臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在本文中我們探討了各種個人社會互動投入與社會資本之間的關係，及分析其對實質生產的影響，進而探討長期均衡時消費與實質資本的型態。在第三章中，我們討論了社會互動投入只需消耗實質產出。我們發現在社會互動投入大於零(中央計劃者)的社會型態下，其長期實質資本、消費均衡值及實質資本、消費成長率都會高於社會互動等於零(非中央計劃者)的社會體係。且當生產函數具有規模報酬遞增時，整個經濟體就會有均衡路徑未定性的出現。
當個人社會互動投入為流量，但總體社會資本為存量時，我們發現當長期的總體社會資本很高時，隱函著中央計劃者下之長期個人社會互動投入、與實質資本均會高於個人自由選擇下所形成的長期個人社會互動投入、與實質資本均衡值。這同時也隱函了，政府其實可以藉由一些政策工具來參與規劃社會資本，以達到較高的社會互動投入、與實質資本長期均衡值。
而若社會資本能帶來效用，其充分條件就不在反映在總體社會資本量的高低，而是反映在長期消費均衡值的高低。當長期消費均衡值很低時，此時使用個人自由選擇的分配方式，在長期時的個人社會互動投入、與實質資本均會較採用中央計劃者分配方式所形成的長期個人社會互動投入、及實質資本來的高。反之，在長期消費均衡值很高時，此時用個人自由選擇分配方式所產生的長期均衡值，會低於使用中央計劃者分配方式下的長期均衡值。
在第四章中，我們討論假設投入個人社會互動不需要投入實質資源，但是需要時間投入的情形。當我們假設工作時間是固定的情下，加入以此方式生產的社會資本，會造成收斂路徑出現均衡路徑未定的現像。在放鬆對工作時間固定的假設下，則在用此方式所生產的社
會資本的影響下，其長期均衡並不是唯一的，而是會有複均衡的現像產生。最後我們討論了社會互動同時需要實質資源與時間的投入。在此模型中，我們發現它會同時具有複均衡與均衡路徑未定的現像。
關鍵字：社會資本；均衡路徑未定性

In the paper, we are discussing the relationship between social interaction and social capital, analyzing the impact to physical output, and the type in long-term equilibrium of consumption and physical capital. In Chapter 3, we assume social interaction costs physical output only. We conclude that if social interaction exists-in the type of social planner-the equilibrium of physical capital and consumption, and the growth rate of physical capital and consumption will all be higher than what they are as social interaction not exists. When production function has increasing returns to scale, the indeterminacy exists in converge path.
In Chapter 4, we assume social interaction costs time only. As the working time is fixed, the indeterminacy exists in converge path. When we relax the assumption, it exists multiple equilibriums. At last, we assume social interaction costs not only physical output but also time. In the model, it exists multiple equilibriums and indeterminacy at the same time.
Keywords: social capital; indeterminacy

第一章、 緒論
1.1、研究動機與目的 P.1
1.2、論文結構 P.2
第二章、 文獻回顧
2.1、社會資本的定義 P.2
2.2、社會資本在這個社會中所扮演的角色 P.4
2.3、社會資本是如何形成的 P.5
2.4、社會資本與人力資本的關係、 P.5
2.5、個人社會資本與整體社會資本間的關係 P.6
2.6、均衡路徑未定性 P.7
第三章、 實質產出投入模型
3.1、基本假設 P.9
3.2、實質產出投入模型 P.12
-以中央計劃者角度
3.3、討論一 P.15
3.4、實質產出投入模型 P.16
-以個人自由選擇的角度
3.5、實質產出投入模型下 P.18
社會資本具跨期累積效果
3.6、小結 P.28
第四章、時間投入模型
4.1、勞動時間固定 P.29
4.2、勞動時間固定下 P.32
社會資本具跨代累積效果
4.3、勞動時間不固定 P.37
4.4、討論二 P.39
4.5、效用函數中加入社會資本的影響 P.39
4.6、討論三 P.44
4.7、結合模型 P.46
第五章、結論 P.52
參考文獻 P.53

