跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/19 05:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:孫領弟
研究生(外文):linti sun
論文名稱:組織公平、信任與組織員工工作滿足之相關研究─以基隆市政府為例
指導教授:陳義勝陳義勝引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立海洋大學
系所名稱:航運管理學系碩士在職專班
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:55
中文關鍵詞:組織公平信任工作滿足
外文關鍵詞:Organization justiceTrustJob satisfaction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:362
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:127
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
工作滿足一直是最熱門的研究話題,尤其是Gibson et al. 於2000年提出的工作滿足的理論更是達到最高點。本研究認為組織公平、信任對工作滿足會產生影響關係,因此,針對基隆市政府從組織公平與信任的不同觀點對工作滿足進行研究,主要希望了解基隆市政府員工透過組織公平、信任能否影響工作滿足,以及信任對於組織公平及工作滿足是否具有中介效果。
首先以基隆市政府為母體進行實證研究,總計發放616份,蒐集有效問卷403份。其次使用SAS套裝軟體來分析各變數之間的關係。
經研究結果可得下列結論:
1.組織公平與組織員工工作滿足有正向影響關係。
2.組織公平與組織員工間信任有正向影響關係。
3.組織員工間信任與組織員工工作滿足有正向影響關係。
4.信任為組織公平對組織員工工作滿足影響之中介變項。
本研究結果希望未來在工作及領導上可供運用參考,使領導者在做決策及領導部屬更用心,以提升工作績效。
Abstract
Job satisfaction has been always the hottest topic of research. It is the highest point that Gibson et al. proposed the Theory of Job Satisfaction in 2000. This study considered that Organization justice and trust influence Job Satisfaction, So it tried to take different aspects ─Organization justice and trust to test job satisfaction with Keelung City Government.
The main purpose of this study is to understand that whether job satisfaction will be influenced by Organization justice and Trust , and if Trust will be an intermediary effect between Organization justice and Job satisfaction.
First of all, the thesis took Keelung City Government as sample, The total quantity of questionnaire are 616 and the effective ones are 403. The thesis used SAS software to test the all hypothesis.
The conclusions are below:
1.Organization justice is related with Job satisfaction.
2.Organization justice is related with Organization Trust.
3.Organization trust is related with Job satisfaction.
4.Trust has the intermediary effect between Organization
justice and Job satisfaction.
The conclusions hope application to work and lead in future , let leaders make decisions and lead employees will heartfelt, raise the job performance.
目 錄
謝辭---------------------------------------------------I
中文摘要----------------------------------------------II
ABSTRACT---------------------------------------------III
表目錄------------------------------------------------IV
圖目錄------------------------------------------------VI
第一章 緒論-------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機-------------------------------------1
第二節 研究問題-------------------------------------3
第三節 研究架構與變項之操作性定義-------------------4
第二章 文獻探討---------------------------------------9
第一節 組織公平與工作滿足之相關研究-----------------9
第二節 組織公平與信任之相關研究--------------------11
第三節 信任與工作滿足之相關研究--------------------13
第四節 組織公平、信任和工作滿足之相關研究----------15
第三章 研究方法--------------------------------------17
第一節 研究假說---------------------- -------------17
第二節 研究對象與資料蒐集--------------------------22
第三節 統計分析方法--------------------------------23
第四節 衡量工具------------------------------------24
第四章 實證結果與分析--------------------------------29
第一節 組織公平與員工工作滿足之關係----------------29
第二節 組織公平與信任之關係------------------------34
第三節 信任與員工工作滿足之關係--------------------38
第四節 組織公平、信任與員工工作滿足之關係----------42
第五章 結論與建議------------------------------------50
第一節 結論----------------------------------------50
第二節 建議----------------------------------------55
參考文獻----------------------------------------------56
一、中文部分----------------------------------------56
二、英文部分----------------------------------------57
附錄--------------------------------------------------62
樣本資料統計分析--------------------------------------67
樣本資料皮爾森積差相關係數分析總表--------------------69
樣本資料皮爾森積差相關係數各別分析表-----------------70
一、中文部分
1.方鈺如(民91),「人際信任、社會資本與工作滿意度之相關性研
究」,碩士論文,國立台灣海洋大學航運管理學系研究所。
2.周志法(民91),「領導風格、公平認知、員工工作滿足之關係探
討」,碩士論文,國立台灣海洋大學航運管理學系研究所。
