臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在驗證病態網路使用的認知行為模式，並發展以認知行為模式為基礎的網路敵意模式。研究樣本來自於北部三所大學，分別為台灣大學、交通大學與淡江大學，經由網路問卷的實施，總共蒐集有效樣本987份。經由統計分析，可以發現以下之結果：在病態網路使用方面，病態網路使用的認知曲解是最重要的影響因素，其次為網路使用時間，而憂鬱與網路情境線索對於病態網路使用則有間接影響效果，初步驗證了Davis對於病態網路使用認知行為模式的假設。此外在背景變項上，性別差異在病態網路使用上之差異已不復見；成績較差者其病態網路使用情形較嚴重；大學生過度使用網路情形普遍高於研究生。而在網路敵意方面，敵意的認知曲解是影響網路敵意最主要的因素，而憂鬱與網路論戰經驗則具有間接影響效果，因此驗證了研究者對於網路敵意認知行為模式之假設。此外在背景變項上，男性較女性有較高的網路敵意表現；成績較差的學生也具有較高的網路敵意分數；在網路敵意展現上，個體隨年齡增長而轉變攻擊型態的假設並未獲得證實。以群集分析為網路敵意人群進行區分，樣本中約有一半可被定名為迂迴表達網路敵意群體，約有四分之一的樣本屬於沈默群體，只有四分之一人群可稱為直接表達網路敵意的群體，他們的網路人際懷疑、表現忿怒、直接口語攻擊、運用團體力量攻擊、其他網路攻擊手段等得分均顯著高於前述兩個群體。最後，在病態網路使用與網路敵意的結合模式中，並未發現病態網路使用與網路敵意的直接影響效果，間接證明網路成癮的名詞不適用來描述網路過度使用，但是本研究也發現當去抑制行為發生時，認知曲解佔有重要的影響地位。
在研究限制方面，本研究係屬調查研究，尚有許多不足之處有待克服。首先，在推論性方面，本研究選取北部三所大學，因此在進行全國性的推論時須謹慎小心。其次，本研究屬於橫段性的問卷調查，只能針對目前的現況加以描述，無法深入探討網路敵意的深層狀態，建議往後研究可以針對個案進行質化訪談，或進行網路論戰的內容分析。第三，受限於時間與研究者之能力，無法發展一套有效的輔導方案並檢驗其成效。最後，本研究建議各級學校能設計相關的課程，教導學生正確的網路使用規範，並且重建學生使用網路時不合理之認知，使其擁有一個健全、無威脅的網路環境，以及培養正確的網路使用態度。

Based on the cognitive behavior theory, this study is aimed to analyze the relation between pathological Internet use (PIU) and Internet hostility. By conducting a questionnaire survey on a website, nine hundred and eighty seven samples were selected from students in three universities of northern Taiwan. The results can be analyzed from three models. First, in the model of pathological Internet use, it is concluded that cognitive distortions of pathological Internet use and the amount of time using Internet could predict pathological Internet use directly. Depression and Internet situational cues could predict pathological Internet use indirectly. Besides, the students with low achievement and undergraduate students had higher scores on the questionnaire of pathological Internet use.
Second, in the model of Internet hostility, it indicated that hostility cognitive distortions could predict Internet hostility directly. Depression and online flaming experience could predict Internet hostility indirectly. Moreover, male Internet users’ Internet hostility level was higher than females’, and the Internet users with low achievement showed more Internet hostility as well. The result of a clustering analysis demonstrated that samples could be grouped into three hostility style groups. They were the direct expression of Internet hostility group (26%), the silent group (27%), and the indirect expression of Internet hostility group (47%). The direct expression group reported to have higher scores on suspicion on Internet relations, expression of anger, direct oral aggression, group aggression, and other Internet aggression than other two groups.
