一、中文部分
丁振豐(1989)︰場地獨立性認知型式個別差異現象及其對教學歷程影響之探討。台南師院學報，2 2 ，141。
王敬仁(1977)：孤立效果與認知型式對國中學生閱讀成就的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王澄霞(1995a)：STS 活動中之「學」與「教」。科學教育學刊，3 (1)，115-137。王澄霞(1995b)：從「科學與社會互動之學習」探究數理教育問題。科學發展月刊，23 (5)，433-455。王澄霞、陳國華(1994)︰STS 主題—「油脂與生活」之開放性思考評量。化學，52 (4)，415-442。王澄霞、游珮琪(1994)︰油炸後的實用油該如何處理。化學，52（4），415-442。
王澄霞、劉弈昇(1994)︰臭氧層破洞STS 單元活動。師大學報，40，331-363。
王澄霞(1996)：建立STS教師專業能力基準：化學領域。計畫報告， 計畫編號： NCS 84-2511-s-003-094。
王曉璿(1997)：建構主義在電腦軟體教材設計應用。菁莪季刊,8(4)，13-19。
江新合(1992)：中學生浮力相關概念發展及其相關迷思概念的分析研究。高雄師範大學學報，3，139-177。
吳心楷(1997)：科學學習相關的認知能力與認知風格之性別差異探討。科學教育學刊，204，16-23。吳心楷(1997)：科學學習相關的認知能力與認知風格之性別差異探討(續)。科學教育學刊，205，9-18。吳知賢(1989)。國小高年級兒童之人格特質、媒體偏好、科目興趣與其認知型態的關係。國立台南師範學院學報，22，29-54。
吳嘉麗(1996)：提昇女性的科技參與。兩性、文化與社會，11-34。
吳裕益(1987)：認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊，7，51-98。吳明隆(1998)：電腦網路學習特性及其相關問題的省思。教育部電子計算機中心簡訊，8709，23-39。何祖鳳、陳俊欽和陳銘欽(1998)。網路教學系統評估準則之研究。遠距教學，7，20-29。
李田英(1988)：學習成就的性別差異。台北師範學報，1，119-130。
李詩閔(2001)：以微量實驗裝置的教學活動探討學生對於酸鹼概念的學習情況。國立台灣師範大學，未出版碩士論文。岳修平，林一鵬(1998)：網路非同步輔助學評估計畫。國科會研究計畫。
林甘敏(1999)：建構式電腦網路輔助教學教材的選擇與設計原則。發表於第八屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集。上網日期：92年1月12日。網址：http://acbe.tku.edu.tw/iccai8/84/84.htm。
林家平(2001)：國小學童光合作用概念之分析應用。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所，未出版碩士論文。洪志明、許仁杰(1998)：STS 遠拒教學系統設計與實作。第十一屆科學教育學會年會論文集，237-242。
洪木利(1983)：A study of children’s concept patterns in gravity。高雄師院學報，11，183-199。
孫鈺凱(2001)：網路問題式學習環境建置與學習行為分析之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文。陳幸仁(1996)：成就與能力在性別差異上的探討。教育資料文摘，38 (5)，148-155。
陳啟明、陳瓊森(1992)：發展紙筆測驗以探究高一學生對直流電路的迷思概念。彰師科學教育，3，21-73陳廣勇(2000)：國小學生對於物質微小粒子的概念與迷思概念的研究。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系，未出版碩士論文。陳欣舜、徐新逸(2000)：在職教師資訊素養內涵與進修方式及課程之探討。資訊與教育雙月刊，80，11-22。曾志朗(1997)：網路上的科學教育。「網際網路」 。建構與教學網站，http://www.bio.ncue.edu.tw/c&t/issue9-10/v10-2.htm。鄭湧涇、邱貴發(1998)：網路科技對高中教育的影響之研究。國科會專題研究成果報告（NSC87-2514-S-003-004-N）。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
黃鴻博(1997)：國民小學 STS 課程發展之研究。台中師院學報，第11 期，443-469。
黃鴻博(1998a)：以 STS 教育理念改進國小自然科教學之研究。科學教育研究與發展，12 ，3-17。
黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)：課程設計—理論與實際。台北：五南。
黃湘武、邱韻如、莊福泰(1995)：我國學生水平面及空間概念成長之研究。科學教育學刊，8(1)，167-188黃湘武、劉謹輔、陳忠志、杜鴻模、陸業堯、江新合(1995)：國中學生質量守恒、重量守恆、外體積觀念與比例推理能力之抽樣調查與研究。中等教育，36(1)，44-65。
郭重吉(1987)：英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究。資優教育季刊，22，2-8。教育部(2001)：學習科技--主動社會學習及其應用，從台灣到全世界。教育部大學學術追求卓越研究計劃。
胡寶玉、楊錦潭(2001)：非同步網路教學單元課程實施之個案研
究。發表於2001 技職教育新意涵研討會，台北科技大學。
彭惠明(2003/11/16)：無線網路 教學電子化。聯合報，C2 版。
邱瓊慧、王振川、張騰元、陳煥彬(1998)：建構式電腦輔助系統
之研究。發表於第七屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會。
