跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/06 15:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃坤麟
研究生(外文):Raymond Huang
論文名稱:國際加盟系統主加盟者知識管理活動之探討-以咖啡連鎖業為例
論文名稱(外文):The Knowledge Management Activities of Master Franchisees in International Franchising Systems: A Case Study of Coffee Chain Stores
指導教授:許英傑許英傑引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ying-Kiat Kho
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:行銷與流通管理所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:159
中文關鍵詞:零售業國際化主加盟者企業網絡資源知識管理活動
外文關鍵詞:Retailing internationalizationMaster FranchiseeCorporate ResourcesKnowledge Management Activity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1002
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:212
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:12
近年來,在國際化與全球化的潮流下,許多企業迅速地走出國界,邁進更有市場潛力的海外地區。而在各種國際擴張的方式當中,國際加盟連鎖制度似有益發盛行的趨勢。此外,由於零售業是一種立地化程度很高的產業,因此零售業之經營者在進行國際化的過程中,必須充份地將其業態經營方式當地化,以適應當地市場環境且迎合消費者之需求。然而,零售企業母公司之經營者因缺乏當地市場營運之經驗,故在本土化的過程中可能會與消費者的期望產生落差,此時,主加盟者的重要性將不言可喻。
另一方面說來,由於知識已成為企業成長動力與最重要的策略性資產,因此組織的知識管理活動愈發受重視。況且,對於進行國際擴張的零售業者而言,如何將本身的品牌經營知識與當地的市場及顧客知識相結合,將會影響到進入國際市場的成功與否,而這種整合加盟總部之經營知識與當地市場知識的平臺,即為國際加盟連鎖系統中的主加盟者。故本文以主加盟者之角度和層級,來探討零售化國際化過程中有關知識移轉、整合與組織學習之知識管理活動,將有助於加盟總部充份瞭解將經營知識當地化之方式,且對於主加盟者之當地市場擴展與開發具有積極的正面效益。
本研究以個案分析方法探討「上海統一星巴克咖啡」與「中國真鍋咖啡」所從事的知識管理活動,而研究結果的重要發現包括:(一) 除了國際化的推力及拉力外,知識複製的低成本特性亦為主加盟者進行國際化的主要動機之一;(二) 若主加盟者所能獲得的企業網絡資源越多,則主加盟者必須進行較多且較複雜的知識移轉及整合活動;(三) 在組織學習方面,主加盟者皆較偏重標竿學習與不斷改良的學習方式;(四) 若主加盟者的企業網絡資源愈多時,主加盟者亦可能運用實驗學習的組織學習方式,反之,則可能透過外部學習來進行組織學習。
本研究建議在企業國際化的過程中,應嘗試加入知識基礎觀點進行企業國際化之競爭優勢分析,而且在零售業國際化過程中,母公司或加盟總部應強調且關注主加盟者的知識管理活動,並透過知識移轉、整合、組織學習的方式提高主加盟者的知識存量,方能有利於零售業國際化之成功。
With the increasing importance of internationalization and globalization, many companies cross the boundaries for the potential regions, and retailers are included. Then among variety of internationalization explorations, international franchising systems become growingly common. Furthermore, in order to cater to customer needs and adapt to local market environments, the international retailers usually empower master franchisees the responsibility and right of local market development. Therefore, the roles of master franchisees will get more and more tremendous at the internationalization processes of retailers.
On the other hand, when knowledge management activities of organizations catch more and more attentions, how to combine the organizational knowledge and market knowledge, for retailers, will influence the success of international explorations. And master franchisees will exactly provide a platform for such knowledge combinations. Therefore, the study researched the knowledge transfer, integration and organizational learning in the internationalization processes of retailing from the level of master franchisees.
The author took international coffee chain stores for case study, and found 1) the low costs of knowledge replication became another main motivation of internationalization; 2) the master franchisees may use more benchmarking and continuous adaptation for organizational learning; 3) if master franchisees could access more resources, they may use experimentation for learning; on the contrary, they may use external learning if less resources could be accessed.