Third, from the combination model of pathological Internet use and Internet hostility, the study found that pathological Internet use did not directly predict Internet hostility as the hypothesis suggested. Additionally, cognitive distortions had a significant way toward Internet disinhibition, i.e. pathological Internet use and Internet hostility.
The limitations of this study are in the following. First, because the samples came from the universities of northern Taiwan, it should be cautious to infer the results to other samples. Second, this study adopted questionnaire survey, so it provides quantitative descriptions without deeper understanding. Thus, a further qualitative study in the future is suggested. Third, the study didn’t offer counseling methods for PIU users. Finally, the researcher suggests teachers several preventive ways for student’s Internet hostility from the view of cognitive behavior therapy.

目錄
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………....1
第一節 問題性質與研究動機…………………………………………..………1
第二節 待答問題………………………………………………………………..3
第三節 研究目的………………………………………………………………..3
第四節 名詞釋義………………………………………………………………..4
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………….8
第一節 網路溝通行為…………………………………………………………...8
一、電腦中介傳播之特性……………………………………………………...8
二、論戰………………………………………………………………………...9
第二節 敵意、攻擊、暴露於暴力情境與網路敵意………………………….12
一、敵意之相關研究………………………………………………………….12
二、攻擊之理論……………………………………………………………….13
三、攻擊類型與年齡、性別之關聯………………………………………….20
四、敵意與攻擊之測量……………………………………………………….22
五、暴露在網路論戰之影響………………………………………………….24
第三節 病態網路使用………………………………………………………….27
一、網路成癮及其定義……………………………………………………….27
二、網路成癮之爭議………………………………………………………….30
三、病態網路使用之認知行為模式………………………………………….32
第四節 病態網路使用與網路敵意…………………………………………….35
一、病態網路使用與網路敵意之相關研究………………………………….35
二、建構病態網路使用與網路敵意之理論模式…………………………….37
第五節 研究假設………………………………………………………………..43
第三章 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………...44
第一節 研究樣本………………………………………………………………..44
第二節 研究工具………………………………………………………………..46
第三節 實施程序………………………………………………………………..55
第四節 資料分析………………………………………………………………..56
第四章 研究結果與討論……………………………………………...57
第一節 病態網路使用相關因素之分析………………………………………..57
一、病態網路使用認知行為模式之積差相關與描述統計分析……………..57
二、病態網路使用與一般網路使用者遠端、近端影響變項之
差異性考驗……………………………………………………….……….58
三、病態網路使用之背景變項分析…………………………………………..65
第二節 網路敵意相關因素之分析……………………………………………..80
一、網路敵意認知行為模式之積差相關與描述統計分析…………………..80
二、網路敵意極端組之遠端、近端影響變項之差異性考驗………...….…..83
三、網路敵意之背景變項分析………………………………………………..86
第三節 病態網路使用與網路敵意之區別預測分析…………………………..98
一、網路敵意之群集分析……………………………………………………..98
二、病態網路使用對於不同網路敵意群體之區別預測分析………………100
第四節 病態網路使用與網路敵意之結構方程模式……...…...……………....103
一、病態網路使用與網路敵意之探索性預測分析……………………..…..103
二、驗證性因素分析…………………………………………..……………..108
三、病態網路使用與網路敵意之認知行為模式考驗……………………….123
第五節 認知曲解、病態網路使用與網路敵意之交互作用分析…………..…131
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………….…....141
一、病態網路使用之結論與建議……………………………………………141
二、網路敵意之結論與建議…………………………………………………142
三、病態網路使用與網路敵意模式建構與背景資料之結論與建議………143
