跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/05 05:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:辜子修
研究生(外文):Tzu-Hsiu Ku
論文名稱:南仁山森林底棲性蜘蛛多樣性與其對落葉分解速率之影響
論文名稱(外文):Diversity of litter spiders and their effects on litter decomposition in Nanjenshan rain forest, Taiwan.
指導教授:侯平君侯平君引用關係張學文張學文引用關係卓逸民卓逸民引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ping-Chun Lucy HouHsueh-Wen ChangI-Min Tso
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:生物學系碩博士班
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:英文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:捕食者落葉無脊椎動物落葉分解季風群落多樣性底棲性蜘蛛南仁山
外文關鍵詞:communitydiversitylitter spidermonsoonlitter decompositionlitter invertebratespredatorsNanjenshan
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:359
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:83
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
底棲性蜘蛛是森林落葉層中最重要的捕食者之一,但是對於牠們在生態過程(例如落葉分解)中所扮演角色的認知仍極為有限。本研究的主題在於探討底棲性蜘蛛對落葉層無脊椎動物之捕食效應,以及其是否會間接地對落葉分解產生影響。首先,我在實驗樣區的迎風坡與背風坡進行每月一次底棲性蜘蛛多樣性與密度的調查。我一共採集了733隻成熟個體,並鑑定出其屬於17科中的46種。 底棲性蜘蛛在背風坡的密度明顯高於迎風坡,不過在季風季與非季風季之間卻十分相近。此外,底棲性蜘蛛之群落組成不但在迎風坡明顯易於背風坡,在季風季與非季風季之間也有顯著差異。
以前述的實驗結果為基礎,我設立了排除所有底棲性蜘蛛與包含Ctenus yaeyamensi該種底棲性蜘蛛的圍籬。利用落葉分解袋比較圍籬之間的落葉分解速率與落葉無脊椎動物群落,實驗將分別在兩受風區與兩季節間進行。結果發現有、無底棲性蜘蛛圍籬間,無論是落葉分解速率或落葉無脊椎動物群落皆無顯著差異,我推測底棲性蜘蛛在落葉無脊椎動物與落葉分解上,造成的由上而下之效應可能並不顯著。此外,在非季風季時的落葉分解速率明顯高於季風季時,而迎風坡與背風坡之間並無顯著差異,由結果來看,在南仁山雨林中影響落葉分解的主要因子應為溫度與濕度,而非東北季風。還需要後續研究來確認碎屑食物網的結構與落葉分解者開始分解落葉所需的時間,以釐清底棲性蜘蛛在落葉分解過程中所扮演的角色。
Litter spiders are one of the most important predators in the forest litter layer, but little is known about their roles on ecological processes, such as litter decomposition. The aim of this study was to investigate the predatory effects of litter spiders on litter invertebrates and indirectly on the rate of litter decomposition. At first, densities and diversitiess of litter spiders were examined monthly in the wind-exposed and wind-shielded locations for the monsoon and the non-monsoon seasons. A total of 733spiders were collected and 46 species from 17 families were identified from the adult specimens Mean density of the litter spiders in the wind-shielded area was significantly higher than the wind-exposed area, however, the spider density in the monsoon season was very similar to that in the non-monsoon season. In addition, composition of litter spiders in the wind-exposed area was different from that in the wind-shielded area and also varied between the monsoon and the non-monsoon seasons.
Based on the above results, enclosures excluded of all spiders and containing the litter spider, Ctenus yaeyamensi, were setup. Decomposition rates and the invertebrates in the litterbags from these enclosures were compared in two locations and two seasons. The decomposition rates and the invertebrates in litterbags from the enclosures containing spiders did not differ from those in the spider-excluded enclosures, suggesting the litter spiders have insignificant top-down effects on the invertebrates and the litter decomposition. Furthermore, the decomposition rate in the non-monsoon season was faster than that in the monsoon season and the decay rate in the wind-exposed locations did not differ from that in wind-shielded area. These results suggest that the influences of temperature and moisture are more important than the monsoon winds on litter decomposition in Nanjenshan rain forest. Further studies on the timing at which the fragmenters begin to feed on the litter and the structure of detrital food web are crucial to understand the role of litter spiders on litter decomposition.