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………i
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………ii
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………iii
目錄…………………………………………………………………………iv
表目錄………………………………………………………………………v
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………vi
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………......3
第三節 研究範圍……………………………………………………......4
第四節 研究流程……………………………………………………………5
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………7
第一節 國際連鎖加盟制度與主加盟者之類型……………………………7
第二節 零售業國際化動機……………………………………………....11
第三節 企業集團網絡資源…………………........................21
第四節 知識管理活動....…………………………………………………27
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………54
第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………54
第二節 變數定義與衡量……………………………………………………55
第三節 個案研究法……………………………………………..........57
第四節 研究對象………………………………………………..........61
第五節 資料蒐集與訪談設計………………………………………………63
第四章 個案分析……………………………………………………………67
第一節 上海統一星巴克……………………………………………………67
第二節 中國真鍋咖啡……………………………………….. …………90
第三節 命題發展…………………………………………….. ………104
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………113
第一節 研究結論與管理意涵………………………………………………113
第二節 研究建議………………………………………………..........120
第三節 研究限制………………………………………………..........122
第四節 後續研究建議………………………………………………......123
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………124
附錄一 訪談大綱……………………………………………………………130
附錄二 訪談記錄……………………………………………………………131
表2-1 解釋國際化概念之方式……………………………………13
表3-1 研究變數之概念性定義與衡量……………………………55
表3-2 受訪者基本資料……………………………………………61
表3-3 各種資料來源的優缺點……………………………………64
表4-1 統一星巴克的門市分佈……………………………………71
表4-2 統一超商流通次集團之成員………………………………74
表4-3 星巴克目前所進入的全球市場……………………………77
表4-4 星巴克咖啡在中國三地之規模…………………. ………80
表4-5 中國真鍋咖啡館的門市分佈………………. ……………91
表4-6 台灣客喜康的門市分佈…………………. ………………93
表4-7 上海統一星巴克與中國真鍋之個案分析表………………104
圖1-1 研究流程圖…………………………………………………6
圖2-1 主加盟系統之組織型式……………………………………9
圖2-2 加盟系統國際化之模型……………………………………15
圖2-3 四種組織學習方式…………………………………………49
圖3-1 研究架構……………………………………………………54
圖3-2 個案研究的設計類型………………………………………58
圖4-1 星巴克咖啡進入中國市場之示意圖………………………79
圖4-2 真鍋咖啡進入中國市場之示意圖…………………………98
一、中文部份
1. 吳青松,1999,國際企業管理-理論與實務,二版,台北:智勝文化總經銷。
2. 吳若君,1997,「網路事業知識整合與創新類型關聯之研究」,政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
3. 陳萬淇,1995,個案研究法,再版,台北:華泰書局。
4. 楊國安、大衛.歐瑞奇、史蒂芬.納森 & 瑪莉安.范格林娜,2001,組織學習能力,台北:聯經出版。
5. 楊其清,2001,「組織內部知識移轉流程之研究-以惠普科技顧問事業群為例」,國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
6. Ikujiro Nonaka & Hirotaka Takeuchi,1997,楊子江、王美音譯,創新求勝:智價企業論,台北:遠流出版。
7. Leonard-Barton,1995,王美音譯,知識創新之泉:智價企業的經營,台北:遠流出版。
二、英文部份
1. Argyris, C. & D. Schon, 1978, Organizational learning, London: Addison-Wesley.
2. Argyris, C., l990, “Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning.” Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, pp.92-94.
3. Baets, W., 1998, “Organizational Learning and Knowledge Technologies in a Dynamic Environment”, Netherland, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bhatt, G. D., 2000, “Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.4, No.1, pp.15-26.
5. Chait, Herschel N., 1998, “How organizations learn: An integrated strategy for building learning capability,” Personnel Psychology, Vol.51, Iss.3, pp.771-774.
