跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/05 01:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳省三
研究生(外文):Sen-San Chen
論文名稱:國際市場進入模式評估程序之研究-以機車產業為例
論文名稱(外文):The evaluating Process of Foreign Entry-Mode Choice - A Case of the Motorcycle Industry
指導教授:徐村和徐村和引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:行銷與流通管理所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:133
中文關鍵詞:景象分析模糊德菲層級分析法模糊德菲法多準則決策進入模式
外文關鍵詞:Multi-Criteria Decision MakingFuzzy Delphi MethodScenario Analysis.Fuzzy Delphi Analytic Hierarchy ProcessEntry-Mode
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:1223
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:231
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:12
國際市場進入模式選擇是企業國際化策略中重要的問題,因為其與企業之經營績效與成敗有著密不可分的關係。因此企業如何選擇適合的進入模式成為一重要課題。過去對國際市場進入模式的評選上有以下幾個問題:(一)缺乏完整評估因素;(二)未探討如何決定評估準則權重;(三)未具體說明如何整合決策者意見。使評選結果的客觀性與有效性令人質疑。
由於國際市場進入模式評選具有:(一)多準則評估之特性;(二)群體決策方式評選;(三)評選過程因準則績效值的評價上有模糊衡量之問題。故本研究試圖發展一套國際市場進入模式評估程序,將模糊決策理論之模糊德菲法、層級分析法與綜合評判應用至國際市場進入模式評選;並藉由對未來景象之模擬,給予廠商在數種特定未來景象(最樂觀景象、最可能發生景象、最悲觀景象)中,適當的進入模式選擇建議,符合Porter「景象分析必須協助企業形成競爭策略,才能發揮其真正價值」之觀點。針對所欲探討之特定景象,來評選合適之進入模式。故本研究結合多準則決策理論與產業景象分析法,發展出一套完整進入模式評估程序,提供企業在檢討現行進入模式與評估未來最適進入模式之參考。
研究結果發現:(一)企業在選擇國際市場進入模式時,除了地主國因素層面外,並會綜合考量其他因素如廠商因素、產業因素與母國因素等層面,來進行最適方案的遴選;(二)相較於傳統評估方法只有一個結果,本評估程序提供不同景象下之方案,給予決策者較多建議與資訊,較符合現實決策環境;(三)藉由敏感度分析來模擬評估準則權重變化,是否會產生方案逆轉的情況,影響最適進入模式的選擇。可使決策者面對未來經營環境改變時,作為判斷是否調整經營型態之參考。
本評估程序能有效整合決策者的意見、客觀地獲得評估準則的權重值與方案之評價值,提高最終評選結果的合理性。可解決傳統評估方式所產生之缺失。
The foreign entry-mode choice is an important decision in international strategy because of its relationships to the performance and survival of a firm. How to choose appropriate foreign market entry-mode is the first problem of entrepreneurs which enter an international market. In the past, several problems of the choice of evaluating foreign entry-mode are as follows: (1) Lack of entire evaluated factors. (2) Lack of discussing how to determine weights of criteria. (3) Lack of explaining how to solve the consensus problem of the group decision. So the outcomes are in doubt.
Entry-mode selection problem has inherently contained the characteristics of multi-criteria decision-making problem. The problem of the process of evaluation is group decision-making problem. During the process of entry-mode selecting, the decision makers have to evaluate all kinds of criteria evaluated values under a fuzzy circumstance where the whole environment is uncertain and the future is unknown. For these reasons, we try to apply Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (FMCDM) method to the evaluating process of foreign entry-mode choice. Furthermore, we apply Scenario Analysis to provide decision makers suggestions under several special scenarios. Like what Porter said“Scenarios are the best used to guide the choice of a strategy, rather than as a means of confirming one”. To special scenarios, entrepreneurs can choice appropriate entry-mode for each other. We combine MCDM method with Industry Scenario Analysis to develop a new set of evaluating processes, which can provide information for entrepreneurs.
The results are as follows: (1) Besides the factor of host country level, managers also consider other levels to choose alternatives, like factory, Industry strategy and home country levels, and so on. (2) To compare with evaluating method before, this new evaluating process provides alternatives in different scenarios and more information to decision makers. (3) Simulating criteria weights by Sensitivity Analysis, we can rank all of alternatives for each scenario to find out if“alternatives adverse”has happened. Sensitivity Analysis can let decision makers to determine change entry-mode choice when circumstances will be changed in the future.
This evaluating process can integrate decision makers’ opinions effectively, and make weight of each criteria and evaluated values of alternatives objectively. By considering these factors, we can get appropriate method to explain each scenario reasonably.
