(3.236.228.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/17 07:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:孟令珠
論文名稱:電腦化教學策略對中文輸入學習成效之影響探討
指導教授:陳明溥陳明溥引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:資訊教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:82
中文關鍵詞:中文輸入法字根學習成效字根應用成效資訊處理
外文關鍵詞:Chinese keyboarding skillsChinese character-pattern learningChinese character-pattern applicationinformation processing
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:357
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:65
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討教學策略及學習者的電腦態度,對「字形解碼」式中文輸入法之字根的學習及應用成效,並探討英文輸入能力與其字根學習及應用成效的關聯性。研究樣本為高職資處科一年級127位學生。在教學實驗中,依據不同的教學策略學習活動分為精熟學習組、精緻化學習組、或混合學習組;電腦態度包含信心、焦慮、有用性、喜好等四個分量表,分別依電腦態度量表中各分量表得分,分為高信心組與低信心組、高焦慮組與低焦慮組、高有用性組與低有用性組、高喜好組與低喜好組,電腦態度則依各分量表得分加總,分為高電腦態度組與低電腦態度二組。
  研究結果發現:(1)在字根學習成效上,不同教學策略學習活動各組間沒有顯著差異;高電腦態度組顯著優於低電腦態度組;高信心組顯著優於低信心組;低焦慮組顯著優於高焦慮組;高喜好組顯著優於低喜好組;高有用性組與低有用性組則無顯著差異;而且英文輸入能力與字根學習成效之間有顯著正相關;(2)在字根應用成效上,精緻化學習組及混合學習組顯著優於精熟學習組;高電腦態度組顯著優於低電腦態度組;高信心組與低信心組無顯著差異;低焦慮組與高焦慮組無顯著差異;高喜好組顯著優於低喜好組;高有用性組與低有用性組無顯著差異;而且英文輸入能力與字根應用成效之間有顯著正相關。
The purpose of this study was to explore the achievement and application of Chinese character-pattern learning in relation to different instruction strategies, and different learner’s attitude toward computer. And their correlation with English keyboarding skills was also surveyed. The study samples consisted of 127 students of a commercial school. The subjects were assigned to one of the three experiment groups: the master-learning group, the elaboration-learning group, or the combination-learning group. Also a computer attitude scale was adopted in this study. According to the scale, the subjects were identified as either high or low in the following categories: computer attitude, computer confidence, computer anxiety, computer usefulness, computer liking.
The main findings of this study can be described briefly as follows: first, in the achievement of Chinese character-pattern learning, different instruction strategies caused no significant difference. But the group with high computer attitude, high computer confidence, high computer liking and low computer anxiety outperformed the group with low computer attitude, low computer confidence, low computer liking and high computer anxiety. And English keyboarding skills and the achievement of Chinese character-pattern learning had positive correlation. Second, in the Chinese character-pattern application, the elaboration-learning group and the combination-learning group outperformed the master-learning group. And the group with high computer attitude and high computer liking outperformed the group with low computer attitude and low computer liking. Besides, English keyboarding skills and Chinese character-pattern application had positive correlation.
附表目錄……………………………………………………………………vi
附圖目錄……………………………………………………………………vii
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………….……1
第一節 研究動機與背景………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………..……5
第三節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………..…………6
第四節 重要名詞解釋…………….………….…………..…………7
第二章 文獻探討……….……………………….………..…………9
第一節 中文輸入法之介紹………….………….………..…………9
第二節 學習理論……………………………….………..…….….19
第三節 電腦輔助學習………………………….………..…….….28
第四節 電腦態度………………………….………..………….….34
第三章 研究方法……………………………...………….……….39
第一節 研究樣本………………………….………..……….…….40
第二節 研究設計………………………….………..……….…….41
第三節 研究步驟………………………….………..……….…….46
第四節 研究工具…………………………………….……….…….49
第五節 資料處理與分析……………….………..………….…….54
第四章 結果與討論…………………...…………………….…….56
第一節 字根學習成效……………….……………………….…….56
第二節 字根應用成效………………...…………………….…….61
第五章 結論與建議…………………...…………………….…….66
第一節 結論……………………….………………………...…….66
第二節 建議………………………...……………………….…….69
參考文獻…………………..……………………..……………….…….70
附錄一 字根學習成效測驗試題……..……..……………….……...76
附錄二 字根應用成效測驗試題……..………..……………………..77
附錄三 字根應用成效測驗操作畫面..……..……………….……...79
附錄四 電腦態度問卷…….…………………………………………….81
中華民國電腦技能基金會(2001)。中英數輸入實力養成暨評量。台北:松崗。
中華民國電腦技能基金會(1997)。企業人力資源與電腦技能需求。http://www.csf.org.tw/join/3000/3000.htm(2001.03.25)。
吳明隆(1998)。電腦態度的意義及其量表內涵的探究。資訊與教育,65,48-55。
朱敬先(1997)。教育心理學-認知取向。台北:五南。
朱則剛(1993)。教學設計核心理念-學習理論與教學理論知識基礎的探究。視聽教育雙月刊,35(2),1-23。
朱則剛、李麗君、單文經、楊美雪譯 (1998)。教學科技的定義與範疇研究。台北:五南。(Instructional technology: the definition and domains of the field by Seels., B. B. & Richey, R. C.)
