跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.168.16) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/21 16:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:游俊哲
研究生(外文):Chun-Che Yu
論文名稱:以社會行銷觀點探討台北市民眾酒後駕車之行為意向
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Effect of Social Marketing Strategies on Drivers’Intentions of Drunk Driving- An Empirical Study for Taipei City
指導教授:張新立張新立引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Li Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:運輸科技與管理學系
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:103
中文關鍵詞:酒後駕車社會行銷行為意向計畫行為理論
外文關鍵詞:drunk drivingsocial marketingbehavioral intentionTheory of planned behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:76
  • 點閱點閱:1633
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:338
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:13
我國近年來由於車輛數目迅速攀升,使得交通環境衍生出許多問題,加上國人飲酒習慣不佳,因此導致酒後駕車交通事故件數暨傷亡人數一直高居不下。國內過去對酒後駕車之研究,多著重執法與罰則對酒後駕車之影響,鮮少探討宣導訊息與駕駛者酒後駕車行為之關係。本研究企圖援用計畫行為理論對行為意向之相關定義,並從社會行銷觀點架構分析模式,以瞭解訊息察覺度對民眾酒後駕車行為意向之相關影響。
本研究依據相關文獻進行酒後駕車行為之系統分析,並提出酒後駕車行為意向之模式,模式內容包括訊息察覺度、法規知識、對政府執行政策之信心、酒駕風險感認、酒駕感認行為控制與酒駕行為意向等六個潛在構面。為驗證所建構之模式的適配性與假設,本研究採用線性結構關係模式作為分析工具,進行確認性因素分析與路徑分析。研究對象係選取台北市成年有飲酒習慣之民眾,並以台北市住宅用戶電話簿為母體進行樣本之選取,調查方式則派員指導並回收問卷。
分析結果發現人口統計變數之性別、年齡與婚姻狀況以及民眾之飲酒量與飲酒頻率對酒駕行為意向都有顯著影響。在模式驗證方面,酒駕感認行為控制為影響酒駕行為意向之最重要因素,訊息察覺度、法規知識、對政策執行之信心與酒駕風險感認等變數也對酒駕行為意向產生顯著影響,至於沒有得到驗證之假設,則為訊息察覺度對風險感認與酒駕感認行為控制之影響。根據整體模式分析結果,本研究認為台北市政策行銷已具有初步成果。
為讓台北市未來能有效進行酒後駕車政策之行銷,本研究乃將分析成果與策略性行銷規劃程序結合,並提出幾點具體建議。首先建議未來政府可採用市場區隔方式,選取性別、年齡、飲酒行為與道路使用者型態等變數為區隔依據。在設計行銷方案方面,應讓產品更多元化,且應多加利用社區與網際網路等行銷通道。最後建議政府應建立適當之評估與控制之機制,設定適當行銷目標,並訂出相關標的,爾後能定期進行行銷績效評估,以期能修正行銷策略。
Drunk driving is commonly recognized as an important factor affecting the occurrence of traffic accidents. Most of studies for drunk driving preventive strategies were mainly focused on the applications of enforcement and penalty. Little attention has been placed on exploring the effect of policy promotion on reducing the drivers’ intensions of drunk driving. The aim of this study was conducted to explore the effect of information consciousness on drunk driving behavioral intentions by employing the theories of planned behavior and social marketing.
We started this study by developing a conceptual framework for the behavioral intentions of drunk driving, and then formulated the relationship between six developed constructs by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and path analysis of Linear Structural Relations (LISREL). A set of questionnaires was designed to collect the relevant information about the adult drivers, who were randomly sampled from the telephone directory of residents in Taipei city and had the experience of drinking, in order to verify the developed model.
The study results showed the gender, age, marital status, as well as the amount and frequency of drinking had significant effects on drunk-driving behavioral intentions. Furthermore, the information consciousness, comprehension to regulations, confidence to policy implementation, and risk perception for drunk driving were also found to have significant effects on drunk-driving behavioral intentions. The perceived behavior control for drunk driving was found to be the most important factor affecting drivers’ drunk-driving behavioral intentions. However, the effects of information consciousness on the risk perception and perceived behavior control for drunk driving were not significant as expected. In sum, the effect of policy promotion on reducing drivers’ drunk driving behavioral intentions in Taipei City has been somewhat achieved.
