跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(54.224.117.125) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/01/28 20:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳嘉瑜
研究生(外文):Juyu,wu
論文名稱:代間矛盾經驗之分析:成年子女婚後與父母之關係研究
論文名稱(外文):Intergenerational Ambivalent Experiences:The Relationships Between Adult Married Offspring and Parents
指導教授:趙淑珠趙淑珠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-chu,Gu
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:輔導與諮商系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:271
中文關鍵詞:代間矛盾經驗代間關係老年父母成年子女配對研究
外文關鍵詞:Intergenerational Ambivalent ExperiencesIntergenerational relationshipsAging ParentsAdult ChildrenPaired Research
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:2756
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
代間矛盾經驗之分析:
成年子女婚後與父母之關係研究
摘 要
本研究目的欲瞭解親代與子代代間矛盾經驗內涵。本研究採用質性研究及配對研究法,訪談三個家庭中共十五位受訪者,整理出不同代間及不同性別的代間經驗,並呈現出彼此觀點相同及相異之處。研究發現如下:
親代男性在決定子代婚事上所產生「心不願卻得接受」的為難;在面對女婿與媳婦時所出現的「求全與界限」的矛盾及在面對已婚女兒與媳婦的互動關係上所呈現「文化規範與情感親疏」的矛盾是最明顯的共通經驗。
親代女性在決定子代婚事上產生「心不願卻得接受」的為難、「老年居住安排的疑慮」、「時代變遷的感慨:媳婦不能熬成婆」以及婆媳互動間存有「求全與界限」的顧忌四者是最明顯的共通經驗。
對子代男性而言,「努力融入岳家,卻仍有情感區隔感」及在糾結在原生家庭與婚姻家庭間「忠誠衝突」是最明顯的共通經驗。
對子代女性而言,有下列六種共同的代間矛盾經驗:對原生父母因婚後疏於互動而產生「有心想作而未作的愧疚感」;對公婆因情感距離而表現不出孝行的「應為而未為的愧疚感」;與長輩同住所引發的「連結與衝突的矛盾」;與公婆相處所產生的「自我意願與界限」的矛盾及「自主意願與順從壓力」的為難;對長輩的協助有著「依賴與自主」的抉擇難題,以及身處在不同家庭系統間所產生的「忠誠衝突」。
研究者針對前述研究結果加以討論,對本土代間關係的意涵作探究,並提出對未來研究的建議。
Intergenerational Ambivalent Experiences:The Relationships Between Adult Married Offspring and Parents
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the intergenerational ambivalent experiences between parents and adult offspring. In-depth interview of qualitative approach and paired research method were adopted. After interviewing 15 participants in 3 families, the similarities and differences of their intergenerational ambivalent experiences were integrated. The major findings are summarized as following:
In the decision of his descents’ marriages, the paternal parent was in a hole about “unwilling acceptance”. He had contradictions of “compromise or limit” when facing his sons-in-law or daughters-in-law. He felt contradictions of “culture norm or affectionate intimacy” when he had interactions with his daughters and daughters-in-law. These phenomena are the most common experiences of parental parents.
There are four phenomena as their common experiences in maternal parents: “an unwilling acceptance” in the marriage of their descents, “the anxiety about the living arrangement when aging”, “the sigh of the changes of times”, and “compromise or limit” when interacting with their daughters-in-law.
For a male descent, he made effort to merge into his wife’s family, but they did not view him as one of them. He had “loyalty conflicts” between his original family and his married family. These phenomena are the most evident common experiences.
For a female descent, there are six common intergenerational ambivalent experiences. First, she had a sense of guilt of “unfulfilled intentions” about lack of close interaction with her own parents after marriage. Second, she had also a sense of guilt of “unperformed responsibilities” about filial duty to parents-in-law. Third, she had contradictions of “connection or conflict” about living with her elder family members. Forth, she had contractions of “self-willing or limit ” as well as compromises of “self-willing or the pressures of compliance” when living with her parents-in-law. Fifth, there are difficulties in balancing “dependence or independence” for family members’ assistance. Finally, she had “loyalty conflict” between different family systems.
The contributions of the results are discussed and further researches are also suggested.
