本研究旨在探討「跨組織關係」對於跨組織專案「合作過程」與「團隊知識管理」的交互影響作用。
本研究由五個產業中取得64個樣本資料，經統計分析檢驗結果發現：
1. 跨組織專案「合作過程」對「團隊知識管理」有正面的影響。
2. 資源分享、合作時間長度與組織間過去的合作關係對團隊知識分享與創造有接近顯著的交互作用。
3. 專案成員的涉入程度、衝突解決與依存程度及專案領導人間的關係有顯著的交互作用。
4.「團隊知識管理」對跨組織專案團隊績效有正面的影響。
本研究除了討論上述分析結果之原因外，也提出幾項學術上及管理上的意涵，在後續研究部分，建議未來之研究者可考慮「個案研究」以了解質化分析是否對相同議題有創新的結果。

The main purpose of this study is to examine the outcome of interaction of the inter-organizational relationships between an inter-organizational project team ’s cooperative process and its effect on the team’s performance in the knowledge management. Based on the results of statistical analysis of 64 samples collected from five industries, we conclude that:
1. An inter-organizational project team’s cooperative process has a significant effect on the team’s knowledge management performance.
2. Interactions between the resource sharing among team partners and the time length and quality of past inter-organizational relationships result in a significant monotonic positive effect on the knowledge sharing and creation of the team.
3. The level of the team members’ participation (or involvement in conflict resolution) and the degree of interdependence among team members (or the relationships among team members) have a significant monotonic positive effect on the knowledge application performance of the team.
4. Team knowledge management performance has a significant effect on the innovation performance of the project team.
The managerial implications derived from the above study are discussed at the end of this thesis. To extend this study, researchers can use case studies and qualitative analysis to elucidate further these findings, particularly those pertaining to the innovation performance of inter-organizational project teams.

Chinese Abstract ……………………………………………………………. i
English Abstract ……………………………………………………………. ii
Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………. iv
Index ……………………………………………………………. v
Table Index ……………………………………………………………. viii
Figure Index ……………………………………………………………. ix
I Chapter One Introduction…………………………………….………… 1
1.1 Background and Motivation of the Study…….………….. 1
1.2 Objectives………………….……………………………... 2
1.3 Organization of the Study……..………………………….. 2
II Chapter Two Literature Review…………………………………….…… 3
2.1 Team Knowledge Management……………….………….. 3
2.1.1 Knowledge Sharing………………………………..……… 3
2.1.2 Knowledge Creation…..…………………………..……… 3
2.1.3 Knowledge Application.…………………………..……… 4
2.2 Cooperative Process………………………………………. 4
2.2.1 Involvement of Participants………………………………. 4
2.2.2 Resource Sharing………………………………………….. 5
2.2.3 Conflict Resolutions……………………………………… 5
2.3 Cooperative Process and Team Knowledge Management.. 6
2.4 Inter-organizational Relationships…………….………….. 8
2.4.1 Degree of Interdependence……………………………….. 8
2.4.2 Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships.………. 9
2.4.3 Relationships among Key Project Players………..……… 10
2.5 Inter-organizational Relationships, Cooperative Process and Team Knowledge Management………………………. 11
2.6 Team Knowledge Management and Performance of Inter-organizational Project Team…………………………. 12
III Chapter Three Hypotheses and Model……………………….…………… 13
3.1 Theoretical model…………………………………………. 13
3.2 Hypothesis……..…………………………………………. 14
3.2.1 Effects of Cooperative Process on Team Knowledge Management……………………………………………….. 14
3.2.2 Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on Team Knowledge Management………………..……..……..…… 15
3.2.3 Moderating Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on Cooperative Process and Team Knowledge Management……………………..………………………… 15
3.2.4 Effects of Team Knowledge Management on Performance of Inter-organizational Project Team…………………..….. 16
IV Chapter four Research Method………………………………………..… 17
4.1 Subjects………………………………………….………… 17
4.2 Measurement of Variables………………………………… 18
4.2.1 Cooperative Process.……………………………………... 18
4.2.2 Inter-organizational Relationships………………………… 19
4.2.3 Team Knowledge Management…..………………………. 20
4.2.4 Performance of Inter-organizational Project Team……………………………………………………….. 20
4.3 Data Collection Process…………………………………… 20
4.4 Data analysis Method……………………………………… 21
V Chapter five Results and Analysis……………………………………... 22
5.1 Characteristics of the Sample……………………………… 22
5.2 Factor Analyses, Means, Standard Deviations, Reliabilities and Correlations………………….………………………... 23
5.2.1 Factor Analyses…………………………………………… 23
5.2.2 Means, Standard Deviations, Reliabilities and Correlations………………………………….……………. 26
5.3 Regression Analysis and Hypotheses Testing…..…………. 27
5.3.1 Effects of Involvement of Participants (or Resource Sharing or Conflict Resolutions) on Team Knowledge Management……………………………………………….. 30
