跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(54.224.117.125) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/01/28 19:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張應中
研究生(外文):Chang, In-Chung
論文名稱:從制度面探討電信自由化過程共用電信設施之管理課題
論文名稱(外文):A Preliminary Study of the Institutional and Operational Issues on the Sharable Telecom Facilities under the Policy of Telecom Liberalization
指導教授:謝長宏謝長宏引用關係楊千楊千引用關係
指導教授(外文):Charng-Horng HsiehChyan Yang
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:169
中文關鍵詞:共用性電信設施公設地上權路權事物之本質類型類推適用公益管理課題
外文關鍵詞:the sharable telecom facilitiespublic property rightroad rightessential qualities of objectsTypeapplicability of analogypublic interestoperational issues
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:581
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:170
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
我國為因應全球電信自由化趨勢並遵循WTO入會承諾,於民國85年起參考電信先進國家經驗,結束官署兼營電信事業型態,另成立國營電信公司經營電信事業;同時採取階段自由化方式,於八十六年起先陸續開放無線行動通信業務,至八十九年起始開放以投資傳輸設備基礎建設之服務業,即目前所謂之固定網路通信服務業者,該事業因係利用自然資源如空中之電波頻率及稀有土地為經營的基礎。在官署獨占經營至市場寡占型態過程中,引發這些稀少資源的重分配,也鬆動了市場版圖,利益的衝突自然難免且方興未艾,然而處理這類資源重分配問題遠比資源分配更為棘手。例如,雖然在固網通信業務開放,但就設施管道部分仍處於獨占狀態,業者必須從零開始建置自有之管道設施,為達成政府普建寬頻網路之目標,要求每家業者至少應實收400億元之資本額、100萬用戶門號或通信埠之最低系統容量,及15萬用戶門號與通信埠之開台門檻等經營義務,因此,業者必須在一定時程內完成設施管道及寬頻網路之建置鋪設。此一階段,市場上既有業者擁有絕大多數基礎設施而為市場主導者,新參進業者因對基礎設施面臨諸多新建困難,很難於短時間跨過進入市場競爭門檻,爭議於是浮現。
回顧我國有關電信基礎設施之管理規範係沿襲歐盟國家有關網路互連及設施共用之管理制度,然而依上述觀察我國電信自由化的時程及措施有其特點,在外國法律制度內國化方面,對本土電信市場與環境宜有更深入及廣泛的研究,爰有本篇之作。
在研究事項方面,分四項剖析及論証並獲致以下研究成果:
其一、歸納我國電信自由化過程在「電信設施」管理(建設、使用、維護)所面臨的爭議:以「事物本然之理」探索「電信設施」的本質特性,以及問題產生的根本原因、以「類型」學說歸類電信設施爭議事實並推導出其基本特徵。
其二、設定及分析電信自由化過程具共用性「電信設施」之主要管理課題:將管理課題設定為1.財產權、2.資源稀少、3.公益、4.經營效率、5.公平競爭等五項管理課題。
其三、研提共用性「電信設施」之認定與審驗原則:經以上述五項管理課題推導論証四項之認定與審驗原則如1.絕對必須共用2.彈性共用3.不得拒絕共用4.不得共用等情形。
其四、依上述共用「類型」研提一套具制度功能的「共用電信設施」管理架構:提出既有設施共用組織架構及未來新建設施共用的組織架構。包含業者共用的推演及執行程序,並提出業者共用合作的基本權利義務規範。
本論文之作,即從我國電信自由化過程中,所面臨電信基礎設施之建設、使用及維護所產生之管理課題,從制度面向探究、分析各項管理課題的性質,並嚐試提出「共用電信設施管理架構」以減少業者間爭議並能促進公平競爭環境。
In response to the liberalization of global telecommunications and observance of undertakings for accession to World Trade Organization (WTO), a national telecommunication company was established to replace the government controlled telecommunication monopoly by referring to the experiences of industrialized countries. The liberalization of telecommunications was phased in 1997 in relaxation of the wireless mobile telecommunications businesses till 2000 for relaxation of investment in facilities-based service, which is called the fix network operator at present stage. The business triggers the redistribution of these very few resources by taking advantage of natural resources, such as radio frequency and operation on very few lands, in the process of government controlled monopoly through to oligopoly that relaxes the market territory. The conflict of interests cannot be avoided growing, yet the dilemma of redistributing resources is even more difficult to handle, comparing to that of resource distribution. For instance, the facilities based channels are monopoly that the business owners have to build up their own channel facilities with zero albeit the relaxation of fix network operation. Each business is required to establish with paid-up capital of forty billion new Taiwan dollars and with a minimum system capacity of a million phone’s numbers or ports, and to start business with 150 thousand phone’s numbers at the threshold of operation in order to achieve the goal set by the government that broadband network shall be widely established. Under such circumstances, the business owner shall finish the layout of facilities channel and broadband networks within the specified time frame. At this stage, the incumbent business owners who own the majority of infrastructure become the market dominator, while the entrants encounter the challenge of establishing new infrastructure and fail to cross the threshold of market possession, therefore, the disputes arise.