According to the study results, some suggestions are drawn in this study. Different promotion strategies are suggested to apply to different market groups in terms of gender, age, marital status, and drinking behaviors. Furthermore, the marketing programs are supposed to be diversified and promoted through various marketing channels like communities and the Internet. At last, an assessing, auditing, and controlling mechanism for policy promotion should be established so as to evaluate the performance regularly and revise marketing strategies if necessary.
誌 謝 iv
目 錄 v
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍與對象 3
1.4 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 6
2.1 酒後駕車相關研究 6
2.1.1酒後駕車行為之研究 6
2.1.2國外防制酒後駕車之研究 7
2.1.3 國內酒後駕車之研究 12
2.2 社會行銷相關研究 14
2.2.1社會行銷 14
2.2.2 政策行銷 18
2.2.3 社會行銷之應用 23
2.3 健康訊息設計與傳播之理論背景 25
2.3.1 理性行為理論與計畫行為理論 26
2.3.2 健康訊息傳播模式 28
第三章 研究方法 30
3.1 系統分析 30
3.2 研究模式與假設 31
3.3 問卷設計與衡量變數 33
3.4 問卷試測與修改 36
3.5 資料蒐集 38
3.6 分析方法 40
3.6.1 資料處理與基本資料分析 41
3.6.2 信度與效度之檢定 41
3.6.3 模式驗證之方法 43
第四章 分析結果 48
4.1 樣本結構分析 48
4.2 問卷信度與效度分析 50
4.3 酒後駕車行為意向特性分析 50
4.3.1 酒後駕車行為意向敘述統計分析 51
4.3.2 飲酒頻率與酒駕行為意向之關聯分析 52
4.3.3 飲酒量與酒駕行為意向之關聯分析 53
4.4 酒後駕車行為意向模式分析 55
4.4.1 確認性因素分析與模式特性分析 55
4.4.2 路徑分析 59
4.5 酒後駕車政策行銷之分析 60
4.5.1 酒後駕車議題之群眾環境分析 62
4.5.2 酒後不駕車之行銷核心策略 64
4.5.3 酒後駕車政策行銷之評估與控制 68
4.6 防治酒後駕車政策之態度分析 70
第五章 結論與建議 73
5.1 結論 73
5.2 建議 75
5.2.1 對台北市防治酒後駕車政策之建議 75
5.2.2 對未來研究之建議 75
參考文獻 77
附錄一 初測問卷 87
附錄二 正式問卷 91
附錄三 酒後駕車相關之道路交通管理處罰條例條文 95
1.王信之,「政府行銷的理論與應用─以行政院新聞局為例」,文化大學,碩士論文,民國87年。
2.王保進,統計套裝程式SPSS與行為科學研究,松岡電腦圖書資料股份有限公司,民國85年。
3.吳統雄,「態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、反應、反省」,民意學術專刊,夏季號,民國74年。
4.李長晏,「行銷觀念政府組織管理上之應用」,公共行政的知識議題與新趨勢,張家洋(編),,三民書局,民國84年。
5.李昭儀,「政府機構的策略性行銷規劃─家庭計畫研究所個案分析」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,民國81年。
6.李涴汝,「符號學運用於政策行銷之研究」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,民國88年。
7.阮祺文,「酒醉駕車─飲不盡的悲歌」,彰化基督教醫院急診醫學部教學資料,民國86年。
8.林妙芬,「降低酒醉駕車肇事之政策探討:台灣之實証研究」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國80年。
9.林清山,「『線性結構關係』 (LISREL)電腦程式的理論與應用」,中國測驗學會測驗年刊,第31輯,149~164頁,民國73年。
