臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在這一百多年的發展歷史中，牛仔褲已從原本的工作褲變成是一種相當普及化的商品，近幾年來更成為時尚與流行的代表。根據2000年EICP的調查，國人在過去一年內買過牛仔褲等牛仔服飾的消費者，高達三成四。使牛仔褲成了普及率甚高的服飾商品之一。
在科技的發達與資訊爆炸的洪流裡，消費者面對過多的資訊量，常因無法有效的判斷與分析，產生所謂的「困惑」，不管從廠商還是消費者的角度來看，因困惑所造成的干擾或資訊的損失都是可觀的。然而國內過去的研究中，鮮少對於「顧客困惑」現象提出深入的探討。
本研究以消費者購買牛仔褲所產生的顧客困惑與價格合理知覺為研究主軸，首先探討顧客困惑對於價格合理知覺之影響，之後，再以消費者知覺風險與通路類型為干擾，研究兩干擾變項對顧客困惑之價格合理知覺所造成的影響。在經過前測與正式實驗後，研究結果共可歸納為下列幾點：
1. 困惑程度的高低對於消費者價格合理知覺有顯著的影響。
2. 在顧客困惑程度高的情境下，消費者知覺風險的高低對於價格合理知覺高低無顯著之干擾效果。
3. 在顧客困惑程度高的情境下，通路類型的差異對於消費者價格合理知覺高低有顯著之干擾效果。
研究最後並提供相關建議給行銷企劃人員作為日後銷售牛仔褲之參考，以減少廠商與消費者雙方因資訊困惑所造成之損失。

During the past hundred years of historical development, jeans have changed from casual working men’s clothing to everyday fashionable clothing. According to EICP’s year 2000 report, 34% of Taiwanese people have bought jeans within the past year. Thus, jeans continue to receive popular demand and universal acceptance in Taiwan.
Due to improvements throughout generations and technological developments, people living in today dynamic environment face information overload. This hectic environment leads to consumer confusion. As a result, it’s hard for consumer to analyze and choose products that suit their needs. This confusion creates a serious problem for both producers and consumers, since past market researchers have not thoroughly analyzed this dilemma.
In conclusion, this research aspires to explore the effects of consumer confusion on price fairness. In addition, consumer’s perceived risk and different store type are used to modulate independent variables. Through experiment design, the result of this research is exploring the following points:
1. There is a significant difference on price fairness in different level of consumer confusion.
2. In high confusion conditions, there is no significant difference on jeans price fairness in the amount of perceived risk.
3. In high confusion conditions, there is a significant difference on jeans price fairness in the different store type.
After thorough market research, this research hopes to propose answers to the problem of consumer confusion, so that future jeans producers and consumers can make right decisions about jeans purchases.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 顧客困惑 7
第二節 價格合理知覺 13
第三節 知覺風險 22
第四節 通路類型 29
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究假設 35
第三節 研究變數與操作性定義 36
第四節 研究設計 39
第五節 統計分析方法 50
第四章 研究分析與結果 51
第一節 基本資料分析 51
第二節 信度與效度分析 53
第三節 顧客困惑與價格合理知覺之相關驗證 55
第四節 知覺風險與通路類型之干擾效果分析 58
第五節 研究結果 63
第五章 結論與建議 64
第一節 研究結果與討論 64
第二節 研究貢獻與實務建議 67
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向建議 70
參考文獻 72
一、中文文獻 72
二、西文文獻 73
【 附錄 】 79
前測一 80
前測二 83
正式問卷 107

1. 方世榮，「行銷學」，台北：三民書局，1996。
2. 日本流通經濟研究所，「流通事典」，台北：故鄉出版社，1991。
3. 李律嫻，「商店實體環境暗示對消費行為影響之研究-以服飾零售業為例」，輔仁大學織品服裝研究所碩士論文，2003。
4. 周泰華，杜富燕，「零售管理」，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司，1997。
5. 林如瑩，「風險降低策略於網路購物之研究-以實驗室實驗法探討」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2000。
6. 林宣杏，「商店型態與品牌熟悉度對購買行為之影響」，國立台灣科技大學管理技術研究所碩士論文，1998。
7. 林祐全，「購物中心環境與購物型態對惠顧意願影響之研究」，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2001。
8. 翁景民，胡同來，「行銷通路」，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司，2002。
9. 郭振鶴，「行銷管理」，台北：三民書局，1996。
10. 彭秋萍，「新產品預告對消費者知覺價值與購買意願影響之分析」，東吳大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文，2001。
11. 馮綺文，「顧客困惑、顧客滿意度與品牌忠誠度關係之研究」，義守大學管理研究所碩士論文，2001。
12. 黃智強，「影響採用網路購物因素之研究-以網路書店為例」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，1999。
13. 粱安昌，「不同價格訊息呈現方式下參考價格對消費者行為之影響」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1998。
14. 詹智翔，「由消費者觀點探討高科技產品特性、知覺風險與購買決策過程之研究」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，1999。
15. 鍾佑德，「網站特性對網路購物知覺風險、資訊搜尋策略影響之研究」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2000。
1. Baird, Inga Skromme, and Howard Thomas, “Toward A Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.2, 1985, pp.230-243.
