跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.235.140.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/08/13 04:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:錢沛鴻
研究生(外文):Pie-Hong Chan
論文名稱:樓版對鋼梁與鋼筋混凝土柱接頭複合行為研究
論文名稱(外文):Composite Behavior of Slab and Steel Beam-to-RC Column
指導教授:鄭錦銅
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:營建工程所
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:190
中文關鍵詞:複合構造梁柱接頭耐震試驗
外文關鍵詞:Composite StructuresBeam-Column ConnectionsSeismic Test
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:313
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:40
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究主要在探討中低樓層建築之樓版對鋼梁與混凝土柱(RCS)梁柱接頭之耐震行為影響,以作為中、美合作計畫之先期研究。此中、美合作計畫將於2002年在國家地震工程研究中心進行實尺寸三層樓三跨度RCS平面構架試驗。本研究針對此三層樓構造,進行子結構反覆循環載重試驗及近斷層位移反覆載重試驗,試驗項目包括一樓梁柱接頭交會區箍筋細節設計與樓版對交會區的影響進行研究,於文獻中選擇梁穿透式RCS接頭型式引進國內,製作與整體構架相同斷面之次結構試體3 座(含樓版之十字型內柱),以實驗驗證其耐震行為,深入探討樓版、接頭細節對接頭耐震行為影響。
試驗結果顯示,樓版對鋼梁提供橫向束制,穩定梁上翼版且延遲其挫屈發生時間,同時也有效預防梁上翼版發生扭轉挫屈。因此,在正彎矩作用下,梁柱結構之抗彎起始勁度與極限強度皆比承受負彎矩作用時高各約67%及27%。由於試驗構架為二維,試驗結果顯示模擬三維接頭試體(含橫梁)與二維試體(未含橫梁)並無明顯差異,試體之主要破壞位置發生於梁塑鉸區,鋼梁翼版與腹版相繼有挫屈之現象,最後鋼梁翼版斷裂破壞。由試體變形分離之結果發現絕大部分結構變形集中於梁上,柱撓曲變形與鋼梁對柱混凝土所產生之承壓變形所造成梁端之轉角皆很小,且維持在彈性範圍內,交會區剪力所造成梁端之轉角稍大,呈現些許非線性行為。觀察試體之遲滯迴圈消能能力,含樓版之試體消能能力比不含樓版之試體稍大,兩者之消能趨勢類似。
This research aims to investigate the composite effect of floor slab on the RCS connections, in an effort to form a basis for the international research corporation between Taiwan and USA in the year of 2002. This corporation proposes to test a three-story three bays RCS in-plane frame at the NCEER, Taiwan. Based on the three-story frame, three “cross shape” composite RCS interior joint subassemblages were constructed, and tested. Parameters such as composite effect due to slab and various details in beam-column connections may be clarified through this study.
Experimental results showed that lateral-torsion buckling at the top beam flange could be suppressed by the support of slab. Stiffness and ultimate strength of specimens with slab were increased respectively 67% and 27% under positive bending when compared to the specimens without slab. Due to two dimensional test frames, experimental results showed that there is not many difference between three-dimensional joint specimens (with transverse beam) and two-dimensional joint specimens (without transverse beam). Primary failure of the specimen occurred at the plastic hinges of steel beam where buckling sequentially took place at the flange and web of steel beam. Deformation separation revealed that major deformations come from beam; while column rotation and joint bearing rotation were small and remained elastic. Although, joint panel shear rotation was also small, but accompanied with some non-linear behavior. It was also found that specimens with floor slab have only marginal effect on the energy dissipation of RCS beam-column connections then the specimens without slab.
