(3.215.183.251) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/22 10:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳政道
研究生(外文):Chen Chen Tiao
論文名稱:應用matK序列研究國際木麻黃種源及台灣栽培木麻黃遺傳變異
論文名稱(外文):Using matK sequence data to unravel genetic variation of Casuarina international Provenances and Casuarina grown in Taiwan
指導教授:蕭如英蕭如英引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ju-Ying Hsiao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:生命科學系
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:木賊葉木麻黃種源matK演化樹雜交
外文關鍵詞:CasuarinaProvenancesmatKEvolution Treehybridization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:218
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
木賊葉木麻黃(Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. & Forst.)在東南亞及澳洲之熱帶及亞熱帶海岸地區有廣闊的原生植群分布,木麻黃類在台灣引種繁殖時間長,形態分類困難,加上栽植面積廣,已有馴化現象。但是否有地域品種形成,及是否有種間漸滲雜交現象發生有待釐清。本實驗採用木麻黃葉綠體之matK序列進行遺傳關係之鑑定。matK序列相比於其他序列其演化速度快,非同義取代量大及插入缺失事件發生次數都較多。所以有利於用來分析不同的種間關係。本實驗材料包含木賊葉木麻黃、銀木麻黃、肯氏木麻黃原生種源加木賊葉木麻黃栽培種源及台灣海岸栽培木麻黃。把三個種源序列作基因型分析時發現木賊葉木麻黃在同一地區基因型並不完全一致,而肯氏及銀木麻黃則有同一地區同一基因型現象。應用Modeltest軟體(hLRT及AIC檢定)找到最符合木麻黃DNA資料的模式(h,接著利用貝貽理論(Bayesian Inference)及最大概度法(Maximum Likelihood)找到最佳的演化樹。發現其演化樹中銀木麻黃跟肯氏木麻黃最接近,後才跟木賊葉木麻黃原生種源接在一起。對木賊葉木麻黃栽培種源研究後,發現木賊葉木麻黃栽培種源在演化樹上被放到木賊葉原生種源樹枝內,並無證據顯示有雜交的發生。對台灣海岸栽培木麻黃分析後,在形態上出現在木賊葉木麻黃及銀木麻黃中間型的9個樣本(來自台中港、石門、芳苑、鹽寮、南澳的部分樣本)中3個樣本(台中港兩個樣本、芳苑一樣本)在演化樹上被放到靠近銀木麻黃原生種源的分支位置,表示這3個樣本可能是母本銀木麻黃和父本木賊葉木麻黃的雜交後代,另外6個則可能是母本木賊葉木麻黃和父本銀木麻黃的雜交後代。

Abstract
Casuarina has been introduced and cultivated in Taiwan for a long time. The classification of the plant grown in Taiwan is difficult. The area of cultivation is wide spread and in some areas they have escaped from cultivation. Whether there is introgressive hybridization between species still remain to be clarified. The matK sequence of chloroplast genome was employed for the study of genetic relationship in Casuarina in the present study. Compared to other sequences, matK has faster evolutionary rate and more non-synonymous substitutions and indel events. The sequence is suitable for the study of relation between species. The materials used in the present study includes native provenances of C. equisetifolia, C. glauca, C. cunnunghamiana, cultivated provenances of C. equisetifolia, and the Casuarina cultivated on the coast of Taiwan. When the same sequences of different individuals were treated as a haplotype, different individuals of a provenance belong to the same haplotype in C. glauca and C. cunninghamiana while it is different in C. equisetifolia. Modeltest software was used to find the best DNA model based on hLRT and AIC test methods and the best model found was used in Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood methods to obtain best evolution trees. Among three species studied, C. glauca and C. cunninghamiana have closer relationship. The evolution trees resulted from Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood analyses indicated that there is resolution among species. However, the resolution within species is poor. The result of the study including native provenances of three species and cultivated provenances of C. equisetifolia indicated that all samples of cultivated provenances were clustered within the clade of C. equisetifolia. There is no evidence of hybridization in the samples of cultivated provenances. The result of the study including native provenances of three species and Casuarina grown in Taiwan indicated that among nine samples that are morphologically intermediate between C. equisetifolia and C. glauca (part of samples from Port of Taichung, Simun, Funyien, Yienliao, and Nanau), three samples were clustered within the clade of C. glauca indicating that these three samples may be the result of hybridization between maternal C.glauca an paternal C. equisetifolia. The remaining six intermediate samples clustered within the clade of C. equisetifolia may be the result of hybridization between maternal C. equisetifolia and paternal C. glauca.

目錄
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………….IV
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………….VI
壹、前言………………………………………………………………………………………….1
貳、材料與方法………………………………………………………………………………….4
參、結果………………………………………………………………………………………….10
肆、討論………………………………………………………………………………………….14
陸、結論………………………………………………………………………………………….17
柒、引用文獻…………………………………………………………………………………….49
附錄、各單倍體型序列………………………………………………………………………….56

何坤益. 2002.木麻黃種源在台灣之遺傳變異.國立中興大學森林學系博士論文。
Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control .19:716-723.
