跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.64.76) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/16 05:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李昭叡
研究生(外文):Chao Jei Li
論文名稱:鋼筋混凝土建築結構受震損壞指標之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Earthquake Damage Index of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
指導教授:林其璋林其璋引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chi Chang Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:土木工程學系
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:105
中文關鍵詞:損壞指標受震損壞指標
外文關鍵詞:Damage indexEarthquake Damage Index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:279
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:39
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本文探討歷年來諸位學者所定義之建築物受震損壞指標,所謂損壞指標,係根據一連串結構動態反應將結構物遭受地震之損壞程度表現出來,吾人藉由損壞指標,可初步認識建築物之損壞程度。2001年Bozorgnia與Bertero提出了新的損壞指標DI1&DI2,完全合乎學者們對損壞指標的認知,並且一掃之前其他損壞指標為人們所詬病之處。本文介紹DI1&DI2並與其他損壞指標比較其良窳,最後再利用中央氣象局裝設之強震儀所紀錄的地震以及建築物耐震設計規範,探討DI1&DI2在國內之適用情形。

This paper discusses with earthquake damage indices over the years. So called earthquake damage index, is to present the degree of damage according to a series of response parameters after an earthquake. By damage index, we can know the damage degree of this building preliminarily. Bozorgnia and Bertero define a improved damage index DI1&DI2 in 2001, conforming with the knowledge of scholars completely, and clear off those disadvantages in other damage indices. This paper introduces the improved damage index DI1&DI2 and compares with others. At last, it discusses the suitability of DI1&DI2 in Taiwan according to earthquake records and building code.

第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機與目的 1
1.2 文獻回顧 3
1.3 本文內容 5
第二章 RC建築物受震損壞指標之回顧 6
2.1 建築物損壞原因之探討 6
2.2 根據非彈性變形定義損壞指標 8
2.3 建築物在地震下之能量平衡方程式 9
2.3.1 正規化遲滯能 11
2.4 根據遲滯能定義損壞指標 12
2.5 根據非彈性變形與遲滯能之線性組合定義損壞指標 13
第三章 Bozorgnia與Bertero之損壞指標 14
3.1 DI1 & DI2之定義 14
3.2 DI1 & DI2之特性 16
3.3 DI1 & DI2之計算流程 18
3.3.1 降伏強度Fy之探討 20
3.3.2 地盤種類之決定 23
3.3.3 韌性容量 之探討 25
3.3.4 輸入地震力之探討 28
3.3.5 權重係數 與 之探討 29
3.4 韌性譜、遲滯能譜與損壞譜 30
第四章 實測地震紀錄之損壞分析 32
4.1 921地震各倒塌建築物之損壞指標分析 32
4.1.1 分析結果與討論 35
4.2 國立中興大學土木環工大樓受歷年地震之損壞指標分析 37
4.2.1 分析結果與討論 39
4.3 921地震台中市南區之損壞實例 41
4.3.1 分析結果與討論 43
4.4 921地震台中市北區之損壞實例 45
4.4.1 分析結果與討論 46
第五章 結論與建議 48
參考文獻 50

1. Ang, A.H-S., and D. de Leon (1994). “Reliability and response control of R/C buildings,” Proceedings, ASCE Structures Congress XII, Vol. 2, pp. 1593-1599.
2. Bertero, V.V., S.A. Mahin, and R.A. Herrera (1978). “Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records,”Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, Vol.10, pp.179-193.
3. Bolt, B.A. (1973). “Duration of strong motion,” Proceeding, 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp.1304 -1313.
4. Bozorgnia, Y., and V.V. Bertero (2001). “Improved shaking and damage parameters for post-earthquake applications,” Proceeding, SMIP01 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, Los Angeles, CA, September 12,2001.
5. Bozorgnia, Y., and V.V. Bertero (2002). “Near-real-time post- earthquake damage assessment based on reliable damage indices and damage spectra,” Proceeding,7 th US National Conf. on Earthquake Eng., July 2002, Boston, pp.363.
6. Chai, Y.H., K.M. Romstad, and S.M.Bird (1995). “Energy-based linear damage model for high-intensity seismic loading,”ASCE Journal of StructuralEngineering, Vol121, No5., pp.857-864.
7. Clough, Ray W. ,and J. Penzien (1993). “Dynamics of structures,” second edition, pp.603-607.
8. Cosenza, E., G. Manfredi, and R. Ramasco (1993). “The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 22, pp.855-868.
9. Fajfar, P. (1992). “Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, pp.837-848.
10.Mahin, S.A., and V.V.Bertero (1976). “Problems in establishing and prediction ductility in aseismic design,”Proceedings, International symposium on Earthquake Structural Engineering, St. Luis, Missouri, August1976, pp.613-628.
11.Mahin, S.A., and V.V.Bertero (1981). “An evalution of inelastic seismic spectra,”ASCE Journal of Structural Division, Vol107, No. ST9, pp.1777-1795.
12.Mahin, S.S., and J.Lin (1983). “Construction of inelastic response spectra for single-degree-of-freedom systems,”Report UCB/EERC -83/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkely.
13.Newmark, N.M., and W.J. Hall (1982). “Earthquake spectra and design,” Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Reaearch Institute (EERI).
14.Park, Y.J., and A-H-S. Ang (1985). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete,” ASCE Journal of structural Engineering, Vol. 111, No.4, pp.722-739.
15. Park, Y.J., A-H-S. Ang, and Y.K. Wen (1987) “Damage-Limiting aseismic design of buildings,”Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 3,No.1, pp.1-26.
16.Powell, G.H. and R. Allahabadi (1988). “Sesmic damage prediction by deterministic methods: Concepts and procedures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 16, pp.719-734.
17.Uang, C-M, and V.V. Bertero (1988). “Implications of recorded earthquake ground motions on seismic design of building structures,”Report No.UCB/EERC-88/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkely.
18.Uang, C-M, and V.V. Bertero (1990). “Evaluation of seismic energy in structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 19, pp.77-90.
19.Vanmarcke, E.H. (1976). “Structure response to earthquakes.” Chapter 8 in C. Lomnitz and E. Rosenblueth, eds., Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.287-338.
20.陳生金, 鄭蘩, “設計地震力之探討,” 結構工程 第十卷 第四期, pp.3-25。

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top