5.3.2 Effects of Degree of Interdependence (or Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships or Relationships among Key Project Players) on Team Knowledge Management…………………………………………….…. 30
5.3.3 Moderating Effects of Degree of Interdependence (or Time Length and Quality of the Past Relationships or Relationships among Key Project Players) on the Relationships between Cooperative Process and Team Knowledge Management..…………………………….….. 31
5.3.3.1 Moderating Effects of Degree of Interdependence on the Relationships between Involvement of Participants, Conflict Resolution and Knowledge Application……..….. 33
5.3.3.2 Moderating Effects of Relationships among Key Project Players on the Relationships between Involvement of Participants, Conflict Resolutions and Knowledge Application………………………………………………… 34
5.3.3.3 Moderating Effects of Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships on the Relationships between Resource Sharing and Knowledge Application……….…………….. 35
5.3.3.4 Moderating Effects of Relationships among Key Project Players on the Relationships between Resource Sharing and Knowledge Application……………….……………… 37
5.3.4 Effects of Performance on Inter-organizational Project Team………………………………………………………. 39
VI Chapter six Discussion and Conclusion………………………………. 42
6.1 Discussion Results……………………………………….. 42
6.1.1 Effects of Cooperative Process on Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Creation……………..………….……….…… 42
6.1.2 E Effects of Cooperative Process on Knowledge Application. 43
6.1.3 Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on Knowledge Sharing and Creation……..….……………..… 43
6.1.4 Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on Knowledge Application.………………………………….. 44
6.1.5 Moderating Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on the Relationships of Cooperative Process and Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Creation……………. 45
6.1.6 Moderating Effects of Inter-organizational Relationships on the Relationships of Cooperative Process and Knowledge Application…………………………….… 45
6.1.7 Effects of Team Knowledge Management on Performance of Inter-organizational Project Team………………………. 47
6.2 Managerial Implications…………………………………... 47
6.3 Theoretical Implications…………………………..……… 49
6.4 Limitations………………………………………………… 50
6.5 Future studies……………...……………………………… 50
References ……………………………………………………………. 51
Appendix 1 ……………………………………………………………. 57
Appendix 2 ……………………………………………………………. 63
Table Index
Table 5.1 Characteristics of the Sample……………………………………..………. 22
Table 5.2 Results of Factor Analysis for the Variables “Cooperative Process”……………………………………………………………………. 24
Table 5.3 Results of Factor Analysis for the Variable “Inter-organizational Relationships”……………………………………………………………… 25
Table 5.4 Results of Factor Analysis for the Variables “Team Knowledge Management”…………………………………………………………….… 26
Table 5.5 Means, Standard Deviation, Reliability and Correlations of Variables…………………………………………………………..……….. 27
Table 5.6 Regression Model: Cooperative Process, Inter-organizational Relationships Regressed onto Knowledge Sharing/ Creation……..……… 28
Table 5.7 Regression Model: Cooperative Process, Inter-organizational Relationships Regressed onto Knowledge Application…………..……….. 29
Table 5.8 Regression model: Knowledge Sharing and Creation and Knowledge Application regressed onto Performance of Inter-organizational Project Team……………………………………………………………………….. 40
Table 5.9 Summary of Results of Hypothesis Testing………………………………. 41
Figure Index
Figure 3.1 Model of the Study…………………………………………………..…... 13
Figure 5.1 Effect of Resource Sharing on Knowledge Sharing & Creation as a Function of Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships…..… 32
Figure 5.2 Effect of Involvement of Participants on Knowledge Application as a Function of Degree of Independence..………………………………….. 33
Figure 5.3 Effect of Involvement of Participants on Knowledge Application as a Function of Relationships among Key Project Players……………….…. 34
Figure 5.4 Effect of Resource Sharing on Knowledge Application as a Function of Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships…………………….… 35
Figure 5.5 Effect of Resource Sharing on Knowledge Application at Extreme Values of Time Length & Quality of the Past Relationships………….… 36
Figure 5.6 Effect of Resource Sharing on Knowledge Application as a Function of Relationships Among Key Project Players……….……………………. 37
Figure 5.7 Effect of Resource Sharing on Knowledge Application at Extreme Values of Relationships Among Key Project Players…………………… 38

Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, (3), 425-455.
