跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(35.172.136.29) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/26 20:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:孫國隆
研究生(外文):Kuo-Lung Sun
論文名稱:探索全面品質管理與學習型組織的關係
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Linkage Between Total Quality Management and Learning Organization
指導教授:張東生張東生引用關係
指導教授(外文):D.S Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:全面品質管理(TQM)學習型組織(LO)對應分析(Correspondence Analysis)群集分析
外文關鍵詞:Correspondence AnalysisTotal Quality Management (TQM)Learning Organization (LO)Cluster Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:109
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘 要

全面品質管理(Total Quality Management, TQM)最重要的目的在追求組織內各功能的持續改善,而學習型組織(Learning Organization, LO)主要在學習準則的運用,達到組織的學習與成長。由於,此二者的管理精神追求類似的目標,因此檢視此二者管理之間的關係,對管理者有很大的價值;故本研究的目的主要在探索TQM與LO的關係。
TQM的衡量構面擳自Rao et al.的13個構面;而學習型組織則直接摘自Peter Senge的五項修煉。評估者由學術界學者、企業管理顧問以及產業實務界組成,評估者對TQM的各個構面與LO的五項修煉予以評量它們之間的相對應關係。
藉由「對應分析」統計工具,本研究發現TQM與LO之間確實存在有緊密的關係。
再者,本研究隨後定義三群組完全不同管理意涵—1. 個人意向 2. 高層權威 3. 產品原料組別,這些組別可劃出在本研究淬取出的管理二維向度。最後針對此三群組提出管理意涵。
Abstract

The greatest importance of total quality management (TQM) is to pursue continuous improvement of all aspects for organization. Whereas learning organization (LO) serves as learning principles that eventually leads to organization learning and growth. Owning to these principles seek similar goals, to investigate the association of these twos is very valuable to management.
The primary purpose of this study is to explore the relationship of TQM and LO. The TQM were made of thirteen constructs of Rao et al.; whereas, the LO was directly adapted from Peter Senge’s five disciplines. A group of evaluators consisting of academic scholars, business consultants as well as industry practitioners judged the relative strength of relationship between TQM constructs and the Senge’s five disciplines. By applying correspondence analysis, the finding of this study exhibited that close linkage emerges between TQM and LO.
Moreover, this study subsequently identified three distinctive groups made of TQM constructs and LO disciplines—individual dominant, higher authority and product/material oriented—on a two-dimensions of management. Managerial implications from these findings were articulated.
Table of Contents
Page
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..I
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background……………………………………………………………………..1
1.2 Research Motivations and Purpose…………..…….…………………………...2
1.3 Research Schema……………………………………………….……………….3

Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Total Quality Management (TQM)………………….…………………………..5
2.2 Learning Organization (LO)…………………………………………………...14
2.3 Relation of TQM and LO…………………………………………………… ..20

Chapter 3 Research Design
3.1 Research Framework…………………………………..………………………22
3.2 Questionnaire Design………………………………….………………………23
3.3 Selection of Rater……………………………………..……………………….26
3.4 Data Analysis Tooling………………………………….……………………...29

Chapter 4 Research Finding
4.1 Data Collection……………………………………………...…………………32
4.2 Data Consolidation…………………………………………...………………..33
4.3 Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………..34
4.4 Results Presentation……………………………………………………………38
4.5 Managerial Implication………………………………………...……………...42
4.6 Industry Interview…………..…………………………………………………44

Chapter 5 Summary and Conclusion
5.1 Conclusion……………………..………………………………………………48
5.2 Research Limitation……………..………………………………………….….49
5.3 Future Research Suggestion…….……………………………………………..49

References……………………………………………………………………………………51

Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………..55
REFERENCES
Bendell, A. (1992). The quality Guru. London: DTI

Bennis, Warren. (1990). Why Leaders Can’t Lead? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Barrow, James W. (1993). Does Total Quality Management Equal Organizational Learning? Quality Press, Milwaukee: July 1993, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, p39.

Benzecri, J.-P. (1992). Correspondence Analysis Handbook. Paris, France: Marcel Dekker

Besterfield, Dale H. (1995). Total Quality Management. New York: Prentice Hall.

Bossidy, Larry. (2002). Execution: the Discipline of Getting Things Done. Crown Business.

Carr L.P., Rao, A., Dambolena, I., Martin, J., Rafii, F., & Schlesinger P.F. (1996). Total Quality Management: A Ccross Functional Perspective. John Wiley & Son.

Cicmii, Svetlana. (1997).“Achieving completeness TQ principles and organizational learning,” The Learning Organization, Vo. 4, Iss, 1, p30.

Clausen, Sten-Erik. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis. a SAGE UNIVERSITY PAPER, v-2.