【1】Acemoglu, Daron (1996) “A Microfoundation for Social
Increasing Returns in Human Capital Accumulation,”
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 111, 779-804
【2】Baranano, Ilaski (2001) “On Human Capital Externalities
and Aggregate Fluctuations,” Journal of Economic and
Business, Volume 53, 459-472
【3】Benhabib, Jess and Roger E. A. Farmer (1994)
“Indeterminacy and Increasing Returns,” Journal of
Economic Theory, Volume 63, 19-41
【4】Benhabib, Jess and Roger E. A. Farmer (1996)
“Indeterminacy and Sector-Specific Externalities,”
Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 37, 421-443
【5】Coleman, James S. (1988) “Social Capital in the Creation
of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, Volume
94, 95-120
【6】Collier, Paul (1998) “Social Capital and Poverty,” The
World Bank, Social Development Family, Social Capital
Working Paper Series, Working Paper #4
【7】Cooper, Russell and John Andrew (1988) “Coordinating
Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models,” Quarterly
Journal of Economics, Volume 103, Issue 3, 441-463
【8】Dayton-Johnson, Jeff (2001) “Social capital, Social
Cohesion, Community: A Microeconomic Analysis,”
Department of Economics, Dalhousie University
【9】Fukuyama, Francis (1995) “The Social Values and The
Creation of Prosperity,” The Free Press, New York
【10】Fukuyama, Francis (1999) “Social Capital and Civil
Society,” International Monetary Fund Working paper
【11】Glaeser, Edward L. and David Laibson and Bruce Sacerdote
(2000) “The Economic Approach to Social Capital,” NBER
Working Paper #7728
【12】Gradstein, Mark and Moshe Justman (2001) “Education,
Social Cohesion and Economic Growth,” CEPR Discussion
Paper #2773
【13】Humphrey, John and Hubert Schmitz (1998) “Trust and
Inter-Firm Relations in Developing and Transition
Economics” The Journal of Development Studies, Volume
34, 32-61
【14】King, Robert G. and Charles I. Plosser and Sergio T.
Rebelo (1988) “Production Growth and Business Cycles,”
Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 21, 195-232
【15】Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer (1997) “Dose Social
Capital Have an Economic Payoff ? A Cross-Country
Investigation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume
112, 1251-1288
【16】Knack, Stephen (1999) “Social Capital, Growth and
Poverty: A Survey and Extensions,” The World Bank,
Social Development
Family, Social Capital Working Paper Series, Working
Paper #7
【17】La Porta, Rafael and Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and
Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny (1997) “Trust in
Large Organization,” American Economic Review Papers and
Proceedings, Volume 87, 333-338
【18】Lucas, Robert E. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic
Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 22,
3-42
【19】Narayan, D. and Pritchett L. (1998) “Cents and
Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in
Rural Tanzania,” Economic Development and Culture
Change, World Bank Washington
【20】Putnam, R. (1993) “Making Democracy Work: Civic
Traditions in Modern Italy,” Princeton University Press
【21】Putnam, R. (2000a) “The Collapse and Revival of American
Community,” Simon Schuster, New York
【22】Rose, Richard (1999) “What Dose Social Capital Add to
Individual Welfare: An Empirical Analysis on Russia,”
The World Bank, Social Development Family, Social Capital
Working Paper Series, Working Paper #15
【23】Wilkinson, Richard G. (1999) “Income Inequality, Social
Cohesion and Health: Clarifying the Theory,”
International Journal of
Health Services, volume 29, 525-43.
【24】Wilkinson, Richard G. (1999) “Health, Hierarchy and
Social Anxiety,” Socioeconomic Status and Health in
Industrial Nations： social, psychological and biological
pathways