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。台北:商鼎文化出版社。
李咏吟(1989)。國中生學習技巧運作狀況之調查。輔導學報,12,239-264。
李祥(2000)。鍵盤輸入法萬「碼」奔騰。http://input.foruto.com/introduce/introduce_article001.htm(2001.07.15)。
邱上真(1991)。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報,1,1-50。
林世駿(1996)。打開中文輸入發展史。第三波,165,114-118。
洪榮昭(1992)。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用。台北:師大書苑。
徐蕙君(1996)。電腦鍵盤輸入適性練習策略之研究。台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部(1998)。商業職業學校資料處理科課程標準暨設備標準。台北:教育部。
曾士熊(1997)。中文輸入法概述。中央研究院計算中心通訊,13(8),85-88。
張新仁(1993)。奧斯貝的學習理論與教學應用。教育研究雙月刊,32,31-51。
董峰政(1992)。為中文輸入法進一言。http://demol.nkhc.edu.tw/~t0015/taiwan/t2.htm(2001.07.15)。
楊家興(1993)。超媒體:一個新的學習工具。教學科技與媒體,12,28-39。
楊家興(1986)。個別化教學:智慧型電腦輔學習的展望(上)。科學教育,93,17-24。
廖明德(1998)。漫談中文輸入法。http://input.foruto.com/introduce/introduce_article026.htm(2001.07.15)。
廖瑞民(1993)。談理想的中文輸入法。第三波,126,61-65。
蔡子安(2000)。中文輸入適性學習。彰化師範大學工業教育學系博士論文。
錢正之(2001)。教育理論演進對CAI設計與教學的影響-以科學教育為例。http://per.ntptc.edu.tw/03cchienweb/CAI.htm(2002.07.27)。
劉重次(2001)。嘸蝦米輸入法。台北:行易有限公司。
薛偉傑(2000)。鍵盤輸入三大主流。http://input.foruto.com/introduce/introduce_article036.htm(2001.07.15)。
謝東翰(2000)。中文輸入法。http://www.softwareliberty.org/project/software-map/v1.0/node110.html(2001.07.15)。
戴文雄 (1994)。高工學生空間觀念對機械製圖學習成效與態度之研究。國科會研究報告。NSC 83-0111-S-018-023。
戴俊芬(1996)。倉頡中文輸入法與大易中文輸入法之比較。中山中文學刊,2,211-234。
戴建耘、林世良(1995)。中文輸入技能教學與競賽現況調查與芻議。商業職業教育季刊,60,67-74。
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Anderson, A. A. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), 61-77.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
Anderson-Inman, L. (1990). Keyboarding across the curriculum. The Computing Teacher, 36(4), 37-39.
Artwohl, M. J. (1989). What research says about keyboarding skills and computer anxiety. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 444)
Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human Memory and Cognition. Harper Collins Publishers.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. (12th ed.). N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ayersman, D. J. & Minden, V. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behaviors, 11(3-4), 371-390.
Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173-188.
Boos, M. (1986). The relationship of certain personality and cognitive variables to computer attitudes and anxiety in pre-service teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(7), 2547A.
Britten, R. M. (1988). The effect of instruction on keyboarding skills in grade 2. Educational Technology, 28(4), 34-37.
Brown, T. S., Brown, J. T., & Baack, S. A. (1987). The development reexamination of the attitudes toward computer usage scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 261-269.
Chau, P. Y. K. (1999). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.
Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Murphy, L. C. R. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 5-21.
Coffin, R. J. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 549-569.
Cohen, V. B. (1985). A reexamination of feedback in computer-based instruction: Implications for instructional design. Educational Technology, 25(1), 33-37.
Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 141-159.
Fenneman, G. C. (1973). The validity of previous experience, attitude, and attitude toward mathematics as predictors of achievement in freshman mathematics at wartburg college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
Fry, E. (1988). The value of keyboarding as ‘basic skill’ is stressed. Education Week.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. NJ: CBS College Publishing.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gardner, D., Discenza, R., & Dukes, R. (1993). The measurement of computer attitudes: An empirical comparison of a variable scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 487-507.
