參考文獻
一、 中文部分
李佳琪（民86）。教育資料文摘，40，107-127。
李美鈴（民86）。教學取向與閱讀能力對國小學童閱讀後設認知訓練效影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。李素足（民88）。台中縣市國小中高年級學童閱讀動機的探討。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。林建平（民83）。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。林建平（民84）。國小學童的閱讀動機、理解策略與閱讀成就之相關研究。台北市立師院學報，26，267-294。
胡永崇（民84）。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成敗之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。涂志賢（民87）。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解後設認知、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
張春興（民82）。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
張春興（民83）。教育心理學。台北：東華書局。
張新仁（民81）。認知心理學對教學的影響。教育研究，28，13-31。張瑛昭（民83）。自我發問策略對國小學生閱讀理解與自我發問能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
郭靜姿（民81）。閱讀理解訓練方案對於增進高中學生閱讀策略運用與後設認知能力之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。陳李綢（民80）。思考模式、學術經驗與認知策略訓練對大學生後設認知與智力的影響。教育心理學報，24，67-90。陳淑敏 （民83）。Vygotsky的心理發展與教育。國立屏東師院學報，7，119-144。曾陳密桃（民79）。國民中小學生的後設認知及其閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。黃瓊儀（民85）。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。鄭昭明（民82）。認知心理學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
鄭麗玉（民80）。促進後設認知策略的閱讀教學。教師之友，33，14-17。鄭麗玉（民82）。認知心理學－理論與應用。台北：五南。
藍慧君（民80）。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解與理解策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。蘇宜芬（民80）。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀解與後設認知能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。二、 英文部份
Alexander, J. E., ＆ Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting
classroom reading problems. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Armbruster, B. B. (1986). Schema theory and the design of content-area
textbook. Educational Psychologist, 21, 253-267.
Baker, L., ＆ Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills of reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Beger, R. S., & Reid, D. K. (1989). Differences that make a difference:
Comparisons of metacomponetial functioning and knowledge base among
groups of high and low IQ learning disabled, mildly mentally retarded,
and normally achieving adults. Jouranal of Learning Disabilities, 22,
422-429.
Borkowski, J. G., & Kirtz, B. E. (1987). Metacognition and executive control: In J. G. Borkowski & J. D. Day (Eds.), Cognition in Special Children: Comparative Approaches to Retardation, Learning Disabilities, and Gifted (pp. 123-152). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literary , writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 253-257.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A., ＆ Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Guide , cooperative learning and
individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing,
learning, and instruction (pp. 393-452). NJ: Lawence Erlbaum.
Cross, D. R., & Paris S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of
children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (2), 131-142.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Instrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum.
Dermody, M. (1988). Metacognitive strategies for development of reading
comprehension for younger children. ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED292070.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of
cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacogniton, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frances, S., & Eckart, J. A. (1992). The effects of reciprocal teaching on
comprehension. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED350572.
Gagn’e , E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring of passage in consistence among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the ‘Piecemeal Processing’ explanation. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 159-162.
Garner, R. (1988). Metacogniton and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 631-659.
Heliman, A., Blair, T., & Ruply, W. (1990). Principles and Practices of Teaching Reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading comprehension performance in poor comprehenders. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 469-484.
Miller, C. D., Miller, L. F., ＆ Rosen, L. A. (1988). Modified reciprocal teaching in a regular classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 183-186.
Oldfather, P. (1992). Sharing the ownership of knowing: A contructivist concept of motivation for learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 352610.
Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Collaboration for Collaborative Learning of Text Comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285123.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-foster and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The Benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister. C. E. (1993). Reciporcal teaching: A review of 19 experimental studies. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356456.
Rosenshing, B., & Meister. C. E. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of research. Review of Education Reasearch, 64(4), 479-530.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance: VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. D. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediation deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225-235.
Singer, J. B., & Flavell, J. H. (1981). Development of knowledge about communication : Children’s evaluations of explicitly ambiguous messages. Child Development, 52, 1211-1215.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
Stewart, O., & Tei, E. (1982). Some implications of metacognition for reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 27, 36-43.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30-43.
Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452-477.
Williamon, R. A. (1989). The effect of reciprocal teaching on student performance gains in third grade basel reading instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas A & M University.
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1992). Effects of passage type on comprehension monitoring and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 373-391.