Aldrich, H. E. 1979. Organizations and Environments, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bardach E. 2001. Development dynamic: Interagency collaboration as an emergent
phenomenon, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 149-164
Borghoff, U. M. & Pareshi, R., 1998. Information Technology for Knowledge Management.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. 1997. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for windows. London: Routledge.
Celsi, R. L., and J. C. Olson, 1988. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 210-224.
Chang Shauw Hsing, 2000. SPSS for Windows, Unalis Corporation.
Chen Y. C., 2000. Competitive, cooperative relationships and strategic development research of multinational manufacturers-the triangle relationship among Nike, Feng Tai, and Pao Chen,. master thesis of National Dong Hwa University. 陳月琴「跨國製造合作廠商間競合關係與策略發展研究─NIKE、豐泰、寶成間的三角關係」，國立東華大學國際企業研究所，碩士論文 170-190.
Dechant K., & Marsick, V. J., 1993, Team learning survey: Leaders guide, King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design & Development.
Eisenhardt KM, Kahwajy JL, Bourgeois LJ. 1997 Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review , 39, (2), 42-62.
Ellen, M. K., 1998. Knowledge management, Business & Economic Review, July-Sept, 3-6.
Eugene Sivadas & F. Rober Dwyer. 2000. An examination of organizational factor influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, 64, 31-49.
Garrity, E. J., & Siplor, J. C. 1994. Multimedia as a vehicle for knowledge modeling in expert system, Expert System with Application, 7, (3), 397-406.
Gate, Stephen. 1993. Strategic Alliances: Guidelines for successful management. New York: The Conference Board Inc.
Hamel Gary, 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner leaning within international strategic alliance, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
Harrigan, Kathryn R. 1988. Strategic Alliances and Partner Asymmetries, Management International Review 28 (special issue), 53-72.
Herzberg, F. 1968. Work and Nature of Man, London Granada Pub., London.
Hsies L. S., 2001. The research of key successful factors for cross-functional team executing project in research institutes, questionnaire appendix of master thesis. Chung Yuan Christian University. 謝立詩(2001)，「跨功能團隊對研究機構執行專案計劃 關鍵成功因素」問卷部分，中原大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文
Hsiung H. H., 2001. The confidence management of inter-organizational cooperation, questionnaire appendix of Phd dissertation of National Chengchi University. 熊心華 (2001)，「組織間信心合作的管理」問卷部分，政治大學企管研究所，博士論文
Huang J. C. & Wang S. F., 2000. Knowledge Conversion Abilities Combination and Innovation: An examination of knowledge spiral theory on team level. Soochow University (Taipei). 黃家齊、黃思峰，「知識轉換能力組合與創新-知識螺旋理論的團隊層次驗證」問卷部分
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. 2000. Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 1150-1175.
Jones, G. R.. & George J. M. 1998. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and team work, Academy of Management Review, 23, (3), 531-546.
