臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的主要目的是為了修訂現有中國人幸福感量表，發展適合我國國中學生之幸福感量表，藉以做為未來相關課程、活動等發展之評估相關依據工具及指標，同時瞭解對於國中生之「幸福感」其本質、相關特有影響因素並針對現有國中生幸福感之程度進行了解。本研究的主要工具乃參考中國人幸福感量表（Chinese Happiness Inventory；CHI），進行修改成為適用於研究對象國中生之版本，並參酌其前身牛津幸福感量表（Oxford Happiness Inventory；OHI）及相關研究文獻，增加有關國中生幸福感之指標因素，在參考國內外有關幸福感之相關研究，遂而發展成本研究之研究架構。
根據本研究之抽樣母群，本研究母群之國中生為台北市內各公私立國民中學或完全中學（同時有國中一年級及三年級）一及三年級學生，而研究之樣本則為本研究分層隨機抽樣之三所國民中學或完全中學（同時有國中一年級及三年級）之一年級及三年級學生，分別為A、B、C三校，所提供的班級數分別為8班、8班及6班，國一及國三各佔一半，總共施測22個班級，計有效問卷607份。
本研究的主要發現如下：
1.本研究之研究工具，在經內容建構效度及專家效度的雙重考驗與信度的檢定，並與之前研究比較，證實為一個穩定的工具，並在國中生對象上的測量仍維持「幸福感」之原始構念。
2.本研究中發現，社會人口學之變項及相關客觀環境，對於幸福感預測力低，無法有效預測幸福感的高低。
3.本研究發現，有關於生活中的主觀評估及滿意程度，對於幸福感呈現高預測力，能有效預測幸福感的高低。
4.本研究發現，來自好朋友的支持及關係的聯繫，對於幸福感呈現高預測力，能有效預測幸福感的高低。
5.本研究發現，對於自己的喜愛及接受程度，對於幸福感呈現高預測力，能有效預測幸福感的高低。
6.本研究之質性資料與量性資料結果一致，確認上述變項對於幸福感的影響力。
7.國中生之幸福感相關模式與成人在內涵上因環境時空不同有差異，但在對幸福感的認知上，並無構念上的違背。
根據研究發現，提出數項建議，提供國內相關幸福感研究及有關單位之參考，並提供未來研究之相關建議。

The main purpose of this study is revising the Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI) and developing an adequate happiness inventory for the junior high school students in Taiwan. In addition to use the inventory as an indicator or an instrument for further curricular developing or activity design. In conjunction, this study also explores the essence as well as the factors of happiness of the research subjects. The main instrument used in this study was developed after revising and modifying the Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI). The framework of this study emerged from research worldwide as well as in Taiwan. The Oxford Happiness Inventory (OHI) was the primary source used for the development of the Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI), therefore it was also an important reference aimed at the developing of this study’s instrument.
All of the students at the junior high schools and the junior departments ( the total high schools in Taipei City enrolled in the 2001 academic year) were included in the population. The Stratified random sampling method was used to select the sample. In total, 3 schools, 22 classes with 607 effective questionnaires were collected and used.
The main results of this study are as follows:
1.After proceeding dual validity test for the content constructing and experts’ perspectives, the instrument of this study shows a stable trait. Even though the subjects had been converted to junior high school students.
2.Demographic variables and other objective outcomes hold no prediction of the happiness of junior high school students.
3.Subjective evaluations toward life and satisfaction with life did hold strong predictions of the happiness of junior high school students.
4.The relationships and support from close friends did hold strong predictions of the happiness of junior high school students.
5.The acceptance toward him/herself did hold strong predictions of the happiness of junior high school students.
6.The data from qualitative and quantitative research showed no difference. Both indicated and supported the results as above.
7.Differences were found between the adult and junior high school students’ content and concept of happiness due to the different living situations, but nothing fundamental against the construction or concept of happiness was found in this study.
According to the findings of this study, several suggestions were omitted with regard to as reference of the authorities. And also aimed to help the further and future studying in this field.