張世忠(2000)：建構教學－理論與應用。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
張首泰(1977)：前導架構短文與認知型式對國中學生閱讀成就
的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張春興、陳李綢(1978)：國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師性別差異的關係。台灣師範大學教育心理學報，10，21-34。張春興(1994)：教育心理學。台北市：東華書局。
楊龍立(1992)：科學教育中性別差異的解釋。教育研究集刊，34，115-141。
廖焜熙(1999)：有機立體化學成就影響因素及解題模式之研究。台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。簡茂發(1975)：國民中學才賦優異學生科學性向之研究。測驗年刊，22，52-57。
劉聖忠(2001)：從 STS 的角度看統整課程。花蓮縣吉安鄉太昌國小八十九學年度辦理九年一貫課程自然與生活科技領域種子教師工作坊研習手冊。
劉得煒(2001)：主題式網路學習環境系統平台之建構與評鑑。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文。鄭淑玲(1997)：開發 STS 模組--「植物色素」與「天然清潔劑」。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。鍾孟蓉、楊文金(2000)：實驗組內的性別刻板印象。國立台灣師範大學科教育研究所，未出版碩士論文。
裘維鈺(1995)：國小學童植物概念及其相關迷思概念之探究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所，未出版碩士論文。唐健文(2001)：中學生電流磁效應及感應電流迷思概念及二段式診斷工具之研究。國立高雄師範大學，未出版碩士論文。資策會(1999)：「專科以上學校開辦遠距教學作業要點」，http://www.edu.tw/ rules/ index.htm，台北，教育部。
蔡佳璋(2000)：三至八年級學生熱膨脹概念之研究。國立高雄師範大學，未出版碩士論文。魏明通(1997)：科學教育。台北市，五南圖書出版有限公司。
魏明通(1994)：「各國 STS 課程教材評介(三)--日本的科學-技術社會(STS)教育」，科學教育月刊，170，11-22。蘇育任(1996)：開發國小自然科學STS 單元教材之研究，進修部學士學位班獨立研究專輯(台中師範學院)，5 ，161-181
蘇育任(1999)：職前及在職國民小學教師的天氣概念及其相關迷思概念之探究。科學教育學刊，7(2)，157-176。謝忠豪(2002)： STS 理念融入基礎物理網路教學學生學習興趣之探討。國立台灣師範大學物理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
謝臥龍、駱慧文、吳雅玲(1999)：從性別平等的教育觀點來探討高雄地區國小課堂中師生互動的關係。教育研究資訊，7(1)，57-80。二、英文部分
Ager, T. (1993) Online placement testing in mathematics and chemistry. Journal of Computer Basded Instruction, 20(2),52-57.
Alexander, P. A., Pate, e. a., Pate, E. P., Kukiowich, L. M., & Wright, N. NL. (1989). Domain-specific and stragegic knowledge: Effects of training on students of differing ages or competence levels. Learning and Individual Difference, 1,183-325.
Alexander, P. A, Kukiowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1992 , April). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS Science Teaching？In J. Soloman & G. Aikenhead (Eds), STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform
(pp.47-49). New York: Teachers College Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender scheme theory and its implication for child development.Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8, 598-617.
Campbell, N. J. (1990).Self-perceived computer proficiency, computer attitudes, and computer attributions as predictors of enrollment in college computer courses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Boston, MA, April 16-20, 1990). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED317618).
