓民、洪明洲與蘇國賢,1995,我國國際競爭力評估之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會經濟研究處出版。
60.陳宜靖,1998,台灣主要都市全球城際資訊網絡之研究,國立中興大學法商學院都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
61.陳冠位、施鴻志,2001,城市競爭力知識體系之探討,中華民國都市計劃學會年會研討會。
62.陳威志,1994,台灣投資環境評估之研究—卓越中小企業之看法,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩論。
63.陳湘裕,1996,台灣地區都市經濟效率之探討,中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文(初稿)。
64.章仁彪,2001,城市化道路和城市管理的全球本土化思考,中華經濟論壇http://www.stcsm.gov.cn/fuwuzhinan/fg/review/ref_report/。
65.華昌宜,1994,台灣之亞太營運中心計畫,空間雜誌,第61期,pp41~43.。
66.黃文櫻,2000,都市競爭力與製造業生產力關係之研究,政大地政碩論。
67.黃旭男,1993,資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文。
68.黃書禮,1996,台北市都市永續發展指標與策略研擬之研究,中興大學都市計畫研究所,台北市都市發展局委託研究。
69.經濟部技術處,1991,我國產業科技競力指標之研究。
70.鄒繼礎等譯,2000,國家行銷,遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
71.鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上、下),中國統計學報,第27卷6、7期。
72.薛絢譯,2001,競爭的極限,正中書局股份有限公司。
73.薛瀾,1995,從國際競爭力評估美國在全球競爭地位,美歐月刊,pp.44-60。
74.羅積玉編著,1999,多元統計分析方法與應用,科技圖書股份有限公司。

(二)英文部份
1.Adams, R.C., Kash, D.(1994), Industry Culture, Public Policy and Competitiveness: the US and German Chemical Industry, Science and Public Policy, Oct., pp.309-320.
2.Albrow, M., 1990, Globalization, Knowledge and Society, London: Sege Publishers.
3.Amin, A., 1994, Post-Fordism: Models, Fantasies and Phantoms of Transition, in Amin, A. (ed), Post-Fordism: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.1-40.
4.Andrieu, M., Michalski, W. and Stevens, B. (eds), 1992, Long-term Prospects for the World Economy, Paris: OECD.
5.Arun Mahizhnah and Yap, Mui Teng, 2000, Singapore: The Development of an Intelligent Island and Social Dividends of Information Technology, Urban Studies, Vol.37, No.10, pp.1749-1756.
6.Ashworth, G. J., and Voogd, H., 1990, Selling the City, London: Belhaven.
7.Ayres, R.U., US Competitiveness in Manufacturing, Management and Decision Economics Special Issue, pp.3-12.
8.Beaverstock, J. V., Taylor, P. J. and Smith, R. G., 1999, A Roster of World Cities, Cities, Vol.16, No.6, pp445-458.
9.Begg, I., 1999, Cities and Competitiveness, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No.5-6, pp.795-809.
10.Bell, D., 1979, The Social Framework of the Information Society, in Dertouzos, M. L. (ed), The Computer Age: a Twenty Year View, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.Bell, Daniel, 1973, The Coming of Post-industrial Society; a Venture in Social Forecasting, Basic Books.
12.Berg, L. Van Den, and Braun, E. and Meer, J. Van Den, 1997, Metropolitan Organising Capacity, Aldershot: Avebury.
13.Berg, L. Van Den, and Klaassen, L. H. and Meer, J. Van Den, 1990, Marketing Metropolitan Regions,Rotterdam: Euricur.
14.Berg, L. Van Den, Erik, Braun, 1999, Urban Competitiveness, Marketing and The Need for Organising Capacity, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, Issue 5/6.
15.Birch, Eugenie L., 1996, Planning in a World City: New York and Its Communities, Journal of the American Planning Association Vol. 62, Iss. 4, pp.442-459.
16.Bowen, Jr. T. and T. Leinbach, 1995, The State and Liberalization: The Airline Industry in The East Asian NIC’s, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, pp.168-193.
17.Boyne, G. A., 1997, Competition and Local government: A Public Choice Perspective, In: R. Paddison and W. F. Lever (Eds) International Perspectives in Urban Studies, pp. 102-122. London: Jessica Kingsley.