第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………….. 1
研究動機及重要性 …………………………………………. 1
研究目的 …………………………………………………. 5
研究假設 …………………………………………………. 6
研究問題 …………………………………………………. 6
名詞界定 …………………………………………………. 7
第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………… 9
幸福感的意義 ……………………………………………… 9
幸福感的相關影響因素、理論及內涵 ……….…………… 12 12
幸福感之實際測量 ………………………………………… 21
國內相關研究 ………………………………………… 24
第三章 研究方法 ……………………………………………….. 28
研究架構 …………………………………………………….. 28
研究對象 …………………………………………………….. 30
研究工具 …………………………………………………….. 31
實施步驟 …………………………………………………….. 50
第四章 研究結果 ……………………………………………… 54
樣本的社會人口學變項 …………………………………… 54
樣本目前主觀評估 …………………………………… 55
樣本的同儕團體及其支持系統 ……………………………… 58
樣本的自我接納情形 ……………………………………… 59
樣本的幸福感 ……………………………………… 60
幸福感量表的分析 ……………………………………… 60
幸福感與社會人口學變項及客觀因素之考驗 …………… 65
幸福感與各主觀評估因素之考驗 ………………………… 68
幸福感與同儕團體主觀評估及自我接納因素之考驗 …… 72
整體因子的迴歸模式及相關 ……………………………… 76
開放式問題及焦點訪談對幸福感來源的發現 ……………… 79
第五章 討論、結論與建議 ……………………………………… 85
討論 ……………………………………………………… 85
結論 ……………………………………………………… 91
研究限制及建議 ………………………………………… 93
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 96
附錄一：正式量表及問卷 …………………………………… 103
附錄二：中國人幸福感量表 …………………………………… 112
附錄二：焦點訪談資料 …………………………………… 118
附錄二：專家效度名單 …………………………………… 125

行政院少年輔導委員會（2001）。少年快樂成就指數報告。行政院少年輔導委員會。
王淑女（2001）。影響青少年身心健康的社會因素。提升生活品質的理論與實際學術研討會。台北：私立天主教輔仁大學法學院主辦。（2001/6/1）
巫雅菁（2001）。大學生幸福感之研究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文。
吳明清（1991）。教育研究—基本觀念及方法分析。台北：五南。
呂敏昌（1993）。國中學生的生活壓力、因應方法與心理社會幸福感之關係。私立中國文化大學碩士論文。
李榮安（2000）。教師角色及教與學的喜悅。教與學的喜悅（pp. 5-8）。香港：朗文。
胡中宜（1997）。保護管束少年福利需求滿足、社會支持與情緒幸福感之相關研究。私立中國文化大學碩士論文。
林子雯（2000）。成人學生角色扮演、社會支持與幸福感之相關研究。正修學報，13，269-290。
施建彬（1995）。幸福感來原與相關因素之探討。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。
晏涵文（2001）。健康與體育新課程綱要之理念、內涵與特色。九年一貫課程學習領域教學研討會。台北：中華民國教材發展學會、國立台灣師範大學主辦。（2001/4/14）
高淑芳（1997）。父母管教態度、高中聯考壓力與國三生心理健康。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。
孫振清（1996）。亞里斯多德的倫理學。台北：台灣書店。
孫效智（2002）。宗教、道德與幸福的弔詭。台北：力緒文化。
陸洛（1998）。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素討論。人文及社會科學，8（1），115-137。
陸洛（2002）。中國人幸福感量表。手稿。
黃毅志（1998）社會階層、社會網路與心理幸福。台灣社會學刊，21，171-210。
黃信二（2000）。論亞里斯多德「幸福」觀念在古希臘倫理學脈絡中之意義。文明探索叢刊，21，49-76。
楊中芳（1997）。如何研究中國人：心理學本土化論文集。台北：桂冠。
歐陽教（1996）。教育哲學導論。台北：文景。
羅天佑（2000）。論「愉快教學」。教與學的喜悅（pp. 19-31）。香港：朗文。
Mclnerney, P. K.（1996）（林逢祺譯）。哲學概論。台北：桂冠。
Powell, D. H.（1996）（俞筱鈞譯）。適應與心理衛生。台北：揚智文化。
Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N.（2000）（歐素汝譯）。焦點團體：理論與實務。台北：弘智文化。
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S. & Sinagub, J.（1999）（王文科、王智弘譯）。焦點團體訪談-教育與心理學適用。台北：五南。
Andrews, F.M. & Withey, S.B.(1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.
Aargyle, M., Martin, M. & Crossland, J.(1989). Happiness as function of personality and social encounters. Firgas, J. P. & Innes, J. M.(eds.) Recent advance in social psychology, 189-203, Holland: Elsevier Science.
Argyle, M. & Crossland, J.(1987). The dimensions of positive emotions. The British Psychological Society, 26, 127-137.
Argyle, M.(1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.
Argyle, M. & Lu, L.(1990a). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and individual differences, 11, 1011-1017.
Argyle, M. & Lu, L.(1990b). Happiness and social skills. Personality and individual differences, 11, 1255-1261.
Aristotle (1975). The Nicomachean ethics(Apostle, H.G. Trans.). Holland: D.Rediel.
Aristotle (1992). Eudemian ethics (2nd ed.)(Woods, M. Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon.
Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J. & Feij, J. A.(1999). The Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS): appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and individual differences, 26, 815-826.