2. Bauer, R. A., “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” In R. S. Hankcock(ed.) Dynamic Marking for a Changing World, Chicago AMA Proceedings, 1960, pp.24.
3. Benady, D., “P & G does a U-turn with Ariel Launch”, Marketing Week, 21 March, 1997.
4. Bettman, James R., “Perceived Risk and Its Components-A Model and Empirical Test”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.10, May, 1973, pp.184-190.
5. Bolton Lisa E., Warlop Luk and Alba Joseph W., “Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.29, March 2003, pp.474-491.
6. Boxer, S. and Lloydd, C., “Too Many Systems Spoil the CD Broth”, The Sunday Times, 13 February, 1994, p.16.
7. Boyd D. Eric and Bhat Subodh, “The Role of Dual Entitlement and Equity Theories in Consumers for Fair Price Judgments: an Investigation within a Business-Business Service Setting”, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 17(January), 1998, pp.1-13.
8. Burke, R. R. and Srull, T. K., “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory of Advertising”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, No.1, 1988, pp.55-68.
9. Cahill, D. J., “We Sure as Hell Confused Ourselves, but What About the Customers?”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol.13, No. 4, 1995, pp.5-9.
10. Calder, B J., Philips, L. W. and Tybout, A. M., “Designing Research for Application”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.8, September 1981, pp.197-202.
11. Chaiken, Jan M., “Transfer of Emergency Service Deployment Model to Operating Agencies”, Management Science, Linthicum, Vol.24, March 1978, p719.
12. Cox, Donald F., “Risk-Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior”, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp.1-19.
13. Cox, Donald F. and Rich, Stuart U., “Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision Making-The Case of Telephone Shopping”, Journal of Marketing Research, November, 1964, pp.229-238.
14. Cunningham, Scott M., “The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk”, In Cox, Donald F. (ed.), Risk-Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp.82-108.
15. Della Bitta, Alber J., Kent B. Monroe and John M. McGinnis, “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(November), 1981, pp.416-427.
16. Dodds, William B., Monroe, Kent B. and Grewal, Dhruv., “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 1991, pp.307-319.
17. Dowling, R. and Staelin, R., “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21, No.6, 1994, pp.119-134.
18. Einhorn, H. J. and Hogarth, R. M., “Decision making under ambiguity”, Journal of Business, 59(April), 1986, pp.225-250.
19. Gelfand, M., “ Blank Tapes: Untangling the Market”, Discount Merchandiser, Vol.32, No. 4, 1992, pp.66-69.
20. Gotlieb, Jerry B. and Alan J. Dubinsky, “Influence of Price on Aspects of Consumers'' Cognitive Process”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (August), 1991, pp.541-49.
21. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan, “The Effects of Price Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions”, Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 1998, pp.46-59.
22. Horton, Raymond L., “The Structure of Perceived Risk”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4 (April), 1967, pp.694-706.
23. Hovland, C.I., “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change”, American Psychologist, Vol.14, 1959, pp.8-17.
24. Huppertz John W., Sidney J. Arenson and Richard H. Evans, “An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situation”, Journal of Marketing Research, 15(May), 1978, pp.250-260.
25. Ippolito, P. M. and Mathios, A. D., “Nutrition Information and Policy: a Study of US Food Production Trends”, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol.17, No.3, 1994, pp.271-305.
26. Jacoby, J., “Information Load and Decision Quality: Some Contested Issues”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.14, November, 1977, pp.569-573.
27. Jacoby, J. and Kaplan L. B., “The Components of Perceived Risk”, Advances in Consumer Research. M Venkatesan, ed., Chicago, 1972, pp.382-383.
28. Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E. and Kohn, C. A., “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load”, Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 1974, pp.357-365.
29. John A. Carlson and Robert J. Gieseke, “Price Search in a Product Market”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, March, 1983, pp.357-365.