3.林鉦琴(民85),「組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換
理論之觀點」,管理科學學報,第十三卷,第三期,頁391-415。
4.卓正欽(民89),「組織中分配正義與程序正義對員工組織承諾、工作
滿意度及離職傾向之研究-以會計事務所為探親對象」,碩士論文, 國
立臺灣大學商學研究所
5.洪振順(民87),「組織公正對組織公民行為影響之研究—信任關係的
觀點」,碩士論文,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
6.徐瑞萍(民89),「終身僱用導向對員工公平認知、工作動機與組織承
諾之影響」,碩士論文,國立台灣海洋大學。
7.許彩娥(民70),「領導型態、工作特性與我國女性公務員工作滿足關
係之研究」,碩士論文,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
8.陳正強(民88),「組織公正、信任對工作投入與組織公民行為影響關
係之研究」,碩士論文,國防管理學院資源管理研究所。
9.黃俊英、林震岩(民86),SAS精析與實例,初版再印,台北:華泰,頁
364-365,頁611。
10.黃仲毅(民90),「薪酬公平的認知與醫院員工的工作態度關係之探
討」,碩士論文,台北醫學院醫學研究所。
11.黃怡姿(民88),「員工之組織信任的形成與影響」,碩士論文,國
立台灣大學心理學研究所。
12.戚樹誠、羅新興、黃敏萍(民87),「組織成員的人際信任與言論禁
忌之關聯性─以國軍軍官為研究樣本」,台大管理論叢,第九卷,第一
,頁177─200。
13.劉鈞慈(民89),「程序公平、組織承諾、信任與組織公民行為關係
之研究─以我國產物保險產業為例」,碩士論文,銘傳大學管理科學研
究所。
14.黎士群(民88),「組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究-以
Unix系統管理人員為例」,碩士論文,銘傳大學管理科學研究所。
15.鄭仁偉、杜啟華、潘思云(民89),「組織信任研究─以我國保險公
司與保險輔助人為例」,商學學報,第八期,頁293-320。
二、英文部分
1.Adams, J. S.(1965), Inequity in Social Exchange, In L.
Berkowite (Ed),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol.2, pp.267-299, New York:Academic Press.
2.Alexander, S., & Ruderman,M.(1987)”The Role of
Procedural and Distributive justice in organizational
behavior”,Social Justice Research , 15,143-161.
3.Beehr, T.A. (1996), Basic Organizational Psychology,
Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bise , R. & Moag, J. S.(1986), Interactional Justice :
Communication Criteria of Fairness, In R. J. Lewicki, B.H.
Bazerman(Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations,
pp.43- 55.
5. Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and power in social life. NewYork:
Wiley.
6. Brockner , J. & Siegel, P. (1996),” Understanding the
Interaction between procedural and Distributive Justice ,
” in R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(eds.), Trust in
Organizations : Frontiers of Theory and Research .Thousand
Oaks , CA : Sage Publications , pp.331-356.
7. Carnevale , D. G.(1998),“ Organizational Trust ,” in Tay
M. Shafritz(ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Public
and Administration . Westview Press.
8. Cook, J. & Wall, T.(1980), “ New Work Attitude Measures
of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need
Nonfulfillment ” Journal Of Occupational Psychology, Vol.53,
pp.39-52.
9. Daley , D. M. & Vasu , M. L. (1998),”Fostering
Organizational Trust in North Carolina : The Pivotal Role of
Administrators and Political Leaders," Administration &
Society , Vol.30, pp.62-84.
10. Deluga, R. J.(1994) , “Supervision Trust Building ,
Leader-member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship
Behavior ”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology , Vol.67 , 315-326.
11.Deutsch, M. (1962), “ Cooperation and Trust : Some
Theoretical Notes ”Industrial Relations, Vol.8, No.1, pp.1-
27.
12.Driscoll, J.W. (1978), “ Trust and Participation in
Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction
” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.44-56.
13. Folger , Robert & Greenberg , J. (1985) , “ Procedural
justice : an interpretive analysis of personnel systems ,”
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management , Vol.3,
pp.141-183.
14.Folger , R., & Konovsky , M. E. (1989), Effects of
Porcedural and Distributive Justice on Reaction to Pay
Raise Decision, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.32,
pp.115-130.
15.Gambetta , D.G. (1988) , Can We Trust Trust ? , In D.G.
Gamgetta (Eds.) Trust, NY : Basil Blackwell, pp.213-237.
16.Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M. & Donnelly, J. H.(2000),
Organizations Behaviors Structure Processes, 10th(Ed.)
McGraw-Hill.
17.Golembiewski, R.T. & McConkie, M. (1975), ”The
Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Processes” In
C.L. Cooper(Ed.), Theories of Group Processes, New York,
NY : Wiley, pp.131-185.
