臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在台灣，由於綠色矽島的產業政策下，重高科技產業而輕傳統產業，衍生產業結構傾斜化的現象，對於人才的培育亦可能造成傳統產業的邊緣化。在邁入知識經濟的21世紀，隨著全球化、自由化、以及技術的快速進步，有效的技術取得已成為企業建立與維持競爭優勢的重要手段；另一方面，在全球化的驅使下，全球人力的大融合使得聘雇無國界、教育訓練無國界等人力資本儲存與提升成為跨國議題，在這樣的發展下使得技術的移轉及擴散開始模糊，人力資本的提升是否將成為另一個技術進步的主因，亦或是人力資本的無國界為產生技術移轉的主要因素？本研究將針對這兩個問題作進一步的探討。

在選擇技術來源的同時，企業更應針對人力資本作更深入的自我剖析，以取決是否向外購入技術或是採自行研發，亦或是為因應技術來源不同而對於人力資本之提升有不同投入之方向。

本研究以人力資本之角度，衡量對企業之技術移轉與技術進步之影響，本文為一探索型研究，企圖從文化與全球化之觀點檢視人力資本對於技術移轉與技術進步的影響，研究中發現，台灣與美國企業對於人力資本之持有態度在面對技術移轉與進步時與日本企業有截然不同之觀點，其結論為：（一）高度獨佔技術之企業並不因人員流動而造成技術擴散，進而引發產業間之技術進步；（二）對於外資投入研發據點之成立代表人員知識流動的開始，此因素可能造成技術擴散而引發本國內相關技術之進步；（三）教育訓練方式對於欲承接之技術不同而採用不同的方式。（四）光電顯示產業中因人力資本之密集而影響技術移轉時程與技術取得方式。

The inclinationalized industry structure that derives from Taiwan’s Green Silicon Island industrial policy that favors hi-tech industries and overlooks traditional industries is projected onto incubation of human capital, which may leads to further marginalization in traditional industries. In the 21st century of knowledge economy where globalization, privatization, and technology advance at mega speed, effective acquisition of technique is now a crucial mean for business to build and maintain competitive advantage. On the other hand, driven by globalization, a mass fusion of global human capital that has removed national boundaries of employment education and training, and has made reservation and enhancement of human capital international issues. Such development has blurred technique transfer and expansion. Will enhancement of human capital become another major factor of technique advancement? Will absence of boundary in human capital become a major factor of technique transfer? These two issues shall be further explored and discussed in this study.

When choosing source of technique, businesses should conduct in-depth self-assessment in human capital for the decision between external acquisition and internal development, as well as technique source-dependent investment direction for human capital enhancement.

This study measures influences of business technique transfer and technique advancement from human capital standpoint. This exploratory study intends to review influences brought by human capital on technique transfer and technique advancement from viewpoints of culture and globalization. Results of this study show that attitudes held by Taiwanese and American businesses toward human capital in terms of technique transfer and advancement entirely differ from Japanese businesses. The conclusions are： （1） Personnel turnover does not incur technique expansion that further leads to technique advancement among industry in highly technique monopolized business; （2） Investment of foreign capital in research and development base indicates beginning of personnel knowledge circulation, which may cause technique expansion and trigger related technique advancement domestically; （3） Methods of education and training differ from the alternative of technique transfer, and （4）Human-capital-intensive affects schedule of technology transfer and methods of technology obtained in Photoelectronic Display Industry.

中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… iii
誌謝詞 ……………………………………………………………… v
目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vi
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vii
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………… viii
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………… 1
第三節 研究範圍與方法………………………………………………… 2
第二章 研究架構與方法………………………………………………… 4
第三章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………… 7
第一節 技術定義………………………………………………………… 7
第二節 技術移轉的定義………………………………………………… 9
第三節 技術進步的定義………………………………………………… 14
第四節 人力資本的定義………………………………………………… 16
第五節 人力資本、技術移轉與技術進步……………………………… 22
第六節 變數定義….…………………………………………………...… 23
第四章 光電顯示產業分析……………………………………………… 26
第一節 光電顯示產業簡介……………………………………………… 26
第二節 樣本公司簡介…………………………………………………… 30
第五章 個案分析………………………………………………………… 32
第一節 人力資本………………………………………………………… 32
第二節 人力結構………………………………………………………… 38
第三節 技術移轉與技術進步…………………………………………… 41
第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………… 44
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………… 44
第二節 研究限制………………………………………………………… 47
第三節 未來研究建議…………………………………………………… 48
參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………50
附錄一 …………………………………………………………………… 56
簡歷 …………………………………………………………………… 60

王心婷（民92），2003年上半年我國平面顯示器產業動態與展望，工研院經資中心ITIS計畫。

吳靄書（民66），企業人事管理，大中國圖書股份有限公司。

李仁芳，花櫻芬(民86)，「技術知識類型與知識交流網路模型」，科技管理學刊，第2卷，第1期， 75-121頁。

林毅夫（1998），技術進步是東亞經濟增長的源泉嗎？，北京大學經濟研究中心政策性研究簡報，第47期。

張文菁（民國90年），企業特性、人力資本、產業環境與組織績效之相關性研究，中山大學碩士論文。

黃英忠（民82），產業訓練論，三民書局股份有限公司。

賴榮仁（民國75年），美、日在台企業管理技術移轉之研究，政治大學碩士論文。

謝文凱（民國82年），技術移轉過程互動程度與技術移轉績效關係之研究─以共同研發聯盟為例實證，中原大學碩士論文。

Autio, E. ＆ T. Laamanen (1995),” Technological Management and Transfer of Technology”, International Journal of Technology Management, 10（7/8）：643-664.
Almeida, P.（1996）,“Knowledge Sourcing By Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis In The U.S. Semiconductor Industry ”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, P.155-165.

