跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.171.156) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/22 03:10
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳尚晏
研究生(外文):Shang-yen Chen
論文名稱:台灣地區高科技產業實行企業電子化之策略研究─以動態能力觀點分析
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Transformation Strategy from the Implementation of ERP to e-Business for Hi-Tech Domestic Company - Based on the Dynamic Capability Theory
指導教授:孫思源孫思源引用關係
指導教授(外文):Szu Yuan Sun
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:核心競爭能力動態能力企業資源規劃
外文關鍵詞:core competencedynamic capabilitiesERPe-business
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:195
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
由於環境的不確定性與複雜性,企業競爭已非以往單純地追求更快、更好的線性模式;企業應檢視本身既有的資源或能力,以此為基礎,自行找出一至二項最有競爭力的優勢,也就是核心競爭能力,才是利基之所在。動態能力觀點則強調企業必須具備適當地應用、整合與重新配置組織內外部技術、資源與功能的能力,藉以更新目前的核心能力而達到與經營環境的協調一致。本研究即以動態能力理論,也就是透過企業能力演進、變化、適應之概念,針對國內高科技產業進行個案研究,以深入訪談的方式瞭解ERP目前所處之階段,並探討轉型至電子化過程中所受到的影響及其轉換之路徑。
Because of uncertainty and complexity in business environment, it is not a simple linear mode in the competition between firms. They should view themselves own competence and find the competitive advantage out whereupon. In dynamic capabilities theory, firms must have capabilities to apply, integrate and reconfigure technology, resource and function both at outside and inside organization. By renovating core capabilities, a firm can act in business environment collaboratively. We employed case study by depth interview at hi-tech domestic companies according to dynamic capabilities theory to understand the ERP implementation stage of the firm, and tried to find the path of transformation from implementation ERP to e-Business out.
目錄I
表目錄II
圖目錄III
第1章 、緒論1
第1節 、研究背景與研究動機1
第2節 、研究目的3
第2章 、文獻探討5
第1節 、電子化企業(E-BUSINESS)5
第2節 、企業資源規劃(ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; ERP)的關鍵成功因素8
第3節 、資源基礎理論(RESOURCE BASED THEORY;RBT)13
第4節 、動態能力(DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES)14
第5節 、ERP/電子企業矩陣29
第3章 、研究設計39
第1節 、資料蒐集的方法39
第2節 、研究方法的選擇43
第3節 、研究架構47
第4節 、研究假說48
第4章 、資料分析55
第1節 、個案簡介55
第2節 、歸納分析58
第5章 、研究發現69
第1節 、假說驗證69
第2節 、從動態理論推導由實施ERP的建置到企業E化之架構75
第3節 、由動態能力之產業E化架構規劃行動路徑之方案77
第6章 、結論與建議84
第1節 、研究結論與建議84
第2節 、研究貢獻84
第3節 、研究限制與未來研究方向84
參考文獻87
1.丁源鴻,1998,”應用調適性結構化理論於ERP導入的個案研究─以SAP為例”,國立中央
大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。
2.司徒達賢,林晉寬,詹聖生,1995,”資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討”,國科
會專題研究報告,1月,頁237。
3.司徒達賢,2000,策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法,致勝出版。
4.吳怡萱,2000,”我國ERP 產業發展動態之分析與探討”,國立台灣大學商學研究所,碩
士論文。
5.吳思華,1996,策略九說,麥田出版公司,台北。
6.林東清,許孟祥,1997,”MIS調查研究方法探討”,資訊管理學報,vol.4,no.1,頁
21-40。
7.周樹林,1999,”我國ERP市場狀況與展望”,資訊與電腦,第228期。
8.周樹林,2000,”ERP 市場趨勢分析”,新電子科技雜誌,175期,10月。
9.信懷南,1998, “該不該建立ERP?”,EMBA世界經理文摘, 146 期,頁118-126。
10.黃光雄,簡茂發,1991,教育研究法,頁258-260。
11.黃政傑,1987,”教育研究亟需擺脫量化的支配”,教育研究方法論,頁131-140。
12.黃瑞琴,1991,質的教育研究方法,心理出版社,台北。
13.許文科,2000,”企業導入ERP的成功關鍵因素探討”, 國立台灣科技大學工業管理研
究所,碩士論文。
14.葉立誠,葉至誠,1999,研究方法與論文寫作,商鼎出版。
15.張一蕃,1997,”資訊時代之國民素養與教育”。
16.張旭男,2002,”應用動態能力架構探討企業發展途徑”,東海大學企業管理學系碩士
班,碩士論文。
17.張志明,劉淑娟,2000,”知識管理在學校行政的應用:以總務處營繕工程為例”,學
校行政雙月刊,6期,頁71-82,台北。
18.張素碧,2000,”ERP系統在電子業導入成功關鍵因素之研究∼個案導入探討”,元智大
學工業工程研究所,碩士論文。
19.廖志德,2000,”導入ERP,實踐世界級的管理”,誠邦EB 策略電子報,5月1日。
