跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.49.72) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/12 12:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:簡文珍
研究生(外文):Chien, Wen-chen
論文名稱:再述王爾德美學:論《多利安.葛雷的畫像》呈現的顛覆現象
論文名稱(外文):Re-reading Oscar Wilde's Aestheticism: The Subversion in The Picture of Dorian Gray
指導教授:蕭 嫣 嫣
指導教授(外文):Hsiao, Yan-yan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:78
中文關鍵詞:王爾德美學多利安.葛雷的畫像顛覆愛爾蘭維多利亞時代虛偽文化主權社會階層語言男同志情慾文化殖民佩特唯美派
外文關鍵詞:AestheticismSubversionAestheticismVictorian moralityallegorical readingPater’s influenceArt for Art’s Sakecultural hegemonycultural imperialismhypocrisyhomoerotic desirelanguage inversionerotic pleasure
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:410
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:54
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:7
中文摘要
再述王爾德美學:論《多利安.葛雷的畫像》呈現的顛覆現象

王爾德,英國劇作家兼評論家,在他唯一一本小說《多利安.葛雷的畫像》中以愛爾蘭作家的身份,點出維多利亞時代社會的虛偽矯情及被文化主權壓抑的現實面。此論文以三個面向-唯美美學理論、同性情慾流動及後殖民論述來反思,王爾德如何以愛爾蘭藉英國作家的身份,以藝術創作與語言倒置的筆觸來顛覆大英帝國的文化大一統的霸權。
英國文學傳統以來,王爾德的文字藝術與戲劇創作深獲好評,然而,他唯一的一本小說《多利安.葛雷的畫像》在評論家眼中被視作自身同志情感的自白,在社會階層嚴謹與權力言說的維多利亞時代,王爾德因為《多利安.葛雷的畫像》一書被社會視為反叛及不名譽的象徵,本論文為王爾德一百多年來受到扭曲不公平的評論作一平白,再次讀出他愛爾蘭傳統在英國文學上所帶來的衝擊,並影響當代及後代其他劇作家在文字語言上的懷疑與探究性。
在王爾德美學的呈現上,挑戰了十九世紀評論家阿諾德的主流美學評論,深受佩特唯美派的影響,主張十九世紀文學傳統中創作家與評論家的角色地位同等的重要,藉此以提升評論家的獨立性。論文的第二章節以傅柯的權力論述及性別變裝的言說來探討在小說中,男同志情慾的流動如何表現在藝術的創作上,藉以探討小說中三位主角心理層面的蛻變與投射。第三章以文化殖面的議題來分析,王爾德如何以文化、裝扮、面具、語言的精練來深入英國社會上流階層來揭穿文化殖民的深層手段。實是,王爾德以他機智的文字手法來揭露維多利亞時代文化社會的不真實性,進而以顛覆的美學表達深刻的愛爾蘭文學傳統。
Abstract

Re-reading Wilde’s Aestheticism: The Subversion in
The Picture of Dorian Gray
Until the 1980s, Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray was generally considered to be a flawed novel. This study aims to justify The Picture of Dorian Gray as Wilde’s aesthetic presentation and exploration of the Victorian morality in terms of allegorical reading. My thesis re-examines the nineteenth-century literary Aesthetic tradition, tracing from Pre-Raphaelite movement postulated by Ruskin, through Walter Pater’s influence, to Oscar Wilde’s advocacy of Art for Art’s Sake. From the perspective of Irish cultural nationalism, I discuss how Wilde has rebelled against the British imperialism. In Wilde’s case, as a doubly marginalized status, he has to subvert the powerful British authority and cultural hegemony by his aesthetic creation. My research focuses on analyzing the conflicts between the Victorian moral doctrines and Wilde’s aesthetic conception in The Picture of Dorian Gray. This conflicts, actually, is Wilde’s subversion against the British cultural imperialism by unmasking the colonial strategy. My thesis concludes that through Wilde’s aesthetic exemplification in The Picture of Dorian Gray, he conveys his persistent resistance against Victorian moral hypocrisy.
Introduction
Chapter One Wilde’s Aestheticism
Chapter Two The Male Body as the Source of Aesthetic and Erotic Pleasure
Chapter Three Wilde and British Cultural Imperislism
Conclusion
Works Cited
Works Cited
Backus, Margot Gayle. “Homophobia and the Imperial Demon Lover: Gothic
Narrativity in Irish Representations of the Great War.”
CRCL 21.1 (1994): 45-63.
Bhabha, Homi K.. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial
Discourse.” The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994. 65-110.
Brinkley, Edward S.. “Homosexuality as (Anti)Illness: Oscar Wilde’s
The Picture of Dorian Gray and Gabriele D’Annunzio’s Il Piacere.”
StTCL 22.1 (1998): 61-82.
Bristow, Joseph. “‘A Complex Multiform Creature’: Wilde’s Sexual Identities.”
The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Ed. Peter Raby.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 195-218.
---. “Wilde, Dorian Gray, and Gross Indecency.” Sexual Sameness: Textual
Differences in Lesbian and Gay Writing. Ed. Joseph Bristow. London:
Routledge, 1992. 44-63.
Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York:
Routledge, 1997.
Cohen, Ed. “Writing Gone Wilde: Homoerotic Desire in the Closet of
Representation.” PMLA 102 (1987): 801-13.
Cohen, Philip K.. The Moral Vision of Oscar Wilde. New Jersey: Fairleigh
Dickinson, 1978. 117-20.
Deborah, McCollister. “Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
Explicator 54.1 (1995): 17-20.
Dollimore, Jonathan. “Different Desires: Subjectivity and Transgression is Wilde
And Gide.” TexP 1 (1987): 48-67.