Aitken, J. B. ＆ H. E. Ann （1999）, “Do Domestic Firms Benefit From Direct Foreign Investment？ Evidence from Venezuela” The American Economic Review,89（3）：605-618.

Barney, J. （1991） “Firm Resource And Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17（1）：99-120.

Booking, A. （1996）, “Intellectual Capital”, Boston: International Thompson Business Press.

Bassi, L.J.＆ M. E. Van Buren （1999）, “Valuing Investment in Intellectual Capital”, International Journal of Technology Management, 18（5）：414-432.

Bils, M.＆ P. J. Klenow（2000）, “Does Schooling Cause Growth？” American Economic Review, 90(5)：1160-83.

Chuang, Y. C.（1998）, ”Learning by Doing, Technology Gap and Growth”, International Economic Review, 39（3）：697~722.

Davidson, W. H. & G. D. McFetridge（1984）, ”International Technology Transactions and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Industrial Economics, 12（3）：253-265.
Drucker, P.F. (1995), “Managing In a Time of Great Change”. London: The Penguin Group.

Easterly, W., R. King, R. Leving ＆ S. Tebelo（1994）, “Policy, Technology Adoption and Growth,” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper no.4681.

Edvinsson, L. ＆ M. S. Malone.(1997), Intellectual Capital, New York：Harper Collins Publishers Inc.

Hall, E. R. ＆ C. I. Jones（1999）, “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1)：83-116.

Hedlund, G. (1994), “A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-form Corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, 15:73-90.

Holstius, K.(1995), “Cultural Adjustment in International Technology Transfer”, Interior Journal Technology Management, 10（7/8）：676-686.

Johnson, W.H.A.（1999）, ”An Integrative Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital: Measuring the Sock and Flow of Intellectual Capital Components in the Firm.” International Journal of Technology Management, 18：562-575.

Kojima, K.（1997）, ”Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Japanese Type
Verse American Type”, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 23(1)：103-116.

Khanna, T., R. Gulati,＆ N. Nohira（1998）, “The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope”, Strategic Management Journal, 19：102-116.

Leory, D.（1978）,”The “Opera de Paris” and Technological Progress”. Journal of Cultural Economics, 2（2）：73-77.
Lambe, C. J.,& E. R. Spekman (1997), "Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change", Journal Product Innovation Manage. 14：102-116.
Lee, K. & V. A. Witteloostuijn (1998), “Human Capital, Social Capital, and Firm Dissolution”, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4)：425–440.

Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer, ＆ N. D. Weil（1992）, “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economics Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2)：402-37.

Masfield E.（1975）,“International technology Transfer Forms, Resource Requirements and Polices.” American Economic Review, 65：372-376.

Piper, W.S.＆ S. Naghshpour（1996）, “Government Technology Transfer： The Effective Use of Both Push and Pull Marketing”, International Journal of Technology Management, 12（1）：85-94.

Porter, E. M.（1985）, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Porter, E. M. ＆ S. Stern（2001）,“Innovation Location Matters,” Sloan Management Review, 42（4）：28-36.

Qunjian, M.L. ＆ E.B. Carne（1987）,”A Study of the Factors Which Affect Technology Transfer in a Multiplication Multi-business Unit Corporation”, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 34(3).

Rogers E.M.＆ R. A. Solo （1972）, “Including Technological Change for Economic Growth and Development, East Lansing”, Michigan State University Press.

Ballance H R., J. A. Ansari, ＆ H. W. Singer（1982）,The International Economy And Industrial Development ：The Impact Of Trade and Investment on the Third World. Allanheld, Osmun Pub.

Robock, S. H.＆ K. Simonds（1983）, “International Business and Multinational Enterprise”, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Robinson R.D.（1988）, The International Transfer of Technology-Theory, Issues, and Practice, Ballinger, Cambridge.

Ross, J., R. L. Edvinsson ＆ N. Dragonetti（1998）, Intellectual Capital ：Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York University Press.

Steers, R. M. (1977),”Antecedend and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly , 22: 47.
Souder, W. E. (1987), Managing new Product Innovations, Lexington Books, Toronto.

Sharif, M. N.（1988）,"Basis For Techno-Economic Policy Analysis", Science and Public Policy，15（4）217-229.

Steel, L. W. （1989）, Managing Technology, New York: McGraw Hill Book company.

Schuler, R. S. (1989), Strategic Human Resource Management and Industrial Relation.
Human Relation, 42（2）：157-184.

Stewart, T. A. (1997), “Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations”, New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.

Teece, D. J. (1986), “Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications For Integration, Collaboration, Licensing And Public Policy.” Research policy, 15: 285-305.

Van, P. H. ＆ H. Y. Wan（1996）,”Interpreting East Asian Growth, Department of Economic studies”, Cornell University.

Zhao, L. M. ＆ A. Reisman （1992）, "Toward Meta Research On Technology-Transfer." IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 39(1):13-21.