(3.237.20.246) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/14 09:40
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳惠貞
研究生(外文):Hui-Chen Chen
論文名稱:以凱利方格技術探之學生知識概念圖-以高職數學為例
論文名稱(外文):Concept map analysis using Kelly''''s grid for senior high school mathematics
指導教授:劉寶鈞劉寶鈞引用關係劉晨鐘劉晨鐘引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:資訊工程學系
學門:工程學門
學類:電資工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:50
中文關鍵詞:網路學習概念圖凱利方格技術
外文關鍵詞:Concept mapRepertory Grid Technique(RGT)Network learning system
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:249
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
凱利方格技術一般應用在取得被研究者的深層理念,概念圖是近期內廣泛的被應用在教學與學習策略的知識測量上,在學習科技的研究範疇中,這兩大領域頗受學者的重視。本研究嘗試透過凱利方格技術來了解學習者的構念,包含構念的作用方式、構念間的關聯,以及組成構念的方法等資訊;修改過去傳統概念圖的繪製方式,結合電腦記錄學習者在網路學習過程所建立之凱利方格來自動建立學生概念圖。期望透過概念圖結構化的呈現,讓學習者更能掌握自己的知識結構,並透過概念比對機制讓學生透過網路活動來組織自己的知識結構,系統再運用其知識結構來輔助學生探究學習。
本研究樣本以45名光啟高中二年級學生為對象,以數學學科中「平面座標系」的相關概念為教材,探討概念圖的學習對高職學生學習平面座標系課程相關知識的影響?其中30位學生為實驗組,接受概念圖學習系統的學習策略;15名學生為控制組,即未接受實驗處理。實驗結果發現,學生在學習前後,成績確實有明顯的提昇,而且實驗組的改變更為顯著(t=4.911 顯著性=0.000);在後測與概念的相關度分析亦達顯著水準(0.003)。由此顯示,概念圖學習系統對學習確實有相當程度的助益。
Repertory Grid Technique(RGT) is application in acquire deeper and further personal cognition and Concept mapping has been used in many subject domains as a useful strategy for learning and instruction.. In this study we combined Repertory Grid Technique(RGT) and concept mapping to build a concept mapping based learning and Assessment system.
In this research, the second-grade students of Paul Shu Senior high school were chosen as experiment subjects. This research was focused on learning achievements by Concept mapping, which were measured by Horizontal Coordinate System. Thirty students was the experiment group ,they were asked to learning the topic of ‘Horizontal Coordinate System ‘ in mathematic through the Concept mapping learning system and the other fifteen students was control group. The results indicated : 1. Experimental group had higher learning achievement than control group, there was significant difference between pre-test score and post-test score in experiment group 2. Both C and N-G indices were significant correlation with the achievement scores. According to above conclusions, Concept mapping learning system can get better quality and effectiveness in leaning achievement.
圖目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 問題與對策 5
第二章 相關技術與文獻探討 8
第一節 建構理論 8
壹、 建構主義學習觀 (Personal Construct Psychology) 8
第二節 凱利方格技術( REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE ) 10
壹、 凱利方格技術的理論基礎 10
貳、 凱利方格技術的實施方式 10
參、 凱利方格技術的應用 11
第三節 概念構圖(CONCEPT MAP) 12
壹、 概念圖的意義 12
貳、 概念圖在教學上的應用 14
參、 概念圖的評分方式 14
第三章 系統架構 17
第一節 實作環境 17
壹、 程式開發 17
貳、 實作平台 17
第二節 系統概觀 18
第三節 系統功能 20
壹、 教材知識庫 21
貳、 Concept Map Model(知識圖模組) 22
參、 Activities(學習活動) 23
第四節 概念取得之系統流程圖 24
第五節 概念構圖模組 26
第六節 概念評分模組 28
壹、 C 值的計分方法 28
貳、 修改N-G 值的計分方法 31
第四章 實驗設計 33
第一節 研究設計 33
第二節 實驗設計與實驗實施 33
壹、 前置研究階段 33
貳、 正式實驗流程 34
參、 資料處理與分析 35
第五章 實驗結果與討論 36
第一節 學習前後,成績改變情形 36
第二節 實驗組與控制組成績改變情況分析 37
第三節 學習後概念改變情形與成績之相關度分析 39
第四節 不同學習程度學生概念圖改變情形 40
第五節 結論及建議 41
參考文獻 42
[1]. Anderson, R. D. “A consolidation and appraisal of science education meta-analyses. “,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 497-509,1983
[2]. Anderson, R. D., Kahl, S. R., Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. “Science education: a meta-analysis of major questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, 20(5), 379-385,1983
[3]. Ausubel, D.P. “The psychology of meaningful verbal learning.” New York: Grune and Stratton.,1968
[4]. Ausubel, Novak J. D. & Hanesian, H. , Educational psychology: A cognitive view. ,New York: Holt ,Rinehart & Winston. 2 nd ed.,1978
[5]. Bezzi, A. “Use of Repertory Grids in Facilitating Knowledge Construction and Reconstruction in Geology”. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 33(2), p179-204.,1996
[6]. Bezzi, A. “What is this thing called geo-science Epistemological dimensions elicited with Repertory Grid and their implications for scientific  literacy”. Science Education, 83: 675-700.,1999
[7]. Brian R. Gaines and Mildred L. G.,” Shaw Knowledge Acquisition Tools based on Personal Construct Psychology.”, Shaw Knowledge Science Institute University of Calgary Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
[8]. C. Conati, A. Gertner, K. VanLehn, and M. Druzdzel, “On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks” , In proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 231-242, 1997.