10.林潔瑜,「行銷理念應用於公共組織之研究:全民健康保險方案個案分析」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,民國87年。
11.邱立誠,「酒醉駕駛行為之特性與防制方法」,都市交通,第52期,13~23頁,民國79年。
12.洪英正,「行銷觀念的擴大─社會行銷理論的整理與啟示」,思與言,第30卷第30 期,87~105頁,民國81年。
13.胡谷展,「台北市酒後駕車執法策略與績效之研究」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國90年。
14.胡龍騰,「政策行銷之理論與實踐:野生動物保育政策個案分析」,國立中興大學,碩士論文,民國86年。
15.張金鳳,「社會行銷公益活動之傳播效果個案研究以臺北地區大學生對1996『把愛找回來』公益活動之認知、態度及行為為例」,中國文化大學,碩士論文,民國86年
16.張重昭,「探討社會行銷的意義、內涵及未來發展」,社會科學論叢,第33期,295~310頁,民國85年。
17.張新立等,「實施酒後駕車道安講習對道路交通安全之改善成效評估─以台北市為例」,第七屆運輸安全研討會論文集,民國89年11月7日。
18.張新岳,「從酒罪駕駛執法現況論正當法律程序之適用」,中央警察大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
19.曹俊漢,公共政策,三民書局,台北,民國79年。
20.曹常鴻,「行銷在非營利機構之應用─消費者文教基金會實例研究」,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文,民國76年。
21.莊世鳳,「政策擴散設計之研究─以台北市推動資源回收政策為個案」,中國文化大學,碩士論文,民國83年。
22.郭文俊,「酒後駕車風險知覺之資訊整合實驗」,國立中山大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
23.陳宜棻,「整合行銷傳播在公共政策上之推廣研究-以臺北市新制垃圾收費為例」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
24.陳高村,「道路交通管理法規立法技術之研究─從酒後駕車管理立法」,八十九年道路交通安全與執法研討會論文集,民國89年6月8日。
25.陳逸潔,「行銷取向之公共關係研究─非營利機構之個案分析」,輔仁大學,碩士論文,民國80年。
26.黃承傳,胡谷展,「台北市酒後駕車外顯特徵及違規原因分析」,九十一年道路交通安全與執法研討會論文集,民國91年10月4日。
27.黃昌宏,「公共政策行銷理念之引介」,公共事務論叢,461~186頁,民國82年。
28.黃俊英,「市民就是顧客─行銷觀念與市政建設」,研考月刊,第112期, 53~60頁,民國75年。
29.黃俊英,行銷研究─管理與技術,華泰書局,民國85年。
30.黃嘉斌,「非營利事業行銷─以高雄市天主教為例初探」,國立中山大學,碩士論文,民國82年。
31.楊國樞等,社會及行為科學研究方法(上)(下),十三版,東華書局,1992。
32.趙家皓,「台灣酒後駕車行為的探討與分析」,輔仁大學,碩士論文,民國89年。
33.劉潔心、劉貴雲、蔡春美,「青少年互動式戒菸自助手冊教材發展及介入效果之初探性研究」,衛生教育學報,第13期,73~89頁,民國89年。
34.鄭麗嬌,「社會行銷理論在科技策之應用─美國太空總署太空發射計畫之個案研究」,政治科學論叢,第6期,223~258頁,民國84年。
35.魯允文,「行銷觀念應用於政策執行之研究」,國立中興大學,碩士論文,民國85年。
36.駱淑女,「社會行銷模式之研究─以公益彩券行銷為例」,東海大學,碩士論文,民國86年。
37.叢萍,「社會行銷在臺灣捐血事業的應用--以中華血液基金會為例」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,民國84年。
38.蘇庭滿,莊弼昌,「以顏色管理強化酒後駕車防治措施之初探」,九十一年道路交通安全與執法研討會論文集,民國91年10月4日。
39.Ajzen, I., “From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior”, In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer Verlag, New York, 1985.
40.Ajzen, I., “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991.
41.Andreasen, A.R, “Social marketing: Definition and domain”, Journal of Marketing and Public policy, pp.108-114, 1994.
