臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

中文摘要
本研究旨在探討大學生依附風格、愛情關係中之壓力事件困擾與因應策略之關係。本研究的主要目的在瞭解大學生的依附風格、戀愛經驗與愛情關係中之壓力事件來源等現況，並探討依附風格、性別與壓力事件來源在困擾程度與因應策略上的差異情形。以台灣北部地區公私立大學及獨立學院學生共733名為研究對象，其中有325名受試為目前有戀愛對象者，175名受試為曾有過戀愛經驗但目前無戀愛對象者，233名受試為未曾有過戀愛經驗者。本研究採問卷調查法進行資料蒐集，全體受試者均施以「人際依附風格量表」，另外，有過戀愛經驗者（包括目前有戀愛對象者以及曾有過戀愛經驗但目前無戀愛對象者）則自述在愛情關係中令其印象深刻的壓力事件，並完成「事件衝擊量表」與「因應量表」。調查所得的資料分別以卡方考驗、三因子多變項變異數分析等統計方法進行處理；關於受試者自述之壓力事件內容則以編碼分類的方式進行資料分析。茲將本研究的主要發現分述如下：
一、依附風格、戀愛經驗與愛情關係中之壓力事件來源之現況
（一）本研究之全體受試的依附風格分佈狀況為：安全型佔34.9%，焦慮型佔33.3%，拒斥型佔27.4%，恐懼型佔4.4%，以安全型所佔的比例最高。
（二）本研究之全體受試的依附風格與性別之間沒有顯著關係存在，但就目前有戀愛對象以及未曾有過戀愛經驗的受試來說，依附風格與性別之間有顯著關係存在。在目前有戀愛對象的受試中，以安全型的男生與焦慮型的女生所佔的比例最高；在未曾有過戀愛經驗的受試中，安全型依附的男生的比例顯著地低於安全型依附的女生。
（三）大學生的依附風格與戀愛經驗之間沒有顯著關係存在。
（四）大學生在愛情關係中的壓力事件來源有：外在阻隔因素、兩人關係、三角關係與關係失落。
（五）大學生的依附風格與自述的壓力事件來源之間沒有顯著關係存在。
二、不同依附風格的男女大學生在愛情關係中不同壓力事件困擾上之差異情形
（一）不同依附風格的大學生對愛情關係中所發生的壓力事件之困擾有顯著差異存在。焦慮型依附比安全型依附的大學生有較高的「侵入症狀」表現。
（二）不同性別的大學生對愛情關係中所發生的壓力事件之困擾有顯著差異存在。女生比男生有較多的「侵入症狀」表現。
三、不同依附風格的男女大學生在愛情關係中不同壓力事件因應上之差異情形
（一）不同依附風格的大學生在愛情關係中所發生的壓力事件的因應上有顯著差異存在，且依附風格與壓力事件來源在壓力事件的因應上有交互作用效果。不同依附風格的大學生在面對愛情關係中不同的壓力事件時之因應情況如下：
1.安全型依附
(1)傾向於以問題解決的方式處理壓力事件；
(2)傾向於以正面的態度詮釋壓力事件；
(3)在不同的壓力情境下能有彈性的運用不同的因應策略；
(4)能有效的並用問題解決與情緒處理的因應策略。
2.焦慮型依附
(1)傾向於使用逃避的因應策略；
(2)在面對「三角關係」的壓力事件時，比拒斥型依附的大學生出現較多問題解決與尋求支持的因應策略。
3.拒斥型依附
(1)傾向於使用逃避的因應策略；
(2)面對不同的壓力事件，仍呈現一致的遠離、逃避因應策略。
（二）不同性別的大學生對愛情關係中所發生的壓力事件之因應策略有顯著差異存在。男生較女生傾向於使用較多的「使用菸酒藥物」的因應策略；而女生較男生傾向於使用較多的「表達感受並尋求支持」、「接受事實並正向詮釋」與「遠離問題」的因應策略。
最後，研究者依據本研究結果加以討論，並提出具體建議，以應用在兩性關係諮商與教育方面，並做為未來研究之參考。

Attachment Styles, Distress in Love Relationship, and Coping Strategies in College Students
Bi-Hui Huang
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to explore the relationship among adult attachment style, distress in love relationship, and coping strategies in college students. The study was designed to investigate the attachment style, love experience, and stressors in love relationship among college students, and to examine the relationship among the three variables. In addition, the study was designed to probe the effect of attachment style, gender, and stressors in love relationship on the degree of distress and on coping strategies. The sample was composed of 733 undergraduate students in Northern Taiwan. Among all participants, 325 participants were in love relationship, 175 participants had ever been in love relationship, and 233 participants have never been in love relationship. All subjects were asked to complete the “Attachment Style Scale” to assess their attachment styles. Subjects who were in love relationship or had ever been in love relationship were asked to write a narrative account of an impressive stressful experience in love relationship and to complete the “Impact of Event Scale ” and “The COPE Scale”. Chi-square analysis and three-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were performed to analyze the data gathered in the study. Subjects’ narrative accounts of impressive stressful experiences were analyzed by open coding approach. The major findings were as follows:
1. Attachment styles, love experience, and stressors in love relationship
(1)The proportions of the four attachment styles among all participants were as
follows: secure=34.9%, preoccupied=33.3%, dismissing=27.4%, fearful=4.4%.
