跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.236.124.56) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/02 06:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊耀傑
研究生(外文):Yao-chieh Yang
論文名稱:影響組織動態能力因素之研究-以知識管理觀點來探討
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Affecting Factors of Organizations’ Dynamic Capabilities-Based on the KM Perspective
指導教授:林東清林東清引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tung-ching Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:中文
論文頁數:91
中文關鍵詞:吸收能力理論知識管理路徑相依動態能力理論
外文關鍵詞:Path DependenceKnowledge Management.Absorptive CapabilitiesDynamic Capabilities Theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:52
  • 點閱點閱:783
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:197
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
在快速變遷的網路經濟時代中,資訊科技的迅速發展,減少顧客搜尋替代品的時間、降低競爭者模仿的困難度;因此提高了業者在建立與維持長期競爭優的困難度。Teece(1997)認為傳統的競爭力分析模式(Competitive Forces)、策略衝突模式(Strategic Conflict)與資源基礎模式(Resource-Based Theory, RBT),皆無法完整供提組織面對快速變遷環境時的策略指導方針;因而提出了動態能力理論(Dynamic Capabilities Theory, DCT),指導組織建立對內、外部流程協調、重整能力,以反應環境中的高度變化,進而建立與維持組織在產業內的競爭優勢。
因此,為了瞭解影響組織動態能力之因素,本研究的目的在於經由相關文獻的探討,結合知識吸收能力理論,以知識管理的觀點探討影響組織動態能力的因素,並瞭解組織在發展知識吸收能力時之路徑相依性。
本研究的實證結果指出,組織的知識吸收能力對於動態能力的建立有正面的影響;另一方面,研究結果也指出知識吸收能力的培養會受到過去經驗和知識累積的影響,展現了組織在於能力發展上的路徑相依性。對學術價值而言,本研究驗證組織吸收能力與動態能力的關係,提昇動態能力理論的應用範疇,以供未來研究者使用。在實務上之含意,則是指導組織如何以知識的角度建立其動態能力以面對快速變化的環境。
The 21st century is the time for network economic with hyper-competition. The well-developed information technology makes information flow smoothly among suppliers, retailers, competitors, and entrants. Thus, that lowers the barrier for entry, imitation, and then increases the difficulty in long-term competitive advantage. Under such circumstances, Teece et al. (1994) published the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, DCT, for the incomplete description of former competitive strategies such as Competitive Forces, Strategic Conflict, and Resource-Based Theory (RBT). DCT is referred to a firm’s capabilities to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competences to address rapidly changing environments.
The purpose of this study is to apply the absorptive capabilities to investigate the affecting factors of organizations’ dynamic capabilities from the knowledge management perspective. In addition, the path-dependence of absorptive capabilities is discussed and verified in this study as well.
The empirical results show that absorptive capabilities have strong influence on organizations’ dynamic capabilities and the path-dependence of absorptive capabilities is supported in this study. From the academic application, the results of this study provide the research model of absorptive capabilities and dynamic capabilities to the following researchers who are interested in these topics. And, from the practice implication, firms can adopt this results and suggestion of this study to build dynamic capabilities throuth knowledge absorption.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景及動機……………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………2
第三節 論文結構與研究流程………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 動態能力……………………………………………………………4
第二節 吸收能力……………………………………………………………12
第三節 路徑相依……………………………………………………………17
第三章 研究模式
第一節 研究模式…………………………………………………………….21
第二節 研究假說與推論……………………………………………………24
第三節 研究變數操作型定義………………………………………………27
第四章 研究方法
第一節 研究設計……………………………………………………………32
第二節 資料分析方法………………………………………………………34
第五章 資料分析與研究結果
第一節 樣本的基本分析……………………………………………………37
第二節 效度與信度檢測……………………………………………………39
第三節 研究模式驗證………………………………………………………42
第四節 相關研究分析………………………………………………………53
第五節 研究結果……………………………………………………………55
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 研究貢獻……………………………………………………………58
第二節 管理上的實務建議…………………………………………………58
第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………………59
第四節 未來研究方向………………………………………………………59
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………61
附錄A 問卷詳細內容……………………………………………………………69
附錄B 效標關聯效度與收斂效度一覽表………………………………………74
附錄C 迴歸模式假設檢定………………………………………………………79
中文部份
余民寧 (1993),”次序性評定資料的信效分析和因素分析”,教育與心理研究,16期,1-21頁。
林東清,知識管理,台北:智勝文化,2003。
周文賢,多變量統計分析—SAS/STAT之應用,台北:智勝文化,2002。
陳尚晏 (2003),台灣地區高科技產業實行企業電子化之策略研究-以動態能力觀點分析,國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園合編,社會及行為科學研究法,上冊,台北:東華,2002。
葉至誠、葉立誠,研究方法與論文寫作,台北:商鼎文化,2002。

英文部份
Aiken, A. A. (1980), “Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 40, pp. 955-959.