6. Crossan, Mary C., Henry W. lane & Rodrick E. White, 1999, “An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.24, Iss.3, pp.522-537.
7. Davis, B.K., and F. Fergusson (1994), “Networks, Value Chains and Retailer Internationalisation in Pacific-Asia”, AMA/KMA Conference, Seoul, Korea.
8. Dawson, J., 1994, “The Internationalisation of Retailing Operations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.10, pp.267-282.
9. Dixon, N. M., 1994, The Organizational Learning Cycle: How We Can Learn Collectively, Hampshire, England: Gower.
10. Doz, Y., 1996,”The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliance:Initial Conditions or Learning Processes?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp.55-83.
11. Dyer, J. H. & H. Singh, 1998, “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.4, pp.660-679.
12. Dyer, J. H. & K. Nobeoka, 2000, “Creating and Managing A High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The TOYOTA Case”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.345-367.
13. Erouglu, S., 1992, “The Internationalization Process of Franchise Systems: A Conceptual Model”, International Marketing Review, Vol.9, No.5, pp.19-30.
14. Fiol, C. M. & M. A. Lyles, 1985, “Organizational learning”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.4, pp.78-84.
15. Fulmer, R. M., 1994, “A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn”, Planning Review, Vol.22, Iss.3, pp.20-24.
16. Garvin, D. A.,1993, ”Building a learning organization”, Harvard Business Review, 71, pp.78-91.
17. Gilbert, M. & M. Gordey-Hayes, 1996, “Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation”, Technovation, Vol.16, No.6 pp.365-385.
18. Grant, R. M. (1996a), “Toward a knowledhe-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7 Winter Special Issue, pp.109-122.
19. Grant, R. M. (1996b), “Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration”, Organization Science, 7, pp.375-387.
20. Gulati, R., N. Nohria, & A. Zaheer, 2000, “Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.203-215.
21. Haeckel, S. H. & R. L. Nolan, 1993, “Managing by Wire,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.71, No.5, pp.122-132.
22. Hall, Richard., 2000, “The management of external resources”, Journal of General Management, Vol.26, No.1, pp.56-68.
23. Hedlund, 1994, “A model of Knowledge management and the N-form Corporation”, Strategic Management Journal,Vol.15, pp.73-90.
24. Howells, J., 1996, “Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.8, No.2, pp.91-106.
25. Huber, G. P., 1991, “Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures”, Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.88-115.
26. Iansiti, M. & K. B. Clark, 1994, “Integration and dynamics capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, pp.557-605.
27. Inkpen, A. C., 1996, “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration”, California Management Review, Vol.39, No.1, pp.123-140.
28. Inkpen, A.C., & A. Dinur., 1998, “Knowledge Management Process and International Joint Venture”, Organization Science, Vol.19, No.4, pp.454-468.
29. Kacker, M., 1988, “International Flow of Retailing Know-How: Bridging the Technology Gap in Distribution”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, No.1, pp.41-67.
30. Kaufmann, P. J. & S. H. Kim, 1995, “Master Franchising and System Growth Rates”, Franchising: Contemporary Issues and Research, The Haworth Press, Inc., pp.49-64.
31. Klimecki, Ruediger & Hermann Lassleben, 1998, “Modes of organizational learning: Indications from an empirical study,” Management Learning, Vol.29, Iss.4, pp.405-430.
32. Kogut, B. & U. Zander, 1993, “Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of The Multinational Corporation”, Journal of International Business Studies, pp.625-645.
33. Kolb, D. A., 1984, Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Leonard-Barton, D., 1995, Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation, Massachusetts, Harvard Business School Press.
35. Levitt , B. & J. G. March, 1988, “Organization Learning ”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.14, pp.319-340.
36. Lewison, Dale M., 1997, Retailing, Prentice-Hall, London.
37. Mansfield, E., 1982, “Technology Transfer, Productivity and Economic Policy” W.W. Norton and Company Inc.
38. March, James G., 1991, “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,” Organization science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.71-87.
