跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.235.140.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/08/13 06:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳佳斌
研究生(外文):Chia-Ping Chen
論文名稱:董事會之政治角色-以100家上市公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The political directors in board —The evidence of 100 firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange
指導教授:馬黛馬黛引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tai Ma
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:財務管理學系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:90
中文關鍵詞:董事會規模股權結構績效獨立性政治董事
外文關鍵詞:BoardPoliticsOwnership structurePerformanceBoard sizeIndependence
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:432
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究認為政治在董事會中的運作是影響公司價值的關鍵,因此本文主要研究目的在於觀察董事會中具有政治影響力的董事如何影響公司績效,本文有別於先前對董事會文獻的地方,在於將政治議題加入董事會的效率之中;此外本研究亦特別使用了三階段最小平方法(Three-stage Least Square),針對政治與董事會獨立性(外部董事佔董事會的比例)和績效之間作了因果的分析,並和一般加權平均最小平方法(Weighted Least Square)做比較。觀察的樣本為各產業上市公司100家,1999年為基準,以前後各一年的EPS、ROA、ROE和Tobin 為績效變數進行實證。發現公司規模愈大(政治對公司重要性越高),則有政治董事的人數會增加;且公司政治董事人數愈多,則公司績效愈差。
In this study, we examine the impact of political factors in corporate governance on the performance of firm. The major difference between this study and other corporate governance studies is use of three stage least square method, which can estimate the cause and effect between endogenous variable. Our sample consists of 100 firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange. We find that the political directors harm the performance of firm.
第一章 緒論 ------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機與目的-------------------------------------1
第二節 研究流程與研究限制-------------------------------4
第二章 文獻回顧-------------------------------------------6
第一節 與董事會組成相關之文獻探討-------------------6
第二節 與股權結構相關之文獻探討---------------------10
第三節 與董事會規模相關之文獻探討------------------15
第四節與董事會政治議題相關之文獻探討------------17
第五節總結---------------------------------------------------18

第三章 研究方法-------------------------------------------20
第一節 研究假說---------------------------------------------20
第二節 資料與樣本------------------------------------------24第三節 實證方法---------------------------------------------38
第四章 實證結果-------------------------------------------40
第一節 迴歸結果分析----------------------------------------40
第二節 綜合分析----------------------------------------------72
第五章 結論與建議----------------------------------------79
第一節 研究結論---------------------------------------------79
第二節 後續研究建議---------------------------------------80
參考文獻-------------------------------------------------------81
一、中文部分
1. 張明峰,1991,「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
2. 黃鈺光,1993,「我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究」,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文
3. 邱慧吟,1994,「我國上市公司董事會特性與董事非常規市場行為之研究」,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文
4. 吳昆皇,1995,「上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
5. 孫秀蘭,1996,「董事會制度與經營績效之研究」,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
6. 張旭玲,1998,「我國股票上市公司股權結構暨經營績效之研究 “, 國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文」
7. 陳正澄,1998,「計量經濟學」
8. 江雅雲,1999,「我國上市公司董監事改選機制與其經營績效之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究碩士論文
9. 中華徵信所,1999,「台灣集團企業研究」
二、英文部分
1. Agrawal, Anup and Charles R. Knoeber,, 1996, “ Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between managers and shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, pp.377-397
2. Agrawal, Anup and Charles R. Knoeber,, 1999, “ Outside Directors, Politics, and Firm Performance “, Social Science Research Network Electronic Library
3. Bacon, J.,1973, “ Corporate Directorship Practices: Membership and Committees of the Board ”, New York: The Conference Board and American Society of Corporate Secretaries
4. Barber, Brad M. and John D. Lyon, 1996, “ Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics “, Journal of Financial Economics 41, pp.359-399
5. Barber, Brad M. and John D. Lyon, 1997, “ Detecting Long-run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics “, Journal of Financial Economics 43, pp.341-372
6. Baysinger, Barry and Henry Butler, 1985, “ Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition “, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1, pp.101-124
7. Baysinger, B. D., and Hoskisson, R. E.,1990, “ The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: effects on corporate strategy ”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, pp.72-87
8. Bhagat, S., and Black, B., 1997, “ Do Independent Directors Matter ? ”, Working Paper, University of Colorado, Boulder
9. Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black, 2000, “ Board Independence and Long Term Firm Performance “, Social Science Research Network Electronic Library
10. Byrd, John W. and Kent A. Hickman, 1992, “ Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? “, Journal of Financial Economics 32, pp.195-221
