跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.97.0) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/04/14 02:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳龍森
研究生(外文):Lung-Sen Chen
論文名稱:當代科技理性的探討
論文名稱(外文):The Question Concerning Contemporary Technoscientific Rationality
指導教授:姜新立姜新立引用關係
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:中山學術研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:政治學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:384
中文關鍵詞:科學合理性技術主體性
外文關鍵詞:RationalityScienceSubjectivityTechnology
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:480
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:100
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
提要
本研究的主要目的是想要探究處於現代性與後現代性夾縫中的當代人如何面對未來,尤其是中國在科技理性時代中,所面臨的雙重危機以及轉機。以目前而言,國內學者對於現代性與後現代性的爭論往往皆陷入哲學的沉思中,而未觸及社會實際的現狀,另一方面他們往往以西方的學術為藍本而未觸及中國在後現代社會中所面臨的問題以及所能扮演的角色。
本研究所採用的方法模型是筆者鑽研社會科學方法論十幾年的心得結晶,基本上社會科學的研究是從問題與危機開始的,有了問題與危機,我們將進行詮釋與理解,有了詮釋的基礎,我們可能進行重建與批判的工作以維護既有的典範,我們也有可能進行解構與融合的工作以達成典範轉換的目的。根據上述的方法模型,本文首先探討西方科學的危機以及技術社會的宰制現象,進而分析這些現象產生背後的理性基礎與主體性特徵,同時我們也想要了解關係西方科學與技術興起的人文主義與啟蒙運動思潮,透過這個理解,我們才能知道危機的根源以及可能的解決途徑。
當西方科技理性面臨危機時,波柏與哈伯馬斯所要進行的就是重建與批判的工作,而費耶阿本德、胡塞爾、海德格以及後現代學者所要進行的就是解構與融合的工作。基本上,前者是想要在現有的典範中重建其原有的規範標準以批判現實社會的扭曲,後者則是想要解構既有的典範以開啟新的可能性。關於科技典範所造成危機的解決途徑大抵包括︰技術的解決、民主參與、美學救贖與後形上學途徑,前二者採取重建與批判的立場,對於科技理性抱持樂觀的態度,後二者採取解構與融合的策略,對於科技理性則抱持悲觀的態度。
中國在科技時代中的處境是兩難的,一方面我們必須發展科學理性以加速進入現代,另一方面我們又要以傳統的宗教哲學積極參與後現代的論述,這種矛盾的處境要求我們採取「既是又是」(both/ and )的立場,才能破除「非此即彼」(either/ or)的焦慮,因此我們必須科學與人文並重,才能在後現代社會中找到立足之地。

關鍵詞︰科學、技術、合理性、主體性
ABSTRACT
This text is to understand, in the fissure of modernity and post-modernity, how contemporary people face the future; in particular, in the age of technoscientific rationality, how China face her binal crisis and to solve them. Until Now, in regard to the debate between modernity and post-modernity, domestic scholars usually fall into philosophic speculation, and don’t touch the real condition of society. Besides, they usually follow the science of Western, and don''t deal with the problems faced by China in the postmodern society, and how she can play a role in the postmodern society.
This text uses a method model that I obtain from my research of the methodology of social science for more than ten years. Basically, social science research begins from question and crisis; if there are question and crisis, we will proceed to interpret and understand them; if we have a foundation of interpretation, we may proceed to reconstruct and criticize in order to maintain original paradigm, or we may proceed to deconstruct and fuse in order to achieve paradigm shift. According to this method model, this text begins with exploring Western scientific crisis and the domination of technological society; further, we analyze the rational foundation and subjectivity characteristic of this phenomenon, at the same time we want to understand humanism and the Enlightenment that influenced the rise of Western science and technology. Through this understanding, we can understand the root of crisis and possible solution.