四、實務之建議與研究限制…………………………………………………146
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….…....147
附錄
一、預試問卷…….………………………………………………………………161
二、正式問卷…….………………………………………………………………170

中文部分
王大延（民82）。行為偏差兒童的攻擊與暴力行為與原因探討之定義。學生輔導通訊，24期，頁14-23。
王澄華（民90）。人格特質與網路人際互動對網路成癮的影響。輔仁大學心理研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
朱美慧（民89）。我國大專學生個人特性、網路使用行為與網路成癮關係之研究。大葉大學資訊管理研究碩士論文（未出版）。
李美枝（1984）。高低攻擊傾向之國小、國中男學生在觀看電視習性、父母教養方式、友伴中地位及學業成就上之比較研究。教育與心理研究，7期，頁19-41。
吳姝蒨（民85）。電腦中介傳播人際情感親密關係之研究─探討電子佈告欄（BBS）中的「虛擬人際關係」。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李建德（民89）。敵意特質與自律神經功能之相關性研究。國立成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
林一真（民84）。成人敵意量表之編制初步報告。測驗年刊，42期，頁309-330。
林珊如、蔡今中（民88）。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究─子計畫三：中學生網路沈迷現象之深度訪談研究。國科會「教育政策研析：網路科技對教育的影響」計畫成果，發表於民88年6月25日，國立台北師範大學。
金榮泰（民89）。國中生電子遊戲經驗與攻擊行為、攻擊信念之關係研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
林珊如（民90）。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象與因應策略之研究─子計畫二：我國高中生網路沈迷與青少年心理特質、媒體使用之研究。國科會資訊教育專題研究計畫成果討論會，發表於民90年11月22日，國立台北師範大學。
林珊如、黃宏宇（民91年10月）。網路敵意及網路沈迷：兩種去社會抑制行為之相關研究。2002年台灣網際網路研討會，新竹市清華大學。
洪蘭 譯（民84）。心理學。台北市：遠流。
柯永河、林幸台、張小鳳（民82）。人際行為量表之修訂報告。中華測驗學會測驗年刊，40期，頁27-40。
周倩（民88）。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究─子計畫二：網路沉迷現象之教育傳播觀點研究。國科會「教育政策研析：網路科技對教育的影響」計畫成果，發表於民88年6月25日，國立台北師範大學。
黃瓊慧（民89）。從沈浸（flow）理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
張春興（民78）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟（民82）。SPSS For Windows 多變量統計分析。台北市：松岡。
連秀鸞（民88）。國中生認知扭曲與攻擊行為之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
陳心怡 譯（民89）。貝克憂鬱量表第二版（中文版）指導手冊。台北市：中國行為科學社。
陳淑惠（民88）。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究─子計畫一：網路沉迷現象的心理病因之初探（1/2）。國科會「教育政策研析：網路科技對教育的影響」計畫成果，發表於民88年6月25日，國立台北師範大學。
游森期（民89）。大學生網路使用行為 網路成癮及相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究碩士論文（未出版）。
楊瑞珠（民85）。高危險群青少年文化心理特質與甄別量表編製。台北：心理。
趙居蓮 譯（民84）。社會心理學。台北市：桂冠。
鄭夙雅（民90）。國中生社會技巧、認知曲解與校園暴力行為相關之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
潘明君（民90）。全球上網人口超過4億人─台灣經常上網人口名列全球第11名。台北市：資策會。民90年12月12日，取自：http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=1405
劉樹斐（民88）。自尊的多面向對大學生憂鬱與攻擊行為的影響。國立政治大學心理學系心理研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
鄭曉楓（民90）。認知行為取向團體輔導對國小攻擊傾向兒童之攻擊及攻擊行為影響效果研究信念。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
韓佩凌（民89）。台灣中學生網路使用者特性、網路使用行為、心理特性對網路沉迷現象之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
戴怡君（民87）。使用網際網路進行互動者特質之探索。南華管理學院教育社會學研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
魏麗香（民90）。青少年沉迷網咖經驗及其影響之研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
蘇彥豪（民87）。網路空間的公共與私密─以TANet女性主義BBS站為例。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
襲充文 (民91)。網際網路上解禁行為的原因與意涵。載於國立政治大學心理學系(主編)。e世代心裡學。(頁 245-264)。台北 : 桂冠。
西文部分
Aiken, M., & Waller, B. (2000). Flaming among first-group support system user. Information & Management, 37, 95-100.