第一章 緒論
第一節研究背景……………………………………………………………1
第二節研究動機與目的……………………………………………………3
第三節研究內容與流程……………………………………………………4
第二章 文獻探討
第一節國際市場進入模式評選問題之探討………………………………7
第二節影響進入模式選擇之考量因素與進入模式型態………………..11
第三節景象分析…………………………………………………………..21
第四節模糊決策理論……………………………………………………..28
第五節小結………………………………………………………………..35
第三章 建立評估程序
第一節評估程序發展概念………………………………………………..36
第二節評估程序發展……………………………………………………..37
第四章 實證分析
第一節我國機車產業國際市場發展現況………………………………..49
第二節廠商與專家選取…………………………………………………..52
第三節歐洲機車產業未來景象分析……………………………………..55
第四節建立決策分析架構………………………………………………..66
第五節進入模式評估準則選取…………………………………………..69
第六節最適進入模式評估準則權重之建立……………………………..80
第七節最適進入模式評選………………………………………………..85
第八節敏感度分析………………………………………………………..93
第九節結果討論…………………………………………………………..98
第五章 結論與建議
第一節研究結論…………………………………………………………100
第二節管理意涵…………………………………………………………102
第三節研究貢獻…………………………………………………………103
第四節研究限制…………………………………………………………104
第五節後續研究建議……………………………………………………105
參考文獻
中文參考文獻…………………………………………………………………106
英文參考文獻…………………………………………………………………108
附錄
一、景象分析深度訪談問卷…………………………………………………116
二、模糊德菲法問卷…………………………………………………………117
三、模糊德菲層級分析法問卷………………………………………………121
四、進入模式評價問卷………………………………………………………129
一、中文部分
1. 吳青松,國際企業管理-理論與實務,民國87年,智勝文化。
2. 余序江、許志義、陳澤義,科技管理導論:科技預測與規劃,民國87年,五南。
3. 張有恆、徐村和,「模糊度量AHP法─交通運輸計畫評估新模式」,中華民國第一屆Fuzzy理論與應用研討會,民國82年,頁365-371。
4. 張有恆、徐村和、陳曉玲,「航空站區位選擇評估程序之研究」,運輸計畫季刊,第二十六卷、第一期,民國86年,頁37-68。
5. 徐村和、李達章,「模糊產品投資組合模式」,管理學報,第十四卷,第二期,民國86年,頁263-286.
6. 徐村和、楊宗欣,「模糊綜合評判應用於人力資源管理之研究」,輔仁管理評論,第四卷,第二期,民國86年,頁85-100。
7. 徐村和,「模糊德菲層級分析法」,模糊系統學刊,第四卷,第一期,民國87年,頁59-72。
8. 徐村和、楊宗欣 (a),「應用模糊層級分析法評選廣告媒體」,管理與系統,第六卷,第一期,民國88年,頁19-39。
9. 徐村和、楊宗欣 (b),「媒體選擇影響因素之研究─習慣領域及灰色理論」,東吳經濟商學學報,第二十四期,民國88年,頁115-138。
10. 徐村和、陳龍潭、楊宗欣,「動態資源基礎觀點之模糊策略選取模式─以不鏽鋼產業為例」,管理學報,第十九卷、第五期,民國91年,頁843-871。
11. 曾國雄、蕭再安、鄧振源,「多評準決策方法之分析比較」,科學發展月刊,第十六卷,第七期,民國78年,頁1008-1017。
12. 朱芮鴻,「模糊動態定位策略模式」,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文,民國91年。
13. 蘇子炘,「模糊理論應用於顧客價值定位之研究」,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文,民國91年。
14. 何宜佳、陳梵婷、虞孝成,「智慧型手機發展趨勢之研究」,2002中華民國科技管理研討會論文集,民國91年,頁369-375。
15. 袁建中、張建清、王建彬、許毅芝,「台灣生物資訊產業未來五年發展之情境分析」,2002中華民國科技管理研討會論文集,民國91年,頁140-149。
16. 吳萬益、程永明,「台資企業投資中國大陸市場所有權進入模式之研究」,交大管理學報,第二十卷,第二期,民國89年,頁47-77。
17. 林志宏,「台灣資訊業國際市場進入策略之研究」,政治大學國際貿易研究所未出版碩士論文,民國79年。
18. 簡吉龍,「企業生命週期與進入模式關連性之研究」,政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,民國87年。
19. 翁景民、曾義明,「國際進入模式決策之折衷理論暨國際進入模式組合之研究」,台大管理論叢,第六卷,第二期,民國84年,頁25-60。
20. 張朝龍,「生物技術專利權保護程度於進入模式的影響性探討」,東華大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,民國89年。
21. 賴奎魁、鄭伶如、陳柏宇,「技術情境之研究─以接觸式影像感測器業為例」,管理與系統,第八卷,第四期,民國90年,頁421-438。
22. 藍忠孚、宋文娟、陳琇玲、詹錕鋙,「台灣地區醫師人力供需預測之情境分析」,中華衛誌,Vol.19,No.2,民國89年,頁86-95。
23. 陳昭宏,「創業投資公司投資高科技產業模糊多準則評估之研究─以生物科技產業為例」,輔仁管理評論,第九卷,第二期,民國91年,頁87-110。
24. 余正宗,「我國有線電視系統經營者產業結構分析與預測─產業前景分析法之應用」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國85年。
25. 台灣區車輛工業同業公會; http://www.ttvma.org.tw/,民國92年。
二、英文部分
1. Agarwal, S. and S. N. Ramaswami (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode:Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors”, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, pp.1-28.
2. Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry:A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, pp.1-24.
3. --------------- and A.T. Coughlan (1987), “International Market Entry and Expansion via Independent or Integrated Channels of Distribution”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.51(January), pp.71-82.
4. Anderson, E. and B. Weitz (1986), “Make or Buy Decision:A Framework for Analyzing Vertical Integration Issues in Marketing”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.27(Fall), pp.1-26.
5. Austin, J. E. (1990), “Managing in Developing Country:Strategic Analysis and Operating Techniques”, New York:Free Press.
6. Ayal, I. and J. Zif (1979), “Market Expansion Strategies in Multinational Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.43(Spring), pp.84-94.
7. Bradley, F. and M. Gannon (2000), “Does the Firm’s Technology and Marketing Profile Affect Foreign Market Entry? ”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol.8, No.4, pp.12-36.
8. Brouthers, K. D. (1995), “The Influence of International Risk on Entry Mode Strategy in the Computer Software Industry”, Management International Review, Vol.35, pp.7-28.
9. ---------------------- (2002), “Institutional,Culture and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, pp.203-221.
10. -----------------, L. E. Brouthers and S. Werner (2000),“Industrial Sector, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Entry Mode Strategy”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.55, pp.495-507.
11. Buckley, P. J. and M.C. Casson (1976), “The Future of Multinational Enterprise”, New York:Holmes & Meier Publishers.
12. ---------------, Z. Berkova and G. D. Newbould (1983), “Direct Investment in The United Kingdom by Smaller European Firms”, New York:The Macmillan Press Ltd, pp.1-190.
13. Buckley, J. J. (1985), “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.17, pp.233-247.
14. Bunn, D. W. and A. A. Salo (1993), “Forecasting with Scenarios”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.68, pp.291-303.
15. Calvet, A. L. (1984), “A Synthesis of Foreign Direct Investment Theories and Theories of the Multinational Enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring/Summer 12, pp.43-59.
16. Caves, R. E. (1982), “Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis”, New York:Cambridge University Press.
17. --------------- and S. K. Mehra (1986), “Entry of Foreign Multinationals into U.S. Manufacturing Industries”, Boston:Harvard Business Press.
18. Chang, P. T. ,L. C. Huang and H. J. Lin (2000), “The Fuzzy Delphi method via Fuzzy Statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems , Vol.112, pp.511-520.
19. Chang, Y. H. and C. H. Yeh (2002), “A Survey Analysis of Service Quality for Domestic Airlines”,European Journal of Operational Research,Vol.139, pp.166-177.
20. Chiou, H. K. and G. H. Tzeng (2002), “Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Industrial Green Engineering”, Environmental Management, Vol.30, No.6, pp.816-830.
21. Coates, J. F. (2000), “Scenario Planning”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.65, pp.115-123.
22. Coughlan, A. T. (1985), “Competition and Cooperation in Marketing Channel Choice:Theory and Application”, Marketing Science, Vol.4(2), pp.110-129.
23. ------------------ and M.T. Flaherty (1983), “Measuring the International Marketing Productivity of U.S. Semiconductor Companies”, Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
24. Davidson, W. H. (1982), “Global Strategic Management”, New York:John Wiley.
25. Drucker, Peter F. (1997), “The Global Economy and the National-State”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.76, No.5, pp.159-171.
26. Duckstein L. and S. Opricovic (1980), “Multiobjective Optimization in River Basin Development”, Water Resources Research, Vol.16, pp.14-20.
27. Dunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production:Some Empirical Test”, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring/Summer, pp.9-31.