Alfaro, M.E., S. Zoller and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or Bootstrap? A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling and Bootstrapping in Assessing Phylogenetic Confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 20:255—266.
Bayes, T. 1763. An essay towrds solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Reprinted.in E. S. Pearson and M. G. Kendall (eds). 1970. Pages 131—153 in Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. Charles Griffin, London. 53:370—418.
Campbell, L.D. and A.M. Holden. 1984.Miocene Casuarinaceae fossils from Southland and Central Otago,New Zealand.New Zealand Journal of Botany.22:159-167.
Chen, Z.Z.1980.Identification, introduction of new speices and comparative study of the salt tolerance in certain Casuarina spp. In Taiwan. National Taiwan University, Taipei.(In Chinese with English summary)
Christophel, D.C. 1989.Evolution of the Australian flora through the Tertiary.Plant Systematics and Evolution.162:63-78.
Dilcher,D.L., D.C. Christophel, H.O. Bhagwandin and L.J. Scriven. 1990.Evolution of the Casuarinaceae morphological comparisions of some extant species. American Journal of Botany.77:338-355.
Dolphin, K.R., C.D. Belshaw, C.D.L. Orme and D.L.J. Quicke. 2000.Noise and incongruence: Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Molecular Biology and Evolution.17:401-406.
Doran, J.C.and N. Hall.1983.Notes on fifteen Australian Casuarina specis. CSIRO.Canberra.
Dorothy, A.S., K.L. Wilson and R.S. Hill. 2003.Using matK sequence data to revarel the phylogeny of Casuarinaceae.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.28:47-59.
Dowton, M. and A.D. Austin. 2002.Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy─The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses.Systematic Biology.51:19-30.
Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle. 1990.Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue.Focus.12:13-15.
Ems, S.C., C.W. Morden and K.W. Dixon. 1995.Transcription,splicing,and editing of plastid RNAs in the nonphotosynthetic plant Epifagus virginiana.Plant Molecular Biology.29:621-733.
Efron, B.,E. Halloran and S. Holmes. 1996.Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 93: 13429 - 13434.
Farris, J.S. 1977.Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo’s law.Systematic Zoology.26:77-88.
Farris, J.S., M. K?llersj?, A.G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1994.Testing significance of incongruence.Cladistics.10:315-319.
Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 17:368-376.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Condence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution.39:783-791.
Felsenstein, J. and H. Kishino. 1993.Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Systematic Biology.42, 193—200.
Graham, S.W., P.A. Reeves, A. Burns and R. Olmstead. 2000.Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference.International Journal of Plant Sciences..161:S83-S96.
Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 36:182-198.
Goldman, N, J.P. Anderson and A.G.Rodrigo. 2000.Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology.49:652—670.
Hwang, Y.H. and J.Y. Hsiao. 1985. A taxonomic study on Casuarinaceae in Taiwan. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Repub of China Part B.9:13-19.
Hasegawa, M., K. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 22:160-174.
Hastings, W. K. 1970.Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika.57:97—109 .
Hillis, D. M. and J. J. Bull. 1993.An empirical test of bootstrapping as a methods for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis.Systematic Biology.42.182—192.
Hilu, K.W. and H. Liang.1997.The matK gene:sequence variation and application in plant systematics.American Journal of Botany.84:830-839.
Hilu, K.W., T. Borsch, K. M?ller, D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M.W. Chase, M.P. Powell, L.A. Alice, R. Evans, H. Sauquet , C. Neinhuis, T.A.B. Slotta, J.G.
Rohwer, C.S. Campbell, and L.W.Chatrou.2003.Angiosperm phyogeny based on matK sequence information.American Journal of Botany.90:1758-1776.
Ho, K.Y., C.H. Ou, J.C. Yang and J.Y. Hsiao.2002a. An assessment of DNA polymorphisms and genetic relationships of Casuarina equisetifolia using RAPD markers. Botanical Bulletin Academia Sinica. 43: 93-98.
Ho, K.Y., J.C. Yang and J.Y. Hsiao.2002b.An assessment of genetic diversity and documentation of hybridization of Casuarina grown in Taiwan using RAPD markers.International Journal of Plant Sciences.163:831-836.
Holder, M. and P.O. Lewis. 2003.Phylogeny estimation:Tradition and Bayesian approaches.Nature Reviews.4:275-284.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2000. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Distributed by the author. Department of Biology, University of Rochester.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. and J.J. Bull. 1996.A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Systematic Biology.45:92-98.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen, and J.P. Bollback. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.Science.294:2310—2314.
Johnson, L.A. and D.E. Soltis. 1994.matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.str.Systematic Botany.19:143-156.
Johnson, L.A. and D.E. Soltis. 1995.Phylogenetics inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia(Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences.Annal of the Missouri Botanical Garden.82:149-175.
