跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.173) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 00:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張維纖
研究生(外文):Wei-Hsien Chang
論文名稱:消費者品牌及廣告認知對品牌轉換行為之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Brand and Advertising Cognition on Brand Switching Behavior
指導教授:魯真魯真引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jane L. Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:行銷學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:英文
論文頁數:78
中文關鍵詞:品牌認知廣告認知品牌轉換
外文關鍵詞:Brand CognitionAdvertising CognitionBrand Switching
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:985
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:290
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:15
The Influence of Brand and Advertising Cognition on
Brand Switching Behavior
Abstract
This study intends to analyze consumers’ brand switching intentions and how the cognition of brand and advertising affects the brand switching possibilities. Four different products with various duration and purchasing frequencies are considered in the study, including mobile phones, notebook computers, sports shoes, and carbonated drinks. The path analysis is applied in this study to investigate the relationships among cognition of brand and advertising related factors, motivations of brand switching, purchasing motives, and purchasing intentions. Furthermore, the multinomial logistic regression model is utilized in this study to analyze how the variables that explain purchasing intentions affect the possibilities of brand switching.
Since the reasons of switching brands for nondurable goods may be different from the reasons of switching brands for durable goods, four formats of questionnaires are designed with similar layouts for four product categories. The survey was conducted in April 2003. A total of 600 questionnaires were given to respondents, 515 of them were valid samples, including 135 of mobile phones, 122 of notebook computers, 130 of sports shoes, and 128 of carbonated drinks.
The results of the path analysis indicate that advertising processing influences brand association, and the brand association itself has impacts on brand positioning, brand attitudes, brand behavior, motivations of brand switching, and purchasing intentions. Although purchasing intentions and motivations of brand switching are not directly influenced by advertising, they are affected by advertising processing indirectly through brand association.
Based on the results of the multinomial logistic regression, product advertisements persuade consumers to switch brands, especially for mobile phones, notebook
computers, and carbonated drinks. Brands reduce the possibilities of switching intentions in general. The results also indicate that factors influencing consumers’ switching possibilities of sports shoes are different from other product categories. Advertisements and brands do not seem to affect consumers’ switching possibilities of sports shoes significantly.
Numerous factors affect consumers’ purchasing intentions, directly or indirectly. The findings of this research reveal that brands and advertising have some weights on brand switching intentions. Marketing managers can utilize brand and advertising related marketing strategies to influence consumers’ purchasing decisions.
The Influence of Brand and Advertising Cognition on
Brand Switching Behavior
Abstract
This study intends to analyze consumers’ brand switching intentions and how the cognition of brand and advertising affects the brand switching possibilities. Four different products with various duration and purchasing frequencies are considered in the study, including mobile phones, notebook computers, sports shoes, and carbonated drinks. The path analysis is applied in this study to investigate the relationships among cognition of brand and advertising related factors, motivations of brand switching, purchasing motives, and purchasing intentions. Furthermore, the multinomial logistic regression model is utilized in this study to analyze how the variables that explain purchasing intentions affect the possibilities of brand switching.
Since the reasons of switching brands for nondurable goods may be different from the reasons of switching brands for durable goods, four formats of questionnaires are designed with similar layouts for four product categories. The survey was conducted in April 2003. A total of 600 questionnaires were given to respondents, 515 of them were valid samples, including 135 of mobile phones, 122 of notebook computers, 130 of sports shoes, and 128 of carbonated drinks.
The results of the path analysis indicate that advertising processing influences brand association, and the brand association itself has impacts on brand positioning, brand attitudes, brand behavior, motivations of brand switching, and purchasing intentions. Although purchasing intentions and motivations of brand switching are not directly influenced by advertising, they are affected by advertising processing indirectly through brand association.
Based on the results of the multinomial logistic regression, product advertisements persuade consumers to switch brands, especially for mobile phones, notebook
computers, and carbonated drinks. Brands reduce the possibilities of switching intentions in general. The results also indicate that factors influencing consumers’ switching possibilities of sports shoes are different from other product categories. Advertisements and brands do not seem to affect consumers’ switching possibilities of sports shoes significantly.
