隨著全世界的電子商務環境的快速發展並逐漸成熟，企業漸漸的導入資訊科技於其內部作業流程，使其作業流程加快，但是除了眾多的優點與機會之外，網路也帶來了新的產業競爭淘汰局勢與新的管理挑戰。企業可以直接跟供應商、事業夥伴或個人顧客連結，不僅可以增快交易速度，更可以降低組織間契約訂定與監督執行有關的交易成本(Transaction Cost)，這也是目前企業極力追求的目標，也正改變企業的價值鏈與企業間的供給鍊關係。這類技術可用來支援組織間的協調活動，不但有可能帶給組織競爭的優勢，也可能改變交易的方式及組織間的運作機制以及權力結構關係，甚至影響到組織扮演的角色與其本質。
　　本文將以追求效率觀點的「交易成本理論」、以權力觀點的「資源依賴理論」及機構化觀點的「機構化理論」等三個為理論基礎，針對電機電子公會之第一級會員為研究對象，探討企業在導入跨組織資訊系統進行電子整合之影響因素。根據所收集之文獻及回應之問卷資料分析結果,本研究所獲得的結論如下：(1)交易成本理論方面，事前與事後成本、交易流程相關成本與企業導入電子整合系統是有顯著相關的；(2)資源依賴理論方面，其依賴度與企業導入電子整合系統是有顯著相關的；(3)機構化理論方面，其強制、模仿與規範機制與企業導入電子整合系統是有顯著相關的。而從本研究之結論發現，機構化構面之因素對企業導入電子整合系統之影響最為明顯，其次為資源依賴構面與交易成本構面之因素。而本研究之結論，希望除了提供企業未來在導入跨組織資訊系統進行電子整合時，進一步提高成功機會，避免可能之失敗風險外，並可作為政府在制訂產業電子化政策的參考。

　　The e-commerce environment is changing fast and getting mature, the internet technology enabled evolution created many new business organizations and new business models. Beside a mass of merit and chance, internet also created new competitions and new management challenges. The enterprises could connect to supplier、business partners and customers through internet. This could not only increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of business transactions but also the change the value chain of enterprise and the supply chain within different organization.
　　The research based on 「Transaction cost theory」、「Resource dependent theory」and「Institution theory」, and tried to confer on the factors affecting the adopting of IOS for electronic integration. The conclusions will contain listed below: (1) In the construct of transaction cost theory, the cost of transaction in advance and afterwards (ex ante and ex post)、the correlation cost of transaction process had evident related with enterprises’ adoption and performance of electronic integration. (2) In the construct of resource dependent theory, the degree of dependence is evident to the performance of electronic integration. (3) In the construct of Institutionalization theory, Coercive、Mimetic and Normative are highly related with enterprises’ performance of electronic integration. Finding in the conclusion, factors of institutionalization effect that business import electronic integration system remarkable, then is the factors of resource dependence and transaction cost. The conclusion of research, it hoped provide when business import IOS to electronic integration in the future, and advanced the chance of success, and avoid possible risk of failure, then it could be reference of government set up industry electronic strategy.

摘要 ................................................iv
英文摘要 .................................................v
誌謝 ................................................vi
目次 ...............................................vii
表目錄 ................................................ix
圖目錄 ................................................xi
第一章 緒論 ........................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機 ...............................1
1.2 研究目的 ........................................3
1.3 研究流程 ........................................4
1.4 研究架構 ........................................5
第二章 文獻探討與理論基礎 ...............................7
2.1 交易成本理論 ...............................7
2.2 資源依賴理論 ..............................18
2.3 機構化理論 ..............................20
2.4 電子整合 ......................................24
第三章 研究方法 .......................................32
3.1 研究議題 .......................................32
3.2 研究變數定義 ..............................32
3.3 研究架構 .......................................40
3.4 研究設計 .......................................41
3.5 資料分析方法 ..............................45
第四章 實證分析 .......................................47
4.1 樣本基本資料分析 ..............................47
4.2 問卷之信度與效度檢驗 .....................56
4.3 相關 .......................................65
第五章 結論與建議 .......................................69
5.1 研究結論 .......................................69
5.2 研究限制 .......................................73
5.3 未來研究方向 ..............................74
參考文獻 ................................................76
附錄
A 廻歸分析 .......................................82
B 問卷 .......................................85