30. Judith A. Garretson and Kenneth E. Clow, “The Influence of Coupon Face Value on Service Quality Expectations, Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intentions in the Dental Industry”, The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.13, 1999, p.59.
31. Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch and Richard H. Thaler, “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics”, Journal of Business, 59(April), 1986, pp.285-300.
32. Kalapurakal, Rosemary, Peter Dickson and Joel Urbany, “Perceived Price Fairness and Dual Entitlement,” Advances in Consumer Research, 18, Rebecca Holman and Michael Solomon(eds.), Provo, UT：Association for Consumer Research, 1991, pp.788-793.
33. Kamen, J. and R. Toman, “Psychophysics of Prices”, Journal of Marketing Research , 7(February), 1970, pp.27-35.
34. Keller, K. L., “Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, No.1, 1993, pp.1-22.
35. Kelly, J., “Lapses in concentration”, The Grocer, 3 May, 1997.
36. Kent, R. J., “Competitive versus Noncompetitive Clutter in Television Advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.33, No.2, 1993, pp.40-46.
37. Kerlinger, F. N., “Fundations of Behavioral Research”, 3rd ed., Chicago: Holt, Rinchart and Winston Inc, 1986.
38. Khermouch, G., “Packard Bell becomes Contrarian with Launch of Sub-Brand: Spectria”, Brandweek, Vol.35, No.25, 1994, p.9.
39. Kulik, A., “Differing Recycling Symbols Confuse German Consumers”, World Wastes, Vol.36, No.2, February, 1994, pp.14-19.
40. Lichtenstein, Donald R. and William O. Bearden, “Contextual Inferences on Perceptions of Merchant Supplied Reference Price”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 1989, pp.55-66.
41. Marshall, D., Anderson, A., Lean, M. and Foster, A., “Healthy Eating: Fruit and Vegetables in Scotland”, British Food Journal, Vol.96, No.7, 1994, pp.18-24.
42. Martins Marielza and Kent B. Monroe, “Perceived Price Fairness: a New Look at an Old Construct,” Advances in Consumer Research, 21, Rebecca Holmanand Michael Solomon(eds.), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1994, pp.75-78.
43. Mendleson, N. and Polonsky, M. J., “Using Strategic Alliances to Develop Credible Green Marketing”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.12, No.2, 1994, pp.4-18.
44. Miller, G. A., “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information”, Psychological Rewiew, Vol.63, March 1956, pp.81-92.
45. Mitchell V. W. and Papavassiliou V., “Marketing Causes and Implications of Consumer Confusion”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.8, No.4, 1999, pp.319-339.
46. Monroe, Kent B., Dhruv Grewal, and Larry D. Compeau, “The Concept of Reference Prices: Theoretical Justifications and Research Issues”, present at the Association for Consumer Research Conference, Chicago(October), 1991.
47. Murphy, Patrick E. and Ben M. Enis, “Classifying Products Strategically”, Journal of Marketing, 50, 1986, pp.24-42.
48. Murray, Keith B. and Schlacter, John L., “The Impact of Services versus Goods on Consumers'' Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability”, Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, Vol.18, winter 1990, pp.51-65.
49. Nunnally, J. C., “Psychometrics Methods”, New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1978.
50. Papavassiliou, Nikolaos, “Proposing an Integrated Optimization Model of the Distribution”, Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 31, March, 1995, pp.75-92.
51. Sinha, I. and Batra, R., “The Effect of Consumer Price Consciousness on Private Label Purchase”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.16, 1999, pp.237-251.
52. Sirohi, Niren., McLaughlin, Edward W. and Wittink, Dick R., “ A Model of Consumer Perception and Store Loyalty Intentions for a Supermarket”, Journal of Retailing, 74, February 1998, pp.223-245.
53. Soloman, M. R., Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed., London: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
54. Stone, Robert N. and Gronhaung, K., “Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline”, European Journal of Marketing, 38, 1993, pp.54-60.
55. Sweeney, Jillian C., Geoffrey N. Soutar and Lester W. Johnson, “The Role of Perceived Risk in the Quality-Value Relationship: a Study in a Retail Environment”, Journal of Retailing, 75(January), 1999, pp.77-105.
56. Thaler, Richard, “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice”, Marketing Science, 4 (summer), 1985, pp.199-214.
57. Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, 185(September), 1974, pp.1124-1131.
58. Wiseman, J., “Beliefs about Food Components, Foods, Fat and Heart Disease in New Zealand”, British Food Journal, Vol.96, No.11, 1994, pp.14-19