目 錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及目的 1
第二節 名詞定義 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 社會變遷中代間關係的轉變 7
第二節 代間關係研究之發展與趨勢 10
第三節 代間矛盾研究趨勢的興起與相關文獻 12
第四節 代間矛盾的研究情形與發現 16
第五節 配對研究法 33
第三章 研究方法 39
第一節 研究方法 39
第二節 研究對象 40
第三節 研究工具 41
第四節 研究流程 45
第五節 資料分析 47
第四章 研究結果 51
第一節 Family A 家庭故事 51
第二節 Family B 家庭故事 99
第三節 Family C 家庭故事 167
資料綜合分析 207
第五章 討論 233
第一節 結果與討論 233
第二節 系統觀點的思索 241
第三節 建議 252
參考書目 257
附錄一 受訪成員基本資料分析表 262
附錄二 子代訪談大綱 263
附錄三 親代訪談大綱 264
附錄四 訪談日誌 266
附錄五 子代「代間相處經驗」基本資料表 267
附錄六 親代「代間相處經驗」基本資料表 269
中文部分:
孔祥明(民88)。婆媳過招為哪樁?婆婆媳婦與兒子(丈夫)三角關係的探討,
應用心理研究,4,57-96。
余德慧(民80)。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析,見揚中芳,高尚仁編﹔中國
人中國心─人格社會篇。
余德慧,顧瑜君(民86)。 父母眼中的離合處境與倫理意涵,第四屆華人心理與行為科技學術研討會,中央研究院民族學研究所。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(民84)。質的評鑑與研究。台北:桂冠。
利翠珊(民85)。已婚女性的代問關係一家庭系統的分化與整合初探。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC86-2413-H030-005-G11),未出版。
利翠珊(民87)。 社會變遷中年輕婦女的婚姻觀與家庭觀,「變遷中的台灣研討會」,中央研究院民族學研究所。
利翠珊(民88)。 已婚女性與上一代的互動關係與情感連結,中華家政學刊,
28,31-46。
利翠珊(民89)。親子情感,家庭角色與個人域-已婚女性代問情感糾結的經
驗與內涵,第五屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會,中央研究院民族學研究
所。
利翠珊(民91)。婆媳與母女:不同世代女性家庭經驗的觀點差異,女性學誌:婦女與性別研究,13,179-218。
肖平(民88)。九0年代中國大陸地區家庭觀念及關係變化狀況研究,應用心理研究,4,175-203。
林松齡(民87)。台灣社會的婚姻與家庭-社會學的實證研究。台北:五南。
林如萍(民87)。農家老人與其成年子女代間連帶之研究-從老人觀點分析。國
立台灣大學農業推廣學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
邱文斌(民83)。 三代同住家庭中代間婦女關係之探討。國立政治大學心理研
究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
胡幼慧編(民88)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧,周雅容(民85)。婦女與三代同堂:老年婦女的經濟依賴與居住困境
探索,婦女與兩性學刊,7,27-57。
孫得雄、劉應興(民79)。中國家庭中兩代成員關係之變遷-以台灣為例。行政院
國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC76-0301-H065-001-B),
未出版。
崔依蘭(民76)。嫁出去的女兒,潑出去的水?一個對台灣城市婦女的研究。婦女研究中心專題論文。台北市:國立台灣大學。
莫藜藜、王行(85). 已婚男性的家庭價值觀及對家庭的需求之探究。東吳社會工作學報,2,57-114。
陳舜文(民88)。「仁」與「禮」:台灣民眾的家庭價值觀與工作態度,應用心
理研究,4,205-228。
陳燕錚(民88)。成年期女性從原生家庭到婚姻家庭的心理依附與分離歷程的
探討。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
章英華(民83)。變遷社會中的家戶組成與奉養態度-台灣的例子。國立台
灣大學社會學刊,23,1-34。
楊國樞(民86)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭運作特徵與歷程:夫妻關係。行政院
國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC85-2417-H002-028-G6),
未出版。
葉光輝(民88)。家庭中的循環性衝突,應用心理研究,2,41-82。
葉光輝(民85)。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式:孝道觀點的探討.中央
研究院民族學研究所集刊,82,65-114.
黃光雄等譯(民90)。質性教育研究理論與方法。嘉義:濤石。
齊力(民85)。大台北地區中年人的老年區住安排規劃之研究。行政院國家科學
委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC84-2412-H001-006),未出版。
劉惠琴(民89)。母女關係的社會建構,應用心理研究,6,97-132.
劉淑慧(民88)。折衷取向的質性資料分析方法,諮商與輔導,165,16-19.
謝秀芬(民86)。現代婦女的家庭價值觀與家庭期待之研究。東吳社會工作學報,
3,1-46。
英文部分:
Aguilino ,W. S.(1999).Two views of one relationship : comparing parents’ and young adult children’s report of the quality of intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and the family, 61, 858-870.
Bartholomew, K.(1990). Avoidance of intimacy:An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147-178.
Baruch , G., & Barnett, R. C.(1983). Adult danghters’ relationships with their
mothers, Journal of Marriage and the Family,45, 601-606.
Bengtson, V. L., Rosenthal ,C., & Burton, L.(1990). Families and aging:Diversity and heterogeneity. In R. H. Binstock., & L. K. Georoge(Eds.), Handbook of aging and social sciences(pp. 263-287). New York: Academic Press.
Boyd, C. J. (1989). Mother and Daughters: A discussion of theory and research . Journal of Marriage and the family, 51,291-301.
Braiker, H. B., & Kelley, H. H.(1979). Conflict in development of close relationships. New York : Academic press.
Brody, E. M. (1981).Women in the middle and family help to elder people. Gerontologise, 21,471-480.
Brody, C. J. (1989). Mothers and Daughters:A dicussion of theory and research, Journal of Marriage and the Family,51, 291-302.
Brown , J. S., & Farber , I. G.(1951).Emotions conceptualized as intervening variables with suggestions toward a theory of frustration . Psychological Bulletin ,48, 465-480.