When Western technoscientific rationality faces with crisis, What Karl Popper and Jürgen Habermas do is to reconstruct and criticize, while Paul Feyerabend, Edmund Husserl, Matin Heidegger and postmodernists deconstruct and fuse. Basically, the former want to reconstruct the original normal standard and criticize the deformation of real society in order to maintain original paradigm; the latter want to deconstruct original paradigm in order to open the new possibility. The approaches of resolution about technoscientific crisis include: technical, democratic, aesthetic and post-metaphysical. The first two adopt a stand of reconstruction and critique, holding an optimistic attitude with regard to technoscientific rationality. The latter two adopt the strategy of deconstruction and fusion, holding a pessimistic attitude with regard to technoscientific rationality.
The dilemma of China in the technoscientific era is ambiguity, on the one hand, we must develop technoscientific rationality in order to enter modern quickly; on the other hand, we also must use traditional religious philosophy to participate in the discourse of post-modern. This contradictory plight demands that we adopt a stand of “both/ and”, so we can get rid of the anxiety of “either/ or”. Therefore we must equally emphasize science and humanism, and in this way, we can find a foothold in the postmodern society.

Key Word: science, technology, rationality, subjectivity
目次
第一章 導論
第一節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………1
第二節 研究方法 ………………………………………………6
第三節 科學與技術概念的澄清 ………………………………30
第四節 研究架構 ………………………………………………37
第二章 當代科學與技術的危機
第一節 西方的科學危機 ………………………………………39
第二節 技術社會的來臨 ………………………………………60
第三節 科技社會的雙重性 ……………………………………80
第三章 關於科技理性
第一節 理性概念及其批判 ……………………………………101
第二節 告別理性 ………………………………………………123
第三節 實踐的關懷 ……………………………………………145
第四章 主體性分析
第一節 主體理性的辯證發展 …………………………………167
第二節 現代性與後現代性 ……………………………………187
第三節 互為主體與本體的回歸 ………………………………213
第五章 科技典範的變遷
第一節 民主的途徑 ……………………………………………233
第二節 美學的救贖 ……………………………………………254
第三節 技術的後形上學思考………………………………………280
第六章 科技時代中的中國
第一節 東方世界的雙重危機 …………………………………303
第二節 啟蒙──一個未竟的事業? ……………………………317
第三節 從後現代的視野思考中國 ……………………………342
第七章 結語 …………………………………………………………369
參考書目 …………………………………………………………………373
參考書目
Adorno, Theodor W. 1981. Prisms, translated by Samuel and Shierry Weber. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Agger, Ben. 1992. The Discourse of Domination: From the Frankfurt School to Postmodernism. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987. “The Dialectic of Individuation and Domination: Weber’s Rationalization Theory and Beyond”, in Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity, edited by Scott Lash & Sam Whimster. London: Allen & Unwin.
Alford, C. Fred .1985. Science and the Revenge of Nature: Marcuse & Habermas. Florida: University Presses of Florida.
Alitto, Guy S. 1991. 世界範圍內的反現代化思潮──論文化守成主義。貴陽市:貴州人民出版社。
Appleyard, Bryan. 1992. Understanding The Present: Science and The Soul of Modern Man. New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.
Ayer, A. J. ed. 1959. Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press.
Barbour, Ian. 1980. “Paradigms in Science and Religion”, in Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, edited by Gary Gutting. London: Notre Dame.
Beck, Ulrich. 1996. “Risk Society and the Provident State”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by Scott Lash. London: Sage Publications.
Bell, Daniel. 1989. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting(1973),高銛等譯。台比:桂冠。
Bendix, Reinhard. 1998. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait(韋伯思想與學說),劉北成等譯。台北:桂冠。
Benjamin, Walter. 2002. 機械複製時代的藝術作品,王才勇譯。北京:中國城市出版社。
Bernstein, Richard J. 1976. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, Richard J. 1985. “Introduction”, in Habermas and Modernity, edited and introduction by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bernstein, Richard J. 1988. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, Richard J. 1991. The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/ Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blaug, Mark. 1980. “Kuhn versus Lakatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics”, In Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, edited by Gary Gutting. London: Notre Dame.