中文摘要
英文摘要
致謝
目錄
表目錄
圖目錄
照片目錄
一、緒論
二、文獻回顧
三、梁柱梁交會區及複合樓版之力學行為
四、實尺寸梁柱接頭反覆載重實驗
五、試驗結果之分析模擬
六、結論與建議
參考文獻
附表
附圖
附照片
附錄一
1.計算混凝土柱橫向箍筋鋼筋量
2.交會區箍筋設計
3.鋼梁續接
1.ACI Committee 318 (1995),”Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete ,”American Concrete Institute,Detroit,MI.2.AIJ Compostite Committee (1994). Design Guidelines for Composite RCS Joints, Architectural Institute of Japan ,Tokyo(original in Japanese, English translation by Kuramoto, H., Mehanny, S.S and Deierlein,G.G).3.American Institute of Steel Construction(AISC)“ Manual of Steel Construction Allowable Stress Design ”, Ninth Edition , AISC , Chicago , 1989.4.American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)” Manual of Steel Construction Load and Resistance Factor Design ”, Second Edition , AISC , Chicago , 1994.5.ASCE Structural Division Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete (1994).”Guidelines for Design of Between Steel Beams and Reinforced Concrete Columns”, journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,Vol.120,No.8,pp.2330-2351.6.Baba, N. and Nishimura, Y., “Stress Transfer on Through Beam Type Steel Beam-Reinforced Concrete Column Joints,” Proc. of 6th ASCCS Conference, Los Angles, USA, pp.753-760.7.Bugeja, M.N., Bracci, J.M. amd Moore, W.P., “Seismic Behavior of Composite RCS Frame Systems,” Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering College Station, Texas 77843-3136. Technical Report CBDC-99-01 ,July 12,1999.8.Bugeja, M.N., Bracci, J.M. amd Moore, W.P., “Seismic Behavior of Composite RCS Frame Systems,” Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering College Station, Texas 77843-3136. Technical Report CBDC-99-02 ,August 11,1999.9.Bugeja, M.N., Bracci, J.M. amd Moore, W.P., (2000). “Seismic Behavior of Composite RCS Frame Systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126(4), pp.429-436.10.CA. Kim, K. and Noguchi, H. (1997). “An Analytical Study on the Shear Strength of RCS Joints,” Presentation at 4th JTCC Meeting, Monterey, CA.11.Deierlein, G.G.(1988),”Design of Moment Connections for Composite Frames”, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas12.Deierlein, G.G., Sheikh, T.M., Yura, J.A., and Jirsa, J.O. (1989). “Beam-Column Moment Connections for Composite Frams: Part2,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115(11), pp.2877-2896.13.Deierlein, G.G. and Noguchi, H., (2000), “Research on RC/SRC Column Systems,” 12 WCEE, No.2621.14.Deierlein, G.G. and Mehanny, S.S.F.,”Modeling and Assessment of Seismic Performance of Composite Frames With Reinforced Concrete Columns and Steel Beams .”, National Science Foundation, Grant NO.CMS-9632502 Report NO.135, Jan.2000.15.Esche, C.D., Bracci, J.M. and Moore, W.P. Jr.,”Joint Strength in RCS Frames.”, Center for Building Design and Construction, Technical Report CBDC-99-02 ,August 11,1999.16.Liu, J. and Astaneh-Asl, A., (2000). “Cyclic Behavior of Shear Connections with Floor Slab,” Proc. of 6th ASCCS Conference, Los Angles, USA, pp.745-752.17.Kanno. R. (1993). “Strength Deformation, and Seismic Resistance if Joints between Steel Beams and Reinforced Concrete Columns,” PhD. Dissertation, Connell University, Ithaca, N.Y.18.Kanno. R. and Deilerlein, G.G.,”Seismic Behavior of Composite (RCS) Beam-Column Joint Subassemblies.”,Composite Construction III, 1996.19.Kanno. R. and Deilerlein, G.G.(1998). “Strength Behavior of Composite (RCS) B, and Seismic Resistance if Joints between Steel Beams and Reinforced Concrete Columns,” PhD. Dissertation, Connell University, Ithaca, N.Y.20.Kanno. R. and Deilerlein, G.G.,”Seismic Behavior of Composite (RCS) Beam-Column Joint Subassemblies.”,Composite Construction IV,ASCE,2000.21.Krawinkler, H., Gupta, A., Medina, R. and N. Luco, (2000). “Development of Loading Histories for Testing of Steel Beam-Column Assemblies,” Report for the SAC Steel Project by FEMA.22.Sheikh, T.M., Deierlein, G.G., Yura, J.A., and Jirsa, J.O. (1989). “Beam-Column Moment Connections for Composite Frames: Part1,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115(11), pp.2858-2876.23.Parra-Montesions, G. and Wight, J.K., (2000). “Seismic Response of Exterior RC Column- to-Steel Beam Connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126(10), pp.1113-1121.24.Nishiyama, I., Itadani, H., and Sugihiro, K. (1997). “3D beam-Column Connection (Joint Panel) Tests on RCS,” Presentation at 4th JTCC Meeting, Monterey.25.Yu, Q.S., Noel, S. and Uang, C.M., (2000). “Composite Slab Effects on Strength and Stability of Moment Connections with RBS or Welded Haunch Modification,” Proc. of 6th ASCCS Conference, Los Angles, USA, pp.705-712.26.簡文聖(2000),「考慮合成梁效用之高層構架耐震能力研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩土論文,陳清泉指導,六月。27.孔祥嵐(1998),「具大變形鋼骨梁柱交會區之梁柱接頭行為研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩土論文,蔡克銓指導,六月。28.陳沛清(2002),「鋼梁與RC柱複合構架之構件與接合行為研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩土論文,蔡克銓指導,六月。29.林衍宏(2001),「圓形鋼管混凝土梁柱接頭剪力傳遞行為」,國立高雄第一科技大學營建系碩土班碩土論文,鄭錦銅指導,七月30.于瑞佐(1998),「鋼梁與鋼筋混凝土柱混合型結構梁柱接頭韌性行為研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所愽士論文,蔡克銓指導,十一月。31.陳誠直、林南交(2002),「鋼筋混凝土柱與鋼梁接頭行為」,NCREE-02-018,國家地震工程研究中心研究報告,民國91年。32.內政部營建署(1999),「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」,十一月
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top