臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的目的在探討排球教練對自由球員相關的認知內容，並比較不同帶隊經歷、男、女球隊教練及不同性別的教練對自由球員的認知是否有顯著差異。本研究以國內大專院校100位排球教練為研究對象，以「排球教練對自由球員認知調查問卷」為研究工具，研究方法採問卷調查法，問卷資料回收以SPSS套裝軟體8.0版作描述性統計及卡方檢定，所得結論如下：一、排球教練對自由球員防守的認知，在對隊攻擊時以後排中為最適合的防守位置主張者佔62%最高。在己隊攻擊時，以認為留在後排防守最適合者比率最高佔57%，並以防守對方直接扣擊球的主張最高有75%。有74%的教練認為自由球員防守能力應是該隊最好的，且有94%的教練認為可提昇球隊的防守能力。二、在接發球時，有62%的教練認為自由球員應站後排中擔任接發球，為最大多數，有81%認為接發球能力應是該隊最好的，88%教練認為應擔任主要接發球員，有94%認為可提昇接發球到位率。三、對於自由球員的替換，主張視情況上場的教練最多佔53%。四、教練對於自由球員運用最主要的目的，以替換防守不佳的球員為訴求者最多佔68%，有94%認為應設置自由球員，認為自由球員可提振球隊士氣的教練有93%。五、排球教練認為自由球員應具備的生理素質以反應、敏捷性及協調性為主，心理特質則以自信心及判斷力為主要。六、不同帶隊經歷的教練，只有在自由球員於對隊攻擊時最適合扮演的防守接球的認知有顯著的差異（p＜.05），其他均無顯著的差異（p＞.05）。七、男、女球隊的教練在有關自由球員相關的認知，均無顯著差異（p＞.05）。八、不同性別的教練對於自由球員有關的認知，在自由球員與己隊其他球員防守能力相比較，自由球員於己隊攻擊時最適合扮演何種防守接球、自由球員與己隊其他球員接發球能力相比較及對於自由球員的相關規定等相關認知有顯著差異（p＜.05），其他則無顯著差異（p＞.05）。

The purposes of this study were to investigate the cognition of volleyball coaches toward libero. The cognition of coaches of different teams (male/female), teaching experiences and different sexes was also compared in this research in order to see whether there were obvious differences between them. One hundred volleyball coaches from local colleges were tested by using the questionnaire of cognition of coaches toward libero. And the data were then collected and analysised by using the software pack SPSS ver.8.0. A descriptive statistic conclusion and chi-square was then made. The following conclusions were made: (1) About 62% of the coaches think that it’s the most suitable for the libero to defend in the middle or at the back of their own court when the opponent team attack. When it’s the turn of one’s own side to attack, 57% of the coaches think that the libero should stay at the back row of one’s own court to be ready to defend or go forward to help to defend the opponents’ attacks. About 75% of them suggested that the libero should defend directly the opponents’ attacks. There were 74% of the coaches think that the libero should be the best defensive player among the members of the team, and 94% of them think that it can raise the team’s defending ability. (2) There were 62% of the coaches think that the libero should stand in the middle row of one’s own court in order to work best in serve receiving. There were 81% of the coaches think that the libero should have the best ability to defend a serve from the opponent, and 88% of the coaches think that the libero should play the main role in receiving a serve. There were 94% think it can raise the ability at that. (3) As to the replacement of the libero, 53% of the coaches think that whether to replace the libero was needed depends on the current situation. (4) There were 68% of the coaches think that the main reason of having a libero was to substitute the players whose defending skill was not good. There were 94% of the coaches think that a libero is necessary, and 93% of the coaches think that a libero can increase the team’s confidence and higher spirits. (5) Most of the volleyball coaches think that a libero should have good physical properties: fast reaction, good agility and good coordination. For mental properties, confidence and good judgement were necessary for a libero. (6) Coaches with different teaching experiences were significant differences only in the cognition of the best defending position of a libero when the opponent team attacks (p<.05). There were no significant differences on other items(p>.05). (7) There were no significant differences in the cognition of coaches of teams of different sexes about the libero(p>.05). (8) Cognition of coaches of different sexes was significant differences in the following aspects: the cognition about how the defending skill of libero differs from that of other members of the team, the cognition about the best defending position of a libero when one’s own side attacks, the cognition about how the serve receiving skill of libero differs from that of other players of the team and the cognition of the rules about libero(p<.05). There were no significant differences in other aspects(p>.05).

