跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(35.173.42.124) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/26 14:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:王昶能
研究生(外文):Chang-neng Wang
論文名稱:智慧資本管理與組織學習能力
論文名稱(外文):The Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Learning Capability
指導教授:趙必孝趙必孝引用關係
指導教授(外文):Bih-shiaw Jaw
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:中文
論文頁數:186
中文關鍵詞:智慧資本管理策略組織學習能力智慧資本組織績效
外文關鍵詞:intellectual capitalstrategy management of intellectual capitalorganizational learning capabilityand organizational performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:542
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:146
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
過去幾年來的研究中發現,公司的競爭優勢是建立在無形的資源與能力,而透過學習的過程,組織可以創造知識並累積無形的智慧資本。因此,本研究採用實證研究的方式,整理出學者對智慧資本與組織學習能力的定義與衡量指標,並編列問卷對產業界進行研究,除了瞭解企業的組織學習能力、智慧資本的厚植與組織績效的關係之外,更冀望瞭解組織學習能力與智慧資本管理策略對企業的經營績效有何影響。

本研究經過實證資料的蒐集與統計分析之後,有下列的發現:
一、組織學習能力的構面包括
1、高階領導的學習改善力;
2、透過團隊領導的競爭力。

二、智慧資本的構面包括
1、人力資本構面為高階領導的知識創新與員工的專業技術能力;
2、結構資本構面為跨部門的知識儲存管理、回應市場需求的內部流程與跨
部門的知識社群;
3、關係資本構面為客戶生態導向的彈性經營策略、服務與品牌價值的管理
與顧客導向管理。
三、組織學習能力與智慧資本蓄積對組織績效的影響
1、高階領導的學習改善力與透過團隊領導的競爭力透過智慧資本的中介效
果均對組織的營運績效有顯著影響。

四、組織學習能力與智慧資本管理策略的交互作用對組織績效的影響關係
1、以知識為中心的管理策略與高階領導的學習改善力的交互作用對組織行
為績效與營運績效均有顯著影響;
2、以知識為中心的管理策略與透過團隊領導的競爭力之交互作用對組織行
為績效有顯著影響;
3、以資訊為中心的管理策略與高階領導的學習改善力之交互作用對組織行
為績效與營運績效均有顯著影響。
Over the past years, research on the basis of intangible resources and capability has been suggested for the development of corporate competitive advantage. Through the process of learning, the organization can create knowledge and shortage intangible intellectual capital. This study is empirical research carried out on the industrial circles using questionnaires to clean out scholars’ definition on intellectual capital and organizational learning capability. From this study, I try to find out the relationship among organizational learning capability, shortage intellectual capital, and organizational performance, also the interactive effect between organizational learning capability and strategy management of intellectual capital towards company’ performance.


The results of the research indicate:
I. The factors of organizational learning capability
1. The executives’ direction ability of learning and amelioration
2. Team-leadership competitiveness

II. The factors of intellectual capital
1. The factors of human capital are: the knowledge innovation directed by executives, employees’ professional capability.
2. The factors of structural capital are: cross department’ management and storage knowledge, inner process responds to market demand, and cross department’ knowledge group.
3. The factors of relational capital are: flexible business strategy of customer ecosystem’ orientation, the management of service and brand value, and the management of customer orientation.

III. Organizational learning capability and intellectual capital’ storage have effects on organizational performance.
1. Through the intellectual capital intermediary effect, the executive’ direction ability of learning and amelioration and the competitiveness from the team’ directed have significant influence on business operational performance.

IV. The interaction between organizational learning capability and strategy management of intellectual capital.
1. The interaction between strategy management of knowledge-centered and the executives’ direction ability of learning and amelioration have significant influence on both organizational business operational performance and behavioral performance.

