參考文獻
一、 中文部份
王進德、蕭大全(民83)：類神經網路與模糊控制理論入門。台北：全華科技圖書公司。
余民寧(民80)：題目反應的介紹─測驗理論的發展驅勢(一)。研習資訊，8(6)，13-17。余民寧(民81a)：題目反應的介紹─測驗理論的發展驅勢(二)。研習資訊，9(1)，5-9。余民寧(民86)：教育測驗與評量─成就測驗與教學評量。台北：心理出版社。
何榮桂(民89)，量身定製的測驗-適性測驗。測驗與輔導雙月刊，157期,頁3288-3293。何榮桂、秦靜儀（民 89），部分給分支電腦化適性測驗系統。國立師範大學資訊教育究所碩士論文林邦傑（民89）：如何設計JAVA程式 。台北：知城數位科技。
林原宏(民88)：模糊潛在知識空間之整合模式與應用。國立政治大學教育究所博士論文。施淑娟(民86)：認知網路評量模式及其實例應用之研究─以「分數的加法」單元為例。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。蔡志煌、孫光天（民89） ：利用類神經網路於題目反應理論參數估計之研究。首屆師範學院研究生學術論文集，81-98。
許擇基、劉長萱(民81)：題目作答理論簡介。台北：中國行為科學出版社。
陳英豪、吳裕益(民75)：新舊測驗之比較及其應用。台南師專學報，19，253-290。
二、 英文部分
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.),Educational measurement (2nd ed.) (pp.508-600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Bourlard, H., & Wellekens, C. J. (1987). Multilayer perceptrons and automatic speech recognition. Paper print at the First Int’l Conference On Neural Network, San Diego, 407-416
Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural Networks and Neural Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gullikson, H. (1987). Theory of mental tests. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Originally published in 1950 by New York: John Wiley & Sons)
Lippmann, R.P. (1987). An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4-23.
Lord, F. M. (1977). Practical applications of item characteristic curve theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 117-138.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Application of Item Response Theory to Practial Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
Haebara,T.（1980）.Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method. Japanese Psychological Research,22,144-149.
Hambelton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Hingham, MA: Kluwer, Nijhoff.
Hambelton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. California, NP:Sage.
Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin
Klein, L. W., & Jarjoura, D. (1985). The importance of content representation for common-item equating with non-random groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 197-206.
Kolen, M. J. (1988). Traditional equating methodology. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7, 29-36
Kolen, M. J.，＆ Brennan L.R.（1995）.Test Equating Methods and Practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201-210.
Weiss, D. J., & Yoes, M. E. (1991). Item response theory. In R. K. Hambleton &
J. N. Zaal(eds.), Advances in education and psychological testing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publish.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.