18.Bramezza, I., 1996, The Competitiveness of The European City and The Role of Urban Management in Improving the City’s Performance, Amsterdam: Thesis publishers.
19.Briskin, L., 1987, The Difference Between Productivity and Competitiveness, Industrial Management, 29(3), May/Jun., pp.9-12.
20.Burc Ulengin, Fusun Ulengin, Umit Guvenc, 2001, A Multidimensional Approach to Urban Quality of Life: The Case of Istanbul, European Journal of Operational Research 130, pp.361-374.
21.Castells, A. and Geen, A. E., 1988, Measuring Local Economic Performance: Methodology and Application of The Booming Towns Approach, Built Environment, 14, pp.78-95
22.Castells, M., 1989, The Informational City: Information, Technology, Economic Restructuring and The Urban-Regional Process, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
23.Castells, M., 1996, Grassrooting the Space of Flows, In Wheeler, J. O., Aoyama, Y., and Warf, B. (eds), Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies, London: Routledge.
24.Castells, M., 1996, The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
25.Castells, Manuel, 1994, The Space of Flow: A Theory of Space In The Information Society, Presented on “The New Urbanism ” Conference 1994.
26.Chan, Roger C K, Swets, 1996,Urban Development Strategy in an Era of Global Competition: The Case of South China, Habitat International, Vol. 20, Iss: 4.
27.Charybdis of European Cities, Urban Studies, Vol. 35, Iss: 4 Order: LIB.
28.Chen, Kuan-Wei and Shih, Hung-Chih, 2001, Globalization and Urban Competitiveness-A Case Study of Taipei, World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China, July 11-15.
29.Clare Cooper Marcus & Carolyn Francis, 1990, People Places.
30.Clarke, S., 1993, The New Localism, CA: Sege publications.
31.Competition In An Integrating Europe, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 4, Iss. 3.
32.Daly, 1993, The Peril of Free Trade, Sci. Amer., 196(5): 24-29.
33.Daly, H. E., 1991, Steady-State Economics, Second Edition with New Essays, Washington, D. C.: Island Press.
34.Daly, H. E., 1989, Sustainable Development: from Concept and Theory Towards Operational Principles.
35.Daly, H., 1990, Toward Some Operational Principles of Sustainable Development, Ecological Economics, Vol. 2, pp.1-6.
36.Daniels, P. W., 1993, Service Industries in the World Economy, Oxford: Blackwell.
37.Deas, Iain and Giordano, Benito, 2001, Conceptualising and Measuring Urban Competitivess in Major English Cities: An Exploratory Approach, Environment and Planning, Vol.33, pp.1411-1429.
38.Dicken, P., 1998, Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy - 3rd ed., London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
39.Dieter Frick, The Quality of Urban Life, 1986.
40.Douglass, M., 1994, Culture and City in East Asia: A Perspective for The 21st Century, A Paper Presented at The International Conference Just Mentioned Above.
41.Esparza, Adrian X. and Krmenec, Anderw J., 2000, Large City Interaction in The US Urban System, Urban Studies, Vol.37, No.4, pp.691-709.
42.Friedmann, J. and Wolff, G., 1982, World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, No. 6, pp.309-344.
43.Friedmann, J., 1986, Tourism in Latin America: Spatial Distribution and Impact on Regional Change. Applied Geography and Development, 32: 65-80.
44.Friedmann, J., 1993, Where We Stand: a Decade of World City Research.
45.Friedmann, J., 1995, Where We Stand: A Decade of World City Research, in Paul L. Knox and Peter J. Taylor, eds, World Cities in a World System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-47.
46.Friendmann, J., 1986, The World City Hypothesis, Development and Change, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.309-344.
47.Fu-Chen Lo and Yue-man Yeung, 1998, Globalization and World City Formation in Pacific Asia, Globalization and The World of Large cities.
48.Fujita, K., 1991, Aworld City and Flexible Spacialization: Restructuring of the Tokyo Metropolis, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp.269-284.
49.Giddens, A., 1999, Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives, London: Profile Books.
50.Gordon, Ian, 1999, Internationalization and Urban Competition, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, Nos. 5-6, pp.1001-1016.
