(3.238.250.105) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/18 19:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳俞蓉
研究生(外文):Chen Yu Rong
論文名稱:台灣金融控股公司的宣告及財富效果
論文名稱(外文):The Announcement and Wealth Effects of the Finance Holding Companies:The Case of Taiwan
指導教授:許和鈞許和鈞引用關係鍾惠民鍾惠民引用關係
指導教授(外文):Her-Jiun SheuHuimin Chung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理科學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:28
中文關鍵詞:金融控股法事件研究法宣告效果財富效果
外文關鍵詞:Financial Holding Company ActEvent StudyAnnouncement EffectWealth Effect
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:82
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來,國際間金融市場緊密度愈來愈高,國際金融業經營逐漸從以商品為中心轉為以顧客為中心,結合銀行、證券、保險與資產管理等各項服務,提供全方位的服務遂成趨勢。為強化台灣金融市場競爭力,政府於2001年六月推動金融革新,開放金融控股公司設立。金融控股公司法的通過,揭開了台灣金融大改革的序幕。在變動日益劇烈的全球市場,金融業者必須滿足客戶日新月異的需求,順應一夕數變的市場價格變動,同時快速反應隨時發生的各種風險。為檢測台灣通過金融控股法規的市場效應,本研究以五十二家金融類上市公司為樣本,針對一審及三審通過日以事件研究法的市場模型做異常報酬的檢測。同時針對後續的金控集團主體公司及子公司納入宣告日為事件日,以調整後市場模型為架構做異常報酬的檢測。
根據結果顯示市場對於全體金融機構在法規一審及通過日皆為負的異常報酬。區分為商業銀行、中小企銀、票券金融、保險時,則在一審日除保險業為顯著負報酬外,其他三者皆為不顯著正報酬。財富移轉效果在通過日當天及前後一天成立,商業銀行為負效果,其他三者為不顯著正效果。若以金控及非金控做分類,則皆無顯著效果,可顯示法規通過時市場無法準確預測何者會成立金控。成立金控時,主體公司累積異常報酬為負,而子公司累積異常報酬為正,顯示財富移轉效果成立。若以金控集團的累積異常報酬來看,則平均而言投資者對金控集團的成立具有正面的投資意願。
The deregulation of financial institutions such as commercial banks, investment banks, securities and insurers has become a trend in the world recently. Taiwan Legislatively Yuan passed the Financial Holding Company (FHC) Act on June 27, 2001. The permission for the establishing of holding companies not only enhances the competitive ability for local financial institutions but also consolidates Taiwan’s financial environment. The possible benefits are product diversity, conglomeration effect besides the well-known cost and revenue synergy. This study employed event study to measure the announcement and wealth transfer effects. The samples used include 52 financial institutions listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange. The multiple regression model with additional dummy variable for event period is applied to evaluate the effects. The results examined from the stock market’s evaluation indicate that the market’s perception of wealth effects of the aforementioned financial deregulation overhaul were generally negative. The business banks, bills finance and insurances have positive announcement effect for the final passage of Financial Holding Company Act. The classification of FHC and non-FHC shows no significant effect. It indicates that the public has no information of the main component and subsidiary for the holding company at the FHC passage. It is also implied that the investors might believe the combination of different financial service institutions make synergy in revenue side and/or economic scale cost.
Abstract ………………………………………………………………… i
Abstract in Chinese ………………………………………………………………… ii
Acknowledgement ………………………………………………………………… iii
Contents ………………………………………………………………… iv
Table Contents ………………………………………………………………… v
Figure Contents ………………………………………………………………… vi
1 Introduction…………………………………………………… 1
2 Literature Review……………………………………………… 4
2.1. Financial Institutions Deregulation…………………………… 4
2.2 The Introduction of FHCs in Taiwan ………………………… 5
3 Data and Methodology………………………………………… 9
3.1 Sample Descriptions…………………………………………… 9
3.2 Methodology ………………………………………………… 13
3.2.1 Event Study Analysis of the FHC Act Announcement Effect… 14
3.2.2 Multivariate Regression Model ……………………………… 17
3.2.3 Hypothesis Testing …………………………………………… 18
4 Empirical Results……………………………………………… 19
4.1 FHC Act Announcement Effect ……………………………… 19
4.2 FHC Group Announcement Effect …………………………… 26
5 Conclusion …………………………………………………… 28
Reference ………………………………………………………………… 29
Appendix A ………………………………………………………………… 32
Appendix B ………………………………………………………………… 33
Appendix C ………………………………………………………………… 36
1. Akhigbe, A., and A. M. Whyte (2000), “Changes in Market Assessment of Bank Risk Following the Riegle-Neal Act of 1994,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, pp.87-102.
2. Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphrey, and L. B. Pulley, (1996), “Do Consumers Pay for One-Stop Banking? Evidence Comes from an Alternative Revenue Function,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, pp.1601-1621.