2. The interaction between knowledge-centered strategic management and team-leadership competitiveness has significant influence on organizational behavioral performance.
3. The interaction between strategy management of information-centered and the executives’ direction ability of learning and amelioration have significant influence on both organizational business operational performance and behavioral performance.
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………………..1
第一節 研究背景 ………………………………………………………………………2
第二節 研究動機 ............................................................................................................5
第三節 研究目的 ………………………………………………………………………7
第四節 研究流程 ………………………………………………………………………8
第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………………………………………9
第一節 智慧資本 ………………………………………………………………………9
第二節 組織學習能力…………………………………………………………………47
第三節 智慧資本、組織學習能力與組織績效………………………………………64
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………………70
第一節 研究架構與研究假設…………………………………………………………70
第二節 研究變項的操作性定義與衡量………………………………………………72
第三節 資料蒐集方法與樣本特性分析………………………………………………75
第四節 信度與效度分析………………………………………………………………79
第五節 修正後之研究架構與資料分析方法 ………………………………………..86
第四章 實證結果與分析……………………………………………………………………90
第一節 各研究變項的描述性統計分析………………………………………………90
第二節 產業特性在各研究變項的差異性分析……………………………………..100
第三節 各研究變項間相關性關係 …………………………………………………114
第四節 組織學習能力、智慧資本蓄積與智慧資本管理策略對組織績效的影響..120
第五節 產業界組織學習能力、智慧資本蓄積對組織績效的影響關係…………..128
第六節 產業界的組織學習能力與智慧資本管理策略對組織績效之影響關係…..135
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………………..144
第一節 研究結果與建議……………………………………………………………..144
第二節 研究限制與後續研究的建議………………………………………………..151
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………153
一、中文部份………………………………………………………………………………153
二、英文部份………………………………………………………………………………155
附錄 問卷………………………………………………………………………………168
參考文獻
一、中文部份
何金銘,2001,統計法輯要,台南:台灣復文興業
林大容 譯,2000,智慧資本,台北:臉譜
黃進發 譯,2001,智慧資本,台北:商智文化
朱道凱 譯,2001,平衡計分卡,台北:臉譜
李以仁 譯,2001,破解獲利密碼,台北:藍鯨
李芳齡 譯,2002,NOKIA ! 小國競爭者的策略轉折路,台北:商智文化
劉真如 譯,2002,下一個社會,台北:商周
莫 菲 譯,1999,無形資產致勝策略,台北:圓智文化
胡瑋珊 譯,2002,知識管理,台北:聯經
林宜萱 譯,2003,應變致勝,台北:麥格羅•希爾
楊子江、王美音 譯,2002,創新求勝,台北:遠流
李靜瑤、朱璞瑄 譯,2000,智慧狂潮,台北:高寶國際
陳美岑 譯,2001,全球化競爭優勢,台北:商周
徐作聖,2000,策略致勝,台北:遠流
盧偉斯,1996,組織學習的理論性探究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文
施永昭,2002,義勇警察組織學習能力之建構,中央警察大學警學叢刊,33(1): pp.157-174.
邱皓政,2002,量化研究與統計分析,台北:五南
趙必孝,1994,國際企業子公司的人力資源管理:策略、控制與績效,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文
陳文宏,2003,多國籍企業產業技術特性、知識管理與全球佈局策略之相關研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
陳慶安,2000,績效評估發展趨勢,人力發展月刊,八十二期:頁21-25.
陳燕錫、張中民、李家琪,2001,績效評估之趨勢 – 非財務績效衡量值,今日會計:頁44-52.
張文菁,1999,企業特性、人力資本、產業環境與組織績效之相關性研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
劉佳鑫,1997,我國因應國際化之組織能力與人力資源管理,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
許淑君,1997,競爭策略、人力資源管理系統與組織績效之研究─以國內大型製造業為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
宋威霆,2003,人力資本、結構資本與組織績效關連性之研究,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文
黃奎綸,2003,製造業人力資源管理系統、人力資本與組織績效關係之研究,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文
杜敏绮,2002,企業文化對智慧資本蓄積之關係性研究,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文
黃家齊,2002,人力資源管理系統與組織績效 – 智慧資本觀點,管理學報,
第十九卷第三期:頁415-450.
彭百崇,2000,勞動經濟學,私立文化大學勞工研究所
鄭丁旺,1997,中級會計學第六版,自行出版
林蕙貞,1997,中級會計學新論,台北:證業
詹文男,2003,“我國產業智慧資苯創造之現況”,智慧資本的創造與管理研討會論文集,行政院研究發展考核委員會
周延鵬,2003,“智慧資本投資保障的完整性”,智慧資本的創造與管理研討會論文集,行政院研究發展考核委員會
元勤科技智識網,http://www.ipnavigator.com.tw
殷允芃,1995,鳥一樣的飛翔—能力導向的未來。載於齊若蘭譯,第五項修練Ⅱ--實踐篇上、下(序)。台北:天下遠見