51.Hailia, Anne, 2000, Real Estate in Global Cities: Singapore and Hong Kong As Property State, Urban Studies, Vol.37, No.12, pp.2241-2256.
52.Hall, P. and Preston, 1988, The Carrier Wave: New Information Technology and The Geography of Innovation, 1846-2003, London: Unwin Hyman.
53.Hall, P., 1981, The Geography of the Fifth Kondratiev Cycle, New Society, 26, pp.535-7.
54.Hall, P., 1985, The Geography of The Fifth Kondratieff, in Hall, P. and Markusen, A. (eds), Silicon Landscape, London: Allen and Unwin.
55.Hall, P., 1988, The Geography of The Fifth Kondratieff, in Massey, D. and Allen, J. (eds), Uneven Re-Develoment: Cities and Regions in Transition, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
56.Hall, P., 1995, Towards A General Urban Theory, In J. Brocthie, M. Batty, E. Blakely, Et Al. (Eds) Cities in Competition, pp. 3-31. Melbourne: Longman.
57.Hall, Peter, 1984, The World Cities, 3rd edition, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
58.Hall, Peter, 1996, The Global City, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, pp.15-24.
59.Hall, Peter, 2000, Creative Cities and Economic Development, Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp.639-649.
60.Hanlon, P., 1996, Global Airlines: Competition in a Transnational Industry, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
61.Harvey, D., 1989, The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford: Blackwell.
62.Harvey, D., 2000, Spaces of Hope, Oxford: Blackwell.
63.Hill, Richard Child and Kim, June Woo, 2000, Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul, Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp.2167-2195.
64.Iain Begg, 1999, Cities and Competitiveness.
65.Iain Deas and Benito Giordano, 2001, Conceptualising and Measuring Urban Competitiveness in Major English Cities: An Exploratory Approach, Environment and Planning A 2001, Vol. 33, pp.1411-1429.
66.Inn, Kim, 1995,Globalization and The Management of Seoul As A World City, The Journal of Korea Planners Association, Vol.30.
67.International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 1985, 1990, 1992, 1996a, 1997, On-Flight Origin and Destination.
68.International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 1996b, ICAO news release, (http://www.com.org/~icao/pio9608.htm).
69.IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Since 1990; World Conservation Union), 1981, Caring for The Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living, London: Earthscan.
70.IUCN, UNEP and WWF, 1980, World Conservation Strategy, Switzerland: IUCN.
71.J. Friedman, The World City Hypoththesis, pp72.
72.Jensen-Butler, C., Schacher, A. and Weesep, J. Van (Eds), 1997, European Cities in Competition, Aldershot: Avebury.
73.Jessop, B., 1994a, From the Keynesian Welfare to The Schumpeterian Workfare State, in Burrows, R. and Loader, B. (eds), 1994, Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge, pp.13-37.
74.Jessop, B., 1994b, Post-Fordism and the State, in Amin, A., (ed), Post-Fordism: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.251-279.
75.Jessop, B., 1995, The Regulation Approach, Governance and Post-Fordism: Alternative Perspectives on Economic and Political Change? Economy and Society, 24(3), pp.307-33.
76.John Rennie Short and Yeong-Hyun Kim, 1999, Globalization and The City, Longman.
77.Kanz, J.W, 1994, Technology Power and Structure: Consequences for US Semiconductor Competitiveness, International Jounrnal of Technology Management, 9(5-7), pp.733-755.
78.Keeble, D., 1988, High-Technology Industry and Regional Development in Britain: the Case of The Cambridge Phenomenon, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.
79.Kim, Yong Woong, Masser, Ian, SWETS, 1996, Jeremy Alden Urban and Regional Development Strategies in an Era of Global Competition, Habitat International, Vol. 20, Iss. 4.
80.King, A. D. 1990, World-City Formation: An Overview of Recent View, in Global Cities: Post-Imperialism and the Internationalization of London, pp.24-32, Routledge, New York.
81.King, Anthony D., 1990, Global Cities: Post Imperialism and the Internationalization of London, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-06241-1.
82.Kirby, Andrew, 1989, The Elusive State, CA: Sege publications.