42.Anderson, James C., and David W. Gerbing, “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, vol.103, pp.411-423, 1988.
43.Arndt, “How Broad Should the Marketing Concept Be?” , Journal of Marketing, January, pp.101-103, 1978.
44.Atkin, C. K. & Block, M., “Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers”, Journal of Advertising Research, vol.23, pp.57-61, 1983.
45.Atkin, C. K., “On regulating broadcast alcohol advertising”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, pp.107-113, 1993.
46.Atkin, C. K., Hocking, J., & Block, M., “Teenage drinking: Does advertising make a difference? “, Journal of Communication, vol.34, pp.157-167,1984.
47.Bagozzi R., “Marketing and exchange”, Journal of Marketing, vol.39, pp.32-39, October 1975.
48.Bartels, R.,Jenkins, R.L., “Macromarketing”, Journal of Marketing ,Vol. 41, pp.17-20,1977.
49.Bloom, P.N. & W. D. Novelli. , “Problems and Challenges in Social Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, vol.45, pp.79-88, 1981.
50.Borkenstein, R.F.; Crowther, R.F.; Shumate, R.P.; Ziel, W.B.; Zylman, R. The role of the drinking driver in traffic accidents. Department of Police Administration, Indiana University, 1964.
51.Cairney. p ; Carseldine, D. , “Drinking Driving and Random Breath Testing : A Survey of Knowledge, Attitude, Beliefs and Self Reported Behavior” , Research note prepared for the Road and Traffic Authority , New South Wales,1989.
52.Carol. Bryant etc, “A Social Marketing Approach to Increasing Enrollment in a Public Health Program:A Case study of the Texas WIC Program”, Human Organization,vol.60,2001.
53.Chaloupka, Frank J.; Henry Saffer, and Michael Grossman, 1991, “Alcohol Control Policies and Motor Vehicle Fatalities”, NBER, Working Paper, 3831,1991.
54.Christopher H. Lovelock & Charles B. Weinberg, Marketing for Public and Nonprofit Managers, New York, John Wiley, 1984.
55.Coffman, L.L., Public-Sector Marketing: A Guide for Practitioners , John Wiley & Sons, New York ,1986.
56.Cook, Philip J. and Moore, Michael J., “Alcohol”, NBER, Working Paper, 6905, 1999.
57.Cronin, J. J. Jr. and Taylor, S. A., “Measuring Service Quality:Reexamination and Extension”, Journal of Marketing, vol.56, pp.55-68, 1992.
58.European Transport Safety Council., Safety Monitor & ETSC.s Newsletter on Transport Safety Policy Development in the EU, Rue du Cornet,Brussels,1997.
59.Everett M. Rogers & F. Floyd Shoemaker, Communication of Innovations, New York:Free Press, 1971.
60.Ferber, R., “ The Expanding Role of Marketing in the 1970''s”, Journal of Marketing, vol.34, pp.29-30, 1970.
61.Fine, S.H., The Marketing of Ideas and Social Issues. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1989.
62.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I., Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. , MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
63.Flay, B.R., DiTecco, D., & Schlegel, R. P., “Mass Media in the Health Promotion: An Analysis Using an Extended Information-Processing Model”, Health Education Quarterly, vol.7, pp.127-147, 1980.
64.Frank, J.F. Further laboratory testing of in-vehicle alcohol test devices, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, report DOT-HS-807-333, Washington, DC, November 1988.
65.Garbacz, Christopher, “Traffic Fatalities in Taiwan.” Journal of Transport Economics and policy, pp.317-327, 1989.
66.Gerard E. Watzke. & W. k Mindak, “Marketing-Oriented Planning in Public Administration: The Case of the State Development Agency”, International Journal of Public Administration, vil.9, pp.153-192, 1987.
67.Gerstein, D.R., “Alcohol use and consequences”, Alcohol and public policy -- beyond the shadow of prohibition, pp.182-224, 1981.
68.Guielford . J. P., “Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education”, 1965.