二、英文部份
01.Ahmed Bounfour, “The IC –dVAL approach”, Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 4 No.3, 2003, pp.396-412.
02.Albert Z. Zhou and Dieter Fink, “The intellectual capital web,” Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 4 No.1, 2003, pp.34-48
03.Agryris, C. & D. A. Schon, 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
04.Annand, B.N. & Khanna, T., 2000. “Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliance?” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.295-315
05.Annie Brookink, 1999. Corporate Memory. Thomson Business Press
06.Barney, J. B., “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy” , Management Science, 32(10): 1231-41
07.Barney, J. B., 1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management,17: pp.99-120
08.Bassi, L.J.,1997, “Harnessing the power of intellectual capital”, Training and Development, December, pp.25-30
09.Bell, C., R., 1997, “Intellectual capital”, Executive Excellence, Vol.14, No1, p.15.
10.Bird, A., & Beechler, S., 1995. Link between business strategy and human resource management strategy in U.S. - based Japanese subsidiaries: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), pp.23-46.
11.Bontis, N., “Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field,” International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5/6/7/8/, 1999, pp.433-462
12.Bontis, N.1996, “There’s a price on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically”, Business Quarterly, summer, pp.41-47
13.Chait, Herschel N., 1998. How organization learn: An integrated strategy for building learning capability, Personnel Psychology, Durham, Vol.51, Iss.3, pp.771-774.
14.Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B.1991, “The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and Evidence. Strategic Management Journal,12:pp.33-48
15.Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., 1990, “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128-152.
16.Collis, D.J.,1991, A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry, Strategic Management Journal, 12:pp.49-68
17.Cool、Costa and Dierickx, 2002. “Constructing Competitive Advantage” Handbook of Strategy and Management, pp.55-71
18.Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
19.Davis, T. R.V. & Darling, B.L., “How Virtual Corporations Manage the Performance of Contractors: The Super Bakery Case”, Organization Dynamics, Vol.24, 1995, pp.70-75
20.Debra M. Amidon, 1997, Innovation Strategy for the knowledge Economy – The Ken Awakening, Reed Educational & Professional Publishing Ltd.
21.Delaney, J.T., & Huselid, M.A., 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp.949-969.
22.DiBella, A. J., & Nevis, E. C., 1998. How organizations learning: An integrated strategy for build learning capability. San Francisco, ca. Jossey. Bass
23.Dierickx, I. and Cool, K., 1989. “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage”, Management Science, 35(12): 1504-11
24.Dipankar Ghosh, 2003. Empirical Research in Intellectual Capital. Intellectual Capital in Taiwan. Taiwan Intellectual Capital Research Center, Accounting Research Development Center, Collage of Commercial National Cheng-Chi University.
25.Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction. International Management Accounting Study
26.Dodgson, M., 1993. Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. Organization Studies, 1983, pp.808-813
27.Drucker, P. F., 1999. “Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge.” California Management Review, 41, pp.79-94
28.Duncan, R. & A. Weiss, 1979. Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1: pp.75-123
29.Dzinkowski, R., 2000. “The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction”, Management Accounting, Vol. 78, pp.32-6
30.Erickson, G...S. & Rothberg, H.N., 2000. Intellectual Capital and Competitiveness: Guidelines for Policy. CR, 10(2), pp.192-198.
31.Garvin, David A., 1993. Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review. July/August: pp78-91
32.Garvin, D. A. 2000. Learning in action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
33.Grant, R M.1991, The resources-based theory of competitive advantage implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review,33:pp.114-135.
34.Grant, R.M.1996a. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): pp.375-387
35.Grant, R.M.1996b.Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): pp.109-122
36.Guns, B., 1998. The Faster Learning Organization: Gain and Sustain the Competitive Edge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
37.Guthrie, J., 2001. “The management, measurement and reporting of intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp.27-41
38.Hamel, G., 1991. “Competition for competence and interparter learning within international strategic alliances?” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.83-103