Aiken, A. A. (1985), “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 45, pp. 131-142.
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993), “Strategic assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.1, pp.33-46.
Arthur B. (1989, 1990), “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returens, and Lock-in by Historical Events,” Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 16-31.
Argyres, N. (1995), “Tehcnology Strategy, Governance Structure and Interdivisional Coordination”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 28, pp. 337-358.
Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99–120.
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator-mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategical, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1173-1182.
Boar, B. H. (1997), Strategic Thinking For Information Technology, John Wiley.
Bostrom, R. P. (1989), “Successful Application of Communication Techniques to Improve the System Development Process,” Information & Management, Vol. 16, pp. 279-295.
Christensen, C. M., Suarez, F. F. and Utterback, J. M. (1998), “Strategies for Survial in Fast Changing Industries.” Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. S207-S220.
Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T. (1991), “Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industries,” Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, New York: John Wiley.
Cohen, W.N. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 1128-1152.
Collins, H. (1993), “The Structure of Knowledge,” Social Research, Vol. 60, pp. 95-116.
Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, P. S. (1998), Business Research Methods, Sixth Edition, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cronbach, L. J. (1947), “Test Reliability: Its Meaning and Determination,” Psychometrika, Vol. 12, pp. 1-16.
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
David P. (1985), “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings 75, pp.332-337.
Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D. D. and Coombs, J. (1999), “Dynamic Capabilities and New Product Development in High Technology Ventures: An Emperical Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, pp. 211-229.
Delmas, M. A. (2001), “Innovating Against European Rigidities, Institutional Environment and Dynamic Capabilities,” Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 13, pp. 19-43.
Doz, Y. and Shuen, A. (1990), “From Intent to Outcome: A Process Framework for Partnerships,” INSEAD working paper.
Drucker, P.F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, London: Heinemann.
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1105-1121.
Eriksson, K., Majkgard, A., and Sharma, D. (2000), “Path Dependence and Knowledge Development in the International Process,” Management International Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 307-328.
Garvin, D. (1988), Managing Quality, Free Press, New York.
Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. (2001),“Knowledge Management: An Organization Capabilities Perspective,” Journal of Management Information System (18:1), Summer, pp. 185-214.
Grant, R. M. (1996), “Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environment: Organization Capability as Knowledge Integration,” Organization Science, Vol. 17, pp. 375-387.
Grant, R.M. (1991), ”The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for strategy Formulaton,” California Management Review, Vol.33, Iss.3, pp.114-135.
Hall, R. (1992), “ The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources.” Strategic Management Journal,” 13: 135–144.
Hall, R. (1993), “A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607–618.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black W. C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
Hayes, R., Wheelwright, and Clark (1988), “Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization,” Free Press, New York.
Henderson, R. M. (1994), “The Evolution of Integrative Capability: Innovation in Cardiovascular Drug Discovery”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 607-630.
Kim, L. (1997a), “The Dynamics of Samsung’s Technological Learning in Semiconductors,” California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 86-100.