---. Sexual Dissidence: Augustine to Wilde, Freud to Foucault. Oxford:
Clarendon, 1991.
Ellmann, Richard. “The Critic as Artist as Wilde.” Modern Critical View:
Oscar Wilde. Ed. Harld Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1985.
91-106.
---. Oscar Wilde. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality – Volume I: An Introduction. Trans.
Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1990.
Gagnier, Regenia. “Wilde and the Victorians.” The Cambridge Companion to
Oscar Wilde. Ed. Peter Raby. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 18-33.
Gillespie, Michael Patrick. “Ethics and Aesthetics in The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
Rediscovering Oscar Wilde. Ed. Sandulescu George C..
England: Colin Smythe, 1994. 137-55.
---. “Picturing Dorian Gray: Resistant Readings in Wilde’s
Novel.” English Literature Transition 35.1 (1992): 7-25.
---. “‘What’s in a Name?’: Representing The Picture of
Dorian Gray.” Bucknell Review 38.1 (1994): 44-60.
Gold, Barri J.. “The Domination of Dorian Gray.” Victorian Newsletter 91
(1997): 27-30.
Hamilton, Lisa K.. “New Women and ‘Old’ Men.” Women and British
Aestheticism. Eds. Talia Schaffer and Kathy Alexis Psomiades.
Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1999. 63-79.
James, Joyce. The Portrait of the Artist as A Young Man. 1916.
Rpt. of Taipei: Bookman Company, 1997.
Kaplan, Joel. “The Dandy and the Dowager: Oscar Wilde and Audience
Resistance.” New Theatre Quarterly 15.4 (1999): 318-31.
Kiberd, Declan. “Oscar Wilde—The Artist as Irishman.” Inventing Ireland:
The Literature of the Modern Nation. London: Vintage, 1996. 33-50.
---. “Oscar Wilde: The Resurgence of Lying.” The Cambridge Companion to
Oscar Wilde. Ed. Peter Raby. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 276-294.
Kofman, Sarah. “The Imposture of Beauty: The Uncanniness of Oscar Wilde’s
The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Enigmas: Essays on Sarah Kofman.
Trans. Duncan Large. NY: Cornell UP, 1999. 25-48.
Kohl, Norbert. “Culture and Corruption. The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
Oscar Wilde: The Works of a Conformist Rebel. Trans. David Henry Wilson.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989. 138-75.
Liebman, Sheldon W.. “Character Design in The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
Studies in the Novel 31.3 (1999): 296-316.
Mahaffey, Vicki. “Pere-version and Im-mere-sion: Idealized Corruption in
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
JJQ 31.3 (1994): 189-206.
Manganiello, Dominic. “Through a Cracked Looking Glass: The Picture of Dorian
Gray and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” James and Joyce and His
Contemporaries. Eds. Diana A. Ben-Merre and Maureen Murphy.
New York: Greenwood, 1989. 89-96.
Nassaar, Christopher S.. Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray. Explicator 57.4
(1999): 216-17.
Nunokawa, Jeff. “Homosexual Desire and the Effacement of the Self in
The Picture of Dorian Gray.” American Imago 49.3 (1992): 311-21.
---. “The Importance of Being Bored: The Dividends of Ennui in The Picture of
Dorian Gray.” Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction.
Ed. Sedgwick Eve Kosofsky. NC: Duke UP, 1997. 357-71.
---. “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Anorexia: The Case of Oscar Wilde.”
What’s Left of Theory? Eds. Judith Butler, John Guillory, and Kendall
Thomas. New York: Routledge, 2000. 240-72.
Pater, Walter. The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. Oxford: Oxford UP.
1986.
Powell, Kerry. “A Verdict of Death: Oscar Wilde, Actresses and Victorian
Women.” The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Ed. Peter Raby.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 181-194.
Raby, Peter. Oscar Wilde. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 1988. 67-80.
Raeside, James. “The Spirit is Willing but the Flesh is Strong: Mishima Yukio’s
Kinjiki and Oscar Wilde.” CLS 36.1 (1999): 1-23.
Riquelme, John Paul. “Oscar Wilde’s Aesthetic Gothic: Walter Pater, Dark
Enlightenment, and The Picture of Dorian Gray.”
Modern Fiction Studies 46.3 (2000): 609-31.
Seagroatt, Heather. “Hard Science, Soft Psychology, and Amorphous Art in
The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Studies in English Literature 38.4 (1998):
741-59.
Theoharis, Theoharis Constantine. “Will to Power, Poetic Justice, and Mimesis in
The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Rediscovering Oscar Wilde. Ed. Sandulescu
George C.. England: Colin Smythe, 1994. 397-404.
Walshe, Eibhear. “Wild(e) Ireland.” Ireland in Proximity: History, Gender,
Space. Eds. Scott Brewster, Virginia Crossman, Fiona Becket, and
David Alderson. London: Routledge, 1999. 64-79.
Wilde, Oscar. “The Critic as Artist.” Oscar Wilde: the Major Works. Ed. and
Introd. Isobel Murray. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 241-97.
---. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. Isobel Murray. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.
Womack, Kenneth. “’Withered, Wrinkled, and Loathsome of Visage’: Reading the
Ethics of the Soul and the Late-Victorian Gothic in The Picture of Dorian
Gray.” Victorian Gothic: Literary and Cultural Manifestations in the
Nineteenth Century. Ed. Robbins Ruth. NY: Palgrave, 2000. 18-47.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top