Cohler, B. J., & Grunebaum, H.(1981).Mothers, grandmothers and daughters. Personality and childcare in three-generation familys. New York:Wiley.
Cotterill, P.(1994).Friendly relations? Mother and their daughters-in-law.
Great Britain: Burgess Science Press.
Deal, J. E. (1995). Vitilizing data from multiple family members. A within-family
approach. Journal of Marriage and the family ,57, 1109-1121.
Epstein, S. (1980). Conflict and Stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz(Eds.), The handbook of stress:Theoretical and clinical aspects(pp. 49-68). New York:Free Press.
Fischer, V. R. (1981). Transitions in the mother-daughter relationship. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 43,613-622.
Fisher, L. R.(1991).Between mothers and daughters. Marriage & Family Review ,16(3/4),249-265.
Farber, B.(1989). Limiting reciprocity among relatives:Theoretical implications of a serendipitous finding. Sociological Perspective,32, 307-330.
George, L. K., & Gold, D. T.(1991):Life course perspects on intergenerational
and generational connections. Marriage & Family review, 5 , 67-85.
George , L. K.(1986).Caregiver burden :Conflict between norms of reciprocity and solidarity . In K. Pillemer & R. Wolf (Eds.) , Elder abuse : Conflict in the family (pp.67-92). MA : Auburn House.
Greene, A., & Boxer, A. (1986). Daughters and Sons as young adults. In N. Datan., A.
Greene & H. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Intergenerational
relations (pp.125-149). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hagestad, G. O.(1987).Parent-child relations in later life: Trends and gaps in past research . In J. B. Lancaster., J. Altman., S .Rossi., & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), parenting across the life span (pp.405-434). New York :Aldine De Gruyter.
Hagesead, G. O. (1987), Able elderly in the family contact:Change, chance, and
challenges, Gerontologist, 27, 417-428。
Higgins, E. T.(1990). Personality, social psychology and person-situation relations . Standards and knowledge activation as a common language . In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York :Guilford Press.
Horsley, G. S. (1996). In-Laws:A guide to extended-family therapy. New York:J. Wiley & Sons.
Luescher, K., & Pillemer, K.(1998). Intergenerational ambivalence:A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the family, 60(2), 413-425.
Lewin, K. (1950). Field theory in social science : Selected theoretical papers. New York : Harper & Row.
Mancini, J. A., & Blieszner, R. (1989). Aging parents and adult children:Research themes in intergenerational relations, Journal of Marriage and Family,51,275-290。
Marshall, V. W., Matthews, S. H., & Rosenthal, C. J. (1993). Elusiveness of family life:A challenge for the sociology of aging. In G. L. Maddox & M. P. Lawton(Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics:Focus on Kinship, aging and social change. New York:Springer.
Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in esucation.
San Francisco:Jossey —Bass Publishers.
Nydegger, C. N., & Mittness, L. S.(1991).Father and their adult sons and daughters.
Marrtiage & Family Review,16(3/4),249-265.
Nydegger, C.(1986). Asymmetrical Kin and the Problematic son-in-law. In N. Datan., A. Greene. , & H. Reese, (Eds.). Life-span developmental psychology:intergenerational relation(pp.99-123). Hillstlale:Erlbaum.
Orolff, A. S. (1993). The Politics of Pensions:A Comparative analysis of Britain,
Canacla, and the United States(pp.1880-1940). WI:The University of
Wisconsin Press.
Pinsof, W. M. (1992). Toward a scientific paradigm of family psychology:The
integrative process systems perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 5,
432-447.
Pyke, K.(1999).The micro politics of care in relationship between aging parent and adult children:Individualism, collectivism, and power.Journal of Marriage and Family,61,661-672.
Russell , A., & Saeble, J.(1997). Mother-Son , Mother- Daughter, Father-Son and Father- Daughter:Are They distinct relationships? Developmental Review,17. 117-147.
Sorrentino , R. M., & Holmes, J. G., & Sharp, A. (1995). Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships: Individual differences in cognitive style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (8), 314-327.
Sprey, J. S., & Matthew, S. H.(1982).Contemporary grandparenthood:A systematic transition. Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 464, 91-103.
Thompson, M. M., Naccarato,M. E., Parker,K.,& Moskowitz,G.B.(1993). Measuring
Cognitive needs:The development and validating of the Personal Need for Structure(PNS)and Personal Fear of Invalidity(PFI)measures. Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Thompson, M. M., & Holmes, J. G. (1996). Ambivalence in close relationships: Conflicted cognitions as a catalyse for change. In R. M. Sorrentin & E. T.Higgins (Eds). Handbook of motiuation and cognition :The interpersonal context (pp.497-530). Houston, TX:The Guilford Press.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A.,(1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: conceptual and
Conceptual and methodological issue. Journal of marriage and family, 44,889-900.
Thorne, B.(1992). Feminism and the family:Two decades of thought. In B. Thorne &
M. Yalom(Eds.), Rethinking the family(pp.3-30). Boston:Northeastern University Press.
Umberson. D(1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents:
Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the
family, 54,664-674.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top