臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於資訊部門龐大業務流量，使得資訊部門無法滿足使用者日益成長的需求，而引發使用者自行建置其所需要的系統(EUC：End User Computing)。以往EUC相關的研究，因為有一些重要的因素尚未被討論到，導致其模式解釋力都略低。所以，本論文以科技接受模式為基礎，修正為較完整的EUC接受模式的架構。採用驗證性因素分析的方式並利用結構方程模式來測量本研究所提出之假設模式。分析結果顯示：有趣性、易用性、有用性會直接影響EUC的使用，其中以有趣性的影響程度最高。另外，本研究模式採用了兩個新的因素：科技-任務適配度和網路外部性也對於易用性有顯著的影響。而且，模式的整體解釋度達到56％。所以，本論文的研究結果可以讓我們更加瞭解影響EUC接受的因素。也可以作為企業在其資訊化的過程當中，衡量EUC的導入、管理等議題上可以做一個參考。

This paper proposed a revised technology acceptance model for measuring end user computing (EUC) acceptance. An empirical study was conducted to collect data and the revised model was evaluated by structural equation modeling, and then confirmatory factor analysis was applied to test if the empirical data confirmed to the presumed model. The results demonstrated that the model explained 56% of the variance. The finding contributes to an expanded understanding of the factors that promote the EUC acceptance.

目錄
第一章 緒論 7
1.1 研究背景與動機 7
1.2 研究目的與範圍 9
1.3 研究步驟 10
第二章 文獻探討 11
2.1、何謂EUC 11
2.2、科技接受模式 13
2.3、科技工作適配理論14
2.4、網路外部性理論16
2.5、主觀規範 19
2.6、電腦自我效能 20
2.7、認知有趣性 22
2.8、高階主管支持 24
2.9、組織內外部的技術支援及教育訓練 26
第三章 研究模式與假說28
3.1 研究模式 28
3.2 研究假說 29
3.3 變數操作型定義 31
3.3.1 EUC接受程度 31
3.3.2 認知有用性 31
3.3.3 認知易用性 32
3.3.4 電腦自我效能32
3.3.5 電腦有趣性 32
3.3.6 主觀規範 33
3.3.7 組織外部的電腦支援和教育訓練 33
3.3.8 組織內部的電腦支援和教育訓練 33
3.3.9 高階主管支持34
3.3.10 網路外部性 34
3.3.11 科技任務適配度34
第四章 研究流程 35
4.1 發展模式 37
4.2 發展問項 38
4.3 資料蒐集 39
4.4 信度評估 40
4.5 效度分析 41
4.6 評估模式適合度43
4.7 模式修正 45
4.8 路徑分析 47
第五章 資料分析 49
5.1 問卷回收結果統計49
5.2 LISREL 的模式架構52
5.3 問卷信度分析 55
5.4 問卷效度分析 59
5.5 評估模式適合度 62
5.6 模式修正 63
5.7 路徑分析 64
第六章 結論與建議 69
6.1 研究結論 69
6.2 研究貢獻 70
6.3 研究限制 70
6.4 研究建議 71
參考文獻 72
附錄一、問卷 77

林東清、許孟祥，資訊管理調查研究方法探討，資訊管理學報，4卷，第一期，頁21-40。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園，社會及行為科學研究法，東華書局，民79。
劉勇志，高階主管參與和資訊系統成功之關聯性分析，中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士 論文，民81。
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., and Todd, P. A. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1993, pp. 227-247.
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., Stair, M. “Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment,” Information Syetems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 418-430.
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. “Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, Nj., 1985.
Amoroso, D. L., and Cheney, P. H. “Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness,” Journal of Management Information Systems (3:1), 1991, pp. 63-89.
Bagozzi, R. P., and Phillips, L. W. "Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal," Administrative Science Quarterly (27), 1982, pp. 459-489.
Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. “Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work,” Journal of Applied Psychology (75), 1990, pp. 547-560.