20.歐用生,1985,質的研究,師大書苑,台北。
21.劉鳳如,1998,”企業倒入企業資源規劃(ERP)套裝軟體的策略性目標與重要關鍵因素關
係之研究”,國立臺灣大學商學研究所,碩士論文。
22.蔡育瑩,1998,”台灣電子業導入ERP系統之關鍵因素”,國立中興大學企業管理研究
所,碩士論文。
23.謝達政,2001 ,“影響台灣中小企業以ASP模式導入延伸式企業資源規劃系統(EERP) 之
因素研究”,朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
24.顏美惠,1999,”如何避免導入無效之ERP — 訪SAP台灣分公司總經理蔡宏隆” 及”
ERP:中小型企業競爭新利基 — 訪鼎新電腦副總裁黃錦祿”,資訊與電腦,228期。
25.鍾娟兒,1981,”問卷法之研究”,台灣教育,370期,10月,頁16-17。
26.蘇郁琇,1998,”台灣地區企業採用企業資源規劃系統(ERP)之影響因素研究”,國立台
灣大學會計學研究所,碩士論文。
27.Amit, R., Schoemaker P., 1993, “Strategic assets and organizational rent,”
Strategic Management Journal, vol.14, no.1, pp.33-46.
28.Barney, J.B., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”
Journal of Management, vol.17, pp.99-120.
29.Bogdan, R.C., Biklen, S.K., 1982, “Qualitative research for education:An
introduction to theory and methods,” Newton, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
30.Bonoma, T.V., 1985, ”Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems,
and a Process,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol.22, pp.199-208, May.
31.Caissy, Gail A., 1992, “Curriculum for the Information Age,” North
Carolina department of public instruction., Bob Etheridge, State
Superintendent, p1.
32.Camp, R., 1989, Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best practices that
Lead to Superior Performance, Milwaukee, WI: Quality Press.
33.Clark, K., Fujimoto T., 1991, Product Development Performance: Strategy,
Organization and Management in the World Auto Industries, , Cambridge, MA:
Harvard Business School Press.
34.Davenport, T.H., 1998, “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise
System,” Harvard Business Review, pp.121-131, July-August.
35.Drucker, Peter F., 1995, Managing in a Time of Great Change.
36.Earl, M.J., 2000, “Evolving the e-Business,” Business Strategy Review,
vol.11, no. 2, pp.33-38.
37.Elsenhardt, K.M., J.A. Martin, 2000, “Dynamic capabilities: what are
they? ,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.21, no.10-11, pp.1105-1121.
38.Firestone, W.A., 1987, “Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and
qualitative research,” Educational Researcher, vol.16, no.7, pp.16-21.
39.Garvin, D., 1988, Managing Quality, Free Press, New York.
40.Gay C.L., James E., 2001, Outsourcing strategiczny.
41.Gereffi, Gary, 1999, International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the
Apparel Commodity Chain,” Journal of International Economics, vol.48, pp.37-
70.
42.Grant, R.M., 1991, “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage:
Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review,
pp.114-135.
43.Hamel G., Prahalad C.K., 1990, “The Core Competence of the Corporation,”
Harvard Business Review, vol.68, no.3, pp.79-91.
44.Hamel G., Prahalad C.K., 1995, Competing for the Future.
45.Hammer, M., Champy J., 1993, Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for
Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business.
46.Hackbarth Gary, William J. Kettinger, 2000, “Building an E-Business
Strategy,” Information Systems Management, pp.78-93.
47.Helfat, C.E., 1997, “Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic
capability accumulation:The case of R&D,” Strategic Management Journal,
vol.18, pp.339-360.