Numerous factors affect consumers’ purchasing intentions, directly or indirectly. The findings of this research reveal that brands and advertising have some weights on brand switching intentions. Marketing managers can utilize brand and advertising related marketing strategies to influence consumers’ purchasing decisions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ...……………………………………………………….….. iii
LIST OF FIGURES ...……………………………………………………..…... iv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...…………………………………………..... 1
1.1 Research Background ...……...…………………………….………... 1
1.2 Research Objectives ..…………….………...………………........….. 4
1.3 Research Flow ………………………..…………………….….......... 4
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW ..………….………………..………... 6
2.1 Advertising and Consumers’ Attitudes ….….………………...……... 6
2.2 Advertising and Brands ..…………….…………………………........ 8
2.2.1 Attention ..………………………….……………………..……...... 8
2.2.2 Advertising Processing ..………….……………………………...... 9
2.2.3 Brand Awareness ..……………….………………………….…...... 9
2.2.4 Brand Association ..…………….…………………………...….….. 10
2.2.5 Brand Positioning ..…………….………………………………….. 10
2.2.6 Brand Attitude ..……………….…………………………………... 11
2.2.7 Brand Behavior ..…………….………………………………...….. 12
2.3 Brand Switching Behavior ..….…………………………………..…. 12
CHAPTER III RESERCH METHODOLOGY ..….…………….…………….. 16
3.1 Research Framework ……………………………………………...… 16
3.2 Research Design ..………………………………………………….... 17
3.3 Data Collection .……………………………………..…………….… 26
3.4 Research Methods ……………………………….………………..… 27
CHAPTER IV EMPIRICAL RESULTS ……..………………………….……. 32
4.1. Sample Structure ………..……………….…………………………. 32
4.2 Results of the Path Analysis……………………………………...….. 40
4.3 Examine Brand Switching Possibilities Using the Multinomial
Logistic Model ...…………………………………………………....
48
CHAPTER V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ………………...……...… 53
5.1 Summary ……………………………………...……………..……… 53
5.2 Conclusion …………………...……………………………………… 55
REFERENCE ………………………...……………………………………….. 56
APPENDIX …………………...………………………………………………. 63
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-2-1 Questions Measure the Dimension of Attention ……………………… 20
Table 3-2-2 Questions Measure the Dimension of Advertising Processing …....…. 20
Table 3-2-3 Questions Measure the Dimension of Brand Awareness …………..… 21
Table 3-2-4 Questions Measure the Dimension of Brand Association ……….….... 21
Table 3-2-5 Questions Measure the Dimension of Brand Positioning ...…….……. 21
Table 3-2-6 Questions Measure the Dimension of Brand Attitude ….……………. 22
Table 3-2-7 Questions Measure the Dimension of Brand Behavior ...….................. 22
Table 3-2-8 Questions Measure the Dimensions of Brand Switching Motivations . 23
Table 3-2-9 Questions Measure the Purchasing Motives …………………….…… 24
Table 3-2-10 Questions Measure Purchasing Intentions …………………….……. 25
Table 3-2-11 Questions Measure Switching Intentions ……………………..…….. 25
Table 3-3-1 Valid Samples by Product Categories ………………………..……….. 27
Table 4-1-1 Demographical Characteristics of Respondents ……………….….….. 33
Table 4-1-2 Consumers’ Perceptions Related to Brands and Advertising ….….….. 34
Table 4-1-3 Motivations of Brand Switching ………………………………..……. 36
Table 4-1-4 Evaluations of Purchasing Motives …………………………….……. 37
Table 4-1-5 Evaluations of Consumers’ Purchasing Intentions …….…..…….…… 38
Table 4-1-6 Various Rankings of the Brands …………………………..………….. 40
Table 4-2-1 Coefficient Estimates and Goodness of Fit of the Path Analysis ….… 43
Table 4-2-2 Direct and Indirect Influences on Purchasing Intentions ………….…. 47
Table 4-3-1 Results of Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis of Brand
Switching Intention……………..………………………………….…. 51
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-3-1 Research Flow of This Study…………………………..……..…..... 5
Figure 2-3-1 Four Groups of Buyers as the Sources of Sales………..………..…. 13
Figure 2-3-2 Dual Mediation Hypothesis……………………………..……….… 15
Figure 3-1-1 Conceptual Framework of This Study…………………..……….… 17
Figure 3-4-1 An Example of the Path Diagram……………………..….…..……. 28
Figure 4-2-1 The Path Diagram of Dimensions Related to Advertising, Brand
Switching Motivations, and Purchasing Intentions..……..………… 44
REFERENCE
1. Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, NY: Free Press.