11. Connors, N., 1989, “ Outside Board Members:A Breath of Fresh Air ”, CFO: The Magazine for Chief Financial Officers, Vol. 5, pp.48-52
12. Denis, David J. and Atulya Sarin, 1999, “ Ownership and Board Structures in Publicly Traded Corporations “, Journal of Financial Economics 52, pp.187-223
13. Eisenberg, M. A.,1976, The Structure of the Corporation- A Legal Analysis, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company
14. Fama, E.F.,1980, “ Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm ”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, pp.288-307
15. Grinblatt, M. and C. Y. Hwang, 1989, “ Signaling and The Pricing of New Issues “, Journal of Finance, Vol.44, pp.393-420
16. Hermalin, Benjamin E. and Michael S. Weisbach, 1991, “ The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance “, Financial Management 21(4), PP.101-112
17. Hermalin, Benjamin E. and Michael S. Weisbach, 1988, “ The Determinants of Board Composition “, Rand Journal of Economics 19, PP.589-606
18. Hughes, P. J., 1988, “ Risk Sharing and Valuation under Moral Hazard, In: Feltham, G.A. and A.M. Amershi and W. T. Ziemba, eds. “, Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA: pp.247-267
19. Holthausen, Robert W. and David F. Larcker, 1993b, “ Organizational Structure and Financial Performance “, Unpublished manuscript (Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA)
20. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling, 1976, “ The Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure “, Journal of Financial Economics 3, pp.5-60
21. Jensen, M. C., and Ruback, R. S., 1983, “ The Market for Corporate Control: the scientific evidence ”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp.5-50
22. Jensen, M. C., 1993, “ The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems ”, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.831-880
23. Kesner, I.F., 1987, “ Directors Stock Ownership and Organization Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies ”, Journal of Management, Vol.13 ,pp.499-507
24. Klein, April, 1998, “ Firm Performance and board committee structure “, Journal of Law and Economics 41, pp.275-303
25. Kosnik, R.D.,1987, “ Greenmail:A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance ”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.32, pp.163-185
26. Kothari, S. P. and Jerold Warner, 1997, “ Measuring Long-horizon security price performance “, Journal of Financial Economics 43, pp.301-339
27. Leland, H. E. and D. Pyle, 1977, “ Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation “, Journal of Finance, Vol.32, pp.371-387
28. Lipton, M., and Lorsch, J. W., 1992, “ A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance ”, Business Lawyer, Vol.48, No.1, pp.59-77
29. MacAvoy, Paul W., S. Cantor, J. Dana and S. Peck, 1983, ALI proposals for increased control of the corporation by the board of directors: An economic analysis. In statement of the Business Roundtable on the American Law Institute’s Proposed “ Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure: Restatement and Recommendations, exhibit C-1
30. McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes, 1990, “ Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value “, Journal of Financial Economics 27, pp.595-612
31. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W.,1988, “ Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis ”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.293-316
32. Pound, John,1988 “ Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight “, Journal of Financial Economics 20, pp.237-265
33. Rosenstein, Stuart and Jeffrey G. Wyatt, 1990, “ Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth “, Journal of Financial Economics 26, pp.175-191
34. Rosenstein, Stuart and Jeffrey G. Wyatt, 1997, “ Inside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth “, Journal of Financial Economics 44, pp.229-250
35. Vance, Stanley C., 1964, “ Board of Directors: Structure and Performance “, Havard Business School Press, Boston, MA
36. Weisbach, Michael S., 1988, “ Outside Directors and CEO Turnover “, Journal of Financial Economics 20, pp.431-460
37. Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, “ Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan “, International Review of Finance, Forthcoming
38. Yermack, David, 1996, “ Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors “, Journal of Financial Economics 40, pp.185-212
39. Yin-Hua Yeh, 2002, “ The Effect of Ownership Structure and Board Composition on Agency Problem Caused by Controlling Shareholder: Electronic and Non-electronic Industry “, Working Paper
40. Zahra, S. A., and Pearce J. A., 1989, “ Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrated Model ”, Journal of Management, Vol.15, pp.291-334
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top