(18.206.187.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/19 02:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪淑貞
研究生(外文):Sue-Chen Hung
論文名稱:指數基金上市對指數期貨及選擇權套利之影響
論文名稱(外文):THE EFFECT OF TTT INTRODUCTION ON SPOT-FUTURES AND SPOT-OPTIONS ARBITRAGES
指導教授:李存修李存修引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tsun-Siou Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:38
中文關鍵詞:選擇權指數型基金台灣五十指數基金期貨
外文關鍵詞:optionfuturesTTTETF
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:119
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
期貨及選擇權的價格不效率原因,可能來自套利成本過高、無法一次建構完成投資組合或現貨放空限制。在ETF未上市前,期貨及選擇權價格產生偏離,利用現貨套利、減少偏離程度存有困難度;ETF上市後,ETF的特性將可替代現貨投資組合,作為套利工具。
TTT於2003年6月30日上市,本研究探討TTT上市後,指數期貨及選擇權的套利次數及幅度是否下降。當指數期貨及選擇權的事後套利次數及幅度下降,表示TTT具有取代現貨之弁遄A期貨及選擇權的價格不效率原因,可能同時來自套利成本過高、無法一次建構完成投資組合或現貨放空限制。當指數期貨及選擇權的事前套利次數及幅度下降,則表示期貨及選擇權的價格不效率原因,最可能來自無法一次建構完成投資組合,使套利機會有延遲現象。當指數期貨及選擇權的反向套利(套利策略為放空現貨)次數及幅度下降,則表示現貨放空限制是期貨及選擇權的價格不效率主要原因。
本研究發現指數期貨與選擇權之事後及事前反向套利(套利策略為放空現貨)次數及幅度明顯下降。但事後及事前正向套利(套利策略為買進現貨)及次數及幅度並不明顯。因此認為現貨放空限制是期貨及選擇權的價格不效率主要原因。


This paper uses cost-of-carry model to simulate spot-futures pricing relationship, and uses put-call parity and boundary condition of call and put to simulate spot-option pricing relationship. The empirical results support that spot-futures pricing relationship tense after TTT launching, especially for short arbitrage. The frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation decrease in the post-TTT period for short arbitrage, but not for long arbitrage. The evidence is consistent with the notion that TTT reduces arbitrage opportunity and leads to the improvements of fewer short-sale restrictions, smaller transaction cost and smaller transaction cost for short arbitrage. For imitating boundary condition of call, we find the frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation significantly diminish since TTT began trading. However the result is insignificant for put boundary condition. As for simulating put-call parity, the frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation significantly diminish after TTT introduction for short arbitrage, but is significant for long arbitrage. The evidences are the same as the spot-futures pricing relationship that TTT leads to the improvement of fewer short-sale restrictions, smaller transaction cost and smaller transaction cost for short arbitrage. This paper uses cost-of-carry model to simulate spot-futures pricing relationship, and uses put-call parity and boundary condition of call and put to simulate spot-option pricing relationship. The empirical results support that spot-futures pricing relationship tense after TTT launching, especially for short arbitrage. The frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation decrease in the post-TTT period for short arbitrage, but not for long arbitrage. The evidence is consistent with the notion that TTT reduces arbitrage opportunity and leads to the improvements of fewer short-sale restrictions, smaller transaction cost and smaller transaction cost for short arbitrage. For imitating boundary condition of call, we find the frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation significantly diminish since TTT began trading. However the result is insignificant for put boundary condition. As for simulating put-call parity, the frequency and size of ex post and ex ante violation significantly diminish after TTT introduction for short arbitrage, but is significant for long arbitrage. The evidences are the same as the spot-futures pricing relationship that TTT leads to the improvement of fewer short-sale restrictions, smaller transaction cost and smaller transaction cost for short arbitrage.