(2)For all participants, attachment style was not significantly associated with gender. But for the participants who were in love relationship and those who have never been in love relationship, attachment style was significantly associated with gender.
(3)For all participants, attachment style was not significantly associated with love experience.
(4)Stressors in love relationship included “external barriers”, “difficulties between partners”, “a triangular relationship”, and “relationship loss”.
(5)Attachment style was not significantly associated with self-report stressors in love relationship.
2.Differences between male and female college students with different attachment styles regarding the distress from various stressors
(1)Results of the three-way MANOVA and ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of attachment style on the Intrusion subscale. Students with preoccupied attachment reported more intrusive symptoms than those with secure attachment.
(2)Results of the three-way MANOVA and ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of gender on the Intrusion subscale. Women reported more intrusive symptoms than men.
3.Differences between male and female college students with different attachment styles regarding the coping strategies for various stressors.
(1)Results of the three-way MANOVA indicated a significant main effect of attachment styles on coping strategies. In addition, there was an interaction between attachment styles and stressors on coping strategies. Differences shown in college students with different attachment styles regarding the coping strategies were as follows:
A.Secure attachment group
a. Secure attachment individuals tend to use task-oriented coping ;
b.They tend to use the “positive interpretation” coping strategy;
c.They can flexibly use different coping strategies under different stressful circumstances;
d.They can effectively employ the “problem-focused” strategy and “emotion-focused” strategy at the same time.
B.Preoccupied attachment group
a.Preoccupied attachment individuals tend to use the “distancing” coping
strategy;
b.When facing the stress of “a triangular relationship”, they are more likely
to use “problem-solving” and “support-seeking” coping strategies than dismissing attachment group.
C.Dismissing attachment group
a.Dismissing attachment individuals are inclined to use the “distancing”
coping strategy.
b.They tend to adopt the coping strategy of “being distant” or “avoidance” when facing various stressors.
(2)Results of the three-way MANOVA and ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of genders on “alcohol or drug use ”, “expressing emotions and seeking support”, “acceptance and positive interpretation”, “distancing”. Men reported more “alcohol or drug use ” coping strategy than women. Women reported more “expressing emotions and seeking support”, “acceptance and positive interpretation” and “distancing”coping strategies than men.
Based on the results, implications were discussed and suggestions for the counseling as well as future research were presented.