Bandura, A. “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,” American Psychologist (37:2), 1982, pp. 122-147.
Bollen, K. A. “Structural equations with Latent variables,” New York: Wiley, 1989.
Brancheau, C., and Brown, V. “The Management of End-User Computing: Status and Directions,” ACM Computing Surveys (23:4), 1993.
Cheney, P., and Dickson, G. B. “Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Success: An Extrapolation Investigation,” Academy of Management Journal (25:1), 1982, pp. 170-184.
Churchill, J. R., and Gilbert, A. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, pp. 64-73.
Clark, T. D. “Corporate systems management: An overview and research persceptive,” Communication of the ACM (35:2), 1992, pp. 60-75.
Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. “Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test,” MIS Quarterly (19), 1995, pp. 189-211.
Cottrell, T. “Fragmented Standards and the Development of Japan’s Microcomputer Software Industry,” Research Policy (23:2), 1994, pp. 143-174.
Davis, D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technologym,” MIS Quarterly, 1989, pp. 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace,” Journalof Applied Social Psychology (22), 1992, pp. 1111-1132.
Deci, E. L. “Intrinsic Motivation,” New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1975.
Doll, J., and Torkzadeh, G.. “The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfication,” MIS Quarterly, 1988.
Dishaw, T., and Strong, M. “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs,” Information and Management (36), 1999, pp. 9-21.
Ellis, A. “My philosophy of psychotherapy,” Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (6), 1973, pp. 13-18.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. “Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
Flower, F. J. “Survey research methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series,” Beverly Hills: Sage Publication, 1984.
Fronell, C. “A second generation of multivariate analysis Vol. 1: Methods,” New York: Praeger, 1982.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., and Power, J. G. “A social information processing model of media use in organizations,” Communication Research (14:5), 1987, pp. 529-552.
Gable, G. G. “Consultant Engagement for Computer System Selection: A Pro-Active Client Role in Small Businesses,” Information & Management (20), 1991, pp. 83-93.
Gandal, N. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an empirical Test for Network Externalitis,” Rand Journal of Economics (25:1), 1994, pp. 160-170.
Goodhue, L., and Thompson, L. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, 1995, pp. 213-230.
Goodhue, L. “Development and Measurement Vality of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Decision Sciences (29:1), 1998.
Graud, R., and Dumaraswamy, A. “Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystem Open Sysem Strategy,” Strategic Management Journal (14), 1993, pp. 351-369.
Guimaraes, T. and Igbaria, M. “Exploring the relationship between EUC problems and success,” Information Resources Management Journal (9:2), 1996, pp. 5-15.
Guimaraes, T., Gupta, Y. P., and Rainer, R. K. “Empirically Testing the Relationship Between End-User computing Problems and Information Center Success Factors,” Decision Sciences (10), 1999, pp. 393-413.
Hackathorn ,R. D., and Karimi, J. “A Framework for Comparing Information Engineering Methods,” MIS Quarterly, 1988, pp. 203-220.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, L E., Tatham, L. L., and Black, W. C. “Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings,” New York: Macmillan, 1992.
Harris, R. W. “Schools of Thought in Research into End-User Computing Success,” Journal of End User Computing, 2000, pp. 24-34.
Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). “Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
Hughes, R. E. “Diachronic Variability in Obsidian Procurement Patterns in Northeastern California and Southcentral Oregon,” University of California Publications in Anthropology (17), 1986.
Igbaria, M. “End-User Computing Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Model,” Omega (18:6), 1990, pp. 637-652.
Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., and Davis, G.B. “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems (11:4), 1995, pp. 87-114.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., and Pavri, F.N. “A Path Analytic Study of the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage,” Journal of Management Systems (2:2), 1990, pp. 1-14.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., and Baroudi, J. “A motivational model of microcomputer usage,” Journal of Management Information Systems (13:1), 1996, pp. 127-144.