69.Hardin,P.C.&Reis, J, “Interactive multimedia software design: concepts, process, and evaluation”, Health Education & Behavior, vol.24, pp35-53, 1997.
70.Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention, Social Marketing Strategies for Campus Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems, 1997.
71.Horton L., “Confronting Social Attitudes Toward Alcohol Use”, In Developing Effective Drug Education Programs, pp.19-25. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 620), 1992.
72.Hunt, S. D., “The Nature and Scope of Marketing”, Journal Marketing, vol.40, pp.17-28, 1976.
73.Job, R.F.S. “The application of learning theory to driving confidence: the effect of age and the impact of random breath testing”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.22, pp.97-107, 1990.
74.Job,R., Reported Attitudes, “Practices and Knowledge in relation to Drink-Driving : The effects of the Introduction of Random Breath Testing in New South Wales”, Alcohol ,Drug and Traffic Safety, Ninth international conference , San Juan, Pueto Rico, 1983.
75.Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sorbom, Dag (1996), LISREL VIII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, 1996.
76.Kenkel, Donald S., “Prohibition versus taxation: reconsidering the legal drinking age”, Contemporary Policy Issues, pp.48-57, 1993.
77.Kotler, P & Alan R. Andreasen, Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations, Prentice Hall, 1991.
78.Kotler, P. & G.Zaltman, “Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change”, Journal of Marketing, vol.35, pp.3-12, 1971.
79.Kotler, P. & S.J. Levy, “Broadening the Concept of Marketing “, Journal of Marketing, vol.33, pp.10-15, 1969.
80.Kotler, P. &Roberto, Eduardo L., Social Marketing:strategies for changing public behavior, Free Press, New York, 1989.
81.Krug E, ed.,“A leading cause of the global burden of disease”, Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999.
82.Lamb, CW. Jr, “Public Sector marketing Is Different”, Business Horizon, pp.56-60, July 1987.
83.Lastovicka, J. L., Murry, J. P., Joachimsthaler, E.J., “Evaluating the Measurement Validity of Lifestyle Typologies with Qualitative Measures and Multiplicative Factoring”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.27, 1990.
84.Lazer, W. & Kelley, E.J., Social marketing: Perspectives and viewpoints, Irwin: Homewood, 1973.
85.Leonard Evans, Traffic Safety and The Driver, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.
86.Lieberman, D.A., “Interactive video games for health promotion effects on knowledge, self-efficacy, social support, and health”. In Richard L. Street, Jr. (Eds). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology:Theoretical Application and Future Directions, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
87.Luck, K. J., “ Marketing Notes and Communication: Broading the Concept of Concept of Marketing-Too Far”, Journal of Marketing, vol.33, pp.53-63, 1969.
88.Margie Peden & Adnan Hyder, “Road traffic injuries are a global public health problem”, BMJ, 324, pp.1153, 2002.
89.Mark B. D. & Patricia A.C., Program Planning for HealthEducation and Promotion. Lea & Febiger, 1992.
90.May O. Lwin etc, “Social Marketing Initiatives:National Kidney Foundation’s Organ Donation Programs in Singapore”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol.21, pp.66-77, 2002.
91.McGuire, W.J., “Theoretical foundations of campaigns”. In R. E. Rice, C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns, Sagepublications, 1985.
92.Mercer, G.W., “The relationships among driving while impaired charges, police drinking-driving roadcheck activity, media coverage and alcohol-related casualty traffic accidents”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 17, pp.467-474, 1985.
93.Mokwa, M. P. & S. E. Permut, Government Marketing: Theory and Practice, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1981.
94.Mosher, J.F., “Server intervention: a new approach to preventing drinking driving”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.15, pp.483-497, 1983.
95.Moskowitz, H.; Robinson, C., “Driving-related skills impairment at low blood alcohol levels”, Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety - T86, pp79-86, 1987.
96.Mullahy, John and Sindelar, Jody L., “Do drinkers know when to say when? An empirical analysis of drunk driving”, Economic Inquiry, pp.383-394, 1994.