3. Berger, A. N., G. A. Hanweck, and D. B. Humphrey (1987), “Competitive Viability in Banking: Scale, Scope, and Product Mix Economies,” Journal of Monetary Economies, 20, pp.501-520.
4. Carow, K. A. (2001), “Citicorp—Travelers Group Merger: Challenging Barriers between Banking and Insurance Activities,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, pp.1553-1571.
5. Chen, S. S. (2002), “How Does Strategic Competition Affect Values? A Study of New Product Announcements,” Financial Management, 31, pp.5-22.
6. Chen, M.L. (2002), The Wealth and Risk Effects of Financial Holding Company Act on Taiwan’s Financial Industry, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Finance, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan.
7. Chou, P. H., and K. F. Tsai (1997), “Event Study Methodologies: The Case of Taiwan,” Journal of Securities Market Development, l9: 2, pp. 1-27.
8. Chung, H. (2002), Introduction to Financial Econometrics, Yeh Yeh Book Gallery, Taipei.
9. Chen, Y. H. (2002), A Study of the Impact of Implementing the Bank Holding Company Law on the Financial Stock for Privatization, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Finance Management, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
10. Clifford, W.S (1990), The Modern Theory of Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
11. Cornett, M.M., E. Ors, and H. Tehranian (2002), “Bank Performance around the Introduction of Section 20 Subsidiary,” Journal of Finance, 7, pp.501-521.
12. Cornett, M.M., H. Mehran, and H. Tehranian (1998), “ Are Financial Markets Overly Optimistic about the Prospect of Firms that Issue Equity? Evidence from Voluntary versus Involuntary Equity Issuances by Banks,” Journal of Finance, 53, pp.2139-2159.
13. Cornett, M.M. and H. Tehranianl (1992), “Changes in Corporate Performance Associated with Bank Acquisitions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 31, pp.211-234.
14. Cornett, M.M. and H. Tehranian, (1990), “An Examination of the Impact of the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 on Commercial Banks and Savings and Loans,” The Journal of Finance, 45, pp. 95-111.
15. Delong, G.L. (2001), “ Stockholder Gains from Focusing versus Diversifying Bank Mergers,” Journal of Financial Economics, 59:2, pp.221-252.
16. Diamond, D.W. (1985), “Optimal Release of Information by Firms,” Journal of Finance, pp.1017-1094.
17. Houston, J and C.M James (2001), “ Where Do Merger Gain Come from? Banks Mergers from the Perspective of Insiders and Outsiders,” Journal of Financial Economics, 60:3, pp.285-332.
18. Huang, S.H. (2001), The Impacts of Stock Repurchase Programs on Taiwan Stock Market, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Banking and Finance, Tamkang University, Taiwan.
19. Kane, E.J. (2000), “Incentives for Banking Megamergers: What Motives Might Regulators Infer from Evebt-Study Evidence,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32, pp.672-699.
20. Lee, F. (2001), Event Studies on Stock Price Effects Caused by the Enact of the Law of Bank Holding Company, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, Taiwan.
21. Lee, Y.C. (2002), The Study of Financial Holding Company and Merge: The Case of Fubon FHC, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Finance, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
22. Liu, C.Y. (2002), The Announcement Effect of the Financial Holding Company Act: The Case of Taiwan, Master Thesis (in Chinese), Department of Finance, Yuan-Ze University, Taiwan.
23. Rahul, B., and D. R. Fraser (1998), “On the Wealth and Risk Effects of Commercial Bank Expansion into Securities Underwriting: An Analysis of Section 20 Subsidiaries,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp.447-465.
24. Rhoades, S.A. (1994), A Summary of Merger Performance Studies in Banking, 1980-1993, and an Assessment of the Operating Performance and Event Study Methodology, Staff Studies Series, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
25. Saunders, A. and I. Walter (1994), Universal Banking in the United States, New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Scott, F.W. (1998), “Abnormal Returns in the Acquisition Market: The Case of Bank Holding Companies.1991-1993,” Journal of Financial Service Research, 14:2, pp.145-163.
27. Shapiro, K. (1994), “Systems Competition and Network Effects,” Journal of Economic Perspective, 8:2, pp.93-115.
28. Shen, C.F. and C.R. Lee (2000), Event Study-Application in Empirical Research of Accounting and Finance, Hwatai Publishing, Taipei.
29. Sinkey, J. F. (1999), “The Reaction of Bank Stock Prices to News of Derivatives Losses by Corporate Clients,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, pp. 1725-1743.
30. Yu, L. (2002), “On the Wealth and Risk Effects of the Glass-Steagall Overhual: Evidence from the Stock Market, ” American Finance Association Annual Conference, American.
31. Zellner, A. (1962), “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Test for Aggregation Bias,” Journal of the American Statistic Association, 57, pp.348-368.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