跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.204.48.64) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/30 08:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:唐孟祺
研究生(外文):Meng-Chi Tang
論文名稱:法律環境、創業投資與台灣製造業總要素生產力的成長
論文名稱(外文):The Legal Environment, Venture Capital, and Total Factor Productivity Growth of Taiwan's Manufacturing Industry
指導教授:祁玉蘭祁玉蘭引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yih-Luan Chyi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:35
中文關鍵詞:創業投資法律環境指標總要素生產力
外文關鍵詞:venture capitallegal environment indicatortotal factor productivity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:272
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:88
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本論文以新古典成長理論為基礎,進一步提出一個新的知識成長內生機制模型。傳統的內生成長理論著重在人力資本及研究發展的重要,我們則進一步將另外兩類的知識長成管道納入現有的理論模型:一是來自技術先進國家對技術落後國家的知識外溢效果,包括衡量以出口及外人投資為管道的技術吸收能力,與國家間技術發展的差異;二是來自創業投資者對新進公司企業家的經驗傳遞效果。創業投資者對新企業家在發展技術以外所提供的幫助,包括公司治理及技術商品化等建議,是我們認為同樣對製造業總要素生產力的成長相當重要、卻長久以來為著重技術發展的傳統成長理論所忽略的部份。此外,在創業投資與總要素生產力成長間存在著內生性的問題。為了解決在文獻中的爭議,我們建立一套創業投資的法律環境指標做為工具變數,主要針對台灣目前相關法律對創業投資的資金來源、租稅誘因及上市容易程度等管制及獎勵進行評量。最後,我們進一步提出法律環境、創業投資、與台灣製造業總要素生產力成長間的實證結果。我們發現創業投資對台灣製造業總要素生產力有非常顯著的影響。此外,製造業的研發及出口,同樣對其發展有著顯著貢獻。然而,在我們的結果中,外人投資、人力資本對台灣製造業的影響並不顯著。
This thesis moves beyond the neoclassical growth model by proposing an endogenous mechanism for knowledge growth. We introduce a broader range of channels enhancing growth either by external diffusion of knowledge from technology advanced countries to late-comer countries or by experiential diffusion of knowledge brought about by the interaction between venture capitalists and start-up entrepreneurs. To avoid the endogenous problem between venture capital and knowledge growth, we construct the legal environment indicators of venture capital to serve as instrument variable, and provide the empirical results of the dynamic association between legal environment, venture capital, and total factor productivity growth in Taiwan.
I. Introduction

II. A Model of Knowledge growth
2.1 Internal Diffusion of knowledge: The Baseline
2.2 External diffusions of knowledge: Absorptive Capability and Technology Gap
2.3 Experiential Diffusion of knowledge: Venture Capital

III. The Legal Environment of Venture Capital
3.1 Venture Capital and the Laws
3.2 Methodology
3.3 The Legal Environment Indicators

IV. Empirical Results

V. Conclusions
Appendix
Relevant Legal Rules
Data Sources
References
Acemoglu D. and F. Zilibotti, 2001, Productivity Differences., Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 563-606.
Armour, J., 2002, Law, Innovation and Finance: A Review., ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 243.
Arrow K. J., 1962, The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing., Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-73.
Baumol. W. J., 2002, The Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Black, B.S., and R. J. Gilson, 1998, Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks versus Stock Markets., Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 243-77.
Caselli, F. and N. Gennaioli, 2003, Dynastic Management., CEPR Discussion Paper,No. 3767, http://ssrn.com/abstract=390103.
Chen, B. –L., Hsu M., and J. –Y, Chen, 1999, Technology Adoption and Technical Efficiency in Taiwan: Foreign Investment Led versus Export Performance Promoted., Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Asia- Pacific Region, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 215- 36.
Chuang, Y. –C., 1996, Identifying the Sources of Growth in Taiwan's Manufacturing Industry., Journal of Development Studies, 32 , 3, 445-63.