Bocock, Robert. 1986. Hegemony. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Limited.
Boggs, Carl. 1984. The Two Revolutions: Antonio Gramsci and the Dilemmas of Western Marxism. Boston: South End Press.
Bonß, Wolfgang. 1993. “The Program of Interdisciplinary Research and the Beginnings of Critical Theory”, in On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Braaten, Jane. 1991. Habermas''s Critical Theory of Society. New York: State University of New York Press.
Brubaker, Rogers. 1984. The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bullock, Alan. 2000. The Humanist Tradition in the West, 董樂山譯。台北市:究竟出版社。
Burger, Thomas. 1976. Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bürger, Peter. 1998. Theorie der Avantgarde(前衛藝術理論),蔡佩君、徐明松譯。台北市︰時報文化。
Gamble, Andrew. 1981. An Introduction to Modern Social and Political Thought. London.
Carpenter, Stanley R. 1992. “Instrumentalists and Expressivists: Ambiguous Links Between Technology and Democracy” , in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. Yale University Press.
Cassirer,Ernst. 1979. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, translated by Fritz C. A. Koelin and James P. Pettegrove. Princeton University Press.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1984. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (啟蒙運動的哲學),李日章譯。台北:聯經。
Coleman, Daniel A. 1994. Ecopolitics: Building a Green Society. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Craib, Ian. 1992. Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas. New York: St. Martin''s Press.
Cylke, F. Kurt Jr. 1993. The Environment. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Dallmayr, Fred. 1991. Life-world, Modernity and Critique: Paths between Heidegger and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Davis, Winston. 1987. “Religion and Development: Weber and the East Asian Experience”, in Understanding Political Development, edited by Myron Weiner & Samuel P. Huntington. Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
Durbin, Paul T. 1992. “Maxism and the Democratic Control of Technology”, in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dreyfus, Hubert L.& Paul Rabinow. 1992. 傅柯─超越結構主義與詮釋學(Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics),錢俊譯。台北:桂冠。
Ellul, Jacques. 1964. The Technological Society, Translated from the French by John Wilkinson and with an Introduction by Robert T K. Merton. Vintage Books.
Ellul, Jacques. 1992. “Technology and Democracy”, in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Embree, Lester. 1974. Phenomenology and the Theory of Science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1991. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1995. Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Femia, Joseph V. 1987. Gramsci''s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ferkiss, Victor C. 1969. Technological Man: The Myth and the Reality. India: Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private Ltd.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1970. “Consolation for the Specialist” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: NLB.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1981a. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1981b. Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to Reason. New York: Verso.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1988. Against Method. New York: Verso.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1991. Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Oxford: Blackwell.
Feynman, Richard P. 1999. The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist(1998), 吳程遠譯。台北:天下遠見。
Fielder, John. 1992. “Autonomous Technology, Democracy, and the Nimbys” , in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Foltz, Bruce V. 1995. Inhabiting the Earth: Heigegger, Environmental Ethics, and the Metaphysics of Nature. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1992. Madness and Civilization(瘋顛與文明),劉北成、楊遠嬰譯。台北:桂冠。
Fraser, Nancy. 1994. “Michel Foucault: A‘Young Conservative’?”, in Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/ Habermas Debate, edited by Michael Kelly. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method, tranlation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Crossroad Publishing Corporation.
Gamble, Andrew. 1981. An Introduction to Modern Social and Political Thought. London.
Gehlen, Arnold. 1992. Man in the Age of Technology (科技時代的心靈──工業社會的社會心理問題),何兆武、何冰譯。台北:巨流。
Gellner, Ernest. 1990.“The Gaffe-Avoiding Aninal or a Bundle of Hypotheses”in Individualism: Theories and Methods, edited by Pierre Birnbaum & Jean Leca, translated by John Gaffney. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Giddens, Anthony, ed. 1974. Positivism and Sociology. London: Heinemann.
