臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究之目的為E-Car車用電腦系統之功能需求調查與評估及車用電腦操控按鈕設計與評估，研究主要是以滿足駕駛者對資訊的需求、改善駕駛環境且維護道路安全為目標，第一階段功能需求調查與評估之研究採用問卷方式，蒐集使用者對於車用電腦之功能需求，進而分析與使用者使用車用電腦系統時所著重的部分，所得之統計資料導入第二階段系統操控按鈕設計；第二階段車用電腦系統操控評估採用模擬駕駛車輛並操作系統的實驗方式，多元化蒐集、分析駕駛績效與反應資料，分析實驗的結果以配合發展出具體的車用電腦介面設計模型與操控模組。
問卷調查抽樣達可推論代表台灣地區實際母體所需之樣本數，所得結果非但得到了一般駕駛者對於車用電腦的功能需求，可用於設計更為便利、有效率之操控方式及面板配置外，更可將所得之問卷結果，轉而符合針對各項不同樣本族群之需求，進而設計出配合個人化功能需求、操控方式等功能導向之實體汽車製造業所使用。而實驗研究之結果評估出一套不影響駕駛操作正確、安全性，並可達到操作迅速、績效佳之車用電腦功能切換按鍵介面設計操控模組，提供更安全、便利的車用電腦系統使用。

第一章 前言.
1.1 研究背景
1.2 研究動機
1.3 研究目的
1.4 研究方法及步驟
第二章 文獻探討及研究方法
2.1智慧型e化車輛之系統功能與規格
2.2 相關之人因工程議題
2.2.1 顯示資訊設計
2.2.2 控制盤面設計
2.2.3 認知負荷方面
2.3 操控與顯示的綜合探討
2.4 研究方法
2.4.1 採用之方法及其原因
2.4.2 進行步驟
第三章 功能需求問卷調查
3.1 問卷設計
3.2 抽樣
3.3 調查經過
3.4 問卷結果分析
3.4.1 問卷受試者資料統計
3.4.2 系統需求重要性分析
3.4.3 受試者基本類型之影響
第四章 功能切換控制鈕實驗
4.1 實驗設計
4.2 實驗結果分析
4.2.1 操作面板績效
4.2.2 模擬汽車駕駛績效
第五章 結果分析與討論
5.1 綜合結果分析
5.1.1功能需求問卷調查結果分析
5.1.2功能切換控制鈕實驗結果分析
5.2 討論
5.3限制與缺失檢討
第六章 結論與後續研究方向
參考文獻
附錄一 功能需求問卷按類型分析
附錄二 功能切換控制鈕實驗標準程序及附件
附錄三 操作面板績效自變項變異數分析
附錄四 駕駛偏移量自變項變異數分析

1.Andreas Spernger, 1993, In-Vehicle displays: Head-Up Display Field Test, Vision in Vehicles Volume: 5, 1993, pp. 301-309.
2.Antin, J. F., Dingus, T. A., Hulse, M. C., & Wierwille, W. W., 1990, An evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of an automobile moving-map navigational display, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 581-594.
3.Aretz, A. J., 1991, The design of electronic map displays, Human Factors, 33(1), 85-101.
4.Brookhuis, K., & de Waard, D., 1994, Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic, Ergonomics, 37(3), 427-434.
5.Campbell, J. L., Carney, C., & Kantowitz, B. H., 1997, Design guidelines for advanced traveler information systems (ATIS): The user requirements analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 2, (pp. 954-958). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6.Dewar, R. E., 1988, In-vehicle information and driver overload, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 9, 557-564.
7.Dingus, T. A., & Hulse, M. C., 1994, Human factors analysis of information format options for advanced traveler information systems. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association 12th Triennial Congress, 4, (pp. 136-139). Toronto, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
8.Dingus, T. A., Hulse, M. C., Mollenhauer, M. A., Fleischman, R. N., Mcgehee, D. V., & Manakkal, N., 1997, Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveler information system, Human Factors, 39(2), 177-199.
9.Drory, A., 1985, Effects of rest and secondary task on simulated truck-driving task performance, Human Factors, 27(2), 201-207.
10.Eloranta, P., 2001, A global transferable multi-modal DRT application. Proceedings of the 8 th World Congress on ITS.
11.Flyte, Margaret Galer, 1998, An investigation into the use of the car as a mobile office, Applied Ergonomics Volume: 29, Issue: 5, October, 1998, pp. 383-388, Eost, Charlotte.
