臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

「永續發展」一般在追求社會公平、經濟效率與環境保護等三個向度的目標，因為運輸部門在這三個向度均可能會產生負面效果，其中城際運輸系統具有運輸距離長、轉運行為普遍…等特性，所以城際運輸永續發展實為一重要之研究課題。除此之外，「永續發展」的三個向度存在著相互抵觸的關係，在未能妥善地處理相互衝突的關係之前，本研究決定先從較少被探討的社會公平面來著墨。綜合上述，本研究希望從社會公平面的角度，建立一套「城際運輸永續發展指標系統」，瞭解我國目前城際運輸系統在社會公平面的永續發展程度，並依據研究結果作為政府未來制訂相關政策的參考。
本研究採用目標體系的方式，配合指標訂定原則，產生初始指標集合。透過功能重複性、AHP問卷、資料可得性等篩選方式，得到決選指標集合。應用「模糊推論」方法將決選指標予以整合，運用軟體Matlab來建立模糊規則資料庫，使用「最大-最小」的整合方式，輔以「重心法」來解模糊化，據以評判我國城際運輸系統之在社會公平面的永續性程度。
研究結果顯示，我國目前的永續發展程度為「中等」；其中以老人與殘障者的基本運輸需求滿足程度較為不足，私人運具的使用者亦為不公平現象的來源之一。為了改善這三項造成不永續的指標，本研究擬定三項「虛擬政策」來加以改進；分析結果顯示，光憑少數政策的改善，並無法顯著地提升我國的永續發展程度，必須從各方面同時持續地進行改善，方有明顯的提升效果。

“Sustainable Development” is generally discussed by three objectives：social equity, economic efficiency, and environmental preservation. Since transportation sector may generate some negative effects on these three objectives and intercity transportation has some special characteristics, the sustainable development of intercity transportation becomes an important issue. Although the conflicts exist among these three objectives, this study focused on the social equity for which was seldom discussed before. The purpose of this study is to build an indicator system to evaluate the sustainable development of intercity transportation in the social equity aspect. Based on this indicator system, the national sustainability of intercity transportation can be measured and the development strategies can be designed.
The goal setting method and some setting principles were used to generate the initial indicator set. Based on the examination of functional overlap, the survey of AHP questionnaires, and the feasibility of data acquirement, the final indicator set was decided from the initial indicator set. The fuzzy inference method was used to integrate the final indicator set and the fuzzy rules were built by the Matlab package. The “max-min” method and the “center of gravity” way were used to be the defuzzifier.
The results of this study show that, the degree of sustainable development for intercity transportation in Taiwan is “Medium” in the social equity aspect. The essential transportation needs of elders and the disabled are not satisfied enough. Private vehicle users do not play the reasonable cost. In order to improve these unsustainable phenomena, different strategies were designed and evaluated in this study. We found that the effects of most proposed strategies are insignificant. It was concluded that more strategies should be proceeded in parallel to generate significant improvement.

目錄 頁次
1. 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 2
1.4 研究流程與內容 7
2. 文獻回顧 10
2.1 永續發展之意義與衡量 10
2.2 公平面的衡量 11
2.3 指標系統之建立 17
2.4 其他相關研究文獻 19
2.5 綜合評析 20
3. 研究構想 21
3.1 觀念意義探討 21
3.2 問題分析 27
3.3 理論架構 31
3.4 研究設計 34
4. 構建指標系統 41
4.1 建立初始指標集合 41
4.2 定義初始指標 43
4.3 指標篩選 49
4.4 選擇關鍵指標 58
4.5 指標整合 58
5. 實例分析 68
5.1 不同運具間 68
5.2 不同群體間 74
5.3 不同地域間 77
5.4 不同世代間 85
5.5 綜合分析 87
6. 虛擬政策分析 90
6.1 虛擬政策1 90
6.2 虛擬政策2 94
6.3 虛擬政策3 96
6.4 三項虛擬政策同時施行 98
7. 結論與建議 101
參考文獻 104
附錄一 108
附錄二 112