Cameron, E., Eisenberg, N., & Tyron, K. (1985). The relation between sextyped play and preschoolers’ social behavior. Sex Roles, 12, 601-615.
Cavallo, A. M. L. (1994). Do females learn biological topics by rote more than males? The American Biology Teacher, 56(6), 348-356.
Cavallo, A. M. L. (1994). Do females learn biological topics by rote more than males? The American Biology Teacher, 56(6), 348-356.
Coleman, S.L. & Gotch, A. J.(1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2),206-209.
Cheek, D. W. (1994). Tread and dilemmas in science, technology and society education within K-12 schools in the united states. ED.381429
Deregowski, J. B. (1968). Difficulties in pictorial depth perception in Africa. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 195-204.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teacher''s views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
Dochy, F. J.R.C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant of future learning: the use of knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Utrecht/London: Lemma B. V. /Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Dochy, F. J.R.C. (1994a). Investigating the use of knowledge profiles in a flexible learning environment : Analyzing student, prior knowledge states. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, & H, Mandl (Eds.). Technology-base learning environments: Psychological and educational foundations(pp. 235-242). Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dochy, F. J.R.C. (1994b). Prior Knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education(2nd.).(pp.4698-4702).Oxford/New York: Pergamon.
Dochy, F. J.R.C.(1996). Assessment of domain-specific and domain-transceding prior knowledge: Entry assessment and the use of profile analysis. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C.D.chy (Eds),Alternatives of assessment in achievement, learning process and prior learning (pp.227-264).Boston:Kluwer.
Erickson, G. L. & Erickson, L. J. (1984). Females and science achievement: Evidence,explanations, and implications. Science Education 68(2), 63-89.
Elizabeth, H. H. & Michael, P. (1991). Relationship between students, conceptual knowledge and study stratrgies-part 2: student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4),421-429.
Fletcher, J. D. & Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Evaluation of the Stanford CAI program in initial reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 597-602.
Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York: teachers College Press.
Goldstein,K.M. & Blackman,S.(1978).Cognitive style. New
York:John Wiley & Sons.
Gallgher, J. J. (1987). A summary of research in science education-1985. Science Education, l71, 3.
Harman, G. (1994). Student selection and admission to higher education: Policies and practices in the Asian region. Higher Education, 27(3), 313-341.
Hativa, N., & Shorer, D. (1989). Socioeconomic status, aptitude, and gender differences in CAI gains of arithmetic. Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 11-21.
Haertel, G. D., Walberg, H. J., & Weinstein, Th. (1983). Psychological models of educational performance: A theoretical synthesis of constructs. Review of Educational Research, 53(1), 75-91.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender difference in verbal activities: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
Hooper, E. B. (1982). The effect of field dependence and instructional sequence on student learning, In a computer-based algebra lesson. Unpublished master,s thesis, Iowa state University.
Hudson, W. (1960). Pictorial depth perception in sub-cultural groups in Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 183-208.
Iskandar, S. M. (1991). An evaluation of the science-technology-society approach to science teaching. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from ProQuest: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9217158.
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Mindtools: Computer in the classroom. Prentic
Hall: Englewood.
Jovanovic, J., & King. S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performance? American Educational Research Journal,35(3), 477-496.
Kohler,J.(1987).Die Entwicklung von Gedachtnis-und Metagedachtnis-leistungen in Abhangigkeit von bereichsspezifischen Vorkenntnissent (Memory and meta-memory achievement in relation to domain-specfic prior knowledge). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based instructon (WBI): What is it and why is
it ？ In B. H. Khan (Ed.). Web-based instruction (pp. 5-18). Nglewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in development of moral thought and action. New York: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
Kahle, J. B., Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131-140.
Kahle, J. B. Matyas, M. L., & Cho, H. H. (1985). An assessment of the impact of science experience on the career choices of male and female biology students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 385-394.
Kumano, Y. (1993). The effects of STS instruction in Japan compared to results reported in the U.S. (United States). [CD-ROM]. Abstract from ProQuest: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9421155.
Lee, D. M. S., Pliskin, N., & Kahn, B. (1994). The relationship between performance in a computer literacy course and students prior achievement and knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(1), 63-77.