Davidow W.H. & Uttal B. (1989). Total Customer Service. New York: Harper & Row, p201.

Dean, James D. & Bowen, David E. (1994). “Management Theory and Total Quality: Improving Research and Practice Through Theory Development,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 3.

de Geus, Aries P. (1988). Planning as Learning. Havard Business Review, March-April,
p70-74.

Deming, Edwards. (1986). Out of Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.


Dervitsiotis, Kostas. (1998). “The challenge of managing organizational change: Exploring the relationship of re-engineering, developing learning organizations and total quality management,” Total Quality Management, Vol., 9, NO. 1, p109-122.

Dubrin, Andrew J. (1997). Foundamentals of Organizational Behavior: An Applied Appraoch. South Western College Publishing.

Easton George S. & Jarrel, Sherry L. (1998). The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance. Journal of Business, 71(2), p253-307.

Feigenbaum, Armand V. (1980). Total Quality Control (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

Garvin, David A. (2000). Learning in Action. Harvard Business School Press, p11.

Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., Balkin, David B. & Cardy, Robert L. (2001). Managing Human Resources. Prentice-Hall.

Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L., Black, William C. Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading, 4th edition. PrenticeHall.

Harung, H.S., Heaton, D.P. & Alexander, C.N. (1999). “Evolution of organizations in the Millennium,” The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, p198-206.

Horng, Ching & Huarng, Fenghneih. (2002). “TQM adoption by hospital in Taiwan,” Total Quality Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, p441-463.

Ishikawa K. (1985). What is TQC? The Japanese Way. Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Jackson, Bradley G. (2000). A Fantasy Theme Analysis of Peter Senge’s Learning Organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Arlington: June. 2000, Vol. 36, Iss. 2, p193-210.

Juran, J. M. and Gryna F. M. (1988). Quality Control Handbook, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Juran, Joseph M. (1969). Managerial Breakthrough: A New Concept of the Manager’s Job. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kerlinger Fred K. & Lee, Howard B. (1999). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th edition. Thomson.

Kanter-Ross, E., Estein, B. & Todd, D.J. (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change, New York, Free Press.

Latzko, William J., & Saunders, David M. (1997). Four Days with Dr. Deming. Adison-Wesley.

McClave, Benson & Sincich. (2001). Statistics for Business and Economic. Prentice-Hall.

Nachmias, C. F. & Nachmias, D. (2000). Research Methods in the Social Science, 6th edition. Worth Publisher & St. Martin’s Press.

NcIver & Carmines. (1981). Unidimensional Scaling. a SAGE UNIVERSITY PAPER, p9-15.

Oakland, John S. & Oakland, Susan. (1998). “The Links Between People Management, Customer Satisfaction and Business Result,” Total Quality Management, Vol. 9, Nos. 4 & 5, 1998, p185-190.

Pool, Steven. (2000). The Learning Organization: motivating employees by integrating TQM philosophy in a supportive organizational culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 21, Iss. 8, p373.

Quazi H.A. (2002). “Impact of ISO 9000 certification on quality management practices: A comparative study,” Total Management Quality, Vol. 13, No. 1, p53-67.

Rao, S. Subba, Solis, Luis E., & Raghunathan, T.S. (1999). “A framework for international quality management research: Development and validation of a measurement instrument,” Total Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 7, 1999, p1047-1075.

Robbins, Stephen P. (1997). Managing Today. Prentice-Hall.

Robbins, Stephen P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Russel, Robert S. & Taylor, Bernard W. (2000). Operation Management. Prentice-Hall.

Saylor, James H. (1992). TQM Field Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill. p71

Senge, Peter. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The learning Organization. Currency Doubleday.

Senge, Peter, 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The learning Organization, Currency Doubleday, p186.

Senge, Peter, 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The learning Organization, Currency Doubleday, p208.

Sohal, Amrik, & Morrison, Michael. (1995). “TQM and the learning organization,” Managing Service Quality, Vo. 5, Iss. 6, p32.

Starkey, Ken. (1996). How organization learn? Thomson Business Presss.

Swieringa, Joop & Wierdsma, Andre. (1992). Becoming a Learning Organization. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Taiwan National Central Library web site, www.datas.ncl.edu.tw/theabs/

Tan, L-P. & Sia, G. (2001). “ISO 9000: The answer for total quality management implementation? The Malaysia case,”. Total Quality Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2001, p223-229.

Warrack, Brian & Keller, Gerald. (1997). Statistics for Management and Economics. Duxbury Press.

Weller, Susan C. & Romney, A. Kimball. (1990). Metric Scaling – Correspondence Analysis. a SAGE University Paper.

楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園 (2002), 社會及行為科學研究法(上下冊), 臺北東華書局

陳順宇 (2000), 多變量分析 二版, 臺北華泰書局
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top