Chinese abstract ......................................... Ⅰ
English abstract ......................................... Ⅱ
Acknowledgements ......................................... Ⅳ
List of tables ........................................... Ⅷ
List of figures .......................................... Ⅹ
General introduction ..................................... 1
Chapter
1. The effects of northeasterly monsoon on litter spiders
in Nanjenshan rain forest, Taiwan ........................ 3
Introduction ............................................. 3
Materials and Methods .................................... 8
Study site ............................................... 8
Sampling ................................................. 8
Community structure ...................................... 9
Guild structure .......................................... 10
Results .................................................. 12
Litter spider diversity in Nanjenshan Nature Reserve ..... 12
Density of litter spiders ................................ 12
Community structure ...................................... 12
ANOSIM and MDS Analysis .................................. 13
Guild structure .......................................... 14
Discussion ............................................... 15
Density and species richness of litter spiders ........... 15
Influence of northeasterly monsoon on litter spiders
community ................................................ 16
Influence of habitat structure on litter spiders
community ................................................ 20
The difference of guild structure between two areas and
seasons .................................................. 22
2. Effects of northeasterly monsoon and litter spiders on litter decomposition in Nanjenshan rain forest, Taiwan. .. 24
Introduction ............................................. 24
Materials and Methods .................................... 28
Study site ............................................... 28
Experimental design ...................................... 28
Enclosure setup .......................................... 30
The litterbags ........................................... 30
Measurement of invertebrate density and composition ...... 30
Results .................................................. 32
The effect of spider on the decay rates and invertebrates in
the litterbags ........................................... 32
The effects of wind exposure and season on the decay rates and
the invertebrates in the litterbags ...................... 33
The relationships between the decay rate and the invertebrate
density/diversity in the litterbags ...................... 34
Discussion ............................................... 35
The reasons for lack of spider effects ................... 35
Litter decomposition in different seasons and locations .. 36
Further studies .......................................... 38
Conclusion ............................................... 39
Reference ................................................ 40
Bardford, M. A., G. W. Toroff, T. Eggers, T. H. Jones, and Newington J. E. 2002. Microbiota, fauna, and mesh size interaction in litter decomposition. Oikos 99: 317-323.
Beard, K. H., K. A. Vogt and A. Kulmatiski. 2002. Top-down effects of a terrestrial frog on forest nutrient dynamics. Oecologia 133: 583-593.
Bell, J. R., C. P. Wheater, and W. R. Cullen. 2001. The implications of grassland and heathland management for the conservation of spider communities: a review. The Zoological Society of London 255: 377-387.
Bultman, T. L. and G. W. Uetz. 1982. Abundance and community structure of forest floor spiders follow litter manipulation. Oecologia 55: 34-41.
Bultman, T. L. and G. W. Uetz. 1984. Effects of structure and nutritional quality of litter on abundances of litter-dwelling arthropods. American Midland Naturalist 111:165-172.
Burgess, N. D., K. L. Ponder, and J. Goddard. 1999. Surface and leaf-litter arthropods in the coastal forests of Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 37 : 355-365.
Carter, P. E. and A. L. Rypstra. 1995. Top-down effects in soybean agroecosystems: spider density affects herbivore damage. Oikos 72: 433-439.
Chang, C.-P. 1998. A Research of Litterfall in Nanjenshan Lowland Rain Forest. Master thesis. NationAL Taiwan University, Taipei.
Chen, B. and D. H. Wise. 1997. Responses of forest-floor fungivores to experimental food enhancement. Pedobiologia 41: 240-250.
Chen, B. and D. H. Wise. 1999. Bottom-up limitation of predaceous arthropods in a detritus-based terrestrial food web. Ecology 80: 761-772.
Clarke, K. R. and R. N. Warwick. 1994. Change in Marine Mommunities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, UK. Page 144.
Clausen, I. 1986. The use of spiders (Araneae) as ecological indicators. Bulletin of British Arachnological Society 7: 83-86.
Coddington, J. A. and H. W. Levi. 1991. Systematics and evolution of spider. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 565-592.
Curtis, D. J. 1980. Pitfalls in spider community studies (Arachnida, Aaneae). Journal of Arachnology 8: 271-280.