97.Murray CJL, Lopez AD, Global health statistics: a compendium of incidence, prevalence and mortality estimates for over 200 conditions. Harvard University Press, Boston, 1996.
98.Murry Jr., J.P., A. Stam and J.L. Lastovicka, “Evaluating an Anti-Drinking and Driving Advertising Campaign with: A Sample Survey and Time Series Intervention Analysis”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.88, pp50-56, 1993.
99.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Alcohol and highway safety 1984:a review of the state of the knowledge . Document DOT-HS-806-569. Washington, DC, February 1985.
100.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Addressing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Training Physicians to Detect and Counsel Their Patients Who Drink Heavily, Washington, DC, 2001.
101.OECD, Road Transport Research, Marketing of traffic safety, OECD, Paris, 1993,
102.Peden, M.M., Krug E., Mohan D., Hyder A., Norton R., MacKay, M., and C. Dora, Five-Year WHO Strategy on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
103.Phelps, Charles E., “Death and taxes: an opportunity for substitution”, Journal of Health Economics, pp.1-24, 1988.
104.Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C., “Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change”, Psychotherapy:Theory Research and Practice , vo.19, pp276-288, 1982.
105.Reark Research, Community Attitudes to Road Safety:community Attitudes Surveys Waves 2, Federal Office of Road Safety,Canberra, 1987.
106.Rice, R.E., & Atkin, C.K., Public communication campaigns, Newbury Park, Calf: Sage Publications, 1989.
107.Roads and Traffic Authority, Road Traffic Accidents in New South Wales 1988, Rosebury, NSW, Australia: Road Safety Bureau, 1989.
108.Roscoe, J.T., Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavior Sciences, 2nd ed., Rinehart and Winston, 1975.
109.Ross H.L.; Voas, R.B., The New Philadelphia story: the effects of severe penalties for drunk driving. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC, March 1989.
110.Ross, H.L., “Brewers view of drunk driving: a critique”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.19, pp.475-477, 1987.
111.Ruhm, Christopher J., “Alcohol policies and highway vehicle fatalities”, Journal of Health Economics, vol.15, pp.435-454, 1996.
112.Russell. B., Trevor. S., “Social Marketing and Regulatory Compliance”, Innovations in Social Marketing Conference, 1999.
113.Saffer, H.; Grossman, M. Beer taxes, “the legal drinking age, and youth motor vehicle fatalities”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.26, pp.351-374, 1987.
114.Scrivens, E., “ Is There A Role For Marketing In the Public Sector”, Public Money & Management, vol.11, pp.17-23, 1991.
115.Siegrist .s., Bachli-Bietry, J., “Target Group Segmentation for Prevention and Control of drink-driving (enforcement measures)”, International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety, 2000.
116.Sloan, Frank A. and Githens, Penny B., “Drinking, Driving, and the Price of Automobile Insurance”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol.61, pp.33-58, 1994.
117.Sloan, Frank A.; Reilly, Bridget a. and Christoph Schenzler, “Effects of Tort Liability and Insurance on Heavy Drinking and Drinking and driving.” Journal of Law and Economics, pp.49-77, 1995.
118.Snavely, K., ”Marketing in the Government Sector : A Public Policy Model”, American Review of Public Administration , vol.21, no.4, pp.311-326, 1991.
119.Stewart Adam, “New Weapons in the Battle for Shelf-space”, Marketing Magazine, pp. 48-51, August 1991.
120.Straub, Detmar W., “Validating Instruments in MIS Research”, MISQ, pp.147-169, June 1989.
121.Touche Ross Services, Community Attitudes to Road Safety:community Attitudes Surveys Waves 2, Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra, 1986.
122.Vlek, C., & Stallen, P. J., “Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.28, pp.235-271, 1983.
123.Vlek, C., Kuyper, H.m & Boer, H., “Large-scale risk as a problem of technological, psychological and political judgment”. In V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. stallen & V. R. R. Uppuluri (eds.), Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
124.Voas, R.B., Cars that drunks can''t drive. National Highway Safety Bureau Report HS-810 169. Washington, DC, 1969.