目 錄
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………Ι
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………Ⅲ
致謝詞 …………………………………………………………Ⅳ
目 錄 …………………………………………………………Ⅴ
表目錄 …………………………………………………………Ⅶ
圖目錄 …………………………………………………………Ⅸ
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景……………………………………………1
第二節 研究動機……………………………………………4
第三節 研究目的……………………………………………5
第四節 研究問題……………………………………………6
第五節 研究假設……………………………………………6
第六節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………7
第七節 名詞解釋……………………………………………7
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 自由球員的緣起……………………………………8
第二節 學者有關對自由球員認知的論點…………………9
第三節 有關排球自由球員功能的研究……………………13
第四節 自由球員實際運用情形……………………………15
第三章 研究方法與步驟
第一節 研究對象與施測……………………………………17
第二節 研究工具……………………………………………17
第三節 研究步驟與流程……………………………………18
第四節 資料處理……………………………………………20
第四章 結果與討論
第一節 排球教練對自由球員的認知………………………21
第二節 不同背景排球教練對自由球員認知的關聯…….32
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論…………………………………………………47
第二節 建議……………………………………………….48
參考文獻……………………………………………………….49
附　 錄……………………………………………………….51

王龍意（民84）。排球規則演變與發展對攻防策略影響之研究。大專排球
研究論集，2，13-30。
安琪（2000）。論自由球員在排球比賽中的應用。中國體育科技36 （3），24-26。
李美娜、孫健、何清、宋信勇、王娟（2000）。對排球後排自由防守隊員相關問題的研究。山東體育學院學報，16（45），67-69。
邱秀霞（民90）。媒體轉播與排球比賽的關係之初探。大專排球研究論集，
7，161-170。
林竹茂（民88）。當今排球技戰術主要特徵與展望研析。大專排球研究論
集，5，1-28。
林清山（民81）。心理與教育統計學。臺北市：東華書局。
林獻龍（民89）。邁向二十一世紀排球規則修訂發展方向之探討。大專體
育，47，88-95。
祝嘉銘（1999）。每球得分制對排球的影響。中國排球，7，18-20。
陳進發（民88）。排球自由防守球員之相關研究。興大體育，4，131-135。
陳儷勻（民87）。對新訂排球規則「自由球員」與「彩色球」之我見。中
華體育，47，21-26。
莊清泉（民88）。1999年增修訂排球規則探析。大專排球研究論集，5，
143-157。
張軾（民85）。自由防守球員取得攻守平衡。中華排球，71，103-104。
褚斌、陳尚忍、鐘衛紅（2001）。影響甲A男排自由人防守能力因素的研究。福建師範大學學報，17（3），113-116。
褚斌、鐘衛紅（2001）。對我國男排甲A聯賽自由人現況的研究。中國體育科技，37，86-87。
鄭世賢（民91）。排球自由球員在比賽時的運用及訓練方針。大專體育，58，19-24。
劉麥如（2000）。淺談排球比賽中的自由防守球員。湖北體育科技，1，29-31。
潘寶石、張榮祥（民89）。排球新修（增）規則對排球運動發展的影響探
討。大專排球研究論集，6，27-38。
鍾秉樞（1997）。排球為何減壓。中國排球，3，47。
鍾秉樞、董天姝、張然、闕永伍、辛沂、李耀先、安琪（2000）。實行新規則後排球比賽規律初探。體育科學，20（2），34-38。