Anderson, K. B., Anderson, C. A., Dill, K. E., & Deuser, W. E. (1998). The interactive relations between trait hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 161-171.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural eqation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociology Review, 15, 257-263.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: Asocial learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1983). Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews, Vol 1: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic Press.
Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, R. B. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 46-57.
Baron, R. A. (1971). Aggression as function of magnitude of victim’s pain cues, level of prior anger arousal, and aggressor-victim similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 48-54.
Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press.
Barratt, E. S., Standford, M. S., Dowby, L., Liebman, M. J., & Kent, T. A. (1999). Impulsive and premeditated aggression: A factor analysis of self-reported acts. Psychiatry Research, 86, 163-173.
Barriga, A. Q. (1997). Preliminary evaluation of a social-cognitive model of adolescent problem behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. DAI-B 57/07, 4739.
Barriga, A. Q., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial　　 youth: Preliminary development and validation of the How I Think questionnaire. Journal of Aggressive Behavior, 22, 333-343.
Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4, 377-383.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities.
Bendig, A. W. (1962). Factor analytic scales of covert and overt hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 200.
Berkowitz, L. (1969). Root of aggression: A reexamination of the frustration-aggression hypothesis. New York: Atherton.
Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychhology, 45, 494-503.
Bjorkqvist, K. (1985). Violent films, anxiety, and aggression. Helsinki: Commentationes Scientiarium Socialum.
Bjorkqvist, K. (1992). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188.
Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression. Aggression Behavior, 18, 177-127.
Bjorkqvist, K., & Osterman, K. (2000). Social intelligence-empathy=aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(2), 191-200.
Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Bjorkqvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51-64). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bradford, J.M., Greenberg, D. M., & Motayne, G. G.. (1992). Substance abuse and criminal behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 605-622.
Brook, J. S., Whiteman, M. M., & Finch, S., (1992). Childhood aggression, adolescent delinquency, and drug use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 369-383.
Bushman, B. J., Cooper, H. M., & Lemke, K. M. (1991). Meta-analysis of factor analysis: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 344-349.
Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343-349.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553-575.
Castella, V. O., Abad, A. M. Z., Alonso, F. P., & Silla, J. M. P. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited through three different communication medias. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 141-159.
Chou, C., & Hsiao, M. C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratifications, and pleasure experience — The Taiwan college students’ case. Computers & Education, 35(1), 65-80.
Cicchette, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Toward an ecological/transactional model of community violence and child maltreatment: Consequences for children’s development. Psychiatry, 56, p96-118.
Coccaro, E. F., (1989). Central serotonin and impulsive aggression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 52-62.
Coccaro, E. F., Harvey, P. D., Kupsaw-Lawrence, E., Herbert, J. L., & Bernstein, D. P., (1991). Development of neuropharmacologically based behavioral assessments of impulsive aggressive behavior. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 3, S44-S51.
Cook, W., & Medley, D. (1954).Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414-418.
Coid, J. (1982). Alcoholism and violence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 9, 1-13.
Davis, R. A. (1999). Internet addiction: Is it real? Available at: http://www.victoriapointcom/internetaddiction.htm.
Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-195.
Davis, S. F., Smith, B., Rodrigue, K., & Pulvers, K. (1999). An examination of Internet use in two college campuses. College Student Journal, 33(2), 257-260.
Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. Joural of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160-1171.
Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162-170.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New York: Yale University Press.
Eckhardt, C. I., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (1995). Diagnosis of anger disorders. In H. Kassinove(Ed.), Anger disorders: definition, diagnosis, and treatment(pp. 27-47). London: Taylor & Francis.
Fantuzzo, J., DePaola, L., Lambert, L., Martino, T., Anderson, G., & Sutton, S. (1991). Effects of interparental violence on the psychological adjustment and competencies of young children. Journal Consult Clin Psychology, 59, 258-265.