39. McGoldrick, Peter J. & Gary Davies, 1995, International Retailing Trends and Strategies, Pitman: London.
40. Meyers, P. W., 1990, “Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms”, Research Policy, Vol.19, pp.97-115.
41. Mulholland, Paul., Zdenek Zdrahal & John Domingue, 2001, “A methodological approach to supporting organizational learning,” International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, Vol.55, Iss.3, pp.337-367.
42. Nevis, E. C., A. J. DiBella, & J. M. Gould, 1995, “Understanding Organization as Learning Systems.” Sloan Management Review, 36, pp.73-85.
43. Nonaka I. & H. Takeuchi, 1995, The knowledge creating company, Oxford University Press, New York.
44. Papows, J., 1999, Enterprise.com, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing.
45. Pedler, M., 1991, The Learning Company: A strategy for Sustainable Development, London: McGraw-Hill, p.98.
46. Pedler, M., 1997, The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, London.
47. Pellegrini, L., 1994, “Alternatives for Growth and Internationalisation in Retailing”, International View of Retail”, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol.4, pp.121-48.
48. Robbins, S. P., 1994, International Management, 4th ed., New York: Prentice Hall.
49. Rugman, A. M. & A. Verbeke, 2001, “Subsidiary-specific Advantages in Multinational Enterprises”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, No.3, pp.237-250.
50. Salmon, Walter J. & Andre Tordjman, 1989, “The Internationalisation of Retailing “, International Journal of Retailing, Vol.4, No.29, pp.3-16.
51. Schulz, M., 2001, “The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No.4, pp.661-681.
52. Senge, P., 1990, The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
53. Shaw, R. B. & D. Perkins, 1992, “Teaching organizations to learn: The power of productive failures In D. A. Nadler, M. S. Gerstein, and R. B. Shaw (Eds.),” Organizational Architecture, pp. 175-191. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Sinkula, James M., 1994, “Market information processing and organizational learning”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, January, pp.35-45.
55. Smith, K., 1995, “Interactions in Knowledge Systems: Foundations, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods.” STI Review, 16, pp.69-102.
56. Sparks, L., 1995, “Reciprocal Retail Internationalisation: The Southland Corporation, Ito-Yokado and 7-Eleven Convenience Stores”, pp.57-96, The Internationalisation of Retailing, London.
57. Subramaniam, Mohan & N. Venkatraman, 2001, “Determinants of transnational new product development capability: Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp.359-378.
58. Swieringa, J. & A. Wierdsma, 1992, Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve, M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
59. Takeishi, Akira, 2001, “Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp.403-433.
60. Teece, D. J. & G. Pisano, 1994, “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, pp.537-556.
61. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano & A. Shuen, 1997, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7, pp.509-533.
62. Thorelli, Hans B., 1986, “Networks: Between markets and hierarchies”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7, pp.37-51.
63. Treadgold, A., 1988, “Retailing Without Frontiers”, Retail and Distribution Management, Vol.16, No.6, pp.8-12.
64. Tsang, Eric W. K., 1997, “Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research,” Human Relations, New York, Vol.50, Iss.1, pp. 73-89.
65. Von Hippel, E., 1988, The sources of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Weick, K. E., 1991, “The nontraditional quality of organizational learning”, Organizational Science, Vol.2, pp. 116-124.
67. Wiig, K. M., 1993, Knowledge management foundations thinking about thinking-How people and organizations create, represent, and use knowledge, Arlington, TX.
68. Williams, David E., 1992, “Retailer Internationalization: An Empirical Inquiry”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.26, No.8/9, pp.8-24.
69. Williamson,O., 1985,The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firm, Markets, Relational Contracting, Free Press: New York.
70. Yin., R. K., 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Method, revised edition, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71. Yin., R. K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Method, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, California ed.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top