83.Klein, L.R, 1988, Components of competitiveness, Science, 241(4863), pp.308-310.
84.Knight, R. V., 1989, City Building in a Global Society, In Knight and Gappert (eds.), pp.326-334.
85.Knox, P.L., 1991, The Restless Urban Landscape: Economic and Socio Culture Change, and the Transformation of Metropolitan Washington DC.
86.Knox, Paul L. and Taylor, Peter J., 1995, World Cities in A World-System, Cambridge University Press.
87.Koenig, Dolores, Swets, 1998, Competition Among Malian Elites In the Manantali Resettlement Project: The Impacts on Local Development, Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, Vol. 26, Iss. 3-4.
88.Kooiman, J., 1993, Modern Governance, London: Sege publishers.
89.Kotler, P., Haider, D.H.&Rein, I., 1993, Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nation, New York: The Free, A Division of Macmillan Inc.
90.Kozlowski, J. and Hill, G., 1993, Towards Planning for Sustainable Development: A Guide for the Ultimate Environmental Threshold(UET) Method, Avebury.
91.Krätke, Stefan, 2001, Berlin: Towards a Global City?, Urban Studies, Vol.38, No.10, pp.1777-1799.
92.Kresl, P. K., 1999, Competitiveness and the Urban Economy: Twenty-Four Large US Metopolitan Areas, Urban Studies, Vol.36, No.5-6, pp.1017-1027.
93.Krugman, P. A., Myths and Realities of U.S. Competitives, 1991, Science, pp. 811-815.
94.Krugman, P., 1996, Pop Internationalism, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.
95.Krugman, P., 1996a, Urban Concentration: The Role of Increasing Returns and Ransport costs, International Regional Science Review, 19, pp. 5-48.
96.Krugman, P., 1996b, Making Sense of The Competitiveness Debate, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12, pp. 483-499.
97.Krugmann, P., 1998, World City Regions in Europe: Structural Change and Future Challenges, Globalization and the World of Large Cities, pp. 37-75.
98.Kuo, Nein-Hsiung, 1995, The Evolution Symposium Regional Cities, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p.3.
99.Lepkowski, W.European Union Sets Competitiveness Vision for The 21st Century Chemical and Engineering News, Obt.17, 1994, pp.46-47.
100.Lessons for policy, Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, Order: LIB.
101.Lester R. Brown et al, State of the World, 1994,W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
102.Lever, W. F. and Turok, I., 1999, Competitive Cities: Introduction to the Review, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, Nos 5-6, 791-793.
103.Lever, William F., 1999, Competitive Cities in Europe, Urban Studies, Vol, 36, Nos 5-6, pp.1029-1044.
104.Lo, Fu-Chen and Yeung, Yue-man, 1998, Globalization and World City Formation in Pacific Asia, Globalization and the World of Large Cities.
105.Logit Approach to Competitive Facility Location, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 38, Iss: 2 Order: LIB.
106.Lx, M., 1995, Promoting the Competitiveness of Biotechnology in Europe, Trend in Biotechnology, 13(2), pp.39-41.
107.Machimura, T., 1992, The Urban Restructuring Process in Tokyo in the 1980s: Transforming Tokyo Into A World City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp.114-128.
108.Malcolm, Waters, 1995, Globalization: Routledge.
109.Masai, Y., 1989, Greater Tokyo As A Global City, In Knight and Gappert (eds.), pp.153-163.
110.Michael A. Hitt, R.Duane, 1987, Building Competitiveness Strength in International Markets, Long Range Planning, 20(1), Feb. pp.115-122.
111.Moomaw, R. L., 1988, Agglomeration Economics: Localization or Urbanization? , Urban Studies, Vol25, pp.150-161.
112.Mowery, D.C, Rosenberg, N., 1989, New Developments in US Technology Policy: Implications for Competitiveness and International Trade Policy, California Management Review, 32(1), pp.107-124.
113.Murray L. Widenbaum, Learning to compete, Business Horizons, Sep. 1986, pp.2-12.
114.Nijkamp, P. and Perrels, A., 1990, Sustainable Cities in Europe, Londom: Earthscan Publications.