目 錄
中文摘要
英文摘要
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………..1
第二節 研究問題與假設……………………………………….11
第三節 名詞釋義.……………………………………………....12
第四節 研究限制…...…………………………………………..15
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 依附的理論基礎與相關研究…………………………...16
第二節 因應的理論基礎與相關研究…………………………...40
第三節 依附風格與壓力困擾之關係與相關研究……………...50
第四節 依附風格與因應策略之關係與相關研究……………...57
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………...62
第二節 研究對象………………………………………………...66
第三節 研究工具………………………………………………...69
第四節 實施程序………………………………………………...83
第五節 資料分析………………………………………………...86
第四章 研究結果
第一節 依附風格、戀愛經驗與愛情關係中之壓力事件來源之現況分析…………………………………………………...88
第二節 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件困擾上的差異情形………………………………………………...96
第三節 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件因應上的差異情形……………………………………………….100
第五章 討論
第一節 大學生的依附風格、戀愛經驗與愛情關係中的壓力事件之現況…………………………………………………118
第二節 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件困擾上的差異情形……………………………………………….126
第三節 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件因應上的差異情形……………………………………………….131
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論…………………………………………………….146
第二節 研究限制……………………………………………….152
第三節 建議…………………………………………………….154
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………...160
附錄一 「事件衝擊量表」原編者同意修訂函………………..172
附錄二 「人際依附風格量表」原修訂者使用同意書………..173
附錄三 「事件衝擊量表」項目分析結果……………………..174
附錄四 「事件衝擊量表」因素分析結果……………………...175
附錄五 「因應量表」項目分析結果…………………………..176
附錄六 「因應量表」之因素分析結果………………………...180
附錄七 「因應量表」各分量表題項之因素負荷量…………..183
附錄八 預試問卷：「大學生人際依附風格與愛情關係因應策略問卷」………………………………………………….186
附錄九 正式問卷：「大學生人際依附風格與愛情關係因應策略問卷」…………………………………………………191
附表目錄
表2-1-1 Bowlby 對依附與依賴之比較…………………………………...19
表2-1-2 Ainsworth對壓力的陌生情境與家中觀察研究結果摘要表...….21
表2-1-3 成人依附測量工具………..………………………………………28
表3-2-1 預式研究樣本人數分配表………………………………………..67
表3-2-2 正式研究樣本人數分配表（有過戀愛經驗者）………………..67
表3-2-3 正式研究樣本人數分配表（未曾有過戀愛經驗者）…………..67
表3-2-4 正式研究樣本基本資料分配表…………………………………..68
表3-3-1 事件衝擊量表正式量表各分量表題項之因素負荷量…………..76
表3-3-2 因應量表之因素命名與題號……………………………………..81
表3-3-3 因應量表各分量表之信度………………………………………..82
表4-1-1 大學生依附風格與性別之關係的卡方考驗結果摘要表………..91
表4-1-2 大學生依附風格與戀愛經驗之關係的卡方考驗結果摘要表…..92
表4-1-3 有戀愛經驗之大學生依附風格與壓力事件來源之關係的卡方考驗結果摘要表…………………………………………………….95
表4-2-1 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件之事件衝擊量表各分量表的平均數與標準差………………………………...…….98
表4-2-2 不同依附風格的男女大學生對愛情關係中不同壓力事件之困擾
三因子多變量變異數分析摘要表……………………………….99
表4-2-3 男女大學生在事件衝擊量表上的得分………………………….99
表4-3-1 不同依附風格的男女大學生在不同壓力事件之因應量表各分量表的平均數與標準差……………………………………….….103
表4-3-2 不同依附風格的男女大學生對愛情關係中不同壓力事件因應之三因子多變量變異數分析摘要表……………………………...105
表4-3-3 男女大學生在面對不同來源之壓力事件時的因應策略之平均數與標準差………………………………………………………...108
表4-3-4 不同依附風格與不同壓力事件在因應策略上之單純主要效果考驗摘要表………………………………………………………..113
表4-3-5 不同依附風格的大學生在不同壓力事件來源下的因應策略比較摘要表（一）…………………………………………………..116
表4-3-6 不同依附風格的大學生在不同壓力事件來源下的因應策略比較摘要表（二）…………………………………………………..117
附圖目錄
圖2-1-1 內在運作模式的功能…………………………………………..18
圖2-1-2 Bartholomew 與Horowitz 的成人依附四分類模式………....25
圖3-1-1 研究變項間的關係架構圖（全體受試者）…………………...62
圖3-1-2 研究變項間的關係架構圖（有戀愛經驗的受試者）………...64

參考文獻
王慶福（民84）：大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文。
王慶福（民89）：當男孩愛上女孩：人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報，8期，177-201頁。
王慶福、林幸台、張德榮（民86）：人際依附風格、性別角色取向與人際親密能力之評量。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，44卷，63-78頁。
江承曉（民80）：青少年的生活壓力、因應行為與身心健康之研究。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士輪文。
余德慧（民76）：中國人的父母經：黏結與親情。台北：張老師出版社。
余德慧（民82）：中國人的養育觀。台北：張老師出版社。
吳嘉瑜（民86）：衝突原因、處理方式對愛情關係的影響─以焦慮依附型的大學生為例。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
林佳玲（民89）：夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
邱碧慧（民83）：不同依附類型的成人在人際互動中的歸因差異。私立中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
洪櫻瑜（民87）：內在運作模式對日常互動的影響。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
黃于娟（民83）：性別、依附風格與自我坦露、幽默、撒嬌之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
黃玲喬（民87）：不同依附風格夫妻之關係期望、婚姻溝通與婚姻調適之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
楊淑萍（民84）：青少年依附關係、自我尊重與生涯發展之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
廖宏啟（民88）：大學生人際行為之測量極其相關變項之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
鄭照順（民86）：高壓力青少年所知覺的家庭、社會支持及其因應效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
蔣桂嫚（民82）：高中生生活壓力、因應方式與身心健康之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蘇建文（民81）：家庭環境與嬰兒認知與動作能力發展的關係。教育心理學報，21期，13-29頁。
Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M., Water, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New York: Basic Books.
Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. T. (1987). Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53, 337-348.
Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modelling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63, 989-1003.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of four-category model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Baum, A., Fleming, R. E., & Singer, J. E. (1983). Coping with technological disaster. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 117-138.
Bender, J. F. (1999). The influence of attachment style on coping strategies. Long Island University, The Brooklyn Center. DAO No. AAT9934164.
Billing, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the impact of stressful life events. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 4, 139-157.
Birnbaum, G. E., Orr, I., Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1997). When marriage breaks up－Does attachment style contribute to coping and mental health? Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 14, 643-654.
Bolger, N. (1990). Coping as a personality process: A prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, 525-537.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Depression and sadness. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
Bowman, M. L. (1990). Coping efforts and marital satisfaction: Measuring marital coping and its correlates. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(2), 463-474.
Brennan, K., Shaver, P., & Tobey, A. (1991). Attachment styles, gender and parental problem drinking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 451-456.
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775.
Campos, J. J., Barrett, K., Lamb, M. E., Goldsmith, H., & Stenberg, C. R. (1983). Socioemotional development. In M.M. Haith & J.J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.2. Infancy and developmental psychobiology (pp. 783-915). New York: Wiley.
Carnelley, K. B., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Jaffe, K. (1994). Depression, working models of others, and relationship functioning. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66, 127-140.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1983). A control-theory model of normal behavior, and implications for problem in self-management. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 127-194). New York: Academic Press.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1985). Self-consciousness, expectancies, and the coping process. In T. Field, P. M. McCabe, & N. Schneiderman (Eds.), Stress and Coping (pp.305-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(2), 267-283.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Pozo, C. (1992). Conceptualizing the process of coping with health problems. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping, and health (pp. 167-199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cassidy, J. (1988). Child^mother attachment and the self in six-year-olds. Child Development, 59(1), 121-134.
Chickering, A. W. (1990). Education and identity. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Cohen, Hanna. (1998). Adult attachment styles, romantic love, and the maintenance of love relationships. Indiana University. DAO No. AAT 95013111.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult Attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58, 644-663.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood, Vol.5, Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London and Bristol, Pennsylvania.
Coyne, J. C., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Depression and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90(5), 439-447.
Delagarze, S. M. (2000). The influence of attachment style on coping and adaption in adults on hemodialysis. Texs A&M University. DAO No. AAT 9980140.
Egeland, B., Kalkoske, M., Gottesman, N., & Erickson, M. F. (1990). Preschool behavior problems: Stability and factors accounting for change. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 31 (6), 891-909.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58, 844-854.
Erickson, M. F., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (1985). The relationship between quality of attachment and behavior problems in preschool in a high risk sample. In I. Brethorton & E. Water (Eds), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monogrsphs of the Society of Research in Child development, 50 (1-2, Serial No.209), 147-186.
Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment styles as a predictor of romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58, 281-291.
Feeney, J., & Noller, P. (1996). Adult attachment. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
Fine, M. A., & Sacher, J. A. (1997). Predictors of distress following relationship termination among dating couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(4), 381-388.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992-1003.
Frazier, P. A.,& Cook, S. W. (1993). Correlates of distress following heterosexual relationship dissolution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(1), 55-67.
Gal, R., & Lazarus, R. (1975). The roll of activity in anticipation and confronting stressful situations. Journal of Human Stress, 1, 4-20.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gregory, R. P., Irwin, G. S., & Barbara, R. S. (1996). Coping and social support. In Z. Moshe & S. E. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of Coping (pp.434-451). New York: Wiley.
Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994a). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430-445.
Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994b). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment process in adulthood (pp. 17-50). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Groer, M. W., & Thomas, S. P., & Shoffner, D. (1992). Adolescent stress and coping: A longitudinal study. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 209-217.
Hamilton, C. E. (1994). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. University of California, Los Angeles. DAO No. AAT9418905.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationship. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Long-distance romantic relationships: Sex differences in adjustment and breakup. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 254-265.
Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1) , 147-168.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The Ecology of Stress. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1976). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Horowitz, M. J. (1982). Psychological processes induced by illness, injury, and loss. In T. Millon, C. Green, & R. Meagher (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology (pp. 53-68). New York: Plenum Press.
Horowitz, M. J., Weiss, D. S., & Kaltreider, N. (1984). Reaction to the death of a parent: Results from patients and field subjects. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 172, 383-392.
Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of event scale: A study of subjective distress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209-218.
Ivacevich, J. M. & Matteson, M. T. (1980). Stress and Work: a Managerial Perspective. New York: Scott, Foresman.
Johnson, S. E. (2001). Gender, attachment, and coping styles as correlates of distress following a relationship breakup among college students. The Florida State University. DAO No. AAT 3016047.
Kaczmarek, M. G., & Backlund, B. A. (1991). Disenfranchised grief: The loss of an adolescent romantic relationship. Adolescence, 26(102), 253-259.
Kemp M. A., & Neimeyer G. J. (1999). Interpersonal attachment: Experiencing, and coping with stress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 388-394.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66, 502-512.
Kobak, R., & Sceery, A., (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representation of self and others. Child Development 59, 135-146.
Kobak, R., Sudler, N., & Gamble, W. (1991). Attachment and depressive symptoms during adolescence: A developmental pathways analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 461-474.
Kobasa, S. C. (1982). Commitment and coping in stress resistence among lawyers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42, 707-717.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. London: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 237-247.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984a). Coping and adaption. In W. D. Gentry (Ed.), The handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 282-325). New York : Guilford.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984b). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and Coviroment. In L. A.. Pervin & M. Lewis (Eds.). Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum.
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for research in Child Development, 50, 66-104.
Manfred, D., Alexandra B. E., & Linda S. B. (1998). Adult attachment Style:Their Relations to Family Context and Personality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 1656-1669.
Martin, T. N., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (1983). Work and nonwork influence on health: a research agenda using inability to leave as a critical variable. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 650-655.
Matas, L., Arend, R. A., Sroufe, L. A. (1978). Continuity of adaptation in the second year: The relationship between quality of attachment and later competence. Child Development, 49(3), 547-556.
Mattlin,J. A., Wethington, E., & Kessler, C. (1990). Situational determinants of coping and coping effectiveness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 103-122.
Mikulincer, M., & Erev, I. (1991). Attachment style and the structure of romantic love. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 273-291.
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationship. New York: Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmatz, R. (1990). Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect regulation. Journal of personality and social psychology,58, 273-280.
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Weller, A. (1993). Attachment styles, coping strstegies, and posttraumatic psychological distress: The Impact of Gulf War in Israel. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64, 817-826.
Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61, 321-331.
Mikulincer, M., & Orbach, I. (1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of personality and social psychology, 68, 917-925.