Chuang, Y. –C and C. –M. Lin, 1999, Foreign Direct Investment, R&D and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms., Journal of Development Studies, 35, 4, 117-37.
Coe D. and E. Helpman, 1995, International R&D Spillovers., European Economic Review, 39, 859-87.
Collins, S. M. and B. P. Bosworth, 1996, Economic Growth in East Asia: Accumulation Versus Assimilation., Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 135-204.
Dale W. J., 1996, Empirical Studies of Depreciation., Economic Inquiry 34, 1, 24-42.
Dessus, S., 1999, Total Factor Productivity and Outward Orientation in Taiwan: What is the Nature of the Relationship?. Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Asia- Pacific Region, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 191- 214, http://ssrn.com/abstract=147262.
Färe, R., Grosskopf S., and W. –F. Lee (2001), Productivity and Technical Change: The Case of Taiwan., Applied Economics, 33, 15, 1911-25.
Fu, P. H., 2001, Developing Venture Capital Laws in China: Lessons Learned from the United States, Germany, and Japan., 23 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 487- 528.
Ginarte, J.C., Park,W., 1997., Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study., Research Policy, 26, 283– 301.
Gompers, P. and J. Lerner, 1998, What Drives Venture Fundraising?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 149-92.
_____, 1999, The Venture Capital Cycle, Cambridge: MIT Press.
_____, 2001, The Venture Capital Revolution., Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 2, 145-68.
Gretai Securities Market, 2001, Report of the dynamics of over-the counter market.
Grossman G. and E. Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy., Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Hansen, L., 1982, Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Movements
Estimators, Econometrica, 50, 1029-54.
Hellman, T., 1998, The Allocation of Control Rights in Venture Capital Contracts., The Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 1, 57-76.
Hellman, T., and M. Puri, 2000, The Interaction between Product Market and Financing Strategy: The Role of Venture Capital., Review of Financial Studies, 13, 4, 959-84.
Investment Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C., FDI Annual Report. (In Chinese)
Jeng L.A. and P. C. Wells, 2000, The Determinants of Venture Capital Funding: Evidence Across Countries., Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 3, 241-89.
Johnston, J. and DiNardo, J., 1997, Econometric Methods, fourth edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Jorgenson, D.W., and Z. Griliches, 1967, The Explanation of Productivity Change., Review of Economic Studies, 34, 249–83.
Kleibergen, F., 1999, Reduced Rank Regression Using GMM, General Method of Moments Estimation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171-210.
Keller, W., 1998, Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-Related? Analyzing Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners, European Economic Review, 42, 1469-81.
Keuschnigg, C., 2002, Venture Capital Backed Growth., IFF-HSG, CEPR and CESifo Discussion paper no. 2002-04.
Kirzner, I. M., 1979, Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kortum, S. and J. Lerner, 2000, .Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation., RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 4, 674-92.
Krugman, P., 1994, The Myth of Asia’s Miracle., Foreign Affairs, 62-78.
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny, 1998, Law and Finance., Journal of Political Economy, 106, 6, 1113-55.
Levine, R., 1998, The Legal Environment, Banks, and Long-Run Economic Growth., Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 30, 3, 596-613.
Liu X. and C. Wang, 2003, Does Foreign Direct Investment Facilitate Technological Progress? Evidence from Chinese Industries., Research Policy, 32, 945–53.
Lucas Jr., R. E., 1988, On the Mechanics of Economic Development., Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
Milhaupt, C. J., 1997, The Market for Innovation in The United States and Japan: Venture Capital and the Comparative Corporate Governance Debate., 91 Northwestern University Law Review, Spring, 865- 98.
Nadiri, M.I., 1993, Innovations and Technological Spillovers., National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 4423, Cambridge, MA.
Nelson, R. R. and E. S. Phelps, 1966, Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth, American Economic Review, 56, 69-75.
Prescott, E., 1998, Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity, International Economic Review, 39, 525-53.