18.Greenberg,J.(1987)”A taxonomy of organizational justice
theories”,Academy of Management Review, Vol.12, pp.9-22.
19.Greenberg, Jerald(1990), “Organization justice :
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow” ,Journal of Management,
Vol.16, pp.399-432.
20.Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1976) , “Motivation through
the Design of Work : Test of a Theory ” Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 16, pp.250-279.
21. Homans, G. C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary
Forms. New York:Harcourt, Brace, & world.
22.Hoppock, R. (1935), Job Satisfaction, New York : Harper and
Row.
23.Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D.(1994), “Citizenship
behavior and social exchange,” Academy of Management,
Vol.37, pp.656-669.
24. Koozes , J. M. & Posner , B. Z.(1987), “The Leadership
Challenge “ SanFrancisco : Jossey-Bass.
25.Korsgaard , M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995), “Building commitment, attachment , and trust in
strategic decision-making teams:The role of procedural
justice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32. No. 1,
pp.60-84.
26. Lawler Ⅲ, E.E. & Hall, D.T.(1970), “ Relationship of
Job Charteristics of Job Involvement, Satisfaction, and
Intrinsic Motivation”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol.
54 , pp. 305-312.
27. Likert, R. & Willits , J. M.(1940),Morale and Agency
Management . Hartford, CT : Life Insurance Agency Management
Association.
28.Lind,E.A. & Tyler,T.R.(1988),The Social Psychology of
Procedural Justice ,New York:Plenum.
29.Moorman, R. M. (1991), “Relationship between organization
justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : Do
fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship ?,”
Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.76, pp.845-855.
30. Moorman , C., Deshpande, R. & Zaltman ,G.(1993),”
Factors Effecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,”
Journal of Marketing ,Vol.57, pp.81-101.
31. Niehoff , B. P. & Moorman, R. H.(1993),”Justice as a
Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring
and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , ” Academy of
Management Journal ,Vol.36, pp.527-556.
32. Nyhan , R. C.(2000),” Changing the Paradigm : Trust and
Its Role in Public Sector Organizations , ” American Review
of Public Administration ,30(1), March, pp.87-109.
33.Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H., & Fetter,
R. (1990) , ”Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their
Effects of Followers Trust in leader , Satisfaction, and
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors ” Leadership Quarterly,
Vol.1, pp.107-142.
34.Robbins , S.P. (1994), Management , 4th ed., London :
Prentice--Hall International edition.
35.Robbins, Stephen P.(1996), “ Equity Theory",Organization
Behavior, Prentice Hall International Inc. , 7th. , pp.332-
336.
36. Roethlisberger, F.J. & Dickson, W.J.(1939),Management
and the Worker , Cambirdge , MA : Harvard University Press.
37. Rotter, J. B.(1967),“ A New Scale for the Measurement of
Interpersonal Trust. ”, Journal of Personality , Vol. 35 ,
pp.651-665.
38.Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. & Camerer, C.
(1998), “ Not so Different after all : A Cross-Discipline
View of Trust ” Academy of Management Review,Vol.23,No.3,
pp.393-404.
39.Ryan, K.D., & Oestreich, D.K., (1998), Driving Fear Out of
the Workplace : Creating the High-Trust, High- Performance
Organization. 2nd , San Francisco :Jossey-Bass Publishers.
40.Sitkin, S. B. & Stickel, D.(1996), ”The road to hell :
The dynamics of distrust in an era of quality.,” In R. M.
Kramer & T. R. Tyler(Eds.)Trust in Organizations :Frontiers
of Theory and Research, CA : Sage, Thousand Oaks,pp.196-215.
41.Smith, P. C.(1969), Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L., The
Measurement of Satisfaction in Work & Retirment, Chicago:
Rand McNally.
42.Tang,T.L.P., & L.J.Sarsfield-Baldwin(1996)”
Distributive and Procedural Justice as Related to
Satisfaction and Commitment”,Sam Advance Management
Journal,summer ,pp.25-31.
43.Tyler, T. R.(1989), The Psychology of Procedural Justice:
A Test of the Group-Value Model,Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, Vol.57 , pp.853-858.
44.Whitener, Ellen M., Brodt, Susan E., Korsgaard, M. Audrey, &
Werner, Jon, M. (1998) “Managers as initiators of trust :
An exchange relationship framework for understanding
managerial trustworthy behavior ,” Academy of Management
Review, Vol. 23, pp.513-530.
45.Zucker , L.G. (1986) , “ Production of Trust :Institutional
Sources of Economic Structure 1840-1920 ” In B.M. Staw and
L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior,
Vol.8, pp.53-111, Greenwich, CT :JAI Press.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