【1】 Atkinson, A. B. , 1983, The economics of inequality, Oxford：Clarendon Press.
【2】 Barr, N. A. , 1987, The economics of the welfare state, London：Weidenfeld ＆ Nicholson.
【3】 Bellman, R. E. and Zadeh, L. A. , 1970, ”Decision-making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science, Vol.17, pp.141-164.
【4】 Black, W. R. , 1996,” Sustainable transportation : a US perspective,” Journal of Transport Geography ,Vol.4, No.3, pp.151-159.
【5】 Blowers, A. ,1993, Planning for a sustainable environment, A Report by the Town and Country Planning Association Earthscan Publications, London.
【6】 Chang, I. S. , Y. Tsujimura , M. Gen , T. Tozawa , 1995,” An efficient approach for large scale project planning based on fuzzy Delphi method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.76, pp.277-288.
【7】 Chang, P. T. , L. C. Huang , H. J. Lin , 2000,” The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.112, pp.511-520.
【8】 Chen, C. T. , 2000,” Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy sets and systems, pp1-9.
【9】 De Silva, H. and C. Tatam, 1996,”An empirical procedure for enhancing the impact of road investments”, Transport policy, Vol.3, No.2, pp.210-211.
【10】 Feitelson, E. , 2002,”Introducing environmental equity dimensions into the sustainable transport discourse：issues and pitfalls”, Transportation research, Part D, pp.99-118.
【11】 Herrera, F. , Herrera-Viedma, E. and Verdegay, J. L. ,1996,” Direct approach processes in group decision making linguistic OWA operators,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.79, pp.175-190.
【12】 Hinterberger, F. , Luks, F. and Schmidt-Bleek, F. , 1997, “Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’：what makes an economy sustainable,” Ecological Economics, Vol.23, pp.1-14.
【13】 Huang, S. L. , J. H. Wong , T. C. Chen , 1998,” A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.42, pp.15-27.
【14】 Hughes, P. , 1993, Personal transport and the greenhouse effect, Earthscan Publications, London.
【15】 LewisⅢ, S. L. , 1998,” Land and transportation : Envisioning regional sustainability,” Transportation Policy, Vol.5, pp.147-161.
【16】 Maclaren, V. W. , 1996,” Urban sustainability reporting,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.62, No.2, pp.184-202.
【17】 Munasinghe, M. , 1993, Environmental economics and sustainable development, World Bank, Washington, DC.
【18】 OECD（Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development）, 1996, Towards sustainable transportation, OECD, Vancouver.
【19】 Page, T. , 1982, “Inter-generational Justice as opportunity”, In Maclean, D. and Brown, P. , Energy and the future, Ottowa：Rowan and Littlefield.
【20】 Phillis, Y. A. and Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. , 2001, “Sustainability：an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic,” Ecological Economics, Vol.37, pp.435-456.
【21】 Ranst, E. V. , H. Tang , R. Groenemans and S. Sinthurahat, 1996. “Application of fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber production in peninsular Thailand,” Geoderma, Vol.70, pp.1-19.
【22】 Rawls, J. , 1971 ,A Theory of Justice, New York：Oxford University Press.
【23】 Rienstra, S.A, Stead, D., Banister, D., Nijkamp, P., 1997.”Assessing the complementarity of common transport policy objectives”, A scenario apporach. Innovation 10, pp.273-287.
【24】 Shu-Jen Chen, Chin-Lai Hwang, In Ccollaboration with Frank P. Hwang, 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, pp.466-468.
【25】 Theil, H. , 1967, Economics and information theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
【26】 Tietenberg, T. , 1984, Environment and natural resource economics, Scott Foresman, Glenview.
【27】 Waters, H. R. , 2000,” Measuring equity in access to health care,” Social Science and Medicine, Vol.51, pp.599-612.
【28】 WCDE（World Commission on Environment and Development）, 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.400.
【29】 Weiss, Brown E. , 1990, “In fairness to future generations,” Environment, Vol.32, No.3, pp.7-31.