I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. LITERATURE REVIEW 4
II.1. TIPS 4
II.2. SPDRS 4
II.3. DIAMONDS 5
II.4. QQQS 6
III. HYPOTHESES AND EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY 7
III.1. HYPOTHESES TO BE TESTED 7
III.2. THEORETICAL SPOT-FUTURES PRICING RELATIONSHIP AND ARBITRAGE 9
III.3. THEORETICAL OPTION PRICING RELATIONSHIP AND ARBITRAGE 11
III.3.1. BOUNDARY CONDITION 11
III.3.2. PUT-CALL PARITY 12
III.4. REGRESSION MODEL 15
IV. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE 17
IV.1. THE DATA 17
IV.2. THE IMPACT ON SPOT-FUTURES ARBITRAGE 18
IV.2.1. MISPRICNIG RESULTS 18
IV.2.2. REGRESSION RESULTS ON SHORT ARBITRAGE 21
IV.2.3. REGRESSION RESULTS ON LONG ARBITRAGE 23
IV.2.4. REGRESSION RESULTS ON ALL ARBITRAGE 25
IV.3. THE IMPACT ON SPOT-OPTIONS ARBITRAGE 27
IV.3.1. REGRESSION RESULTS OF CALL BOUNDARY CONSITION 30
IV.3.2. REGRESSION RESULTS OF PUT-CALL PARITY 31
IV.3.3. REGRESSION RESULTS OF PUT BOUNDARY CONSITION 32
IV.3.4. REGRESSION RESULTS OF PUT-CALL PARITY 33
V. CONCLUSION 35



固定採樣股價指數期貨:台灣五十指數合約研究,台灣期交所,2003年5月
歐宏杰、賴朝隆、劉宗聖,台灣五十ETF投資實務,寶來證券集團 寶來投信,2003年6月
全球指數型商品,寶來金融商品叢書系列,2002年6月
孫毓徽,「指數股票式基金之上市與指數期貨市場的定價效率-以道瓊工業指商品為例」,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文,91年。
張美媛, 「指數股票式基金之上市與指數期貨市場的定價效率—以S&P 500指商品為例」,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文,91年。
Ackert, L.F. and Y.S. Tian.“Arbitrage and Valuation in the Market for Standard and Poor’s Depository Receipts,”Financial Management, 29(2000),71-88.
Ackert, L.F. and Y.S. Tian. “The Introduction of Toronto Index Participation Units and Arbitrage Opportunities in the Toronto 35 Index Option Market, ” Journal of Derivatives,5(Summer 1998),44-53.
Ackert, L.F. and Y.S. Tian. “Efficiency in Index Options Markets and Trading in Stock Basket”,Journal of Banking and Finance,25(2001),1607-1634.
Chan,K. and P.Y.Chung.“Intraday Relationship among Index Arbitrage, Spot and Futures Price Volatility, and Spot Market Volume: A Transaction Data Test, ”Journal of Banking and Finance,17(1993),663-687.
Chu,Q.C. and W.G.Hsieh. “Pricing Efficiency of the S&P 500 Index Market: Evidence from the Standard and Poor’s Depositary Receipts, ”The Journal of Futures Markets,22(2002),877-900.
Chu,Q.C.,W.G.Hsieh, and Y.Tse.“Price Discovery on the S&P 500 Index Markets: An Analysis of Spot Index, Index Futures, and SPDR, ”International Review of Financial Analysis,8(1999),21-34.
Kurov,A.A. and D.J.Lasser. “The Effect of the Introduction of Cubes on the Nasdaq-100 index Spot-Futures Pricing Relationship,”The Journal of Futures Market,22(2002),197-218.
Klemkosky, R.C. and Lee, J.H (1991).“The Intraday Ex Post and Ex Ante Profitability of Index Arbitrage”,The Journal of Futures Markets,Vol.11, 291-311.
Park,T.H. and L.N.Switzer. “Index Participation Units and Performance of Index Futures Market, Evidence from the Toronto 35 index Participation Units Market,”Journal of Futrues Market,15(1995),187-200.
Switzer,L.N.,P.L.Varson,and S.Zghidi. “Standard and Poor’s Depository Receipts and the Performance of the S&P 500 Index Futures Market,”The Journal of Futures Markets,20(2000),705-716.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top