Balatsky, G. & Diener, E.(1993). Subjective well-being among Russian students, Social Indicators Research, 28, 225-243.
Bowling, A. & Windsor, J.(2001). Toward the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness study, 2, 55-81.
Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M. & Link, K. E.(1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: the case of health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 646-653.
Broadie, S.(1991).Ethics with Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brustein, J.(1993). Personal goal and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(5), 1061-1070.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R.(1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(4), 668-678.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. & Zonderman, A. B.(1987). Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: longitudinal follow-up of and American nation sample. British journal of psychology, 78, 299-306.
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Jarsen, R. J. & Griffin, S.(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener, E., Snadvik, E., Pavot, W. & Gallagher, D.(1991). Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 35-56.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Smith, H. & Shao, L.(1995). National difference in reported subjective well-being : why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7-32.
Diener, E.(1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Emmons, R. A. & Diener, E.(1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 11(1), 89-97.
Emmons, R. A.(1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford.
Fordyce, M.W.(1988). A review of research on the happiness measure: a sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355-381.
Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., Lester, D. & Philipchalk, R. (1998). Happiness as stable extraversion: a cross-cultural examination of the reliability and validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory among students in the U.K., U.S.A., Australia, and Canada. Personality and individual differences, 24(2), 167-171.
Francis, L. J.(1999). Happiness is a thing called stable extraversion: a further examination of the relationship between the Oxford Happiness Inventory and Eysenck’s dimensional model of personality and gender. Personality and individual differences, 26(1), 5-11.
Frankl, V.E.(1967). Psychotherapy and existentialism. England: Penguin.
Frankl, V.E.(1968). Man’s search for meaning. Taipei: Caves.
Fujita, F., Diener, E. & Sandvik, E.(1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: the case for emotional intensity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(3), 427-434.
Furnham, A. & Brewin, C. R.(1990).Personality and happiness. Personality and individual differences, 11(10), 1093-1096.
Heady, B., Veenhoven, R. & Wearing, A.(1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 81-100.
Hills, P. & Argyle, M.(2001). Happiness, introversion-extraversion and happy introvert. Personality and individual differences, 30, 595-608.
Lu, L. & Argyle, M.(1991). Happiness and cooperation. Personality and individual differences, 12, 1019-1030.
Lu, L. & Argyle, M.(1993). TV watching , soap opera and happiness. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Science, 9, 501-507.
Lu, L. & Argyle, M.(1994). Leisure satisfaction and happiness as a function of leisure activity. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Science,10 , 89-96.
Lu, L. & Shih, J. B.(1997a). Personality and happiness: is mental a mediator? Personality and individual differences, 22(2), 249-256.
Lu, L. & Shih, J. B.(1997b). Sources of happiness: a qualitative approach. Journal of social psychology, 137(2),181-187.
Magen, Z.(1998). Exploring adolescent happiness: commitment, purpose and fulfillment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Michalos, A. C.(1985). Multiple discrepancies theory. Social indicators research, 16, 347-414.
Nordenfelt, L.(1993). Quality of life, health and happiness. England: Avebury.
Omodei, M. M & Wearing, A. J.(1990). Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: toward and integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(4), 762-769.
Parducci, A.(1995). Happiness, pleasure and judgment: the contextual theory and its applications. New Jersey: Lawrenece Erlbaum Assocation.
Rim, Y.(1993a). Happiness and coping styles. Personality and individual differences, 14(4), 617-618.
Rim, Y.(1993b). Values, happiness and family structure variables. Personality and individual differences, 15(5), 595-598.
Tatarkiewicz, W.(1976). Analysis of happiness (Rothert, E. & Zielinskn, D. Trans.). Melbourne: Martinus Nijoff.(Original work published 1962)
Veenhoven, R.(1984). Condition of happiness. Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster: D.Reidel Publishing Company.
Veenhoven, R.(1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333-354.
Veenhoven, R.(1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1-34.
Veenhoven, R.(1994). Is happiness a trait? Social Indicators Research, 32, 101-160.
Veenhoven, R.(1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: test of predictions implied in three of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33-68.
Veenhovenm, R.(1997). Advances in understanding happiness. Revne Quebecoise de psychologie, 18, 29-74.
Veenhoven, R.(2001a). What we know about happiness. Paper presented at the dialogue on ‘Gross National Happiness’, Woudschoten, Zeist, The Nertherland, January 14-15, 2001.
Veenhoven, R.(2001b). Quality-of-life and happiness: not quite the same. DeGirolamo, G. et. al (eds). Salute e qualita dell vida, Centro Scientifico Editore, 2001, 67-95, Italy: Torino.
Watts, A.W.(1968). The meaning of happiness. Toronto: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.