Frith, D. and C. Frith. 1990. Seasonality of litter invertebrate population in an Australian upland tropical rainforest. Biotropica 22: 181-190.
Gonzalez, G. and T. R. Seastedt. 2001 Soil fauna and plant litter decomposition in tropical and subalpine forest. Ecology 82: 955-964.
Green, J. 1999. Sampling method and time determines composition of spider collections. Journal of Arachnology 27: 176-182
Greenstone, M. H. 1984. Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia 62: 299-304.
Griffin, R. E. 1998. Species richness and biogeography of non-acarine arachnids in Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 467-481.
Halaj, J., D. W. Ross, and A. R. Moldenke. 2000. Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-wed in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90: 139-152.
Hansen, R. A. 2000. Diversity in the decomposing landscape. Pages 203-219 in D. C. Coleman and P. F. Hendrix, editors. Invertebrates as Webmasters in Ecosystems. CABI publishing, New York.
Horton, D. R., E. R. Miliczky, D. A. Broers, R. R. Lewis, and C. O. Calkins. 2001. Numbers, density, and phenology of spiders (Araneae) overwintering in carboard bands placed in pear and apple orchards of central Washington. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 405-414.
Hsieh, T-H. 1990.Woody Floristic Composition, Structure and Disturbution Pattern of the Substropical Rain Forest of Nanjenshan Area. Master thesis. NationAL Taiwan University, Taipei.
Huang, C. Y. 2002. Effects of the Litter Amphibians and the Litter Invertebrates on Litter Decomposition in Nanjenshan Forest. Master thesis. NationAL Cheng Kung University, Tainan.
Kajak, A. 1997. Effects of epigeic macroarthropods on grass litter decomposition in mown meadow. Agriculture, Ecosystem, and Environment 64: 53-63.
Kajak, A. and H. Jakubczyk. 1977. Experimental studies on predation in the soil-litter interface. Ecological Bulletin (Stockholm) 25: 493-496.
Lang, A. 2000. The pitfalls of pitfalls: a comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in arable land. Anzeiger Fur Schadlingskunde-Journal of Pest Science 73: 99-106.
Lawrence, K. L. and D. H. Wise . 2000. Spider predation on forest-floor Collembola and evidence for indirect effects on decomposition. Pedobiologia 44: 33-39.
Lee, J. W. 1999. Effects of Northeast Monsoon on Litterfall Pattern and Decomposition Process in Nanjenshan Rain Forest. Bachelor Thesis. Tunghai University, Taichung.
Liski, J., A. Nissinen, M. Erhard, and O. Taskinen. 2003. Climatic effects on litter decomposition from arctic tundra to tropical rainforest. Global Change Biology 9: 575-584.
Maelfait, J. P. and Hendrickx F. 1998. Spider as bio-indicators of anthropogenic stress in natural and semi-natural habitats in Flanders (Belgium): some recent developments. Proceedings of the Seventeenth European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997, ed. Selden PA, pp: 293-300. British Arachnological Society.
Majer, J. D. 1997. Invertebrates assist the restoration process: an Australian prespective. Pages 212-237 in K. M. Urbanska and P. J. Edwards, editors. Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development: First International Conference, 27-29 March 1996, Zurich, Switzerland. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Marc. P., Canard A. and Ysnel F. 1999. Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 74: 229-273.
Moran, M. D. and A. R. Scheidler. 2002. Effects of nutrients and predators on an old-field food chain: interations of top-down and bottom-up processes. Oikos 98:116-124.
Morett, M., M. Conedera, P. Duelli, and P. J. Edwards. 2002. The effects of wildfire on ground-active spiders in deciduous forest on the Swiss southern slope of the Alps. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 321-336.
Morin, P. J. 1999. Community Ecology. Blackwell Science Press, Massachusetts. Page 235-274; 154-185.
Nyffeler, M. and Benz G. 1987. Spiders in natural pest control: a review. Journal of Applied Entomology 103: 321-339.
Olson, D. M. 1994. The disturbution of leaf litter invertebrate along a neotropical altitudinal gradient. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 129-150.