2. Akaah, I., P. Korgaonkar and D. Lund (1995), “Direct Marketing Attitudes”, Journal of Business Research, 34 (3):211-219.
3. Arias-Bolzmann, L., G. Chakraborty, and J.C. Mowen (2000), “Effects of Absurdity in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Product Category Attitude and Mediating Role of Cognitive Responses”, Journal of Advertising, 29(1):35-49.
4. Barsky, J.D. (1994), World-Class Customer Satisfaction, Illinois: Irwin Professional Publishing.
5. Bayus, B.L. (1992), “Brand Loyalty and Marketing Strategy: An Application to Home Appliances”, Marketing Science, 11(1): 21-38.
6. Berger, I.E. and A.A. Mitchell (1989), "The Nature of Attitude Accessibility and Attitude Confidence: A Triangulated Experiment", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2): 103-123.
7. Chattopadbyay, A. (1998), “When Does Comparative Advertising Influence Brand Attitude? The Role of Delay and Market Position” Psychology & Marketing, 15(5): 461-480.
8. Chen, C. (2001), “Using Free Association to Examine the Relationship between the Characteristics of Brand Associations and Brand Equity”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(7): 439-451.
9. Clarke, k (2001), “What Price on Loyalty When A Brand Switch is Just A Click Away?”, Qualitative Market Research: An Internal Journal, 4(3):160-168.
10. Davis, F.B. (1964), Educational Measurements and Their Interpretation, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11. Deighton, J., C.M. Henderson, S.A. Neslin (1994), “The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1): 28-43.
12. Del Barrio-García, and Luque-Martínez (2003), “Modeling Consumer Response to Differing Levels of Comparative Advertising”, European of Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2): 256-274.
13. Delorme, D.E. and L.N. Reid (1999), “Moviegoers'' Experiences and Interpretations of Brands in Films Revisited”, Journal of Advertising, 28(2): 71-95.
14. Donald, G.M. (1966), “Testing Brand-Switching Models”, Journal of Marketing Research, 3(4):401-409.
15. Donthu, N. (1992), “Comparative Advertising Intensity”, Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6):53-58.
16. East, A. and K. Basu (1994), Consumer Behavior: Advances and Applications in Marketing, NJ: Prentice Hill.
17. Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (2000), “Repetitive Advertising and the Consumer”, Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6): 39-48.
18. Franzen, G. (1994), Advertising Effectiveness: Finding from Empirical Research, Oxfordshire: Admap Publications,.
19. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (2000), “Customer Poaching and Brand Switching”, RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4): 634-657.
20. Ghose, S. and O. Lowengart (2001), “Perceptual Positioning of International, National and Private Brands in a Growing International Market: AN Empirical Study”, Journal of Brand Management, 9(1):45-62.
21. Gresham, L.G. and T.A. Shimp (1985), “Attitude toward the Advertising and Brand Attitudes: A Classical Conditioning Perspective”, Journal of Advertising, 14(1):10-17.
22. Grossman, R.P. and B.D. Till (1998), “The Persistence of Classically Conditioned Brand Attitudes”, Journal of Advertising, 27(1): 23-31.
23. Hallowell, R. (1996), “The Relationship of Customer Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty and Profitability: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Service Industries Management, 7(4): 27-42.
24. Hatcher, L. (1994), A step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
25. Hawkins, D.I., R.J. Best, and K.A. Coney (1995), Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, Chicago: Irwin.