Igbaria, M., and Toraskar, K. “Impact of end-user computing on the individual: An integrated model,” Information Technology and People (6:4), pp. 271-292.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., and Cavaye, L. M. “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model,” MIS Quarterly, 1997, pp. 279-302.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Ives, B. “Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, 1991, pp.205-227.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. “LISREL 8: User’s reference guide,” Chicago: Scientific Software Inc., 1993.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L. “Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 183-213.
Katz, M. L., and Shapiro, C. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,” American Economic Review (75), 1985, pp. 424-440.
Kelman, H. C. “Processes of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly (2), 1961, pp. 51-60.
Koufteros, X. “Testing a Model of Full Production: a Paradigm for Manufactiring Research Using Structural Equation Modeling,” Journal of Operations Management (17), 1999, pp. 467.
Lieberman, J. N. “Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity,” NewYork: Academic Press, 1977.
Lucas, H. C. “Methodological Issues in Information System Survey Research, In the Information System Research Challenge,” Survey Research Methods (3), Harvard Business School, 1981.
Mathieson, K., and Keil, M. “Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology fit,” Information and Management (34), 1998, pp. 221-230.
Mclean, E., Kappelman, L., and Thompson, J. “Converging end-user and corporate computing,” Communications of the ACM (36:12), 1993, pp. 79-92.
McNulin, B. C., and Sprague, R. H. “Information systems management’s new leader-ship role,” Information Systems Management in Practice 2nd Edition, Practice-Hall Inc, 1990.
Miller, D., and Toulouse, J. M. “Chief executive personality and corporate structure in small firms,” Management Science (32), 1986, pp. 1389-1409.
Mirani, R., and King, R. “The Development of a Measure for End-User Computing Support,” Decision Sciences (25:4), 1994.
Moore, G. C. “An Examination of theImplementation of Information Technology by End-Users: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of BritishColumbia, 1989.
Nunnally, J. “Psychometric theory,” New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
Pae, H., and Hyun, S. J. “The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumers’patronage decisions,” Information and Management (19), 2002.
Powell, A., and Moore, J. E. “The Focus of Research in End User Computing: Where Have We Come Since the 1980s,” Journal of End User Computing (14:1), 2002, pp. 3-22.
Premkumar, G., and King, W. R. “Organizational Characteristics and IS Planning-An Empirical Study,” Information Systems Research (5:2), 1994, pp. 75-109.
Scarborough, N. M., and Zimmerer, T. W., Effective Small Business Management, 6th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
Shurmer, M. 1993. “An Investigation into Sources of Network Externalities in the Packaged PC Software Market,” Information Economics & Policy (5:3), 1993, pp. 231-251.
Szajna, B. “Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model,” Management Science (42:1), 1996, pp. 85-92.
Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1995, pp. 144-146.
Tesser, A., and Shaffer, D. R. “Attitudes and attitude change,” Annual Review of Psychology (41), 1990, pp. 479-523.
Thong, Y. L., Yap, and Raman, K. S. “Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses,” Information Systems Research (7:2), 1996, pp. 248-267.
Venkatesh, V. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 1999, pp. 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., and Davis, D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Information Systems Research (46:2), 2000.
Vessey, I., and Galletta, D. “Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition,” Information Systems Research (2:1), 1991, pp. 63-86.
Watson, R. T. “Influences on the IS manager’s perceptions of key issues: information scanning and the relationship with the CEO,” MIS Quartely, 1990, pp.217-232.
WebSter, J., and Martocchio, J. “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications,” MIS Quarterly, 1992, pp. 201-226.
Yaverbaum, G. J. “Critical Factors in the User Environment: An Experimental Study of Users, Organizations and Tasks,” MIS Quarterly (12:1), pp. 75-88.
Zinatelli, N. “A Case Study and Survey of Factors Affecting EUC Success in Small Firms in New Zealand,” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1994.