28. ----------------- (1988), “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production:A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring, pp.1-31.
29. Erramilli, M. K. (1996), “Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in Multinational Corporations”, Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, pp.225-248.
30. --------------------- and C. P. Rao (1993), “Service Firms’ International Entry- Mode Choice:A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.57(July), pp.19-38.
31. Gaba, V. , Y. Pan and G. R. Ungson (2002), “Timing of Entry in International Market:An Empirical Study of U.S. Fortune 500 Firms in China”, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, pp.39-55.
32. Gatignon, H .A. and E. Anderson (1988), “The Multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries:An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation”, Journal of Law Economics and Organization, Vol.4(2), pp.305- 336.
33. Godet, M. (2000), “The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning:Tools and Pitfalls”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.65, pp.3-22.
34. Harrigan, K. R. (1985), “Strategies for Joint Ventures”, Lexington, Mass.:D.C. Heath & Co.
35. Heijden, K. V. D. (2000), “Scenarios and Forecasting:Two Perspectives”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.65, pp.31-36.
36. Hill C. W. L. and W. C. Kim (1988), “Searching for Dynamic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise:A Transaction Cost Model”, Sloan Management Review, Special Issue 9:93-104.
37. ----------------, P. Hwang and W. C. Kim (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode”, Strategic management Journal,Vol.11, pp.117-128.
38. ----------------- and G. R. Jones (1998), Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
39. Hood, N. and S. Young (1979), “The Economics of Multinational Enterprise”, London:Longman Group Ltd.
40. Hosti, O. R. (1969), “Content Analysis for the Social Sciences Humanities Reading”, Mass:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
41. Huss, W. R. and E. J. Honton (1987), “Scenario Planning─What Style Should You Use?”, Long Range Planning, Vol.20, No.4, pp.21-29.
42. Hwang, C. L. and M. J. Lin (1987), “Group Making Under Multiple Criteria”, Springer-Verlag, New York.
43. Ishikawa, A. , M. Amagasa, T. Shiga, G. Tomizawa, R. Tatsuta and H. Mieno(1993), “The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.55, pp.241-253.
44. Jones, G. R. and Charles W. L. Hill (1988), “Transaction Cost Analysis of Strategy-Structure Choice”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9(2), pp.159-172.
45. Kaufmann, A. and M. M. Gupta (1991), “Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications”, New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
46. Killing, P. J. (1982), “How to Make a Global Jonit-Venture Work”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.60, May-June, pp.120-127.
47. Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang (1992), “Global Strategy and Multinationals Entry Mode Choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, pp.29-53.
48. Kolbe, R. H. and M. S. Burnett (1991), “Content Analysis Research:An Examination of Application with Direction for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivety”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18(September), pp245-250.
49. Kumar, M. S. (1984), “Growth, Acquisition, and Investment:An Analysis of the Growth of Industrial Firms and Their Overseas Activities”, Cambridge:Combridge University Press.
50. Lafourcade, B. and P. Chapuy (2000), “Scenarios and Actors’ Strategies:The Case of the Agri-Foodstuff Sector”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.65, pp.67-80.
51. Lai, V. S. , B. K. Wong and W. Cheung (2002), “Group Decision Making in a Multiple Criteria Environment:A Case Using the AHP in Software Selection”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.137, pp.134-144.
52. Larrhoven, P. J. M. and W. Pedrycz (1983), “A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.1(11), pp.229-241.
53. Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.15, Spring/Summer, pp.27-43.
54. Leontiades, J. C. (1985), “Multinational Corporate Strategy:Planning for Worldwide Markets”, Lexington, Mass:Lexington Books.
55. Lu, J. W. (2002), “Intra- and Inter-organizational Imitative Behavior:Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms’ Entry Mode Choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.33(1), First Quarter, pp.19-37.
56. Murray, T. J. ,L. L. Pipino and J. P. Gigch (1985), “A Pilot Study of Fuzzy Set Modification of Delphi”, Human Systems Management, pp.76-80.
57. Opitz, O. (1985), “Modelle und Verfahren der Prognose”, Die Betriebswirtschaft, Vol.45, pp.83-95.
58. Perlmutter, H. V. (1969), “The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation”, Columbia Journal of World Business,January-February,pp9-18.
59. Porter, M. E. (1985), “Competitive Advantage:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, New York:Free Press.
60. -------------- (1987), “From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.65(3), pp.43-59.