26. Hoyer, W.D. and S.P. Brown (1990), “Effect of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat purchase product”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2): 141-148.
27. Hoyer, W.D. and D.J. Maclnnis (2001), Consumer Behavior, 2nd edition, Houghton: Mifflin Company.
28. Judge, G.G., W.E. Griffiths, R.C. Hill, H. Lütkepohl, T. Lee, (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edition, NY: Wiley.
29. Keaveney, S.M. (1995), “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Marketing, 59(2): 71-82.
30. Keller, S.B., M. Landry, J. Olson, and A.M. Velliqutte (1997), “The Effects of Nutrition Package Claims, Nutrition Facts Panels, and Motivation to Process Nutrition Information on Consumer Product Evaluations”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2): 256-269.
31. Keller, K.L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”, Journal of Marketing, 57(1): 1-22.
32. Khairullah, D.Z. and Z.Y. Khairullah (1999), “Relationships between Acculturation, Attitude toward the Advertisement, and Purchase Intention of Asian —Indian Immigrants”, International Journal of Commerce & Management, 9(3/4): 46-65.
33. Lin, M.Y. and L.H. Chang (2003), “Determinants of Habitual Behavior for National and Leading Brands in China”, The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 12(2):94-107.
34. Lutz, R.J. (1985), “Affective And Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework”, in Psychological Process and Advertising Effects, L.F., Alwitt and A.A. Mitchell, eds., Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Macdonald, E.K. and B.M. Sharp (2000), “Brand Awareness Effects on Consumer Decision Making for A Common, Repeat Purchase Product: A Replication”, Journal of Business Research, 48(1): 5-15.
36. Mackenzie, S.C., R.J. Lutz, and G.E. Belch (1986), “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations”, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2):130-143.
37. Machleit, K.A. and R.D. Wilson (1988), “Emotional Feelings and Attitude toward the Advertising: The Roles of Brand Familiarity and Repetition”, Journal of Advertising, 17(3):27-35.
38. Maheswarn, D. and B. Strenthal (1990), “The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1):66-73.
39. Malaviya, P., J. Kisielius, and B. Sternthal (1996), “The Effect of Type of Elaboration on AdvertiseMent Processing and Judgment”, Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4):410-421.
40. Meenaghan, T. (1995), “The Role of Advertising in Brand Image Development”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(4):23-34.
41. Mittal, B. (1990), “The Relative Roles of Brand Beliefs and Attitude Toward the Ad as Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?”, Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2):209-219.
42. Meurs, L. (1998), “Zapp! A Study on Switching Behavior during Commercial Breaks”, Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (1):43-53.
43. Murphy, J. and M. Amundsen (1981), “The Communications-Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising for a New Brand on Users of the Dominant Brand” Journal of Advertising, 10(1): 14-20.
44. Newell, S.J., R.E. Goldsmith, and E.J. Banzhaf (1998), “The Effect of Misleading Environmental Claims on Consumer Perceptions of Advertisements”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2): 48-60.
45. Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric theory, 2nd edition, NY: McGraw-Hill.
46. O’Cass, A. (2002), “Understanding the Younger Singaporean Consumers’ Views of Western and Eastern Brands”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 14(4): 54-79.
47. O’Cass, A. and K. Lim (2001), “The Influence of Brand Associations on Brand Preference and Purchase Intention: An Asian Perspective on Brand Associations”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2/3): 41- 72
48. Osselaer, S.M.J. and C. Janiszwski (2001), “Two Ways of Learning Brand Associations”, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2): 2020-223.
49. Park, C.S. and, V. Srinivasan (1994), “A Survey-based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2): 271-281.
50. Pascal, V.J., D.E. Sprott, and D.D. Muehling (2002), “The Influence of Evoked Nostalgia on Consumers’ Responses to Advertising: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 24(1): 39-49.
51. Pechmann, C. and D.W. Stewart (1990), “The Effects of Comparative Advertising on Attention, Memory, and Purchase Intentions”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2):180-191.