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. California: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 2001. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives(1999),陳其邁譯。台北:時報。
Goldmann, Lucien. 1977. Lukàcs and Heidegger: Towards a New Philosophy, translated by William Q. Boelhower. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gordon,Scott. 1991. The History and Philosophy of Social Science.New York:Routledge.
Gorz, Andre. 1977. “Sartre and Marx”,in Western Marxism: A Ctitical Reader, edited by New Left Review. London: Verso.
Graham, Gordon. 2003. The Internet: A Philosophy Inquiry, 江淑琳譯。台北縣:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G.N.Smith. London: Lawrence and wishart.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Toward A Rational Society: Student Protest Science and Politics, translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume1, Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. “Neoconservative Culture Criticism in the United States and West Germany: An Intellectual Movement in Two Political Cultures”, in Habermas and Modernity(1985), edited and introduction by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, volume2, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Legitimation Crisis, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988a. Theory and Practice(1963), translated by John Viertel. Cambridge:Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, translated by Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking, translated by William Mark Hogengarten. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, John A. 1981. Diagnoses of Our Time: Six Views on Our Social Condition. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
Hampson, Morman. 1984. The Enlightenment, 李豐斌譯。台北市:聯經。
Harvey, Brian & John D. Hallett. 1977. Environment and Society: An Introductory Analysis. London: The MacMillan Press LTD.
Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1991. The Principle of Reason(1957), translated by Reginald Lilly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology: and Other Essays, translated and with an Introduction by William Lovitt. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Hickman, Larry A. 1992. “Populism and the Cult of the Expert”,in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hindess, Barry. 1977. Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Harvester Press.
Holub, Robert C. 1991. Jürgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. New York: Routledge.
Honneth, Axel. 1991. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory, translated by Kenneth Baynes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Fragmented World of The Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, Edited by Charles W. Wright. New York: State University of New York Press.
Horkheimer, Max. 1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, Max. 1986. Critical Theory: Selected Essays, translated by Matther J. O’connell and Others. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno. 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1993. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, translated by Alexander T. Levine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Husserl,Edumnd. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, translated, with an introduction, by David Carr.Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Irwin, Alan. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.
Jay, Martin. 1984. Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jay, Martin. 1985. “Habermas and Modernism”, in Habermas and Modernity, edited and introduction by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jay, Martin. 1993. “Mass Culture and Aesthetic Redemption: The Debate between Max Horkheimer and Siegfried Kracauer”, in On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Jones, Gareth Stedman. 1977. “The Marxism of the Early Lukàcs” in Western Marxism: A Ctitical Reader, edited by New Left Review. London: Verso.
Kàtz, Barry. 1982. Herbert Marcuse and the Art of Liberation: An Intellectual Biography. London: Verso.
Keat, Russell & John Urry. 1975. Social Theory as Science. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kellner, Douglas. 1989. Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kleinberg, Benjamin S. 1973. American Society in the Postindustrial Age: Technocracy, Power, and the End of Ideology. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Komesaroff, Paul A. 1986. Objectivity, Science and Society: Interpriting Nature and Society in the Age of the Crisis of Science. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lacy, A. R. 1986. A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, Second edition.
Leadbeater, Charles. 2001. 知識經濟大趨勢(Living on Thin Air: The New Economy with a New Blueprint for the 21st Century),李振昌譯。 台北:時報。
Lind, Peter. 1994. 馬庫色的自由理論(Marcuse and Freedom,1985),關向光譯。台北:遠流。
Lohmann, Georg. 1993. “The Failure of Self-Realization: An Interpretation of Horkheimer’s Eclipse of Reason”, in On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Lukàcs, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McNeill, Patrick.1990. Research Methods. London; New York: Routledge.
