跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.80.143.34) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/14 00:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡碧玉
研究生(外文):Pi-Yu Tsai
論文名稱:一個衡量智慧資本報酬率的方法
論文名稱(外文):A Method of Measuring Return on Investment of Intellectual Capital
指導教授:張簡尚偉張簡尚偉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shang-Wei Changchien
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:電子商務研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:86
中文關鍵詞:智慧資本智慧資本報酬率成本計算收益分配
外文關鍵詞:Intellectual CapitalROICCost CalculationRevenue Allocation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:137
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
伴隨著知識經濟時代的來臨,對企業而言,智慧資本成為了最具生產力的要素,許多高科技公司擁有相對高的市場價值和稀少的實質資產,其市面價值與帳面價值的差異被歸屬無形資產所帶來的貢獻。在這樣一個情況下,不僅一個新的衡量智慧資本的方法是必須的,同時也代表新的管理典範的出現。此研究最主要目的在比較現存的智慧資本衡量作為克服這個挑戰的第一步,更進一步,提供一個衡量智慧資本的方法藉由計算智慧資本報酬率來了解公司智慧資本的運用情況。在過去,一些學者提出衡量智慧資本的量測方法,大多數的主要集中在衡量公司整體的智慧資本價值。本研究以個體層面來探討智慧資本的績效,藉由公司產品或服務所產生的收益除以創造智慧資本的成本來得到智慧資本報酬率數值。其中成本面的計算是由流程觀點出發,藉由確認生產產品或提供服務所須的流程來估算各流程智慧資本的成本。在收益分配方面,並藉由文獻整理發展問卷指標,本研究所包含的智慧資本可分為四大類,其中有人力資本,流程資本,創新資本及關係資本,來得到資訊服務業衡量智慧資本的重要指標,並依據各指標對於流程的重要性及存量來計算其所得的分數,最後我們並依據所得到的分數來分配收益到各個流程及智慧資本要項。
此方法原始構想來自於知識附加價值法(Knowledge Value-added Approach),至今,KVA 已被實務界廣泛的使用。企業可將此法應用於產品生產或服務的提供上,來比較各流程智慧資本及四大類智慧資本要項的績效,同時也可以比較多個類似產品或服務的智慧報酬率績效,提供管理者做為投資智慧資本決策或管理的參考依據。
本研究最後並從資訊服務業中挑選出一間在ERP專案導入有卓越成就的軟體公司,來進行個案訪談,以說明此法的運用,且針對個案結果做分析並給予建議。
Intellectual Capital (IC) is the most important productive factor for organization with the coming of knowledge-based economy era. Many high-tech firms have relatively high market value with few physical assets. The difference between market value and book value is attributed to the extension of intangible assets. Not only a new method to measure IC is imperative, but it represents the emergence of new management paradigm. The purpose of this study is to compare the well-known existing IC models as the first step toward meeting that challenge, and furthermore providing a method to produce return on investment of IC (ROIC) ratios to show how to measure and leverage corporate IC. Several techniques have been used to measure IC in the past, the majority focused on measuring unique value of IC at the corporate level. What is proposed here is a sub-corporate level approach meant to measure the performance of intellectual capital by dividing revenue generated by the product or service by the cost incurred for creating IC. The cost is calculated from the process aspect. For the revenue side, we take advantage of questionnaire to obtain the important indicators in information service industry, and then use the indicator to calculate the scores based on the importance of process and stock of intellectual capital. Intellectual capital within organization consists of four categories, including human capital, process capital, innovation capital and relational capital. Finally, we distribute revenue over individual process and individual IC item according to the contribution of intellectual capital.
The original conception of this method derives from Knowledge Value-Added approach (KVA), KVA has been utilized worldwide so far. Businesses can apply my method to products produced or service offered to compare the ROIC performance in each process and the performance of each IC item as the basis of IC investment decision or management for investors and managers.
Ultimately a software company which has an excellent position in the introduction of ERP system is chosen as the case company. The cases are illustrated to show how to use the method and some analysis and suggestions are given.
