中文參考文獻
王文科（民83）。課程與教學論。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。167。
古德曼（民87）。談閱讀。（洪月女譯）。台北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：1996年）
汪榮才（民85）。國民小學資賦優異學生在科學文章閱讀歷程中後設認知知識及後設認知控制之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：NSC 85-2413-H-024-001。
李永吟（民 87）。認知教學：理論與策略。台北市：心理出版社。24-31。
李美鈴（民86）。教學取向與閱讀能力對國小學童閱讀後設認知訓練成效影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。吳麗寬（民88）。合作學習對國小學障學生閱讀理解效果與同儕社會關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。邱上真 （民80）。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報，1期，1-49。林姿君（民89）。同儕互動中閱讀策略使用歷程之探討─以國小四年級國語科小組討論為例。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。林建平（民83）。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。林清山譯（民79）。教育心理學---認知取向。台北市：遠流出版社。
教育部（民89）。【全國兒童閱讀運動實施計劃】。
洪文東（民86）。科學文章的閱讀理解。屏東科學教育月刊，第三期，14-25。
施頂清（民87）。維果斯基（Vygotsky）認知發展論在教學上之應用。教師之友，第41卷，第一期，9-14。涂志賢（民87）。交互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解、後設認知能力、自我效能表現的影響。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
郭靜姿（民81）。閱讀理解訓練方案對於增進高中學生閱讀策略運用與後設認知能力之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。陳李綢（民77）。學習策略的研究與教學。資優教育季刊，29期，15-24。陳怡欣（民83）。閱讀策略對有意義的文章學習影響之研究。教育資料文摘，第三十三卷，第一期，171-182。陳淑敏（民84）。Vygotsky「最近發展區」概念內涵的探討。國立屏東師院學報，第八期，503-526。彭姌齡，張必隱（民88）。認知心理學。台北市：東華書局。
曾陳密桃（民79）。國民中小學生的後設認知及其與閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。黃慧貞譯（民83）。認知過程的原理。台北市：心理出版社。
黃瓊儀（民85）。交互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。張必隱（民81）。閱讀心理學。北京師範大學出版社。
張春興（民83）。教育心理學―三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市：東華書局。
張春興（民88）。現代心理學。台北市：東華書局。
葛聶等（民83）。教學心理學---學習的認知基礎。（岳修平譯）。台北市：遠流出版社。（原著出版年：1985年）
鄭宇樑（民86）。後設認知閱讀教學對國小學生科學文章閱讀理解、閱讀態度及後設認知能力影響之成就。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所課程與教學碩士論文。鄭昭明（民82）。認知與教學。台北市：桂冠圖書公司。
鄭麗玉（民89）。認知與教學。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
鍾雅婷（民89）。學習策略教學對國小六年級學童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。鍾聖校（民79）。認知心理學。台北市：心理出版社有限公司。
顏若映（民83）。先前知識與文章連貫性對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。瞿惕時、徐根榮、劉承發（1990）。段的教學。輯於小學語文---怎樣教小叢書（合訂本1）。上海：教育出版社。
蘇宜芬 (民80)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解與後設認知能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所碩士論文。西文參考文獻
Adams, P. E. (1995). Teaching Romeo and Juliet in the no tracked English classroom. Journal of Reading, 38(6), 425-432
Alexander, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problems. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: the efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 309-332.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.255-292). New York: Longman.
Armbruster, B. B. (1988). Why some children have trouble content area textbooks. ERIC No. ED300782.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills of reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.). Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Brady, P. L. (1990). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students through reciprocal teaching and semantic mapping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Information and Technology：Developing Metacognition.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327218.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development of reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, A. L., & Parlincsar, A. S. (1989). Guide cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing , learning ,and instruction. (pp. 393-452). New Jersey: Erllbaum.
Bruce, M. E., & Chan, L. K. S. (1991). Reciprocal teaching and trans-environmental programming: a program to facilitate the reading comprehension of students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 12(5), 44-54.
Carter, C. J. (1997). Why Reciprocal Teaching. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 64-68.
Dermody, M. (1988). Metacognitive strategies for development of reading comprehension for younger children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of College for Teacher Education, New Orleans, L A.
Fantuzzo, John W.；And Others (1995). Effects of Student Self-Concept and Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 272-281
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Braninerd (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior. Alphen a. d. Rijn, The Netherlands: Sitjhoff & noordhoff.
Frances, S. M., & Eckart, J. A. (1992). The effects of reciprocal teaching on comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 350572).
Goodman, K.(Ed.), (1973). Psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Gag΄ne E. D. (1985). The cognitive Psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to Increase Reading Ability—A Guide to Developmental & Remedial Methods. N.Y.: Longman.
Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (1990). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Herrmann, B. A. (1988). Two Approaches for Helping Poor Readers Became More Strategic. The Reading Teacher, 46, 24-28.
Jarvela, S. (1996). New models of teacher-student interaction: A critical review. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11(3), 249- 268.
Kelly, M., Moore, D. W., & Tuck, B. F. (1994). Reciprocal teaching in a regular primary school classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 88(1), 53-61.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275-293.
King, C. M., & Johnson, L. M. P. (1999). Constructing meaning via reciprocal teaching. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3), 169-186.
Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary- classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 91-106.
Lijern, J. T. (1993). Reciprocal teaching of metacognitive strategies to strengthen reading comprehension of high school strudents in Spanish: A descriptive case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron.
Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching Improves Standardized Reading-Comprehenshion Performance in Poor omprehenders. The Elementary School Journal, 90(5), 469-484.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Palincsar, A. S. (1985). The unpacking of a multi-component, metacognitive training package. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1ž), 73-98.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1983). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension monitoring activities. (Tech.Rep. No. 269). Urbana: Uni. of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, D. A. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
Palincsar, A. S., David, Y. M., Winn, J. A. & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Examining the context of strategy instruction. Remedial and Education, 12(3), 43-53.
Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 211-225, 229.
Palincsar, A. S., & Perry, N. E. (1995). Development, cognitive, and sociocultural perspectives on assessing and instructing reading. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 331-344.
Paris, S. G., & Mayer, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.
Payne, B. D., & Manning, B. H. (1992). Basal reader instruction: effects of comprehension monitoring training on reading comprehension, strategy use and attitude. Reading Research and Instruction, 32 (1), 29-38.
Perfetti, C. A., & Curtis, M. E. (1986). Reading. In R. F. Dillon & R. J. ternberg(Eds.). Cognition and instruction. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Persson, U. (1994). Reading for understanding: an empirical contribution to the metacognition of reading comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381773).
Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing students’ awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 217-235.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schema: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shortland-Jones, B. (1986). The development and testing of an instructional strategy for improving reading comprehension based on schema and metacognitive theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Taylor, B. M. & Frye, B. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 92, 39-48.
Tregaskes, M. R., & Daines D. (1989). Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 29 (1), 52-60.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development higher psycho- logical process. Edited and translated by M. Cole, V. John Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, B. Y. L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-question training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228-239.
Westera, J., & Moore, D. W. (1995). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension in a New Zealand high school. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 225-231.
Wong, B.Y. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55, 227-268.
Wood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181-191.
Yore, L. D., & Shymansky, J. A. (1991). Reading in science：Developing and operational conception to guide instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(2), 19-36.
Yore, L. D., & Craig, M. T. (1992a). Middle school students'' metacognitive knowledge about science reading and Science text: Objective assessment, validation, and results. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356134.)
Yore, L. D., & Craig, M. T. (1992b). Middle school students'' metacognitive knowledge about science reading and Science text: An interview
study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356135.)