Kim, L. (1997b), “From Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning ,” Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kim, L. (1998), “Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor,” Organization Science, Vol. 9, pp. 506-521.
Koestler, A. (1966), The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson.
Langlois, R. (1994), “Cognition and Capabilities: Opportunities Seized and Missed in the History of the Computer Industry,” Conference on Technological Oversights and Foresights, Stern School of Business, New York, 11-12 March 1994.
Lawshe, C.H.(1975), “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 28, pp. 563-575.
Lindsay, P. H. and Norman, D. A. (1977), “Human information processing,” Academic Press, Orlando.
Luo, Y. (2000), “Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion,” Journal of World Business, Vol. 35, No.4, pp.355-378.
Madhok, A. (1997), “Cost, Value and Foreign Market Entry Mode: the Transaction and the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.39-61.
March, J. and Simon, H. A. (1958), Organizations, New York: John Wiley.
Mody, A. (1993), “Learning through Alliances,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.151-170.
Mowery, D. S. and Oxley, J. E. (1995), “Inward Technology Transfer and Competitiveness: the Role of National Innovation System,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 67-93.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nelson, R. R. (1994), “The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 47-63.
North, D. C. (1990), “Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ED., New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Dell, C. and Grayson, C. Jr. (1998), “If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices, ” California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 154~174.
Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, London: Basil Blackwell.
Pisano, G. P. (1994), “Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: As Empirical Analysis of Process Development,” Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, Vol. 15, pp. 85-100.
Pitelis C. (1993), Transaction costs, Markets and Hierarchies, Oxford: Blackwell.
Peter M. Senge (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the learning organization, New York: Doubleday.
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
Porter M.E. (1980), “Competitive Strategy: Technique for Analyzing Industries and
Competitors,” Free Press, New York.
Rocha, F. (1997), “Inter-firm Technological Cooperation: Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Firm-size and Specialization,” Discussion paper serious No. 9707, United Nations University, Institution for New Technology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Schilling, M. A., Vidal P., Ployhart R. E., Marangoni A. (2003), “Learning by Doing Something Else: Variation, Relatedness, and the Learning Curve,” Organizational Science, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 39-56.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper.
Sekaran, U. (2003), Research Methods for Business, New York: John Wiley.
Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline-The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
Seviby, K. (1997), The New Organizational Wealth; Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets, San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
Shankar, V. and Bayus, B. L. (2003), "Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Video Game Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 375-394.
Smith, K. A. and DeGregorio, D. D. (2002), “Bisociation, Discovery, and Entrepreneurial Action,” Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating an integrated mindset. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spender, J. C. (1996), “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of The Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 45-62.
Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exporting Internal Stickness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp. 27-33.
Teece, D. J. (1976), The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
Teece, D. J. (1986a), “Transaction Cost Economics and the Multinational Enterprise,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7, pp. 21-45.
Teece, D. J. (1988), “Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm,” Technical Change and Economic Theory, New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 256-281.
Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G. and Winter, S. (1994), “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: A Introduction,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 537-556.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, pp. 509-533.
Tracy, M. and Wiersema, F. (1993), “Customer Intimacy and Other Value Displines,” Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 84~93.
Tushman, M. L., W. H. Newman and E. Romanelli (1986), “Convergence and Upheaval: Managinf the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution,” California Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 29-44.
Van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., De Boer, M. (1999), “Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities,” Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, September-October, pp. 551-568.
Verona, G. and Ravasi, D. (2003), “Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 577-606.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic,” Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180.
Wiig, K. M. (1999), "Introducing Knowledge Management into the Enterprise," in J. Liebowitz (ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook, Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
Wheeler, B. C. (2003), “NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for assessing Net-Enablement, ” Information System Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 125-146.
Zahra, S. A. and George, G.. (2002), “Absorptive Capability: a Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 185-203.
Zahra, S. A. and George, G.. (2003), “The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,” Information System Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 147-150.
Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002), “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,” Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp. 339-351.
Zott, C. (2003), “Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Industry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 97-125.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top