參考文獻
中文部分:
王文科(1998):教育研究法。五南圖書出版公司。
王道還、傅大為、程樹德和錢永祥(1994):科學革命的結構。遠流出版公司。
金吾倫(1993):科學發現的哲學。水牛出版公司。
金吾倫(1994):托馬斯‧庫恩。遠流出版公司。
林陳涌(1995):高中學生對科學本質瞭解之研究。國科會專題研究成
果報告(NSC84-2511-S-003-083)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
林陳涌(1996):『了解科學本質量表』之發展與效化。科學教育學刊, 4(1), 1-58。
洪振方(1997):科學史融入科學教學之探討。高雄師大學報, (8), 233-246。郭重吉(1992):從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊, 25(5), 548-570。郭重吉和許玫理(1992):從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報, (3), 531-560。
郭重吉和許玫理(1993):我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之調
查研究。科學教育第四期抽印本:國立彰化師範大學科學教育研
究所編印。
郭重吉、江武雄、陳美玲和王春源(1994):從建構主義的觀點探討國中理化教學之改進。論文發表於中華民國第十屆科學教育學術研討會。
翁秀玉和段曉林(1997):科學史對國小六年級學生理解科學本質之成效。科學教育研究與發展, (8), 26-41。
翁秀玉和段曉林(1997):科學本質在教育上的啟示與作法。科學教育月刊, (201), 2-15。
翁秀玉和段曉林(1998):提升國小學生科學本質理解之行動研究。論文發表於中華民國八十七學年度教育學術研討會。
陳忠志(1998):國中教師科學本質及科學教學信念對理化教室環境的影響。科學教育學刊, 6(4), 383-402。
張惠博、何珮琪和林建隆(2000):國中學生對於科學與科學家的認識之研究。教育研究資訊, 8(5), 136-152。國民教育九年一貫課程綱要(2000):「自然與生活科技」課程綱要。
夏林清譯(1997):行動研究方法導論-教師動手作研究。台北市:遠流出版社。
英文部分:
Abimbola, I. O. (1983). The relevance of the “new philosophy of science for the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 83(3), 181-192
American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.:AAAS press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bentley, M. L., & Garrison, J. W. (1991).The role of philosophy of science in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education,2(3), 67-71.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. London: The Falmer Press.
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 429-445.
Clough, M.P., & Clark, R.L.(1994).Creative constructivism: Challenge your students with an authentic science experience.The Science Teacher, 61, 46-69.
Conant, A.B.(1951).On understanding science: A historical approach. New York: New American Library.
Dagher, Z.R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(5), 429-445.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, & Scott, P. (1996). Young peoples images of science. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change,student evaluation,and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education, 76(5), 493-506.
Duschl, R. A. (1994).Research on the history and philosophy of science. In L. G. Dorothy(ed), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.445-455). New York: MacMillan,.
Elliott, J. (1991).Action research for educational change. Bristol : Open University Press.
Feldman, A. (1994). Erzberger’s dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers’ need to know. Science Education, 78(1), 83-101.
Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teacher’s knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science, Science Education, 75(1), 121-133.
Hodson, D. (1991).The role of philosophy in science teaching, In M.R.Matthews (ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: Selected reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education,84(1), 51-70.
Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5-26.
King, B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitude toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education,75(1), 135-141.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N. G. (1986). Students and teacher’s understanding the nature of science: A reassessment. School Science and Mathematics, 86(2), 91-99.
Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. (1987). Science teachers conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior. Science Education, 71(5), 721-734.
Lin, H. S. (1998). Enhancing college students’ attitudes toward science through the history of science. Proceedings of the National Science, Council,R.O.C, 8(2), 86-91.
Manuel, D. E. (1981).Reflections on the role of history and philosophy of science in school science education. School Science Review, 62, 769-771.
Matthews, M. R. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. Science & Education, 6(1-2), 5-14.
Matthews, M.R. (1994). History, philosophy, and science teaching: A useful alliance. New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M.R. (1994) Science teaching: The role of history philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Medling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6, 397-416.
Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 4, 331-354.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The nature of science in science education : Rationales and Strategies. Science & Technology Education Library, 5, 3-39.
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies. Science & Technology Education Library, 5, 41-52.
McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
Munby, A. H. (1976). Some implications of language in science education. Science education, 60, 115-124.
Nussbaun, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives.
International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540
Ryan,A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education,76(6), 559-580.
Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science Journal of Research in science Teaching, 29(4), 375-388.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 10(1), 9-15.
Songer, N., & Linn, M. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761-784.
Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb: They’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Council.
Zeidler, D., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effects of teachers’ language on students conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 771-783.