Joshi, A. W. and S. J. Aenold. 1997. The impact of buyer dependence on buyer opportunism in buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of relational norms, Psychology and Marketing, 14, (8), 823-845
Khanna T. & Palepu K., 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile, Academy of Management Journal, 268-270.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S., 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management 20, 403-437.
Kuper, P. et al., 1985. The social science encyclopedia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lee M. H., 2000. Chinese translation of The Practice of Social Research written by Eral Babbie (1998),「社會科學研究方法」
Liu C. H., 2000. Influence of organizational network toward organizational cooperation, questionnaire appendix of master thesis, National Taiwan Ocean University劉致豪(2000)，「組織間網路關係對組織合作之影響」問卷部分，國立台灣海洋大學航運管理研究所，碩士論文
Mathieu J. S., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., & Salas E. and Cannon-Bowers J. 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (2), 271-281.
Mitchell A. A., 1981, The Dimensions of Advertising Involvement, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 25-30.
Mizrahi T., Rosenthal B., 2001. Complexities of coalition building: Leaders’ successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions, Social Work; New York, 46, 63-78.
Modhad, A. & S. E., 1984. The organization of production: Evidence from the aerospace industry, Journal of Law and Economics, 27 (3), 709-734.
Nancy J Cooke, Eduardo Salas, Janis A Cannon-Bowers, Renee J Stout, 2000. Measuring team knowledge, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Spring 2000, 41, 151.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H., 1995. The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies crest the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pinkley R., 1990. Dimension of conflict: Disputant interpretations of conflict, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117-126.
Porter & Fuller, 1987. Coalitions and global strategy, competition in global industries, edited by Porter, M., Harvard University Press, 315-343.
Powell W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L., 1996. Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
Quinn, J. B., Aderson, P., and Finkelstein, S., 1996. Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best, Harvard Business Review, Mar-Apr: 71-80.
Robbins S. 1974. Managing Organization Conflict, Prentice Hall
Robbins S. & Coulter M., 1999. Management, Prentice Hall International Editions.
Sbragia, R., 1984. Clarity of management roles and performance of R&D multidisciplinary projects in matrix structures, R&D Management, 113-126.
Schoonhoven, C. B., 1981. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumption hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administration Science Quarterly, 26, 349-377.
Schurr, P.H. and Ozanne J.L., 1985. Influence on exchange processes: Buyer’s perceptions of a seller’s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, (4), 939-953.
Smith, K., Smith, K., Olian, J., O’Bannon, D., & Scully, J., 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412-438.
Scott J.E., 2000, Facilitating inter-organizational learning with information technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (2), 81-113.
Snowden, D., 2000. A framework for creating a sustainable program, In Rock, S. (eds.), Knowledge Management: A Real Business Guide, London: Caspian.
Su M. H., 2000. A study of inter-organization collaboration and mechanisms of NPO, questionnaire appendix of master thesis, Providence University. 蘇洺賢，(2000)，「我國非營利事業單位之跨組織合作關係類型」問卷部分，靜宜大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文
Tampoe M., 1993. Motivating knowledge workers-The challenge for the 1990s, Long Range Planning, 26, (3), 49-55.
Thomas K. W., 1992. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations, In M. D. Dunnette & M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 651-717, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
T. K. DAS & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. Between Trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances, 23, (3), 491-512.
Tsai D. J., 2001. The influence of team diversity on knowledge sharing, knowledge creation, and innovation performance- the moderating effects of conflict, questionnaire of master thesis, Soochow University (Taipei) 蔡達人(2000)，「團隊多元化對知識分享及創造的影響-衝突為中介變項」問卷部分，東吳大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文
Whetten, D. A., 1982. Issues in conducting search, in D. L. Rogers and D. A. Whetten, Inter-organizational coordination theory, research, and implementation, Ames, Iowa: The Iowa University Press, 97-121.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A., 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research, in B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, l.20, 77-140, Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Wu S. H., 1994. 吳思華「（策略九說）第四說：資源說」。世界經理文摘，74-87
Yau-De Wang, 1992. Computerized automation, structural design, and performance: an integration of the task uncertainty and the work control approaches, 79-128.