Table of Contents
中文摘要....................................................................................................... I
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................. III
謝誌..............................................................................................................V
TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................VI
LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................... VIII
LIST OF TABLE .......................................................................................IX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1
1.1 Background ......................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Motives ................................................................................ 1
1.3 Research Objective.............................................................................. 2
1.4 Research Flow ..................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW................................................... 5
2.1 The Basics of IC .................................................................................. 5
2.1.1 The definition of IC...................................................................... 5
2.1.2 The classification and content of IC ............................................ 7
2.1.3 The importance of IC ................................................................... 9
2.2 The Measurement and Management of IC........................................ 10
2.2.1 The measurement of IC.............................................................. 10
2.2.2 IC indicators for measurement ................................................... 16
2.2.3 The management of IC............................................................... 20
2.3 The Calculation of Cost..................................................................... 21
2.4 The Allocation of Revenue................................................................ 22
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY..................................... 24
3.1 The Concept of ROIC ....................................................................... 24
3.2 Model Development.......................................................................... 24
3.3 Construction of Measurement Indicators for IC ............................... 29
3.4 Selection of IC Indicators.................................................................. 34
CHAPTER 4 AN EMPIRICAL CASE IN IS INDUSTRY.................... 38
4.1 Introduction of the Case Company ................................................... 38
4.2 Application of the Model- ERP Projects........................................... 39
4.2.1 The calculation of cost ( ia ic Cost , b proc Cost and
m prod Cost ) ............... 39
4.2.2 The revenue allocation and ROIC.............................................. 43
4.3.3 The comparison and analysis of ROIC between projects .......... 49
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS .......... 51
5.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................... 51
5.2 Research Limitation .......................................................................... 52
5.3 Future Directions............................................................................... 53
BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................... 54
APPENDICES ........................................................................................... 59
Appendix A: Questionnaire………………………………………………59
Appendix B: The Results of Questionnaire- Number and Percentage of
Indicators .............................................................................. 65
Appendix C: The Scores Calculatoin of IC 2-Project A…….…………... 70
Appendix D: The Scores Calculation of IC 1 - ERP Project B ...………...83
Appendix E: The Scores Calculation of IC 1 - ERP Project C …………86
1. 吳思華,賴鈺晶,智慧資本衡量因素之研究-以我國網際網路企業為 例。中華民國科技管理研討會論集光碟,民國89年。
2. Bassi, L. J. and Van Buren, M. E., “Valuing investment in Intellectual Capital,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5,6,7,8, pp.414-432.
3. Bell, C. R. (1997), “Intellectual Capital,” Executive Excellence, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 15.
4. Bontis, N. (1996), “There’s A Price on Your Head: Managing Intellectual Capital Strategically,” Business Quarterly, Vol.60, No.4, pp. 40-47.
5. Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models,” Management Decision, Vol.36, No.2, pp.63-76.
6. Bontis, N. (1999a), “Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows of Knowledge: An Empirical Examination of Intellectual Capital, knowledge and business performance,” PhD thesis, Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London.
7. Bontis, N. (1999b), “Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital: Framing and Advancing the State of The Field,” International journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5-8, pp. 433-62.
8. Brennan, N. and Connell, B. (2000), “Intellectual Capital: Current Issues and Policy Implications,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 206.
9. Brooking, A. (1996), “Intellectual Capital” Thomas Business Press, London.
10. Canadian Management Accountants (CMA) (1999), “Focus Group Draft: Measuring Knowledge Assets,” April 16.
11. Chen, J., Zhu, Z. and Xie, H.-Y. (2004), “Measuring IC: A New Model and Empirical Study,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5, No.1, pp.195-212.
12. Dekker, R. and Hoog, R. D. (2000), “The Monetary Value of Knowledge Assets: A Micro Approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.18, No. 2, pp. 111-124.
13. Dzinkowski, R. (2000), “The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction,” Management Accounting, Vol.78, No.2, pp.32-36.
14. Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S. (1997), “Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company''s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower,” U.S.A. : Harper Collin Publishers.
15. Ehrbar, A. (1998), “EVA: The Real Key to Creating Wealth,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
16. Farquhar (1991), “Recognizing and Measuring Brand Assets,” working paper, Carnegie MellonMIT, Boston, MA.
17. Feiwal, G. R. (1975), “The Intellectual Capital of Michal Kalecki: A Study in Economic Theory and Policy,” Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
18. Guthrie, J., Petty, R. and Johanson, U. (2001), “Sunrise in the Knowledge Economy: Managing, Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital,” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 365-84.
19. Housel, T. and Bell A. H. (2001), “Measuring and Managing Knowledge,” McGraw-Hill Companies.
20. ICM Group, Inc. (1998), “What Are Companies Currently Measuring?” http://www.icmgroup.com/presentpub/LES_MEASUREMENT
21. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), “The Balanced Score-card: Translating Strategy into Action,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
22. Knight, D. J. (1999), “Performance Measure for Increasing Intellectual Capital,” Strategy & Leadership, Vol.27, No. 2, pp. 22-27.