125.Voas, R.B., “Countermeasures for reducing alcohol-related crashes.” Forensic Science Review, January 2000.
126.Wagenaar A.C., Alcohol, young drivers, and traffic accidents: effects of minimum-age laws. MA: Lexington Books, Lexington, 1984.
127.Wagenaar A.C.; Streff, F.M. “Macroeconomic conditions and alcohol-impaired driving”, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, vol.50, pp.217-225, 1989.
128.Waller, P. F., “Epidemiology of Alcohol-Related and the Grand Rapids Study”, Forensic Science Review, vol.12, pp.107-119, 2000.
129.Walsh, B.M., “Do excise taxes save lives? The Irish experience with alcohol taxation”, Analysis and Prevention, vol.19, pp.433-448, 1987.
130.Wells-Parker, E., Williams, M., Dill, P., & Kenne, D., “Stages of change and self-efficacy for controlling drinking and driving: A psychometric analysis”, Addictive Behaviors, 1998.
131.Wilkinson, James T., “Reducing Drunken Driving: Which Policies Are MostEffective”, Southern Economic Journal, vol.54, pp.322-334, 1987.
132.Winett, R. A., Information and Behavior: Systems of Influence, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1986.
133.Yanovitsky, I. & Bennett, c., “Media attention, institutional response, and health behavior change”, Communication Research, vol.26, pp.429-453, 1999.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 33.劉潔心、劉貴雲、蔡春美,「青少年互動式戒菸自助手冊教材發展及介入效果之初探性研究」,衛生教育學報,第13期,73~89頁,民國89年。
2. 16.張重昭,「探討社會行銷的意義、內涵及未來發展」,社會科學論叢,第33期,295~310頁,民國85年。
3. 12.洪英正,「行銷觀念的擴大─社會行銷理論的整理與啟示」,思與言,第30卷第30 期,87~105頁,民國81年。
4. 9.林清山,「『線性結構關係』 (LISREL)電腦程式的理論與應用」,中國測驗學會測驗年刊,第31輯,149~164頁,民國73年。
5. 34.鄭麗嬌,「社會行銷理論在科技策之應用─美國太空總署太空發射計畫之個案研究」,政治科學論叢,第6期,223~258頁,民國84年。
6. 3.王健全(1999),「『促進產業升級條例』租稅優惠措施實施成效評估及其修正方向對台灣經濟的影響」,經濟情勢暨評論季刊第五卷第一期。
7. 8.江莉莉,(2002),「兩稅合一與動態均衡下的所得分配」,經濟論文叢刊第30卷第2期,頁205-227。
8. 9.李文瑞(1999),「加入WTO對我國中小企業與政府政策之衝擊」,理論與政策第50期,頁85-95。
9. 10.李青蓉、李堯賢、林怡芯(2002),「臺灣政府支出規模與經濟成長之研究」,臺灣經濟金融月刊第38卷第4期,頁53-69。
10. 12.汪寧生、李政達(1998),外人直接投資與經濟貢獻及獎勵措施之關係,經濟情勢暨評論季刊第三卷第四期。
11. 13.林世銘(2002),「兩稅合一前後產業租稅環境與經營績效之比較」,財稅研究第34卷第3期,頁64-78。
12. 14.林其昂、陳詠怡(2000),「探究制度變遷的重要性-以租稅邊際超額負擔為例」,經濟論文第28卷第4期,頁397-427。
13. 16.周治邦、李丹(2003),「不可逆轉投資與租稅政策」,財稅研究第35卷第2期,頁116-128。
14. 17.周濟(1988),「獎勵投資租稅措施之總體資料分析(上)(下)」,財稅研究第20卷第5期,頁43-47;第6期,頁8-23。
15. 20.馬嘉應、呂欣諄(2003),「資本投資之策略性租稅規劃」,財稅研究第35卷第2期,頁129-152。