115.Nijkamp, P., 1990, Multicriteria Analysis: a Decision Support System for Sustainable Environmental Managemen, Economy and Ecology: Toward a Sustainable Development, Edited by Archibugi, F. and Nijkamp, P., pp203-220, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
116.OECD, 1994, Environmental Indicators, Paris: OECD.
117.Philo, C. and Kearns, G., 1993, Selling Places,Oxford: Pergamon Press.
118.Porter M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press: A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
119.Porter, M. E., 1996, Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies and Regional Policy, International Regional Science Review, 19, pp.85-90.
120.Porter, M. E., 1998, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan. .
121.Porter, M. E., 1991, Why Nations, World Executive’s Digest, pp.18-29.
122.Press, F., 1990, The Role of Education in Technological Competitiveness. Siemens Review, 57(2), pp.4-7.
123.Pun, K. S., 1996, The Long-Term Development Strategy for Hong Kong-Planning for Growth of an International City, Taipei: Conference on Strategies for an International City, pp78-92.
124.R. Carol, R. Noel, 1986, Successful Strategies in French High Technology Companies, Long Range Planning, 19(6), pp.54-65.
125.Radcliffe, James, Swets, 1997, The Competitive City, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 5, Iss. 3.
126.Rimmer, P., 1986, Japan’s World Cities: Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya or Tokaido Megalopolis?, Develop and Change, 17, pp.121-157.
127.Roessner, J.D., Porter, A. L, Newman, N., Cauffiel, D., 1996, Anticipating The Future High-Tech Competitiveness of Nations: Indicators for Twenty-Eight Countries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51(1), pp.133-149.
128.Rogerson, Robert J., 1999, Quality of Life and City Competitiveness, Urban Studies, Vol. 36, Nos. 5-6, pp.969-985.
129.Ronan, P., 1993, City Marketing, Image Reconstruction and Urban Regeneration, Urban Studies, Vol. 30, pp.339-350.
130.Rugman, A.M., 1987, Strategies for National Competitiveness, Long Range Planning, 20(3), pp. 92-97.
131.Sapienza, A., 1989, R&D Collaboration As A Global Competitive Tactic-Biotechnology and The Ethical Pharmaceutical Industry, R&D Management, 19(4), pp.285-295.
132.Sassen, Saskia, 1991, The Global City. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
133.Sassen, Saskia, 1994, The Global City: New York, London, Tokey, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
134.Sassen, Saskia, 1994,Cities in A World Economy, Thousand Oaks CA: Pine Forge/Sage.
135.Saur, K. G., 1989, Union of International Association, Yearbook of International Organizations, 1989-1990, 7th edition, Vol. 2.
136.Saxenian, Anna L., 1994, Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
137.Schumpeter, J. A., 1939, Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of The Capitalist Process, Vol. 2, New York: McGraw-Hill.
138.Scott, A. J., 1988, Flexible Production Systems and Regional Development: the Rise of New Industrial Space in North American and Western Europe, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12, pp. 171-86.
139.Sengenberger, W. and Campbell, D. (eds), 1994, International Labour Standards and Economic Interdependence, Geneva: Institute of Labour Studies.
140.Sharpe L. J., 1995, The Government of World Cities: The Future of the Metro Model, Wiley.
141.Sharpe, L. J., 1970, Theories and Values of Local Government, Political Studies, ⅩⅧ(2), Jane, pp.153-154.
142.Shih, Hung-Chih, Chou, Shih-Hsiung, 1996, The Experience of Technology City for Internationalization Development in Taiwan, International Symposium on City Planning 1996(Chinese, Korea, Japan).
143.Short, J. R. and Kim, Y. H., 1999, The Global Urban System Globalization and The City, Addison Wesley Longman.
144.Small, B. w., 1995, Competitiveness, Proc Instn Mech Engrs, 209(B6), pp.413-422.
145.Small, B. w, 1996, Competitiveness1995, Proc Instn Mech Engrs, 209(B6), pp.413-422.
146.Smith, R.B, 1989, Competitiveness in The 90’s, Management Accounting, pp.24-29.
147.Stohr, W. B. (ed), 1990, Global Challenge and Local Rresponse: Initiatives for Economic Regeneration in Contemporary Europe, London: Mansell Publishing Limited.