39.Hammilton Beazley, Jeremiah Boenisch, and David Harden, 2002, Continuity Management: Preserving Corporate Knowledge and Productivity When Employees Leave, Doris S. Michaels Literary Agency, Inc.
40.Hedberg, B., 1981. How organizations learn and unlearn, in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (eds), Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.Huang, K., Lee, Y. and Wang, R., 1999. Quality Information and Knowledge, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
42.Huber, George P., 1991. Organizational Learning: The contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organizational Science, February: pp.88-115.
43.Hudson, W., Intellectual capital: How to build it, enhance it, use it, New York: John Wiley, 1993
44.Hudson, W.J., Wiley J. & Sons,1993, “Intellectual capital: How to build it, embrace it, use it” Internet at: http://www.sveiby.com.au/Intellectual Capital.html
45.IFAC, International Federation of Accountants, 1998. The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital, an Induction, NY.
46.Itami, H., 1987, Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Boston: Harvard University Press.
47.James, D., 1997. “The troubled language of accounting gets tongue-tied over intangibles”, Business Review Weekly, October, pp.92-94.
48.Kieso, D. E. and J. J. Weygandt, Intermediate Accounting, 9th, New York: John Wiley & Son, 1998
49.Kim, D. H., 1993. The Link Between Individual and Organizational Learning. Sloan Management Review, Fall: pp.37-50.
50.Klimecki, Ruediger and Hermann Lassleben, 1998. Modes of organizational learning: Indication from an empirical study. Management Learning, Thousand Oaks, Vol.29, Iss.4, pp.405-430.
51.Kolb, D. A., 1984, Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall
52.Kogut, B. & Zander, A., 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology? Organization Science, Vol.3, No.3, pp.383-397
53.Leif Edvinsson, 2002. Corporate Longitude. BookHouse Published.
54.Longford, R., 1999., “Funding intellectual capital: the valuation dilemma”, Australian CPA, pp.22-3
55.Lynn, B. 1998. Performance Evaluation in the New Economy: Bringing the Measurement and Evaluation of Intellectual Capital into the Management Planning and Control System. International Journal of Technology Management. pp.171.
56.Malone, B. M. & Davidow, W., “Virtual Corporation”, Forbes, 7th Dec.1992.
57.March J. G. & H. A. Simon, 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
58.Meyers, Patricia W., 1990. Non-Liner Learning in the Technological Firms. Research Policy, 19(2): pp.97-115.
59.Mowshowitz, A., “Virtual Organization: A Vision of Management in the Information Age”, Information Society, Vol.10, 1994, pp.267-288.
60.Mulholland, Paul, Zdenek Zdrahal and John Domingue, 2001. A methodological approach to supporting organizational learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. (H.W. Wilson – AST), Vol.55, Iss.3, pp.337-367.
61.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998, Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
62.Nancy M. Dixon, 1999, The organizational learning cycle: how we can learn collectively. Hampshire, England: Gower.
63.Nancy M. Dixon, 2000, Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
64.Neilson, R., 1997. Collaborative Technologies & Organizational Learning. Hersey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
65.Nelson, R., & Wnter, S., 1982, an evolutionary theory of economic changes. Boston: Harvard University Press.
66.Nevis, E. C., A. J. DiBella & J. M. Gould, 1995. Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review, 36: pp.73-85.
67.Nonaka, I.1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): pp14-37
68.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H.1995. The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.Normann, R., 1985. Developing capabilities for organizational learning in J. M. pennings et al. (eds) Organizational Strategy and Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70.Pasternack, Bruce A. & Albert J.Visccio, 1998. The Centerless Corporation. Simon & SchusterIncorporated.
71.Patrick H. Sullivan, 1998. Profiting from intellectual capital, extracting value from innovation. John Willy & Sons, Inc.
72.Patricia Ordonez de Pablos, “Intellectual capital reporting in Spain: a comparative view,” Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 4 No.1,2003, pp.61-81
73.Pentti Sydanmaanlakka, 2002, an Intelligent Organization, the Susie Adams Rights Agency, UK...
74.Peteraf, M. A., 1993. “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-91
75.Polanyi, Michael, 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London.
76.Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G., 1990. “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79-91.
77.Quinn, J.B., 1992. Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: The Free Press.
78.Reed, K. K., 2002. The Dynamic of Intellectual Capital, PH.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Unpublished.