61. Puffer, S. M. and D. J. McCarthy (1997), “Strategic Investment Flexibility for MNE Success in Russia: Evolving beyond Entry Modes”, Journal of world Business, Winter, pp.293-319
62. Ringland, G. (1998), “Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.
63. Root, F. R. (1987), “Entry Strategies for International Markets”, Lexington, MA:D.C. Heath.
64. Roubelat, F. (2000), “Scenario Planning as a Networking Process”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.65, pp.99-112.
65. Rugman, A. M. (1979), “International Diversification and the Multinational Enterprise”, Lexington,Mass:D.C.Heath.
66. Saaty, T. L. (1980), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, New York:McGraw-Hill.
67. Sabi, M. (1988), “An Application of the Theory of Foreign Direct Investment to Multinational Banking in LDCs”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.19(Fall), pp.433-448.
68. Schoemaker, P. H. J. (1993), “Multiple Scenario Development:Its Conceptual and Behavioral Foundation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.193-213.
69. ------------------------- (1995), “Scenario Planning:A Tool for Strategic Thinking”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp.25-40.
70. Shepheard-Walwyn and Litterman (1998), “Building a Coherent Risk Measurement and Capital Optimisation Model for Financial Firms”, Economic Policy Review, Vol.4(3), pp.171-182.
71. Stobaugh, R. B., Jr (1969), “How to Analyze Foreign Investment Climates”, Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp.100-108.
72. Tatoglu, E. and K. W. Glaister (1998), “Western MNCs’ FDI in Turkey:An Analysis of Location Specific Factors”, Management International Review, Second Quarter, pp.133-159.
73. Teece, D. (1986), “Transaction Cost Economics and Multinational Enterprise”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, No.7, pp.21-45.
74. Terpstra, V. and C-M. Yu (1988), “Determinants of Foreign Investment of U.S. Advertising Agencies”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.19(1), Spring, pp.33-46.
75. Vernon, R. (1979), “The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, November 41, pp.255-267.
76. -------------- (1983), “Organizational and Institutional Responses to International Risk”, In Richard J. Herring Editor,Managing International Risk Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
77. Wang, J. and Y. Lin (2003), “A Fuzzy Multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development”, Fuzzy Sets and System,Vol.134, pp.343-363.
78. Woodcock C. P. , P. W. Beamish and S. Makino (1994), “Ownership-Based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, pp.253-273.
79. Yong Suhk Pak (2002), “The Effect of Strategic Motives on the Choice of Entry Modes:An Empirical Test of International Franchisers”, Multinational Business Review, Spring, pp.28-36.
80. Yu, Chwo-Ming and K. Ito (1988), “Oligopolistic Research and Foreign Direct Investment:The Case of the U.S. Tire and Textile Industries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Fall), pp.449-460.
81. Zadeh, L. A. (1965), “Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, Vol.8(June), pp.338-353.
82. Zhao, H. and R. R. Levary (2002), “Evaluation of Country Attractiveness for Foreign Direct Investment in the E-Retail Industry”, Multinational Business Review, Spring, pp.1-10.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 8. 徐村和、楊宗欣 (a),「應用模糊層級分析法評選廣告媒體」,管理與系統,第六卷,第一期,民國88年,頁19-39。
2. 9. 徐村和、楊宗欣 (b),「媒體選擇影響因素之研究─習慣領域及灰色理論」,東吳經濟商學學報,第二十四期,民國88年,頁115-138。
3. 10. 徐村和、陳龍潭、楊宗欣,「動態資源基礎觀點之模糊策略選取模式─以不鏽鋼產業為例」,管理學報,第十九卷、第五期,民國91年,頁843-871。
4. 7. 徐村和,「模糊德菲層級分析法」,模糊系統學刊,第四卷,第一期,民國87年,頁59-72。
5. 6. 徐村和、楊宗欣,「模糊綜合評判應用於人力資源管理之研究」,輔仁管理評論,第四卷,第二期,民國86年,頁85-100。
6. 23. 陳昭宏,「創業投資公司投資高科技產業模糊多準則評估之研究─以生物科技產業為例」,輔仁管理評論,第九卷,第二期,民國91年,頁87-110。
7. 21. 賴奎魁、鄭伶如、陳柏宇,「技術情境之研究─以接觸式影像感測器業為例」,管理與系統,第八卷,第四期,民國90年,頁421-438。
8. 16. 吳萬益、程永明,「台資企業投資中國大陸市場所有權進入模式之研究」,交大管理學報,第二十卷,第二期,民國89年,頁47-77。
9. 11. 曾國雄、蕭再安、鄧振源,「多評準決策方法之分析比較」,科學發展月刊,第十六卷,第七期,民國78年,頁1008-1017。