The specifications for the telecommunication infrastructure in the Republic of China are established in accordance with the EU network and operation on sharable facilities. With a view of the uniqueness concerning the time frame and adopted measures for liberalization of telecommunications industry in this country, and in consideration of nationalization of foreign laws, it is required to conduct study in-depth and widely on local telecommunication market and its environment. So, the study to explore this issue.
The study is conducted based on analysis and argument in four areas and come to conclusion as follows:
1. Induction in the disputes on operation in “telecommunication facilities” (construction, use and maintenance): the study attempts to discover the essential qualities of “telecommunication facilities” based on its “originality”, the causes that the issues incur, and classification of various “sharable” basic and changeable type telecommunication facilities according to “Type” methodology.
2. Assumption and analysis on major operational issues of sharable “telecommunication facilities” in the process of telecommunication liberalization. The management issues are set in respect of: (1) property right; (2) scarcity of resources; (3) public interest; (4) operational efficiency; (5) fair play.
3. Proposition of principles for recognition and review: based on the five operational issues as mentioned in previous paragraph, the following four principles for recognition and review will be induced and proved: (1) absolutely sharable; (2) flexibly sharable; (3) non-declinable sharable; (4) non-sharable.
4. Based on the recognition of “Type” specified in previous paragraph, a system of perational structure for “sharable telecommunication facilities” will be proposed: such as a sharable infrastructure being established on basis of existing sharable facilities and newly constructed facilities, and procedure for inference and implementation on business sharing, as well as the code for sharable and cooperative duties and obligations for business owners.
The study is conducted on the issues regarding the operation of construction, use and maintenance of sharable telecom facilities in the process of liberalization of telecommunications in this country in terms of operational system. The study attempts to explore and analyze the operational issues, and propose a system of “operational structure for sharable telecom facilities” that might decrease the disputes among business owners and facilitate to establish a fair play environment through liberalization.
中文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IV
英文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VI
誌 謝-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IX
目 錄-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------XI
圖 目 錄----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------XIV
表 目 錄-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------XV
第一章 緒論-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
1.1 研究背景-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
1.2 研究動機-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
1.3 研究目的-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7
1.4 研究架構-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9
第二章 研究問題之處理概念--------------------------------------------------------------------------20
2.1 處理概念上的文獻探討---------------------------------------------------------------------20
2.2 研究問題的既有處理觀念及其不足------------------------------------------------------29
2.2.1電信自由化階段觀念認知上出現瑕疵------------------------------------30
