跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(54.224.117.125) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/01/23 21:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林奕祺
研究生(外文):Yi-Chi Lin
論文名稱:假設檢定歷程中機率模式探討
論文名稱(外文):A Test of Probability Model in Hypothesis Testing
指導教授:洪瑞雲洪瑞雲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ruey-Yun Horng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:107
中文關鍵詞:假設檢定證真偏好選卡片作業機率模式
外文關鍵詞:hypothesis testingconfirmation biasselection taskprobability model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:278
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
人在假設檢定時不易證偽。Kirby的信號偵測理論(1994)認為人其實有證偽的能力,但假設(若P則Q)中P與Q的機率大小會影響受試者假設檢定的方式,他預測當先行條件P的機率愈大時,證偽的情形將會上升。Oaksford和Chater(1996)的最佳資料選擇理論則不假設人有證偽的能力,他們認為受試者傾向選擇測試後果所提供的預期資訊增加量較大的方案。本研究使用Wason的選卡片作業來探討先行條件P與後果Q的機率大小對假設檢定歷程的影響。實驗中操弄:P及Q的機率大小、及題目中是否提示受試者規則可能會被違反。應變項為觀察受試者在20題選卡片作業中測試P和~Q的次數。結果發現,P機率小時,測試P卡片的次數顯著增加;當Q機率大時,測試~Q卡片的次數也增加,此結果支持Oaksford和Chater的最佳資料選擇理論。亦即,人的假設檢定歷程中含有歸納推理的歷程:將P和Q視為龐大母體的抽樣並評量抽樣的資訊大小。由於題目中提示規則可能會被違反時,~Q的測試數量顯著上升,顯示受試者是有證偽思考的能力,但通常不會主動使用。違規提示與P、Q機率大小之間完全沒有交互作用的現象顯示,以資訊增加量為主的思考與證偽的思考之間是獨立的,兩者皆會分別影響人的假設檢定行為。

While testing a hypothesis, people have difficulty in using falsifying evidence. Kirby’s signal detection theory(1994)assumes that people can falsify, but the probability of P and Q in a rule “if P then Q” would affect hypothesis-testing. He predicts that tending to falsify would increase if the probability of P is low. In contrast, Oaksford and Chater’s optimal data selection theory(1996)doesn’t assume that people can falsify, they predict that people would use whatever information that more expected information gain. In this study, the probability of P or Q in Wason’s selection task was manipulated and the Subject’s selection of P or ~Q card in 20 selection tasks were compared with-or-without rule violation hint. The results show that subjects select more P cards when probability of P is low, and more ~Q card when probability of Q is high. This pattern of result lend the optimal data selection theory, namely, the hypothesis-testing process involves a inductive reasoning process:P and ~Q are regarded as samples of a population and are evaluated according to expected information gain of testing the sample. Besides, the rule violation hint also increased ~Q selection significantly. It indicates that people can falsify, but do not use it automatically. The lack of interaction between rule violation hint and probability of P or Q suggests that the heuristic regarding information gain and the falsification logic may affect hypothesis-testing independently.

目錄
中文摘要……………………………………………………………….i
英文摘要………………………………………………………………ii
誌謝…………………………………………………………………...iii
目錄…………………………………………………………………...iv
表目錄…………………………………………………………………v
一、前言……………………………………………………..……….1
二、文獻回顧………………………………………………………..10
三、方法…………………….…………………………………….…54
四、結果…………………….………………………………….……58
五、討論與結論……………………………………………….…….76
六、參考文獻…………………………………………………..……85
附錄一、選卡片作業的指導語………………………………..……88
附錄二、20題選卡片作業的題目…………………………….……90
附錄三、信心校正前的統計分析……………………..….…….…..99
附錄四、P大Q小規則不可能真的統計分析…………………….105

Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review, 85, 1-21.
Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1983). Logical Reasoning. In P. Mussen (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.
Braine, M. D. S., & O'Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory of If: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 98, 182-203.
Braine, M. D. S. & O’brien D. P. (1998). Mental Logic. Laurience Erlbaum Associates.
Cheng, P. W. & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Human reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
Evans, J. St. B. T. & Lynch, J. S. (1973). Matching Bias in the Selection Task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391-397.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1984). Heuristic and Analytic Processes in Reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 451-468.
Evans, J. St. B. T. & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103, 356-363.
Gigerenzer, G. & Hug, K. (1992). Domain-Specific Rasoning: Sicial Contrast, Cheating, and Perspective Change. Cognition, 43, 127-171.
Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and J.L. Morgan, (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. III. Speech acts. NY: Academic Press, 41-58.
Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The Elusive Thematic-Materials Effect in Wason's Selection Task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., and R. Byrne. (1991). Deduction. Essays in Cognitive Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418-439.
Kirby, K. N. (1994). Probabilities and Utilities of Fictional Outcomes in Wason’s four-card Selection Task. Cognition, 51, 1-28.
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1994). A Rational Analysis of the Selection Task as Optimal Data Selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1995). Theories of Reasoning and the computational Explanation of Everyday Inference. Thinking & Reasoning, 1, 121-152.
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1996). Rational explanation of the selection task. Psychological Review, 103, 381-391.
Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Grainger, B. (1999). Probability Effects in Data Selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 193-244.
Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., & Diaz, R. R. (1999). Bayesian Rationality for the Wason Selection Task? A Test of Optimal Data Selection Theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 115-144.
Politzer, G., & Braine, M. D. (1991). Responses to inconsistent premises cannot count as suppression of valid inferences. Cognition, 38, 103-108.
Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York
Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 38-71.
Sperber D. & Wilson D. (1995), Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell, 2nd ed
Wason, P. C. (1966). New Horizons in Psycholory. Havmondsworth, UK.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top