跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.204.56.185) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/08/14 01:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳鴻鈞
研究生(外文):Hung-Chun Wu
論文名稱:行動、資源與信念:互動演化觀點
論文名稱(外文):Action, Resource, and Belief:
指導教授:洪世章洪世章引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shih-Chang Hung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:88
中文關鍵詞:互動演化行動資源信念聯電
外文關鍵詞:Interactive evolutionActionResourceBeliefUMC
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:207
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
企業為了能夠永續經營,必須不斷地追求成長。創新發展是企業追求成長的重要策略,如何透過創新發展以提高競爭優勢更是企業所重視的議題。本研究以組織創新發展文獻中之互動演化觀點為基礎,結合資源基礎理論與主流邏輯學說,發展出行動、資源與信念三大構面,以研究新創企業的創新發展過程。在實證分析部分,採取個案研究法,並以聯華電子作為單一分析個案。研究結果指出,聯電由1980年代消費性IC起家,到1980年代末轉換為以記憶體為產品主軸,到1995年以後更從IDM廠逐漸轉型為晶圓代工專業廠商,其創新發展過程也反應出台灣半導體產業發展的軌跡,且在聯電創新發展的四階段過程中,存在行動、資源與信念互動演化的關係。本文最後則是討論理論與管理實務意涵。
Firm survival considerably depends on the capacity of organizations to pursue growth, which in turn is achievable through innovation. The purpose of the paper then is to study how a firm is likely to sustain its growth through a series of innovation centered on the interactive process of action, resource and belief. Theoretically, we use the resource-based view and dominant logic to study the growth. Empirically, we adopt the single case study research while focusing on UMC for illustration. We show that UMC started with consumer ICs in 1980, then moved to memory IC and IDM in the late of 1980s, and recently transformed to become a professional manufacturer of foundry. The evolution of UMC, in general, paces the development of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, and this path can be usefully understood as an interactive process of action, resource and belief. Implications for theory, research and practice are discussed.
摘 要 I
Abstract II
誌謝詞 III
目 錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究流程 4
第三節 論文組織架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 組織創新的資源觀點 6
第二節 組織創新的信念觀點 10
第三節 組織創新的行動觀點 13
第四節 觀念性架構 14
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究策略 15
第二節 個案資料來源 16
第三節 資料分析方式 18
第四節 信度與效度分析 21
第四章 個案分析 23
第一節 聯電創業發展過程四個階段的意涵 23
第二節 聯電創業發展過程行動、資源與信念之互動關係 25
第三節 聯電創業發展過程行動、資源與信念之意涵 26
第五章 結論與建議 33
第一節 研究結論 33
第二節 研究貢獻 35
第三節 管理實務意涵 36
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄一、聯電創業發展過程年表 42
附錄二、聯電創業發展過程敘事體 49
附錄三、聯電重要財務項目資料 63
附錄四、聯電專利資料 64
附錄五、聯電產品結構 66
附錄六、訪談記錄 67
天下編輯,88年,曹興誠:聯電的霸業傳奇,台北市:天下雜誌出版社。
Astley, W. G., and Van de Ven. A. H. 1983. Central perspectives an debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 245-273.
Baldridge, J. V., and Burnham, R. A. 1975. Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 165-176.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
Bates, k. A., and Flynn, J. E. 1995. Innovation history and competitive advantage: A resource-based view analysis of manufacturing technology innovations. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 235-239.
Bettis, R. A., and Prahalad, C. K. 1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6): 485-501.
Bettis, R. A., and Prahalad, C. K. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 5-14.
Campel, A. B. 1993. Applied chaos theory: A paradigm for complexity. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
Combs, J. G., and Ketchen, D. J. 1999. Explaining inter-firm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 867-888.
Daft, R. L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 193-210.
Duncan, R. B. 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 313-327.
Hage, J., and Dewar, R. 1973. Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18: 279-290.
Howell, J. M., and Higgins, C. A. 1990. Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 317-341.
March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Meyer, A. D. 1991. What is strategy’s distinctive competence?. Journal of Management, 17: 821-833.
Michalisin, M. D., Smith, R. D., and Kline, D. M. 1997. In search of strategic assets. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5: 360-387.
Mohr, L. B. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., and Cameron, K. S. 2001. Studying organizational chance and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 697-713.
Pierce, J. L., and Delbecq, A. L. 1977. Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2: 27-37.
Priem, R. L., and Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Journal, 26(1): 22-40.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
Robertson, T. S., and Gatignon, H. 1987. The diffusion of high technology innovations: A marketing perspective in new technology as organizational innovation. 179-196. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Rindova, V. P., and Fombrun, C. J. 1999. Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 691-710.
Rumelt, R. P. 1991. How much does industry matter?. Strategic Management Journal, 12(3): 167-185.
Saren, M. 1987. The role of strategy in technological innovation: A re-assessment in organization analysis and development. Mangham, I. L. (ed.), 125-165. Chichester: Wiley.
Schon, D. A. 1963. Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review, 41: 77-86.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitallism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problem in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32: 590-607.
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., and Poole, M. S. 1989. Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Harper and Row.
Van de Ven, A. H., and Rogers, E. M. 1988. Innovations organizations: Critical perspectives. Communication Research, 15: 632-651.
Van de Ven, A. H., and Garud, R. 1994. The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation in Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. (Baum, J. A.C., and Singh, J. V. ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
Yin, R. A. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., and Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.
Zaltman, G., and Wallendorf, M. 1979. Consumer behavior: Basic findings and management implications. New York: Wiley.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