Feshbach, S. (1964). The function of aggression and the regulation of aggressive drive. Psychological Review, 71, 257-272.
Fishbein, D. H., Dax, E., Lozovsky, D. B., & Jaffe, J. H., (1992). Neuroendocrine responses to a glucose challenge in substance user with high and low levels of aggression, impulsivity, and antisocial personality. Neuropsychobiology, 25, 106-114.
Freud, S. (1955). Civilization and its discontents. London: Hogarth Press.
Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf.
Geen, R. G. (1990). Human aggression. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Goldberg, I. (1995). Internet addiction disorder. Available at: http://www.cog.brown.edu/brochure/people/duchon/humor/internet.addiction.html.
Griffiths, M. (1998). Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In J.
Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal,
and transpersonal implications (pp. 61-75 ). San Diego: Academic Press.
Hall, J. A. (1990). Nonverbal sex differences: Accuracy of communication and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harris, J. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Aggression Questionnaire. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 991-993.
Hearn, M. D., Murray, D. M., & Luepker, R. V. (1989). Hostility, coronary heart disease, and total mortality: A 33-year follow-up study of university students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 105-121.
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
Huesmann, L. R., & Eron, L. D. (1986). Television and the aggressive child: Across-national comparison. NJ: Lawance Erlbaum.
Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Lefkowitz, M. M., & Walder, L. O. (1984). Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1120-1134.
Hughes, H., Parkinson, D., & Vargo, M. (1989). Witnessing spouse abuse and experiencing physical abuse: A “double whammy”? Journal of Family Violence, 4, p197-209.
Hyde, J. S. (1990). Meta-analysis and the psychology of sex differences. Signs, 16, 55-73.
Jaffe, J. H., Babor, T. F., & Fishbein, D. H., (1988). Alcoholics, aggression, and antisocial personality. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 49, 211-218.
Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
John, D., & Catherine, T. M. (1998). Exposure to violence. Available at: http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/notebook/violence.html
Kandell, J. J., (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 11-17.
Kankaanranta, R. V., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Bjorkqvist, K. (1993). Social struture of peer groups and indirect aggression among girls. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 55.
Kaplan, H., Martin, S., & Johnson, R. (1986). Self rejection and the explanation of deviance: Specification of the structure among latent constructs. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 384-411.
Kayany, J. (1998). Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information, 49(12), 1135-1141.
Kelloway, E. K. (1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215-224.
Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Common practices in structural equation modeling. In C. L. Copper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organization psychology, 1996 (pp. 141-180). Chichester. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kendall, P. C., & Braswell, L. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for impulsive children. New York: Guilford Press.
Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorder: internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245-1259.
Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Bjorkqvist, K. (1994). Indirect aggression in boys and girls. In R. L. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives(pp. 131-150). New York: Plenum Press.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 34, 238-301.
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated-communication. In M. Lea(Ed), Contexts of computer-mediated-communication (pp. 89-112). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Leon, G. R., Finn, S. E., Murray, D., & Bailey, J. M. (1988). The inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores of MMPI items related to Type A behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 597-600.
Lewinsohn, P. M., Gotlib, I. H., & Seeley, J. R. (1997). Depression-related psychosocial variables: Are they specific to depression in adolescents? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 365-375.
Lorenz, K. (1968). On aggression. New York: Bantam Books.
Maas, D. E. (1997). General semantics formulations in David Burns'' feeling good. A Review of General Semantics, 54(2), 225-235.
McCormick R. A., & Smith, M., (1995). Aggression and hostility in substance abusers: The relationship to abuse patterns, coping style, and relapse triggers. Additive Behaviors, 20(5), 555-562.
Meesters, C. M. G., Muris, P. M., & Backus, I. P. G. (1996). Dimensions of hhhostility and myocardial infarction in adult males. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 40(1), 21-28.