Pfeiffer, W. J. 1996a. Litter invertebrates. Page 138-198, in D. P. Reagan and R. B. Waide, editors. The Foob Web of a Tropical Rain Forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pfeiffer, W. J. 1996b. Arboreal Arachnids. Page 247-272, in D. P. Reagan and R. B. Waide, editors. The Foob Web of a Tropical Rain Forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pfeiffer, W. J. 1996c. Litter invertebrates. Page 171-173, in D. P. Reagan and R. B. Waide, editors. The Foob Web of a Tropical Rain Forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Riechert, S. E. 1974. Thought on the ecological significance of spiders. Bioscience. 24: 352-356.
Riechert S. E. and T. C. Lockley. 1984. Spiders as biological control agents. Annual Review of Entomology 29: 299-320.
Riechert, S. E. and L. Bishop. 1990. Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: spiders in garden test system. Ecology 71: 1441-1450.
Salamanca E. F. N. Kaneko, and S. Katagiri. 2002. Rainfall manipulation effects on litter decomposition and the microbial biomass of the forest floor. Applied Soil Ecology 22:271-281.
Seastedt, T. R. 1984. The role of microarthoropods in decomposition and minerakization processes. Annual Review of Entomology 29: 25-46.
Southwood, T. R. E. and P. A. Henderson. 2000. Ecological Methods, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York. Page 229-234.
Spiller, D. A.,and T. W. Schoener. 1998. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79(2): 503-516.
Spiller, D. A. and T. W. Schoener. 2001. An experimtental test for predator-mediated interaction among spider species. Ecology 82(6): 1560-1570.
Sun, I. F., C. F. Hsieh, and S. P. Hubbel. 1996. The structure and species composition of a subtropical monsoon forest in southern Taiwan on a steep wind-stress gradient. In I. M. Turner, Diong, S. S. L. Lim and P. K. L. Ng, editors. Biodiversity and the Dynamics of Ecosystems. DIWPA Series Volume 1: 147-169.
Topping, C. and K. Sunderland. 1992. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485-491.
Uetz, G.. W. 1976. Gradient analysis of spider communities in a streamside forest. Oecologia 22: 373-385.
Uetz, G. W. 1977. Coexistence in a guild of wandering spiders. Journal of Animal Ecology 46: 531-541.
Uetz, G. W. 1979. The influence of variation in litter habitats on spider communities. Oecologia 40: 29-42.
Uetz, G. W. and J. D. Unzicker. 1976. Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spiders. Journal of Arachnology 3: 101-111.
Uetz, G. W., Halaj J. and A. B. Cady. 1999. Guild structure of spiders in major crops. Journal of Arachnology 27: 270-280.
Vargas, A. J. 2000. Effects of fertilizer addition and debris removal on leaf-litter spider communities at two elevation. The Journal of Arachnology 28:79-89.
Vince, S. W., I. Valiela, and J. M. Teal. 1981. An experimental study of the structure of herbivorous insect communities in a salt marsh. Ecology 62: 1662-1678.
Visser, D., M. G. Wright, B. A. and J. H. Giliomee. 1999. Species richness of arachnids associated with Portea nitida (Proteaceae) in the Cape Fynbos. African Journal of Ecology 37: 334-343.
Weeks, R. D. and T. O. Holtzer. 2000. Habitat and seasons in structuring ground- dwelling spider (Araneae) communities in a shortgrass steppep ecosystem. Environmental Entomology 26: 1164-1172.
Willett, T. R. 2001. Spiders and other arthropods as indicators in old-growth versus logged redwood stands. Restoration Ecology 9: 410-120.
Wise, D. H. 1993 Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wise, D. H. and B. Chen. 1999a.Vertebrate predation does not limit density of a common forest-floor wolf spider evidence from a field experiment. Oikos 84 : 209-214.
Wise, D. H. and B. Chen. 1999b. Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider. Oecologia 121: 129-137.
Wise, D. H., W. E. Snyder and P. Tuntidunpakul. 1999. Spiders in decomposition food web of agroecosystems: theory and evidence. Journal of Arachnology 27: 363-370.
Wyman, R. L. 1998. Experimental assessment of salamanaders as predators of detrital food webs: effects on invertebrates, decomposition and the carbon cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 641-650.
Young, O. P. and G. B. Edward. 1990. Spiders in United States field crops and their potential effect on crop pests. Journal of Arachnology 18: 1-27.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top