148.Stohr, W. B., 1990, Global Challenge and Local Response, New York: United Nations University, Mansell.
149.Sustainable Seattle, The Sustainable Seattle 1993 Indicators of Sustainable Community: A Report to Citizens on Long-Terms Trends in Our Community, U. S. A.: Sustainable Seattle, 1993.
150.Swyngedouw, E. A., 1992, The Mammon Quest, Glocalisation, Interspatial Competition and The Monetary Order: The Construction of New Spatial Scales, in Dunford, M. and Kafkalas (eds), Cities and Regions in the New Europe: the Global-Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies, London: Belhaven, pp.39-67.
151.Taylor, Peter J. and Walker, D. R. F., 2001, World Cities: A First Multivariate Analysis of Their Service Complexes, Urban Studies, Vol.38, No.1, pp.23-47.
152.The Economist, 1999a, Business This Week October 16th - 22nd 1999.
153.Tokyo, http://www.tokyo-teleport.co.jp, 1996.
154.UNCHS, (1995), Using Indicators in Policy, Indicators Newsletter, Vol. 3, pp. 18.
155.UNCHS, Using Indicators in Policy, Indicators Newsletter, 3:18, UNCHS (Habitat).
156.UNEP, 1998, Current Status of Indicator Work, (http://www.unep.ch/earthw/ indstat.htm).
157.Warf, B., 1996, Global Cities in The Age of Hypermobile Capital, City, 3-4, pp.40-3.
158.Waters, Malcolm, 1995, Globalization, London: Routledge.
159.WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.
160.Williamson, O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
161.William F. Lever and Ivan Turok, 1999, Competitive Cities: Introduction to the Review, Urban Studies-An International Journal for Research in Urban and Regional Studies, Vol.36.
162.World Economic Forum, 1996, The Global Competitiveness Report 1996, Geneva, Switzerland.
.
(三)評量資料來源:
1.工業統計調查報告,1990,經濟部工業統計調查聯繫小組編印。
2.工業統計調查報告,1994,經濟部工業統計調查聯繫小組編印。
3.工業統計調查報告,1999,經濟部工業統計調查聯繫小組編印。
4.中華民國台灣地區社會指標統計,1991,行政院主計處。
5.中華民國台灣地區社會指標統計,1996,行政院主計處。
6.中華民國台灣地區社會指標統計,2000,行政院主計處。
7.中華民國台灣地區環境保護統計年報,1991,行政院環境保護署。
8.中華民國台灣地區環境保護統計年報,1996,行政院環境保護署。
9.中華民國台灣地區環境保護統計年報,2000,行政院環境保護署。
10.中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,1990,行政院環保署。
11.中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,1992,行政院環保署。
12.中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,1995,行政院環保署。
13.中華民國台灣地區警政統計年報,1996,內政部警政署。
14.中華民國台灣地區警政統計年報,1999,內政部警政署。
15.中華民國衛生統計,1992,行政院衛生署。
16.中華民國衛生統計,1996,行政院衛生署。
17.中華民國衛生統計,2000,行政院衛生署。
18.內政統計年報,1996,內政部統計處。
19.內政統計年報,2000,內政部統計處。
20.內政部統計提要,1991,內政部統計處。
21.台北市交通改善評鑑指標調查第三期調查計劃服務建議書,2001,台北市政府交通局。
22.台北市統計手冊,1987,台北市政府主計處,第九期。
23.台南都會區家庭旅次起迄調查,2001,交通部運輸研究所。
24.台閩地區工商業普查報告,1986,行政院主計處。
25.台灣省各縣市主要統計指標,1992,台灣省政府主計處。
26.台灣省各縣市主要統計指標,1996,台灣省政府主計處。
27.台灣省物價統計年報,1999,台灣省政府主計處。
28.貧富差距問題-社會及經濟層面探討,1994,行政院研究發展考核委員會。
29.都市及區域發展統計彙編,1992,行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展編印。
30.都市及區域發展統計彙編,1997,行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展編印。
31.都市及區域發展統計彙編,2001,行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展編印。
32.都市地價指數,1996,內政部,第十五期。
33.都市地價指數,2000,內政部,第十五期。
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top