Meesters, C., Muris, P., Bosma, H., Schouten, E., & Beuving, S. (1996). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Aggression Questionnaire. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 839-843.
Megargee, E. I. (1985). The dynamics of aggression and their application to cardiovascular disorders. In M. A. Chesney & R. H. Rosenman (Eds.), Anger and hostlity in cardiovascular and behavioral disorders(pp. 31-57). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morahan-Martin J., & Schumacher, P., (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.
Mruk, C. (1995). Self-esteem: Research, theory, and practice. New York: Springer.
Oates, R. K., & Forrest, D. (1985). Self-esteem and early background of abusive mother. Child Abuse Neglect, 9, 89-93.
O’Hagan, M. B., Kindlon, D. J., Buka, S. L., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. J. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry in All Disease, 39, 215-224.
Osterman, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Kaukiainen, A., Huesmann, R. L., & Fraczek, A. (1994). Peer and self estimated aggression in 8-year old children from five ethnic groups. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 411-428.
Pratarelli, M. E., Browne, B. L., & Johnson, K., (1999). The bits and bytes of computer/Internet addiction: A factor analytic approach. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computer, 31, 305-314.
Putnam, F. W., & Trickett, P. K., (1993). Child sexual: A model of chronic trauma. Psychiatry, 56, 82-105.
Pynoos, R. S., Frederick, C., Nader, K., Arroyo, W., Steinberg, A., Eth, S., Nunez, F., & Fairbanks, L. (1987). Life threat and posttraumatic stress in school-age children. Archive of General Psychiatry, 44, 1057-1063.
Raine, A., & Scerbo, A. (1991). Biological theories of violence. In J. S. Milner(Ed.), Neuropsychology of Aggression(pp. 1-25). Boston: Academic Publishers.
Sanders, C. E., Field, T. M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35, 237-242.
Scherer, K. (1997). College life on-line: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Development, 38, 655-665.
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (2000). “Computer addition”: A critical consideration. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 162-168.
Shoham, S. G., Askenasy, J. J. M., Rahav, G., Chard, F., & Addi, A. (1989). Personality correlates of violent prisoners. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 137-145.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, S., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
Siegman, A. W., Dembroski, T. M., & Ringel, N. (1987). Components of hostility and the severity of coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 127-135.
Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(1), 39-50.
Spielberger, C. D., Reheiser, E. C., & Sydeman, S. J. (1995). Measuring the experience, expression and control of anger. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 18, 207-233.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
Surratt, C. G.. (1999). Netaholics? The creation of a pathology. Commack, NY: Niva Science Publishers.
Vitiello, B., Behar, D., Hunt, J., Stoff, D., & Ricciuti, A. (1990). Subtyping aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Neurpsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2, 189-192.
Volovka, J. (1995). Neurobiology of violence. Washington, D. C: American Psychiatric Press.
Tayloy, S. P., & Chermack, S. T. (1993). Alcohol, drug, and human physical aggression. Journal of the Study of Alcohol, Supplement, 11, 78-88.
Tennen, H. & Herxberger, S. (1987). Depression, self-esteem, and the absence of self-protective attributional biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 72-80.
Thompsen, P. A., & Foulger, D.A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computer in Human Behavior, 12(2), 225-243.
Webster, C. D., & Jackson, M. (1997). Impulsivity. New York: Guilford Press.
Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group Discussion and First Advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
Weimer, J. (1988). Machiavellianism and computer-mediated communication: An experiment in the software psychology of terminal to teoerminal communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbook, TX.
Williams, T. Y., Boyd, J. C., Cascardi, M. A., & Poythress, N. (1996). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Aggression Questionnaire in an offender population. Psychological Assessment, 8, 398-403.
Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use XI: Addictive use of the Internet: A case study that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79, 899-902.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical
disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 237-244.
Young, K. S., & Rogers, R. C., (1998). The relationship between depression and addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(1), 25-28.