Rogers, M., 1998, The International Diffusion of Technology: Technological Catch-up and Economic Growth., Paper presented at IRIC Conference, Perth, August.
Romain, Astrid, and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2004, The Economic Impact of Venture Capital, Working Paper WP-CEB: #04/014, Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
Romer P., 1986, Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth., Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-37.
_____, 1990, Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy., 98, 5, 71-101.
Stiroh, K., 2001, What Drives Productivity Growth?, FRBNY Economic Policy Review., 37–59.
Taiwan Venture Capital Association (TVCA), 2003, TVCA Yearbook. (In Chinese)
Tsai, D. -H and T. –G. Chen, 2002, Intra- and Inter-industry R&D Spillovers and Exogenous Technical Change Effects: Evidence from Taiwan High-Tech Plant-Level Data., Taiwan Economic Review, 30, 2, 175-204. (In Chinese)
Ueda M. and M. Hirukawa, 2003, Venture Capital and Productivity., unpublished working paper, University of Wisconsin, USA.
Wang, J. –C., 2003, Taiwan Venture Capital Enterprise and China Market Regulation., Yuê- Dan Law Review, 103, 77- 103. (In Chinese)
Xu, B., 2000, Multinational Enterprises, Technology Diffusion, and Host Country Productivity Growth., Journal of Development Economics, 62, 477–93.
Yang, C. –H. and J. –R. Chen, 2002, R&D, Patents and Productivity--Evidence from Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms., Taiwan Economic Review, 30, 1, 27-48. (In Chinese)
Young, A., 1995, The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience., The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 641-80.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
1. 〈《後漢書》的書寫女性:兼論傳統中國女性史之建構〉,衣若蘭《暨大學報》第4卷第1期(2000年3月),頁17∼42。
2. 〈「敬順」與「悔嫁」──唐代閨怨詩的社會意識〉,鄭華達《大陸雜誌》第97卷第4期(1998年10月),頁1∼14。
3. 〈孝道與婦道:明代孝婦的文化史考察〉,林麗月《近代中國婦女史研究》第6期(1998年8月),頁5∼29。
4. 〈明清時期寡婦守節的風氣──理性選擇(rational choice)的問題〉,張彬村《新史學》第10卷第2期(1999年6月),頁29∼75。
5. 〈貞順節烈足夠嗎?由女兒書看古代對有智婦女之重視〉,吳燕娜《九州學刊》第5卷第1期(1992年7月),頁123∼128。
6. 〈從〈唐晅〉看唐代士族生活與心態的幾個方面〉,陳弱水《新史學》第10卷第2期(1999年6月),頁1∼23。
7. 〈從經濟觀點看唐至北宋的婦女權益〉,陳瑛珣《國立空中大學社會科學學報》第6期(1998年),頁1∼24。
8. 〈傳統女子孝道與孝行述論〉,蕭群忠《孔孟月刊》第39卷第6期(2001年2月),頁47∼53。
9. 〈試探唐代婦女與本家的關係〉,陳弱水《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》第68本第1分(1997年3月),頁167∼247。
10. 〈劉向「列女傳」的性別意識〉,劉靜貞《東吳歷史學報》第5期(1999年3月),頁1∼30。
11. 〈論劉向《列女傳》的女性自殘〉,蔡雅霓《輔大中研所學刊》第8期(1998年9月),頁107∼120。
12. 〈歷史的重讀與再現──古代經典《列女傳》的通識意涵〉,劉靜貞《通識教育季刊》第4卷第3期(1997年9月),頁111∼126。
13. 〈太公家教研究〉,朱鳳玉《漢學研究》第4卷第2期(1986年12月),頁389∼408。
14. 〈太公家教重探〉,周鳳五《漢學研究》第4卷第2期(1986年12月),頁355∼377。
15. 〈敦煌王梵志詩新探〉,潘重規《漢學研究》第4卷第2期(1986年12月),115∼128