2.2.2對設施「類型」界定的模糊--------------------------------------------------30
2.2.3電信設施管理範圍有待明確的規範-------------------------------33
2.3 研究問題在實際處理上所出現的特點-------------------------------------------33
2.3.1 在自由化階段上的特點--------------------------------------------------------------33
2.3.2 在設施種類內容的特點--------------------------------------------------------------34
2.3.3 在管理範圍(在建設、使用、維護方面)的特點----------------------------------36
2.4 對研究問題基本性質的觀點、看法-------------------------------------------------------38
2.4.1 自由化階段方面-----------------------------------------------------------------------39
2.4.2 設施種類方面--------------------------------------------------------------------------40
2.4.3 管理範圍(在建設、使用、維護方面)方面-----------------------------------41
第三章 電信自由化過程在電信設施共用上所面臨的爭議--------------------------------------------43
3.1 市場開放初期基礎設施的建設困難--------------------------------------------------------43
3.2 電信設施適用電信法處理共用問題的爭議-----------------------------------------------44
3.3 公法學「公物」、「公有」、「公用」及私法學「租賃」、「共有」概念之分析-----47
3.4 電信設施在規劃新建上所涉及相關法律之疑義-----------------------------------------58
第四章 電信自由化過程具共用性「電信設施」之主要管理課題-----------------------------------67
4.1財產權課題--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------67
4.2資源稀少課題-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------83
4.3公益課題-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------90
4.4經營效率課題-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------96
4.5公平競爭課題----------------------------------------------------------------------------------102
第五章 共用性「電信設施」之認定與審驗-------------------------------------------------------------110
5.1 合理認定共用性「電信設施」的重要性--------------------------------------------------110
5.2 電信自由化過程共用性「電信設施」在認定及管理上的困擾-----------------------111
5.3 共用性「電信設施」的認定及審驗原則及其推導與論証-----------------------------113
5.3.1 絕對必須共用之情形-----------------------------------------------------------------113
5.3.2 彈性共用之情形-----------------------------------------------------------------------117
5.3.3 不得拒絕共用之情形-----------------------------------------------------------------119
5.3.4 不得共用之情形-----------------------------------------------------------------------124
5.4 共用性「電信設施」的認定及審驗之後續考量---------------------------------------127
第六章 具制度功能的「共用電信設施」管理架構----------------------------------------------------129
6.1 共用業者間之基本義務---------------------------------------------------------------------129
6.2 設施管道共用之收費原則------------------------------------------------------------------132
6.3 共用合約之共同事項------------------------------------------------------------------------136
6.4 協商程序、時機、調處及裁決------------------------------------------------------------138
6.5設施共用之公佈、修正及停止-------------------------------------------------------------142
6.6 未來設施共用之管理架構------------------------------------------------------------------144
第七章 結論---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------154
7.1 總結----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------154
7.2 建議----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------156
參考文獻 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------160
附錄:對於電信自由化新建之關鍵設施共用方式之訪談紀錄--------------------------167
作者簡歷:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------169
中文部份
1.立法院秘書處,「電信法修正案」,民國八十六年七月。
2.立法院秘書處,「電信法修正案」,民國八十八年十月。
3.行政院NII產業發展協進會,「固網開放規劃草案」,民國八十七年五月十八日。
4.行政院NICI「電信管道政策」第一至四次會議,民國九十年十月至五月。
5.交通部,交通政策白皮書(電信部分),第二篇第一章「電信自由化」,九十一年一月。
6.交通部,「開放綜合業務申請書表」,八十八年七月。
7.交通部,「開放電路出租業務申請書表(增訂版)」,八十九年八月。
8.交通部,「交通部電信顧問小組(TAB)結論報告」,八十七年四月。
9.交通部,「固網規劃小組競爭政策分組之最後決議」,八十七年八月。
10.交通部,「配合亞太營運中心與NII發展,我國整體電信產業之發展策略研究」,委託單位:執行單位:交通大學電信系,民國八十五年十月,107-108頁。