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1975. Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Mannheim, Karl. 1990. 變革時代的人與社會,劉凝譯。台北:久大桂冠。
Manicas,Peter T. 1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1968. Negations: Essays in Critical Theory, translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1972. Counterrevolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1974. “On Science and Phenomenology”, in Positivism and Sociology , edited by Anthony Giddens. London: Heinemann.
Martin, Bill. 1995. Humanism and Its Aftermath: The Shared Fate of Deconstruction and Politics. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
May, Reingard. 1996. Heigegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on His Work, translated, with a complementary essay, by Graham Parkes. London and New York: Routledge.
McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McGinn, Robert E. 1991. Science, Technology, and Society. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Merquior, J. G. 1998. Foucault(傅柯),陳瑞麟譯。台北:桂冠。
Moon, J. Donald. 1983.“Political Ethics and Critical Theory”in Changing Social science: Critical Theory and Other Critical Perspectives, edited by Daniel R. Jr. Sabia & Jerald T. Wallulis. New York: State University of New York Press.
Nagel, Ernest. 1979. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Columbia University.
Norman, Donald A. 1995. Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, 黃楨賢編譯。台北:時報文化。
Paci, Enzo. 1972. The Function of the Sciences and the Meaning of Man, translated, with an Introduction by Paul Piccone and James E. Hansen. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Parekh, Bhikhu. 1982. Contemporary Political Thinkers. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Pivcevic, Edo. 1997. 胡賽爾與現象學(Husserl and Phenomenology),廖仁義譯。台北:桂冠。
Popper, Karl R. 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, Karl R. 1989. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ransome, Paul. 1992. Antonio Gramsci: A New Introduction. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1965. History and Truth, translated, with an introduction by Charles A. Kelbley. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ritzer, George. 1983. Sociology Theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Romm, Norma R. A. 1991. The Methodologies of Positivism and Marxism: A Sociological Debate. MacMillan.
Rorty, Richard. 1985. “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity”, in Habermas and Modernity, edited and introduction by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rosenbaum, Walter A. 1977. The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Russell, Bertrand. 1952. The Impact of Science on Society. London: Unwin Paperbacks.
Schluchter,Wolfgang. 1986. 理性化與官僚化──對韋伯之研究與詮釋,顧忠華譯。台北:聯經。
Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schumacher, E. F. 1973. Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
Schwarcz,Vera. 2000. The Chinese Enlightenment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919, 劉京建譯。台北市:桂冠。
Strinati, Dominic. 1995. An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Therborn, Goran. 1977. “The Frankfurt School”, in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader, edited by New Left Review. London: Verso.
Tenner, Edward. 1998. Why Things Bite Back(科技反撲:萬物對人類展開報復), 蘇采禾譯。台北:時報文化。
Thompson, John B. 1981. Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge University Press.
Warlofsky, Max W. 1992. “Technology, Power, and Truth: Political and Epistemological Reflections on the Fourth revolution”, in Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by Langdon Winner. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. New York: The Free Press.
Wellmer, Albrecht. 1985. “ Reason, Utopia, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment”, in Habermas and Modernity, edited and introduction by Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge: Polity Press.
White, Stephen K. 1983. “Habermas on the Foundations of Ethics and Political”, in Changing Social science: Critical Theory and Other Critical Perspectives, edited by Daniel R. Jr Sabia & Jerald T. Wallulis. New York: State University of New York Press.
Whitehead, A. N. 2000. Science and the Modern World(科學與現代世界),傅佩榮譯。台北:立緒。
Williams, Roger. 1971. Politics and Technology. London: The Macmillan press Ltd.
Winch, Peter. 1990. The Idea of a Social Science: and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge, second edition.
Zimmerman, Michael E. 1981. Eclipse of the Self: The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity. Ohio University Press.