12.Green, P., Hoekstra, E., & Williams, M. (1993, November). Further on-the-road tests of driver interfaces: examination of a route guidance system and a car phone (Report No. UMTRI-93-35). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
13.Hayes, B.C., Kurokawa, K., & Wierwille, W.W. (1989). Age-related decrements in automobile instrument panel task performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, pp. 159-163.
14.Hiroshi Sugiyama, Tamotsu Hasegawa, Miwako Doi, 2001, A Pedestrian Navigation System Based on a Navigation Demand Model. Proceedings of the 8 th World Congress on ITS.
15.Huey, R.W., Harpster, J. L., & Lerner, N.D., 1996, Summary report on in-vehicle crash avoidance warning systems: human factors considerations. NHTSA Report, Washington, DC, DOT HS 808 531.
16.Hughes, P. K., & Cole, B. L., 1986, What attracts attention when driving?, Ergonomics, 29(3), 377-391.
17.Kantowitz, B. H., Hanowski, R. J., & Kantowitz, S. C., 1997, Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings, Human Factors, 39(2), 164-176.
18.Kayton, M., 1992, Standardization of intelligent vehicles and highways, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 205, 193-197.
19.Kinghorn, R. A., Bittner, A. C., & Kantowitz, B. H., 1994, Identification of desired system features in an advanced traveler information system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1067-1071). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20.Mori, H., Takei, H., Makiuchi, T., Miyake, Y., 2001, A human interface to save drivers’ cognitive loads in a flood of information in ITS. Proceedings of the 8 th World Congress on ITS.
21.National Science and Technology Council, 1996, “Human-centered transportation systems” brochure.
22.Ng, L., & Barfield, W., 1993, User information requirements for intelligent vehicle highway systems as a function of driver category. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1077-1081). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23.Ralf Hinz, 2001, A Parking Space at the push of a button. Proceedings of the 8 th World Congress on ITS.
24.Renge, K., 1980, The effects of driving experience on a driver’s visual attention, International Association of Traffic Safety Sciences Research, 4, 95-106.
25.Srinivasan, R., & Jovanis, P. P., 1997, Effects of selected in-vehicle route guidance systems on driver reaction times, Human Factors, 39(2), 200-215.
26.Stokes, A., Wickens, C., & Kite, K., 1990, Display technology: Human factors concepts. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
27.Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., & Wonsiewicz, S. A., 1985, How to tell people where to go: comparing navigational aids, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 549-562.
28.Tijerina, L, Kiger, S., Rockwell, T. H., & Tornow, C. E. (1995a). Final report - Workload assessment of in-cab text message system and cellular phone use by heavy vehicle drivers on the road. (Contract No. DTNH22-91-07003). DOT HS 808 467 (7A), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA.
29.Tijerina, L., Kiger, S. M., Rockwell, T. H., & Tornow, C. (1995b). Workload assessment of in-cab text message system and cellular phone use by heavy vehicle drivers on the road. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, pp. 1117 - 1121.
30.Wickens, C. D., 1992, Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc.
31.Widdel, H., & Post, D. L. (Eds.), 1992, Color in electronic displays (Defense research series: Volume 3). New York: Plenum Press.
32.Wierwille, W., W., & Tijerina, L. (in press). An analysis of driving accident narratives as a means of determining problems caused by in-vehicle visual allocation and visual workload. To appear in A. G. Gale et al. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles V. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33.Wierwille, W. W. & Tijerina, L. (1995). An analysis of driving accident narratives as a means of determining problems caused by in-vehicle visual allocation and visual workload. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Glasgow, Scotland, September, 1993. (Conference proceedings, North Holland-Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, 1996.)
34.電子商務資訊網, 2001, “福特汽車(Ford)打造移動辦公室”4, April, 2001.
http://www.e21times.com/ei/fortune.asp?rtid=3990&sid=38
35.中華智慧型運輸系統協會, 2001, “新一代e化車 台朔一號MAGNUS風光上路”17,July, 2001. http://www.its-taiwan.org.tw/news/industry/No.79/No.79-06.htm
36.設計資訊網, 2001, “汽車也吹ｅ世代風潮(上) (下)” http://www.infodesign.com.tw/chinese/viewDesignNews.asp?mnewsid=431 http://www.infodesign.com.tw/chinese/viewDesignNews.asp?mnewsid=432
37.Vulcan, 2001, “台朔１號實現e-car 的美夢”, 超級酷車網. http://www.supercarweb.com/L1_news/L2_news/L2_news_formosa001.htm
38.夜光新聞, 2001, “福特車e代化 打造移動辦公室”, 6, April, 2001. http://news.muzi.com/ll/fanti/1063439.shtml