48.Hesterbrink C., 1999, “E-Business and ERP: Bringing Two Paradigms
Together,” Price Waterhouse Coopers.
49.Hill, C.W.L., Jones, G..R., 1998, Strategic Management Theory: An integrated
approach.
50.Hitt M.A. , Lei D., Bettis R., 1996, “Dynamic Core Competence Through
Meta-Learning and Strategic Context,” Journal of Management, vol.22, no.4,
pp.549-569.
51.Huber, G..P., 1991, “Organizational Learning:the Contributing Processes
and the Literatures,” Organization Science, vol.2, no.1, pp.88-115.
52.Joan Giesicke, Beth McNeil, 1999, “Core Competencies and the Learning
Organization,” Library Administration and Management, vol.13, no.3, pp.158.
53.John Galbraith, 1977, The Age of Uncertainty.
54.Kalakota Ravi, Robinson Marcia, 1999, “e-Business Roadmap for Success,”
Addison Wesley Longman.
55.Kaplan, R.S., Norton D.P., 1996, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating
Strategy into Action. Cambridge, Harvard Business School Press.
56.Kown, T.H., Zmud, R.W., 1987, “Unifying the Fragmented Models of
Information Systems Implementation,” Boland and Hirschheim (Eds.) Critical
Issues, Information Systems Research.
57.Lambe, C.J., Spekman, R.E., 1997, “Alliances, External Technology
Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change,” J PROD INNOV MANAG
14, pp.102-116.
58.Langlois, R., 1994, “Cognition and capabilities: Opportunities seized and
missed in the history of the computer industry,” working paper, University
of Connecticut, Presented at the conference on Technological Oversights and
Foresights, Stern School of Business, New York University, March, pp.11-12.
59.Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G., 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
60.Lucas, H.C., Ju., “Methodological Issues in Information Systems Survey
Research,” Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods,
vol.3, K.L. Kraemer, (eds.), Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
61.McFarlan, F.W., Nolan, R.L., 1995, “How to Manage an IT Outsourcing
Alliance,” Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp.9~23.
62.McFarlan, F.W., McKenny, J.L., Applegate, L.M., 1996, Corporate Information
Systens Manaement: Text and Cases, Forth Edition, IRWIN.
63.Merriam, S.B., 1988, Case study research in education: A qualitative
approach, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
64.Mody, A., 1993, “Learning through Alliances, Journal of Economic Behaviour
and Organization,” vol.20, pp.151-170.
65.Montgomery, C., Collis D., 1995, “Competing on Resources,” Harvard
Business Review.
66.Norris, Hurley, Hartley, Dunleavy, Balls, 2000, E-Business and ERP:
Transforming the Enterprise.
67.Pfeffer, J., Salancik G.R., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A
Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row Publishers, NY.
68.Pinsonneault, A., Kraemer K., 1993, “Survey Research Methodology in
Management Information Systems,” Journal of Management Information Systems,
vol.10, no.2, pp.75-105.
69.Porter, M.E., 1985, “Competitive Advantage: Techniques for Analyzing
Industries and Corporations,” New York, NY: The Free Press.
70.Senge, P., 1990, The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning
organization, New York: Doubleaday Company.
71.Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R., 1984, “Introduction to qualitative research
methods,” New York: John Wiley & Sons.
72.Teece, D.J., 1980, “Economics of scope and the scope of enterprise,”
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol.1, pp.223-247.
73.Teece, D.J., 1986, “Profiting from technological innovation,” Research
Policy, vol.15, no.6, pp.285-305.
74.Teece, D.J., Pisano G.., and Shuen, A., 1997, “Dynamic capabilities and
strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.18, no.7, pp.509-
533.
75.Turner C., 2001, The Information E-conomy--Business Strategies for
Competing in the Digital Age.
76.Watkins, K.E., Marsick, V.J., 1993, Sculpting the learning organization, San-
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
77.Williamson Oliver, 1975, “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust
Implications,” New York:Free Press.
78.Poundstone W., 2003, “Beware the interview inquisition,” Harvard Business
Review, vol.81, iss.5, pp.18, May.
79.Yin, R.K., 1984, Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications,
Newbury Park, Ca.
80.Yin, R.K., 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage
Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.
81.Yin, R.K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, Ca.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top