Liu, C. (1992). Evaluating the effectiveness of an inservice teacher education program: The Iowa Chautauqua program. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from ProQuest: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9318467.
Lu, Y. (1993). A study of the effectiveness of the science-technology-society approach to science teaching in the elementary cchool. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from ProQuest: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9334631.
Mackinnu (1991). Comparison of learning outcomes between classes taught with a science-technology-and-society (STS) approach and a textbook oriented approach. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from ProQuest: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9136969.
Mayo, P., Donnelly, M. B., Nash, P. P., & Schwartz, R. W. (1993). Student Perceptions of Tutor Effectiveness in problem based surgery clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5(4), 227-233.
Myers, L.H. (1988). Analysis of Student Outcomes in Ninth Grade Physical Science/Technology/Society Focus Versus one Taught with a Textbook Orientation, Ph.D.
Mehlinger, H. D. (1996). School reform in the information age. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6),400-407.
McKenna,F.(1984)Measures of field dependent: cognitive style or cognitive ability ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,47, 593-603.
Messick,S.(1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativiety.In S.Messick (Eds.),Individuality in Learning San.Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 4-33.
Minnaert, A. & Janssen, P. J. (1992). The causal role of domain-specific prior knowledge on study skills and curriculum outcomes after five academic years. Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 10(3), 134-149-2.
Minnaert, A. & Janssen, P. J. (1996). How general are the effects of domain-specific prior knowledge on study expertise as compared to general thinking skills? In M. Birenbaum, & F. Dochy (Eds.), Alternaives in assessment of achievents, learning processes and prior learning (pp. 265-282). Boston: Kluwer.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex difference. Standford, CA:Standford University Press.
NSTA (1990). Science/ Technology/ Society： A new effort for providing appropriate science for all. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), The Science technology, society movement. (3-5). Washington, DC： NSTA.
Pool, M., & Isaaca, D. (1993). The gender agenda in teacher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(3), 274-284.
Sarath, C., David, F. T., & Kenneth, T. (1987). The role of cognitive factors in chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(2), 145-160.
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls.New York: Scribner’s.
Shymansky, J. & YORE, L. (1980). A study of teaching strategies, student cognitive development, and cognitive style as they relate to student achievement inscience. The Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17,369-382.
Sharp, G. (2001). A longitudinal study exploring pupils’ views on school science learning experiences from a gender perspective. Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, 627-630.
Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, Prior Knowledge and Learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54.
Tracy, D. M. (1987). Boys, spatial ability, science and mathematics achievement. Are they related？Sex Roles, 17(3,4), 115-138.
Weinert, F. (1989). The impact of schooling on cognitive development: one hypothetical assumption, some empirical results, and many theoretical implications. EARLI New, 8, 3-7.
Witkin,H.,Dyk,R.,Faterson,H.,Goodenough,D.,&Karp,S.A(1962)
Psychological differertiation. New York :Wiley.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman. P. K., Raskin, E. & Kaerp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded finures tests. California: Consulting psychologist Press Inc.
Witkin,H.A., & Goodenough,D.R.(1977).Field -dependence and
interpersonal behavior.Psychological Bulletin 84:661-689.
Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (1990 , June).The rationale of a school based centralized examination system. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Maastricht.
Yager, R. E. (1984). Defining the discipline of science education, Science Education, 68(1),35-37.
Yager, R. E. & Tweed, P. (1991). Planning more appropriate biology education for schools, The American Biology Teacher, 53(8), 479-483
Yager, R. E. (1992a). The constructivist learning model: a must for STS classrooms. ICASE Yearbook, 14-17.
Yager, R. E. (1992b). The STS approach parallels constructivist practices. Science Education Intemal. 3(2). 18-20
Yager, R. E. (1993). Science-technology-society as reform. School Science and Mathematics,93(3),145-151.
Yager, R. E. (1994). Instructional outcomes change with STS. Workshop on STS approach in science education. National Taiwan Normal university, Taipei.
Yager, R. E. & Lutz, M. V. (1995). STS to Enhance Total Curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 95(1), 28-35.
Yager, R. E. (1996). Science/Technology/Society as reform in science education. State University of New York Press.
Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.