11.交通部電信公司民營化研究小組,「電信公司民營化研究報告」,八十二年十二月。
12.交通部電信總局,「開放固定通信網路規劃小組」會議紀錄,八十七年一至四月。
13.交通部電信總局,「電信自由化政策白皮書」,八十六年十二月。
14.交通部電信總局,「電信自由化政策白皮書」,九十一年一月。
15.交通部電信總局,「電信法規彙集」,八十七年十月。
16.交通部電信總局 譯,新加坡公眾基本電信業務執照投標須知,附錄十「新加坡互連與接續協定原則和指導原則」,八十六年。
17.交通部電信總局 譯,「日本公用事業電桿或管路等之相關使用指導方針」,九十年四月發布。
18.交通大學電信系,配合亞太營運中心與NII發展我國整體電信產業之發展策略研究,交通部郵電司委託研究,110-114頁,八十五年十月。
19.謝長宏,系統概論,第四講「系統是什麼?」,華泰書文化事業公司,94-95頁,民國八十八年九月。
20.吳庚,行政法之理論與實用,「行政法之法源」,三民書局,八十七年七月,60頁。
21.林立,法學方法論與德沃金,「原則立論法」,學林文化事業公司,84-85,94頁,八十九年九月。
22.施俊吉,「自由化與資費管制革新」,台灣的電信開放自由化研討會,八十七年五月,台北,交通部電信總局。
23.葉俊榮,行政法案例分析與研究方法,「行政法案例的四階段論証模式」,三民書局,58-62頁,民國八十九年十一月。
24.葉俊榮,環境政策與法律,「大量環境立法-環境立法的理論基礎與立法原則」,月旦出版社公司,民國八十七年十月。
25.陳愛娥 繹,法學方法論,「法學中概念及體系的形成」,五南圖書公司,379頁,民國九十一年十月。
26.顏厥安/審校、吳從周/譯,類推與「類推與事物本質─兼論類型理論」之第二章「法律現實化的過程」,學林文化事業公司,140頁,民國九十年三月。
27.董保城,國家責任法,「基於公有公共設施之責任」,神州圖書公司,160、167頁,民國九十一年五月。
28.林水波,公共組織理論:問題分析與政革策略,「資源稀少性與地方政府的有效運作」,華城電腦公司,167-168頁,民國八十四年三月。
29.曹策宏,「頻譜管理特性及管理概念之探討」,交通大學管理研究所,碩士論文,16頁,民國八十三年六月。
30.劉紹樑,「電信市場競爭政策與法律問題」論文,第三屆競爭與公平交易法學術研討會,八十七年五月,台北。
31.陳堯,劉崇堅,「價格上限管制制度及其在國內電信事業實施可能性初 」,經社法制論叢,八十一年。
32.黃承堯,土地稅制度及實務,財政部財稅人員訓練所,台北,民國六十七年。
33.張研田,中國土地政策導論,台灣商務印書館,台北。
34.陳銘詳,「電信規範體制之探討」,經社法制論叢,第23期,61,66,77-88頁、八十八年一 月。
35.黃玉霖,「公共建設民營化」,中華民國營建設協會,民國八十七年五月
36.楊仁壽,「法學方法論」,三民書局有限公司,116-117頁,民國八十三年一月。
37.陳櫻琴,「公平交易法與經濟政策」,翰籚圖書出版有限公司,358-360頁,民國八十九年十月。
38.陳櫻琴,經濟法理與新趨勢,翰籚圖書出版有限公司,436-437頁,民國八十七年十月。
39.城仲模,行政法之一般法律原則,三民書局股份有限公司,102-103、108-109頁,民國八十三年年八月。
40.蘇永欽,經濟法的挑戰,五南圖書出版公司,13-15頁,民國八十三年五月。
41.詹婷怡,電信產業規範之研究,太穎投資顧問股份有限公司,93-102頁,民國八十九年七月。
42.王澤鑑,民法物權,三民書局股份有限公司,189-202頁,八十四年十月。
43.我妻榮,日本物權法,五南圖書出版公司,96-100、280頁,民國八十八年三月。
44.謝哲男,財產法專題研究,三民書局股份有限公司,224-225頁,民國八十四年五月。
45.吳啟賓,租賃法論,五南圖書出版公司,66-67,257頁,民國八十七年二月。
46.廖義男,公共建設與行政法理,三民書局股份有限公司,「肆、公用事業法-國家對公用事業之監督與規範」,233/236頁,民國八十三年八月。
47.葉志良,電信與有線電視在媒介整合下相關管制規範之研究,東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文,民國八十八年七月。
48.李嘉凌,電信局因應自由化、民營化之競爭策略研究,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國八十一年六月。
49.白永忠,電信業法律實務,法律出版社,166-169頁,2001年12月。
英文部分
1.American Institute in Taiwan,1998."Foreign Trade Barriers in Taiwan:USTR 1998 Foreign Trade Barriers Report Second in a Series ,BG-98-8,April 13,1998.
2.Arthur Kaufmann, Analogie und “Natur der Sache”Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Typus. R.v.Decker & C.F.Müller Heidelbdrg 1982.
3.Arthur Kaufmann, Rectsphilosophie im Wandel(wie Anm.),1972, S.269,283.
4.John Moore ,1992, January-Febrary“British Privatization-Taking capitalism to the People”Harvard Business Review.p2-4.
5.Cable Communications Policy Act.1984.Pub.L.No.98-549,98 Stat.2779.
6.Commission Decision(EC)OJ 1994 L15/8.
7.Cook, k. s. "Exchange and Power in Networks of Interor-ganizational Relation," The Sociological Quarterly, V.18, 1977, 62-82.
8.Competition and Choice: Telecommunications Policy for the 1990’s-CM1461.
9.Council Directive 97/33/EC on Interconnection in Telecommunications through Application of the principles of OPEN NETWORK PROVISION (ONP).
10.Council Directive 97/51/EC, supra note 341, Article 2.3.
11.David D.Dill. 1995. "Markets and public policy," International Encyclopedia of Business & Management, Volume 4, p.3354-3363.
12.Detlef Leenen,Typus und Rechtsfindung,Berlin1971,S.34f.
13.Hall, R. H. Organizations:Structure and Process. Engle-wood Cliff, NJ:Prentice-Hall.1982.
14.European Commission, Status Report on European Union Telecommunications Policy,1997 DGXIII/A/1.
15.European Commission, Directive 99/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Interconnection in the Telecommunications with Regard to Ensuring Universal Service and Interoperability through Application of the Principles of open Network Provision.