Gardner, C. (1990). The effect of CAI hand-on activities elementary students’ attitudes and weather knowledge. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326-444).
Glass, A. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Rondom House.
Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1987). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Gordon, H. R. D. (1995). Analysis of the computer anxiety levels of secondary technical education teachers in West Virginia. Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 15(1), 21-29.
Hannafin, J. J. & Cole, D. D. (1983). An analysis of why students select introductory high school computer coursework. Educational Technology, 23(4), 26-29.
Havice, W. L. (1999). College students’ attitudes toward oral lectures and integrated media presentations. Journal of Technology Studies, 7(1), 1-9.
Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 49-59.
Hermann, G. D. (1971). Egrule vs. ruleg teaching methods: Grade, intelligence, category of learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 39(3), 22-33.
Hignite, M. A. & Echternacht, L. J. (1992). Assessment of the relationships between the computer attitudes and computer literacy levels of prospective educators. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 381-391.
Hooper, S. & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). Learning the ROPES of instructional design: Guidelines for emerging interactive technologies. Educational Technology, 28(7), 14-17.
Jonassen, D. H. & Hannum, W. H. (1987). Research-based principles for designing computer software. Educational Technology, 27(12), 7-14.
Kahan, J., Michelle, A., & Kathy, L. (1990). Keyboard familiarization: an alternative to touch typing. The Computing Teacher, 36, 34-35.
Katz, C. & Hoffman, F. B. (1987). Teaching writing through word processing: A case study. Computers in the Schools, 4(2), 99-115.
Kluver, R. C., Lam, T. C., Hoffman, E. R., Green, K. E., & Swearingen, D. L. (1994). The computer attitude scale: Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(3), 251-261.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Mental representation. In J. R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory: Essays in bonor of Gordon Bower (pp. 91-117). San Francisco: Freeman.
Levy, J. (1973). Factors related to attitudes and student achievement under a high school foreign language contingency contract. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California.
Loyd, B. H. & Gressand, C. P. (1984). The effects of sex, age and computer experience on computer attitudes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 246 878).
Mason, B. J. & Bruning, R. (2000). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html(2002.08.02)。
Maxam, S. & Stocker, H. R. (1993). The effects of phases of keyboarding speed on student grades in beginning computer classes. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 35(4), 233-244.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston, MA: Little Brownan co.
Meyer, A. & Pisha, B. (1987). The keyboard-communication link or communication barrier? Masstream, 15(1), 2-3.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Mitra, A. & Steffensmeier, T. (2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 417-433.
Moon, S. B. (1994). The relationships among gender, computer experience and attitudes toward computers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 142).
Morris, D. C. (1997). Ownership, use, and nonuse of personal computers by older adults. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(1), 5-12.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appelton-Century- Crofts.
Pagliaro, L. (1983). The history and development of CAI: 1926-1981, and overview. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 75-84.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
Petersen, R. P. (1991). Should keyboarding instruction precede college- level computer class? Business Education Forum, 45(8), 31-32.
Pisha, B. G. (1993). Rate of development of keyboarding skills in elementary school-aged children with and without identified learning disabilities. A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education of Harvard University.
Reed, S. K. (1988). Cognition: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Pacific grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Rozell, E. J. (1992). Computer-related success and failure: An empirical approach to studying factors influencing performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi University.
Rozell, E. L. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Computer-related success and failure: A longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 1-10.
Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Sales, G. C. & Willams, M. D. (1988). The effect of adaptive control of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21(1), 97-111.
Schloss, P. J., Wisniewski, L. A., Cartweight, G. P., & Smith, M. A. (1988). The differential effect of learner control and feedback in college students’ performance on CAI modules. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 141-150.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey.
Shermis, M. D. & Lombard, D. (1998). Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1),111-123.
Simonson, M. R. (1979). Attitude measurement: Why and how. Educational Technology, 19(9), 34-38.
Simonson, M. R. & Bullard, J. (1978). Influence of student expectations and student sex on predicting academic success. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Area Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Stephen, M. A. & Stanley, R. T. (2000). Multimedia for learning: methods and development. Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts.
Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of educational Research, 61(4), 475-503.
Waldrop, P. B. (1984). Behavior reinforcement strategies for computer-assisted instruction: Programming for success. Educational Technology, 24(9), 38-41.
Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed, pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Woodrow, J. E. J. (1994). The development of computer-related attitudes of secondary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research,11(4),307-338.
Zimbardo, P. & Ebbesen, E. (1970). Influencing attitudes and changing behavior. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