23. Liebowitz, J. and Suen, C.Y., “Developing Knowledge Management Metrics for Measuring Intellectual Capital,” Journal of IC. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 54.
24. Malhotra, Y.(2002), “Measuring Knowledge Assets of a Nation: Knowledge Systems for Development,” available at: www.google.com.tw/
25. Marr, B., Gray D., and Neely, A. (2003), “Why Do Firms Measure Their Intellectual Capital?” Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 441.
26. Mouritsen, J. (2004), “Measuring and Intervening: How do We Theorise Intellectual Capital Management?” Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 257-267.
27. OECD. (1999), “Measuring and Reporting IC: Experience, Issues and Prospects: Programme Notes and Background to Technical Meeting and Policy and Strategy Forum,” Paris: OECD.
28. Osterland, A. (2001), “Grey Matters: CFO''s Third Annual Knowledge Capital Scorecard,” CFO Magazine, April, available at: www.cfo.com/ ArticleParticle = 2514 (accessed October 2002).
29. Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow''s Journey to A Knowledge Value Management Culture,” European Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 365-73.
30. Rodov, I. and Leliaert, P. (2002), “FiMIAM: Financial Method of Intangible Assets Measurement,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 323-336.
31. Roos, J. (1998), “Exploring the Concept of Intellectual Capital (IC),” Long Range Planning. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 150.
32. Roos, J. (1998), “Measuring the Future,” available at http://www.unisys. com/execmag/1998-03/ journal/viewpoints2.htm.
33. Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. and Edvinsson, L. (1998), “Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape,” New York University Press, New York, NY.
34. Stewart, G.B. (1991), “The Quest for Value: the EVAN Management Guide,” HarperCollins, Philadelphia, PA.
35. Stewart, T. A. (1997), “Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations,” Doubleday, A Division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Press.
36. Stewart, T. A. (2001), “The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-first Century Organization,” Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.
37. Sveiby, K.E. (1997), “The Intangible Asset Monitor,” Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 73-97.
38. Sveiby, K.-E. (2002), “Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets,” available at: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm.
39. Ulrich, D.(1998), “IC = Competence x Commitment,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 15- 26.
40. Van Buren Mark E. (1999) “A Yardstick for Knowledge Management,” Training and Development, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 71-78.
41. Zwell, M. & Ressler, R. (2000), “Powering the Human Drivers of Financial Performance,” Strategic Finance, Vol. 81, No. 11, pp. 40-45.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 蔡清田(民90)。教師如何進行教育行動研究:「教師即研究者」的理想與實踐。國教之友,52(3),3-18。
2. 羅文基(民90)。培養全腦思考的創意教學。翰林文教雜誌網路版,23。
3. 蘇育任(民91)。如何增進自然與生活科技的教學技能?國教輔導,42,2,34-41。
4. 蘇明俊、江新合(民92)。野外科學探究教學模式之初探性研究-以小尖石山的地質探究為例。教育科學期刊,62-97。
5. 蕭英勵(民92)。如何引導兒童進行主題探究活動-以科學研究為例。教育資料與研究,53,114-119。
6. 蔡書憲(民90)。實作評量的理論與應用。翰林文教雜誌網路版,22。民92年9月21日,取自http://www.worldone.com.tw/magazine/magazine.htm。
7. 劉宏文(民91)。簡介探究導向的自然科教學。中二中學報,5,79-97。
8. 歐用生(民88)。從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資訊,7(1),22-32。
9. 熊同鑫、王振興(民88)。行動、反思與成長:一位自然科教師的自我研究。科學教育學刊,7(1),17-34。
10. 單文經(民90)。解析Beane對課程統整的理論與實際的主張。教育研究集刊,47,57-89。
11. 范熾文(民90)。課程統整概念淺釋。空大學訊:教學原理補充教材。
12. 柯啟瑤(民90)。由腦的科學看新的教育。翰林文教雜誌網路版,22,50-58。民92年5月17日,取自http://www.worldone.com.tw/magazine/
13. 柯啟瑤(民88)。改革自然科教學的第一步 。翰林文教雜誌網路版,5。民92年5月21日,取自http://www.worldone.com.tw/magazine/magazine.htm。
14. 何翠華(民90)。有效的作文教學與實務。翰林文教雜誌網路版,19。民92年5月17日,取自http://www.worldone.com.tw/magazine/magazine.htm。
15. 宋佩芬(民92)。培養「帶得走的能力」再思統整與學科知識。教育研究月刊,115,123-136。