|
References [1]B. Noble, “System Support for Mobile Adaptive Applications,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 7, pp. 44-49, Feb 2000. [2]H. Bharadvaj, A. Joshi and S. Auephanwiriyakul, “An Active Transcoding Proxy to Support Mobile Web Access,” in Proc. IEEE Symp. Reliable Distributed System, pp.118-123, Oct 1998. [3]S. Acharya, H. F. Korth, and V. Poosala, “Systematic Multiresolution and its Application to the World Wide Web,” IEEE Data Engineering, pp. 40-49, 1999. [4]A. Fox, S. D. Grebble, Y. Chwathe and E.A. Brewer, “Adapting to Network and Client Variation Using Infrastructural Proxies: Lessons and Perspectives,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol.5, pp. 10-19, Aug.1998. [5]F. Kitayama, S. Hirose and G. Kondoh, “Design of a Framework for Dynamic Content Adaptation to Web-Enabled Terminals and Enterprise Applications,” IEEE Software Engineering Conference, pp. 72-79, 1999. [6]R. Mohan, J. R. Smith and C. S. Li, “Adapting Multimedia Internet Content for Universal Access,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 1, pp. 104-114, Mar. 1999. [7]CompuServe Incorporated, “Graphics Interchange Format”. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Graphics/GIF/ [8]S. Chandra, C.S Ellis and A. Vahdat, “Application-level differentiated multimedia Web services using quality aware transcoding,” IEEE Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 18, pp. 2544 —2565, Dec. 2000. [9]W. B. Pennebaker and J. L. Mitchell. JPEG-Still Image Data Compression Standard. V. N. Rein-Hold, New York, 1993. [10]E. Hamilton. JPEG File Interchange Format — Version 1.02 C-Cube Microsystems, 1778 McCarthy Blvd, Milpitas, CA 95035, September 1992. [11]CCITT Recommendation T.81 International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva. Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous-Tone Still Images — Requirements and guidelines, September 1992. [12]C.S Ellis, Quality Factor of a JPEG image. [Online]. Available: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~surendar/research/qat.html#source [13]F. Reynolds, J Hjelm, S. Dawkins, and S. Singhal, “Composite Capability / Preference Profiles (CC/PP): A user side framework for content negotiation,” W3C note, 27 July 1999.flow control. in Proc. SIGCOMM, 1991. [14]WAP Forum. “WAG User Agent Profile Specification,” 10 Nov. 1999. [15]WAP Forum. [Online]. Available: http://www.wapforum.org/ [16]D. Brickley and R. V. Guha, “Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0,” W3C Candidate Recommendation, 27 March 2000. [17]XML/EDI Group. [Online]. Available: http://www.xmledi.com/ [18]W3C. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3c.org/ [19]WAP Forum, “WAP Binary XML Content Format Specification Version 1.2,” 4 Nov 1999. [20]H. Ohto and J Hjelm, “CC/PP exchange protocol based on HTTP Extension Framework,” W3C note, 24 June 1999. [21]H. Nielson, P. Leach, and S. Lawrence, “An HTTP Extension Framework,” RFC-2774, Feb 2000. [22]J. C. Bolot, “End-to-End packet delay and loss behavior in the internet,” in Proc. SIGCOMM, 1993. [23]V. Jacobson, pathchar. [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/pathchar/, 1997 [24]Kevin Lai, Mary Baker, “Measuring Bandwidth,” in Proc. INFOCOM '99. IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol. 1, pp. 235 -245, 1999. [25]W3C, “Standard Generalized Markup Language”. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3c.org/SGML/ [26]W3C, “Document Object Model (DOM) Activity Statement,” [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/DOM/Activity [27]XML-DEV mailing list, “The Simple APL for XML (SAX 2.0),” 5 May 2000. [28]S. Adler, A. Berglund, J. Caruso, S. Deach, P. Grosso, E. Gutentag, A. Milowski, J. Richman, and S. Zilles, “Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL) Version 1.0,” W3C Candidate Recommendation, 21 Nov 2000. [29]W3C, “The Resource Description Framework”. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/RDF/ [30]Zemel, E.,“The linear multiple choice knapsack problem,” Operations Research 28, pp. 1412-1423.
|