Zimmerman, Michael E. 1990. Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Zuidervaart, Lambert. 1991. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
王鑒平、胡佛希,1993,傳播與超越。台北市:博遠出版有限公司。
甘紹平,1996,傳統理性哲學的終結。台北市:唐山出版社。
尼格爾.多德,2002,社會理論與現代性,陶傳進譯。北京︰社會科學文獻出版社。
成中英,2001,合外內之道──儒家哲學論。北京︰中國社會科學出版社。
宋國誠,1990,馬克思的人文主義。台北市:桂冠。
金觀濤、劉青峰,2000,中國現代思想的起源:超穩定結構與中國政治文化的演變(第一卷)。香港:中文大學出版社。
金耀基,1992,從傳統到現代。台北市:時報文化。
李英明,1989,科學社會學。台北:桂冠。
李春秋,2002,當代生命科技的倫理審視。南京市:江蘇人民出版社。
李道湘,1998,現代新儒學與宋明理學。審陽市:遼寧大學出版社。
肖峰,2002,高技術時代的人文憂患。南京市:江蘇人民出版社。
沈清松,1998,解除世界魔咒。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
沈衛威,2000,學思與學潮:胡適傳。台北市:立緒文化事業有限公司。
阿部正雄,1992,禪與西方思想,王雷泉、張汝倫譯。台北市:桂冠。
周憲,1997,20世紀西方美學。南京︰南京大學出版社。
姚大志,2000,現代之後──20世紀晚期西方哲學。北京:東方出版社。
姜新立、陳龍森,1995,「哈伯馬斯」,收錄於現代世界十大思想家,易杰雄主編。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
姜義華,2000,理性缺位的啟蒙。上海:上海三聯書店。
馬國明,1998,班雅明。台北市:東大圖書公司。
袁鼎生、周紀文、牛宏寶,1997,西方美學主潮。桂林市︰廣西師範大學出版社。
高宣揚,1996,論後現代藝術的「不確定性」。台北市:唐山。
黃光國,2002,科學哲學與創造力:東亞文明的困境。臺北縣新店市:立緒文化。
張亨,1993,「『天人合一』觀的原始及其轉化」,收錄在中國人的價值觀,沈清松編。台北:桂冠。
陸陽,2000,後現代性的文本闡釋︰福柯與德里達。上海︰三聯書店。
葉啟政,1990,「台灣『中產階層』的文化迷思」,收錄於變遷中臺灣社會的中產階級,蕭新煌主編。台北:巨流。
葉闖,1996,科學主義批判與技術社會批判。台北市:淑馨出版社。
楊國榮,2000,科學主義:演進與超越。台北市:洪業文化事業有限公司。
陳中立、楊楹、林振義、倪健民等,2001,思維方式與社會發展。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
陳嘉明等,2001,現代性與後現代性。北京︰人民出版社。
陳曉林,1987,學術巨人與理性困境:韋伯、巴柏、哈伯馬斯。台北:時報文化。
鄭家棟,1995,當代新儒學論衡。台北市︰桂冠。
鄭泰丞,2000,科技、理性與自由:現代及後現代狀況。台北:桂冠。
劉少杰,2002,後現代西方社會學理論。北京︰社會科學文獻出版社。
劉自覺,2001,近代西方哲學之父笛卡爾。合肥市:安徽人民出版社。
劉思量,1993,「社會人與自然人之爭:孔子與老子藝術觀之比較」,收錄在中國人的價值觀,沈清松編。台北:桂冠。
劉述先,1993,「論中國人的價值觀在現代的重建」,收錄在中國人的價值觀,沈清松編。台北:桂冠。
劉道鏞,1995,西方社會與西方思潮。南京︰東南大學出版社。
盧梭,1986,論人類不平等的起源和基礎,李常山譯。台北:唐山。
滕守堯,1996,海德格。台北市:生智。
魏萼,2000,中國國富論:經濟中國的第三隻手。台北:時報。
蘇國勛,1989,理性化及其限制──韋伯思想引論。台北:桂冠。
學哲,1994,「海德格關於技術的本質之思」,收錄於現象學與海德格,熊偉編。台北:遠流。
樊和平,1995,儒學與日本模式。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top