[9]. C. K. Chang, and G. D. Chen ,”Student portfolio analysis for decision support of Web based classroom teacher by data cube technology”,Proceedings of Education Multimedia and Education telecom , Friburg Germany ,1998 .
[10]. Chen-Chung Liu, Gwo-Dong Chen , Chin-Yeh Wang,”Student modeling for performance assessment using Bayesian network on web portfolios”,Journal of Educational Computing Research (JECR) (SSCI/SCI)(To appear in Vol. 27(4) 435-467, 2002)
[11]. David Crowe & Hossein Zand ,"Computers and undergraduate mathematics 3: internet resources" Computers & Education, 35, pp.123-147,2000
[12]. Fletcher, J.D., “Modeling of learner in computer-based instruction”, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, vol. 1, pp. 118-126, 1975.
[13]. Goldsmith, T. E. Johnson , Acton,W. H. ,“Assessing structural knowledge.” , Journal of Educational Psychology,v83 n1 p88-96 ,1991
[14]. Gurer, D. W., M. desJardins, and M. Schlager.,” Representing a Student''''s Learning States and Transitions.”, AAAI Spring Symposium on Representing Mental States and Mechanisms, Stanford, CA,1995
[15]. Hebert, C. R. “Motivation: Do struggling students need more?” Reading Today, 16(4), p18.,1999
[16]. Jonassen, D.H. ,”Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking”,Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.,1996
[17]. Jonassen, D.H., & Reeves, T. C.,“Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools”.,In D.H.Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.,1996
[18]. Jones, B. F., Palincsar, A. S., Ogle, D. S., & Carr, E. G. ”Strategic teaching and learning: cognitive instruction in the content areas.” Elmhurst, IL: North Central Regional Laboratory and the Association for supervision and Curriculum Development.,1987
[19]. K. VanLehn and J. Martin, “Evaluation of an assessment system based on Bayesian student model”, International Journal of AI and Education, vol. 8, pp. 179-221, 1997.
[20]. M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser and E. Rees, “Expertise in problem solving”, In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.) Advances in The Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 1, 1982.
[21]. Markow, P. G., & Lonning, R. A. ,”Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: students’ perceptions and effects on achievement. “Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1015-1029.,1998
[22]. Mildred L G Shaw & Brian R Gaines,“Kelly''''s Geometry of Psychological Space and its Significance for Cognitive Modeling”,from The New Psychologist, 23-31, October, 1992 
[23]. Novak, J.D and Gowin, D. B., “Learning How to Learn.”, Cambridge University Press,1984
[24]. Peter M. Senge著/郭進隆譯,第五項修練/The Fifth Displine: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,天下文化出版,2002”
[25]. Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103-1127.
[26]. Roth, W. M. & Roychoudhury, A.“Using Vee and Concept Maps in Collaborative Settings: Elementary Education Majors Construct Meaning in Physical Science Courses.”, School Sciences and Mathmatics, 93(5), 237-244,1993。
[27]. Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A., “The social construction of scientic concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science”,Science Education, v76, p531-557.,1992
[28]. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J.” Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, v33 , p569-600,1996
[29]. Ruiz-Primo,M.A., & Shavelson,R.J.,”Problems and issue in the use of concept maps in science assessment”,Journal of Research in Science Teaching. v33, p569-600,1996
[30]. Shapiro, B. L.”What children bring to light: A study of personal  orientation to science learning”. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 306137.,1987
[31]. Sweller, J. ,” Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.”, Cognitive Science, v12, p257-285.,1988
[32]. 王希亮(1995):多媒體導論與應用,凱立資訊。
[33]. 宋德忠,陳淑芬,張國恩,「電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用」,中國測驗學會測驗年刊,45輯,2期,34-56頁,1998
[34]. 金子葳,「互動式學習系統架構之設計」,逢甲大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文,民88。
[35]. 金子葳,趙銘,「以概念圖為基礎的虎克定律電腦教學系統」,第八屆電腦輔助教學研討會,pp.373~380,民88.
[36]. 張春興 ,(2000)教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐- 東華書局
[37]. 張靜嚳 (1996),傳統教學有何不妥?,《建構與教學》,第四期。
[38]. 陳明溥,莊良寶,「知識圖建構對網路學習的影響」,第八屆電腦輔助教學研討會,pp.253~262,民88.
[39]. 游寶達、翁仲銘、曾渝頊(2000), 「建構主義在網路教學上的運用---基於數學標記語言之網路互動數學學習環境之設計」中正大學
[40]. 黃履峰、邱貴發(2000),「學習歷程檢視器:Web 學習環境中的學習管理工具」。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育所。
[41]. 鄭晉昌,「建構主義與組織學習觀點對數學教育的啟示-運用傳記及歷史故事來發展學生數學知識的社會共構意識」
[42]. 鍾斌賢,林聰武,吳育龍,黃宇辰; 「以概念圖作為合作學習分組策略之研究」,2002全球華人計算機教育應用大會,Page:255~262,中國北京,民國91年6月
[43]. 鍾斌賢,林聰武,吳育龍,黃宇辰; 「於網際網路上應用概念圖輔助學習之研究」,2001年台灣區網際網路研討會,Page:101~106,台灣嘉義,民國90年10月
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