79.Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. and Edvisson, L., 1997. Intellectual Capital: Navigating the New Business Landscape, Macmillan Business, London.
80.Roos, J., Roos, R., Edvinnsson L. & Dragonetti, N.,1998, “Intellectual capital: Navigating in the new business landscape”, New York: New York University Press
81.Rumelt, R., 1984. “Toward a strategic theory of the firm”, in R. Lamb (Ed), Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Pp. 556-70.
82.Rumelt, R., 1987. “Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship”, in D. Teece (ed), The Competitive Challenge. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Pp.137-158.
83.Schwandt, David R. and Michael J. Marquardt, 2001. From world-class theories to global best practice. Sage Publications, Inc., U.S.
84.Senge, P. M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing.
85.Shrivastava, P., 1983. A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems. The Journal of Management Science, 20(1): pp.7-28.
86.Simon, H. A., 1953. Birth of an Organization: The Economic cooperation Administration. Public Administrative review, 13(4): pp.227-236.
87.Simon, H. A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 7-28.
88.Somnath Das and Pradyot K. Sen, “Strategic alliances: a valuable way to manage intellectual capital?” Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 4 No. 1, 2003, pp.10-19.
89.Stata, Ray, 1989. Organizational Learning – The Key to Management Innovation. Sloan Management Review, Spring: pp.63-74.
90.Sullivan, P.H. 2000. Value-driven intellectual capital: how to covert intangible corporate assets into market value, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
91.Susan Conway and Char Sligar, 2002. Unlocking knowledge assets. Microsoft Corporation.
92.Thomas A. Stewart, 2001. The Wealth of Knowledge. Utopia Limited, New York.
93.Thomas Housel & Arthur H. Bell, 2001. Measuring and Managing Knowledge, McGraw-Hill
94.Toffler, A., 1990. Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam Books.
95.Ulrich, D., Von Glinow, M. A., & Jick, T. 1993. High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22, autumn, pp.52-66.
96.Ulrich, D., “Intellectual capital = competence x commitment,” Sloan Management Review, 39, 2, 1998, pp15-26
97.Understanding corporate value: managing and reporting intellectual capital, Internet at: http://www.cimaglobal.com
98.Vemkatraman, N. & Ramanuniam, V., 1986. Measurement in business performance in strategy research: A comparison approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): pp.801-814.
99.Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2000) “Organizational learning, knowledge management, and intellectual capital: an integrative conceptual model.”Working Paper, Ivey Business School.
100.Verdin, P. J., & Williamson P. J., 1992, Competitive Advantage and Industry Structure, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
101.Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. 1991.Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 57-91.
102.Wernerfelt, B., 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2):171-80.
103.Wiig, K.M., 1997. “Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management,” Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp.399-405
104.Wiig, K.M., 1997a. “Knowledge management: where did it come from and where will it go?”, Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, Special Issues on Knowledge Management, Autumn.
105.Wright, N.D., Perace, J.W. & Busbin, J.W., 1997. Linking customer service orientation to competitive performance: Does the marketing concept really work? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(4): pp.23-34.
106.Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C., 1992, Alternative theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management,18: pp.295-320.
107.Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. Jr., & Lepak, D.P., 1996. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp.836-866.
108.Youngblood, M. 1997. Life at the Edge of Chaos. Texas: Perceval Publishing.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 21.陳慧芬(民87)。組織文化的意義與功能。臺中師院學報,第十二期,頁1-22
2. 16.胡聲平(民91)。檢驗官僚政治理論與組織文化理論-以波斯灣戰爭期間美軍的空中運補能力為例。育達研究叢刊,第三期,頁37-58。
3. 14.洪嘉文(民86)。領導型態與工作滿意關係初探。中華民國體育協會體育學報,第二十二輯,頁141-152。
4. 9.吳萬益、林文寶(民91)。主管行為特性、組織文化、組織學習方式與經營績效關係之研究。輔仁管理評論,第九卷第一期,頁71-94。
5. 8.呂祝義(民92)。全面提昇服務品質管理理念。國教之友,第五十五卷第一期,頁56-63。
6. 6.李芝靜(民85)。企業高階主管領導風格對人力資源部門功能運作影響之研究。人力資源學報,第六期,頁107-129。
7. 5.江建良、胡同來、郭家媚(民92)。銀行業服務品質之研究-以公民營銀行為例。臺北科技大學學報,第三十六之二期,頁113-126。
8. 25.康自立、蘇國楨、張淑萱、許世卿(民90)。中國式領導模式的發展及其在技職院校之應用研究。教育研究集刊,第47輯,頁133-154。
9. 26.張肅婷(民91)。員工工作態度與組織文化、領導行為、工作滿足及組織承諾間之關係研究。弘光學報,第四十卷,頁35-44。
10. 32.楊秀娟(民93)。我國行政機關服務品質的發展。品質月刊,第四十卷第四期,頁46-53。
11. 34.趙美珍(民92)。行政院推動提升服務品質現況之研析。研考雙月刊,第二十七卷第三期,頁88-100。
12. 37.蘇國楨、陳榮德(民92)。服務業主管領導行為、組織文化和領導效能之研究。人力資源管理學報,第三卷第四期,頁65-91。
13. 施永昭,2002,義勇警察組織學習能力之建構,中央警察大學警學叢刊,33(1): pp.157-174.
14. 陳慶安,2000,績效評估發展趨勢,人力發展月刊,八十二期:頁21-25.
15. 黃家齊,2002,人力資源管理系統與組織績效 – 智慧資本觀點,管理學報,