16.European Commission, Draft Notice on the Application of the Competition Rules to Access Agreements in the Telecommunications Sector: Framework, Relevant Markets and Principles,December 10,1996 COM(96)649final.
17.European Commission, Commission Recommendation on Interconnection in a Liberalized Telecommunications Market: Part I- Interconnection Pricing(prevision text),October 15,1997,C (97)3148.
18.European Court of Justice , 6April 1995 , Joined Cases C241/91 and C242/91P.
19.European Commission, EU Telecommunications Status Report, sura note 263, at 42.
20.Green Paper on the liberalization of Telecommunications Infrastructure and Cable Television Networks:Part Two,COM(94)682,25 January 1995.
21.Hall, R. H. Organizations:Structure and Process. Engle-wood Cliff, NJ:Prentice-Hall.1982.
22.Huber,p.w. 1993. Telecommunications Regulation:The Beginning of the End, 10 Scien.& Tech.50.
23.Ito,Y. and Y. Oishi. "Cable Television in Janpan:Policy and Empirical Findings." Paper presented at the Advanced Wired Cities:Driving Forces and Social Implications Forum,Washington,D.C., July 12-13,1984.
24.Kellogg, M.J., J.Thorne & P.W. Huber, 1992. Federal Telecommunications Law ,9 Boston: Little, 93-112.
25.Kettl,D.F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets, Washington, D.C: The Brooking Institution .
26.Lang, J.T.1994, "Defining Legitimate Competition:Companies Duties to Supply Competitors and Access to Essential Facilities ," Forham International Law Journal, vol.18, 437.
27.Lindblom, C.E.1997. Politics and Markets:The World''''s politic-Economic Systems, New York:Basic Books.
28.Liu,Lawrence S. January 1998. Telecommunications Market Liberalization in Taiwan, paper delivered to Pacific Telecommunications Council meeting in Hawaii, USA.
29.Lothar Kuhlen,Typuskonzeption in der Rechtstheorie,Berlin1977,S.93.
30.Miller,F.1997. "Predatory Pricing in Deregulated Telecommunications Markets," Journal of World Competition Law, 65-90.
31.MCI Communication Corp.v.AT&T,708F,2d. 1081 , 1132。
32.OFTEL , 17 November 1997 , Statement-Duct and Pole Sharing.
33.OFTEL, Februry1996, A Consultative Document-Duct and Pole Sharing .
34.Ophuls and Boyan, A. S. Ecology and The Politics of Scarcity Revisited. N. Y. : W. H. Free man and Co.1992。
35.Osborne, D. and Gaebler,T.1992. Reinventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, New York:Addison-Wesley.
36.Pierce,Jr.,Richard J.,and Ernest Gellhorn.1994. Regulated Industries in a Nutshell, St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
37.Peter W. Huber,Telecommunications Regulation:The beginning of the End, 10 SCIEN.&TECH.50(1993).
38.Porter, M.E.1987. "From competitive advantage to corporate strategy ",Harvard Business Review 87(3):43-59.
39.Posner,R.A.1969. "A Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation",Standford Law Review, vol.21,p548.
40.Saidel, J. R. "Resource Interdependence:The Relationship Between State Agences and Nonprofit Organizations,"Public Administration Review, V.51 N.6, 1991, 543-553.
41.Saltman,R.B. and von Otter,C.1992. Planned Markets and Public Competition, Bristol. PA:Open University Press.
42.Sappington, D.E.Mand D.L.Weisman.1996. Designing Incentive Regulation for the Telecommunications Industry, MIT Press.
43.Status Report on European Union Telecommunications policy. January,1998Ⅱ.F. "The effect of competition on tariffs;and European Parliament Resolution "of 20 April 1993 on the Commission Communication "Toward cost orientation and the adjustment of pricing structures-- Telecommunications tariffs in the Community"(A3-117/93;OJC150/37,31.05.1993).
44.Telecommunication Authority of Singapore. INFORMATION PACKAGE Relating to the Tender for Public Basic Telecommunication Services License. January 1997.26-28.
45.Treaty Establishing the European Community(1957), as amended by the Treaty on European Union , Article 86。
46.Weimer, D.L. and Vining, A.R.1992. Policy analysis:Concepts and Practice, Englewood Cilffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
47.Venit, James S. and Christian Duvernoy.1994“The ''''Essential Facilities'''' Doctrine:Its Role in EC Competition Law and Telecommunications Policy,”paper delivered at the Forham Corporate Law Conference, October 1994.
48.Wolf, C.1993. Markets or Governments:Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
49.Zitier nach Henkel,Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie(wie Anm.7),S.311,372f.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top