52. Pelsmacker, D. and M. Geuens (1998), “Reactions to Different Types of Ads in Belgium and Poland”, International Marketing Review, 15(4): 277-290.
53. Petty, R.E. and J.T. Cacioppo (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, NY: Springer-Verlag.
54. Phillips, B.J. and E.F. McQuarrie (2002), “The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954-1999”, Journal of Advertising, 31(4):1-13.
55. Reichheld, F.F. and W.E. Sasser, Jr. (1990), “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services”, Harvard Business Review, 65(8):105-111.
56. ReKettye, G. and T. Tersztyanszky (2002), “In Hungary, Customers Rate Their Electricity Distributors”, Transmission & Distribution World, 54(7):63-67.
57. Rossiter, J. R and L. Percy (1987), Advertising and Promotion Management, N.: McGraw-Hill.
58. Rowley, J. and J. Dawes (2000), “Disloyalty: A Closer Look at Non-loyals,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(6): 538-549.
59. Rumdle-Thiele, S. and M. Rogers, (1993), “A Brand for All Seasons? A Discussion of Brand Loyalty Approach and Their Applicability for Different Markets”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1): 25-37.
60. Schiffman, L.G. and L.K. Leslie, Consumer Behavior, 5th ed., NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Sharon, S., P. Lowrey, and J. Haefner (1998), “Public Attitudes toward Advertising: More Favorable than You Might Think”, Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4): 7-22.
62. Shavitt, S., P. Lowrey, and J. Haefner (1998), “Public Attitudes toward Advertising: More Favorable than You Might Think”, Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4): 7-22.
63. Shimp, T.A. (1981), “Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice”, Journal of Advertising, 10(2):9-15.
64. Soderlund, M. (1998), “Customer Satisfaction and Its Consequences on Customer Behaviour Revisited”, International Journal of Services Industries Management, 9(2):169-188.
65. Stephen, S.P. and C. Claycomb (1997), “The Influence of Brand Recognition on Retail Store Image”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(6): 373-387.
66. Swait, J. and W. Adamowicz (2001), “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching”, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 135-147.
67. Till, B.D. and M. Busler (2000), “The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role if Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs”, Journal of Advertising, 29(3): 1-13.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 蔡惠華、簡正儒(民88),影響專科應屆畢業生升學與就業因素之探討,技術學刊,14(3),頁471-478。
2. 蔡惠華(民87),影響高屏地區公私立高職應屆畢業生升學就業因素探討,技術學刊,第十三卷第二期。
3. 鄭勵君(民87年6月),學校形象之行銷管理策略淺析,高市文教,頁55-59。
4. 邱錦昌(民85),選擇與控制:學校教育的改革途徑,教育資料與研究,9,頁20-21。
5. 吳明清(民85),選擇與控制:學校教育改革的理念與爭議,教育資料與研究,9,頁2-9。
6. 沈姍姍(民85),教育選擇與控制理念的另類思考,教育資料與研究,9,頁14-15。
7. 朱寶青、陳柏舟(民90),影響在職人士參與碩士課程進修之決策因素,大葉學報,大葉大學。
8. 蔡璧煌(1989)。國民中小學教師壓力之研究。師大學報,34,75-114。
9. 歐滄和(1995)。對壓力的因應行為與因應資源之探討。測驗與輔導,130,2667-2671。
10. 歐用生(1999)。從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資訊,7(2),22-32。
11. 黃義良(2000)。國中小初任教師工作壓力與調適取向之研究。國民教育研究學報,6,269-298。
12. 黃義良(1999)。國小兼任行政工作教師的工作壓力與調適方法之研究。屏東:國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
13. 黃正鵠、鄭英耀(1989)。國民中學教師工作壓力、成就動機與職業倦怠關係之研究。教育學刊,8,133-176。
14. 郭生玉(1995)。教師的工作壓力對工作心厭的影響。測驗與輔導,130,2664-2666。
15. 游家政(1999)。再造「國民教育九年一貫課程」的圖像-課程綱要的規劃構想與可能問題。教育資料與研究,26,4-18。