Miller, B.C. (1976). A multivariables developmental model of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the family, 38, 643-657.
Monique, B. (1996). Coping with stress in childhood and adolescence. In Z. Moshe & S. E. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of Coping (pp.452-484). New York: Wiley.
Moshe, Z., & Donald, S., (1998). Adaptive and maladaptive coping. In Z. Moshe & S. E. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of Coping (pp.505-531). New York: Wiley.
Mullins, L. L., Olson, R. A., Reyes, S., Bernardy, N., Huszti, H. C., & Volk, R. J. (1991). Risk and resistance factors in the adaptation of mothers of children with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16, 701-715.
Noller, P., Feeney, J. A., Bonnell, D. C., & Victor J. (1994). A longitudinal study of conflict in early marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(2), 233-252.
Pearlin, L. I. (1991). The study of coping: An overview of problems and direction. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The Social Context of Coping (pp.261-276). New York: Plenum.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21.
Peterson, C., Rosenbaum, A. C., & Conn, M. K. (1985). Depressive mood reactions to breaking up: Testing the learned helplessness model of depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3(2), 161-169.
Pierce, G. R., Sarason, B. R., & Sarason, I. G. (1990). Integrating social support perspectives: Working models, personal relationships, and situational factors. In S. Duck with R. C. Silver, (Eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 173-189). London: Sage.
Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate stranger: Men and Women together. New York: Harper & Row.
Sarason, B. R., Pierce, G. R., Shearin, E. N., Sarason, I. G., Waltz, J. A., & Poppe, L. (1991). Perceived social and working models of self and actual others. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60, 273-287.
Scheier, M. F., Weintraub, J, K., & Carver, C. S. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of personality and social psychology,51, 1257-1264.
Seiffge-Krenke, I. (1990). Developmental processes in self-concept and coping behaviour. In H. Bosma & S. Jackson (Eds.), Coping and self-concept in adolescence (pp. 51-68). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Seiffge-Krenke, I. (1993). Coping behavior in normal and clinical samples: More similarities than differences? Journal of Adolescence, 16, 285-303.
Seldman, R. S. (1993). Coping with adult romantic relationship loss: An attachment-theoretical perspective. University of Florida. DAO No. AAT 9432023.
Selye, H. (1956). The Stress of Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1988). A biased overview of the study of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 473-501.
Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationship (Vol.4, pp.29-70). London: Kingsley
Sher, K. J., Wood, P. K., & Gotham, H. J. (1996). The course of psychological distress in college: A prospective high-risk study. Journal of College Student Development, 37(1), 42-51.
Shi, L. (1999). Conflict resolution in romantic relationships: An examination of adult attachment and early attachment experience. Texas Tech University. DAO No. AAT 9925666.
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, 971-980.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (1994). Stress and secure base relationships in adulthood. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships. (Vol. 5, pp. 181-204). Bristol, PA, US: Jessica Kingsley.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (Eds). (1998). Attachment theory and close relationship. New York: Guilford Press.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of personality and social psychology,62, 434-446.
Speer, R. L. (1998). Coping with romantic relationship dissolution. York University. DAO No. AAT MQ27380.
Stein, H., Jacobs, N. J., Ferguson, K. S., Allen, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (1998). What do adult attachment scales measure? Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,62 (1), 33-81.
Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4, 249-288.
Tzeng, Oliver C. S. (1993). Measurement of love and intimate relations: Theories, scales, and applications for love development, maintenance, and dissolution. Westport: Greenwood.
Wanger, P. E., & Tangney, J. P. (1991). Affective style, aspects of the self, and psychological symptoms. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Water, E., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., Merrick, S., & Albersheim, L. (1995). From the Strange Situation to the Adult Attachment Interview A 20-year longitudinal study of attachment security in infancy and early adulthood. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York: Basic BooKs.
West, M. L., & Sheldon-Keller, A. E. (1994). Patterns of relating: An adult attachment perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Zeidner, M., & Endler, N. S. (Eds). (1996). Handbook of coping. New York Wiley.
Zilberg, N. J., & Weiss, D. S., & Horowitz, M. J. (1982). Impact of Event Scale: A cross-validation study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 407-414.