Johnson, L.A.S. and K.L.Wilson. 1989.Casuarinaceae:a synopsis,In:
Crane,P.R. and S.Blackmore,S.[eds],Evolution Systematics,and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae,Volume 2 :”Higher Hamamelidae.”Systematics Association Special Volume No.40B,Clarendon Press,Cxford,Pp.167-188.
Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In H. M. Munro(eds) Mammalian Protein Metabolism,Academic Press, New York, NY. Pp. 21-132.
Kendall, M. and A. Stuart. 1979. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, 4th edition. CharlesGriffin, London.
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions throughcomparative studies of nucleotide sequences. . Journal of Molecular Evolution. 16:111-120.
Kimura, M. 1981. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA .78:454-458.
Kishino, H. and M. Hasegawa. 1989.Evolution of maximum likelihood estimate of evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data,and the branching order in hominoidea.Journal of Molecular Evolution.29:170-179.
Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller and E. Teller.1953.Equation of state cAICulations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics.21:1087—1092 .
Neuhaus, H. and G. Link. 1987.The Thloroplast tRNA-Lys (UUU) gene from mustard (Sinapis alba) contains a class II intron potentially coding for a maturase-related polypeptide.Current Genetics.11:251-257.
Nicolas,G. 2001.Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenetic Analysis Under a Covarion-like Model.Molecular Biology Evolution.18:866—873.2001
Olmstead, R.G., P.A. Reeves and A.C. Yen. 1998.Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. in P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle(eds), Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA sequencing, Kluwer, Boston. Pp. 164-187
Olmstead, R.G. and J.D. Palmer.1994.Chloroplast DNA systematics:a review of mothods and data analysis.American Journal of Botany.81:1205-1224.
Olmstead, R.G. and J.D. Palmer. 1994.Combining data in phylogenetic systematics:an empirical approach using three molecular datasets in the Solanaceae.Systematic Biology 43:467-481.
Oran, J.C. and N. Hall.1983.Notes on fifteen Australian Casuarina specis. CSIRO.Canberra.
Posada, D. 2004. Modeltest 3.5.Distributed by the author. Department of Integrative Biology,University of Brigham Young.
Posada D. and K.A.Crandall. 1998.MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
Rodrigo,A.G., M.Kelly-Borges, P.R. Bergquist and P.L. Bergquist.1993.A randomazation test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. New Zealand Journal of Botany.31:257-268.
Ronquist, F. and J. Huelsenbeck. 2003.MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Bioinformatics.19: 1572-1574.
Scriven, L.J. and R.S. Hill.1995.Macrofossil Casuarinaceae:Their identification and the oldest macfossil record.Gymnostoma antiquum sp. nov..from the Late Paleocence of New South Wales, Australia. Australian Systematic Botany.8:1035-1053.
Shimodaira, H. and M. Hasegawa. 1999.Multiple comparision of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference.Molecular Biology and Evolution.16:1114-1116.
Sogo,A., H. Setoguchi, J. Noguchi, T. Jaffre and H.Tobe. 2001.Molecular phylogeny of Casuarinaceae based on rbcL and matK gene sequences. Journa of Plant research.114:259-464.
Soltis, D.E. and P.S. Soltis. 1998.Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis.in P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis and J.J. Doyle (eds),Molecular systematics of Plants,vol.Ⅱ.Kluwer,Boston,Massachusettes,USA.Pp.1-42.
Swofford, D.L., G.J. Olsen, P.J. Waddell and D.M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. Mable (eds) ,Molecular Systematics (2nd ed.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Pp. 407-514.
Swofford, D.L. 1999.PAUP*.Phylogenetic analisys using parsimony(* and other methods), Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Tamura, K., and M. Nei. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the controlregion of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 10:512-526.
Tavareˊ , S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. in R. M.Miura(eds), Some mathematical questions in biology - DNA sequence analysis , Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Pp. 57-86.
Waddell, P.J., Y. Cao, J. Hauf and M. Hasegawa. 1999.Using noval phylogenetic methods to evalute mammalianmt DNA, including gaminoacid-invariant sites-LogDet plus sites tripping,to detect internAIConlicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, andelephant.Systematic Biology.48:31-53.
Waddell, P.J.,H. Kishino and R.Ota. 2000.Rapid evaluation of the phylogenetic congruence of sequence data using likelihood ratio tests. Molecular Biology and Evolution.17:1988-1922.
Wang, T.T., J.C. Yang and Z.Z.Chen. 1984. Identification of hybridity of Casuarinas grown in Taiwan. Slivae Genetica 33: 128-133.
Wilson,K.L.and L.Johson.1989. Casuarinaceae:Flora of Australia.in A.S. George (eds),Casuarinaeae of the Hamamelidae,Vol.3.Australian Government Publishing Service,Pp. 100-203.
Yoder, A.D., J.A. Irwin and B.A. Payseur. 2001.Failure of the ILD to determine data cpmbinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology.50:408-424.
Zharkikh, A. and W.H. Li.1992.Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock. Journal of Molecular Evolution .9.1119—1147 .
Zharkikh, A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 39:315-29.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