中文文獻
1.Kline, M.(1984) 數學史─數學思想的發展(林炎全、 洪萬生、楊康景松譯)。台北市:九章出版社。
2. 洪萬生(1996) 數學課程的文化衝擊。科學月刊,27(12),1027-1031。3. 洪萬生(1998)HPM通訊 第一卷,第二期(1998, 10月)
4. 林福來和金鈴(1999)高中數學教室中價值的研究(2/3)。國科會專題研究計畫進度報告(計畫編號NSC86-2511-S-003-025),國立台灣師範大學數學系。
5. 李儼 (1992) 中國古代數學簡史 ,56-58頁及157-158頁. 台北:九章.
6. 張靜嚳 (1993) 以問題為中心的教學策略對數學學習成就之影響 (I)。國科會專題計畫成果報告。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
7. 張靜嚳(1995)何謂建構主義。建構與教學,3期,彰化師大科教中心。8. 張靜嚳(1996)建構教學:採用建構主義如何教學?。建構與教學,7期,彰化師大科教中心。9. 張靜嚳 (1999) 國中低學習成就班的雙環數學教學建科學教育學刊9(3)10. 張靜嚳(1994)不會讓學生打瞌睡的教學策略。菁莪月刊,6(3)
11. 張靜嚳(2000)高職數學。臺北:三民書局。
12. 張靜嚳、陳育琳和林福來(1998)一班國二前段班在非傳統數學教室獲得的價值。中華民國第十四屆科學教育研討會。
13. 張靜嚳、郭智威和林福來(1998):一位非傳統國中數學教師的意圖價值。論文發表於中華民國第十四屆科學教育學術研討會。
14. 張靜嚳、曾志華和林福來(1998):一位非傳統國中數學教師的施行價值。論文發表於中華民國第十四屆科學教育學術研討會。
15. 張靜嚳(1999):價值:數理師資培育研究中一個重要但被忽視的領域。論文發表於數理師資培育研究重點討論會,彰化民俗村。
16. 郭重吉,江武雄,王夕堯(2000) 從理論到實務談建構主義,89年度台中縣建構教學觀摩及台中市小班教學研習會。
17. 歐陽絳譯(原著:Howard Eves, 1993) 數學史概論(An introduction to the history of mathematics)。臺北:曉園出版社。
18. 曾志朗,網路上的科學教育,彰化師大建構與教學第十期。19. 邱守榕(1992) 關於數學學習研究。科學發展月刊。20(5),pp.571-584。邱守榕編著(1996) 學門資源整合規劃資料─數學教育。台北市。行政院國家科學委員會。20. 楊淑芬(1992)從皮亞傑的認識論談術學史與數學教育的關聯。台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文。21. 甄曉蘭(2000)教師與教學研究。教學原理。高雄麗文出版社。
22. 黃瑞琴(1997) 質的教育研究法。心理出版社。
23. 蕭文強(1986) 為什麼要學習數學?數學發展史給我們的啟發。凡異出版社。
24. 蕭雅慧(1999)運用投影片改進數學教學的行動研究,
第15屆科學教育研討會。
西文文獻
1. Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematical values in the teaching process. In A. J. Bishop, A. S. Mellin-Olsen, & J. Van Dormolen(Eds.), Mathematical knowledge: Its growththrough teaching. (pp.195-214). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
2. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer
3. Bishop, A. J. (1999). Educating student teachers about values in mathematics education. Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
4. Bishop,A.J.(1999).How should mathematics teaching in modern technological societies relate to cultural values? 1999台北數學教師教育國際學術研討會。
5.Carr, W. & Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming critical:Education knowledge and action research. London:The Falmer Press
1. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Designing Group work (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: the importance of theories and their development. New York: teachers college, Columbia university
3. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change.Bucking-ham, UK:Open University Press.
4. Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, London: Falmer.
5. Fauvel, John(1991). Using History in Mathematics Education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 3-6
6. Feldman, A. (1994). Erzberger’s dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers’ need to know. Science Education.78(1),83-101.
7. Fraenkel, J. R. (1977). How to teach about values: An analytic approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
8. Freudenthal, Hans.(1981). Should a Mathematics Teacher Know Something about the History of Mathematics? For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 30-33.
9. Gardner,H.(1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. NY: Basic Books, Inc
10. ICMI Study Book, vol. 6, HPM 2000 Taipei NetWork
11. Jaworski(1999)Developing Mathematics Teaching:teacher,teacher-educators and researchs as co-learners.1999台北數學教師教育國際學術研討會。
12. The ICMI Study(2000). History in Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 63-70, 173-148, 171-200
13. McNiff, J.(1988).Action research:Principles and practice. London:McMillan Education
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
15. National Council of Teachers of thematics.(2000).Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. printed in U Piaget , J .(1973). To understand is to invent :The future of education. New eston, VA: NCTM.
16. Poole,Michael(1995).What science cannot discover,mankind cannot know?…beliefs and values about science. In Michel, Poole, Beliefs and values in Science Education.(pp33-48.)Open University Press. Buckingham.Philadelphia.
17. Roger Cooke (1997). The history of mathematics (A Brief Course). John Wiley&Sons,Inc,Canad
18. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Macmillan.
19. Sagor, R. & Curley, J. (1991). Collaborative action research: Can it improve school effectiveness? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL
20. Seah, W. T. (1999). The portrayal and relative emphasis of mathematical andmathematics educational values in Victoria and Singapore lower secondary mathematics textbooks: a preliminary study. M.Ed. Thesis. Melbourne: Monash University.
21. Schon D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner : How professionals think in action. New York : Basic Books.
22. Swadener, M. & Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, Mathematics Education, and the task of Developing Pupils’ Personalities: An Indonesia Perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 19(2), (pp.193-208).
23. Vacc, Nancy Nesbitt. (1994). Implementing the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics:Planning for Instruction:Barriers to Mathematics Discussion. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(6), 339-341.
24. von Glasersfeld,E.(1987).Preliminaries to any theory of representation Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Edited Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Edite by Claude Janiver,pp.215-225
25. von Glaserfeld, E. (1988). Environment and Communication. Paper presented at sixth International Congress on Mathematics Education, Budapest
26. von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A way of Knowing and Learning. London: The Falmer Press.
27. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Wilson, B. J. (1986). Values in mathematics education. In P. Tomlinson & M. Quinton (Eds.), Values across the curriculum. (pp.94-108). The Falmer Press, New York.
29. Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.