方世杰，企業技術交易模式影響因素之探討，國立台灣大學商學研究所　　博士論文，民85。
方世杰，技術取得模式與技術取得績效之研究－電子業之實證分析，管　　理學報，民98年3月，pp. 151-174。
金德智，創新交易成本，技術創新政策與行銷策略的配合對技術創新績　　效之影響－以台灣半導體IC業為例，私立輔仁大學管理學研究所未　　出版碩士論文，民82年6月。
林瑞池，技術合作策略影響因素之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所　　未出版碩士論文，民86年6月。
何靜，宼斯定理，經濟前瞻，第二十五號，民82年1月。
吳思華，策略九說，臉譜文化事業公司，民85。
張善智，台灣交易成本之研究，台大經濟研究所碩士論文，民80年。
黃俊英，林震岩，SAS精析與實例，初版，華泰書局，民86年。
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光，策略聯盟的發展策略－交易成本的觀點，管　　理評論，民82年，頁99-117。
薛義誠、蔡政達，”資訊系統委外之研究－交易成本、企業社會特質與　　業主承包商關係之關連性”，管理與系統，民86年1月，第三第一　　　期，頁17-25。
蘇郁琇，台灣地區企業採用企業資源規劃系統之影響因素研究，國立台　　灣大學會計研究所碩士論文，民88。
蕭丁偉，”契約選擇與交易成本－引證自台灣清朝宜蘭的水利契約”，　　國立清華大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文，民82年6月。
Alexander, E. R., “Interorganizational Coordination：Theory 　　　and Pratice,” Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 7, No. 　　4, May 1993, pp. 328-343.
Alpar, P & A. Saharia, “Outsourcing Information System 　　　　　Functions：An Organization Economics Perspective,” 　　　　　Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1995, 　　pp. 197-217.
Aubert, B., S. Rivard & M. Party, ”A Transaction Cost 　　　　　　Approach to Outsourcing Behavior：Some Empirical 　　　　　　　Evidence,” Information and Management, Vol. 30, 1996a, 　　　pp. 51-62.
Anderson, J. C. and J. A. Narus, “A model of distributor firm 　　and manufacturer firm working relationships,” Journal of 　　Marketing, Vol.54(January), 1990, pp. 42-58.
Arrow, K., “The Organization of Economic Activity：Issues 　　　　Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Nonmarket 　　　　　　Allocation, “ in The Analysis and Evaluation of Public 　　　Expenditure：The PPB System, Vol. 1, U.S. Joint Economic 　　　Committee, 91st Cong., 1st sess. Washington, DC; U.S. 　　　　Grovernment Printing Office, 1969, pp. 59-63.””
Balakrishnan, S. and B. Wernerfelt, “Technical change 　　　　　　competition, and vertical integration,” Strategic 　　　　　　Management Journal, Vol.7, No.4, 1986, pp. 347-359.
Blois, K.J., “Vertical Quasi- Integration”, Journal of 　　　　　Industrial Economics, 20, 1972, pp. 253-272.
Barney, J., “The Debate between Traditional Management Theory 　　and Organization Economics：Substantial Differences or 　　　　Intergroup Conflict？”, Academy of Management Journal, 　　　Vol. 7, 1990, pp. 347-359.
Cash, J. I. and Konsynski, B. R., ”IS Redraws Competitive 　　　　Boundaries”, Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1985, 　　pp. 134-142.
Coase, R. H., “The Nature of the Firm”, Economics, Vol. 4, 　　　1937, pp. 385-504.
Dietrich, M., “Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond：Towards 　　a New Economics of the Firm,” London：Routledge, 1994.
DiMaggio, P., ”Interest And agency in institutional 　　　　　　　theory,’’ in L.G. Zucker( Ed.) , Institutional patterns 　　and organization, Cambridge, MA：Ballinger, 1988, pp. 3-21.
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W.W., “The iron cage revistied：　　　　　institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in 　　　organizational fields,” American Sociological Review, 48, 　　1983, pp. 147-160.
Emerson, R. M., “Power-Dependence Relations,” American 　　　　　Sociological Review, Vol. 27, 1962, pp. 31-41.
Fogarty, T. J., “Organizational socialization in accounting 　　　firms：a theoretical framework and agenda for future 　　　　　research,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 　　　17, No. 2, 1992, pp. 129-149.
Galakiewicz, Josph. (1985). “Professional Networks and the 　　　Institutionslization of the Single Mind Set”. American 　　　Sociological Review.50：639-658.
Galbraith, John K., “Organization Design”, Reading, Mass：　　　Addison-Wesley, 1973.
Gulati, R and J Garino, “Get the right mix of bricks & 　　　　　clicks”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 2000, pp. 107-　　114.
Harrigan, K. R., “Matching vertical integration strategies to 　　competitive conditions,” Strategic Management Journal, 　　　Vol.7, No.6, 1986, pp. 535-555.
Heide, J. B. and G. John, “The role of dependence balancing 　　　in safeguarding tracsaction-specific assets in 　　　　　　　　conventional channels,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52　　　　(January), 1988, pp. 20-35.
Holland, C.P., “Cooperative Supply Chain Management: The 　　　　impact of Interorganizational Information Systems,” 　　　　　Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 4, 1995, 　　　pp. 117-133.
Kalakota, R. & Whinston, A. B., Frontiers of Electronic 　　　　　Commerce, Addison-Wesley.
Kambil, Ajit, “Electronic Integration：Designing Information 　　Technology Mediated Exchange Relations And Networks,” 　　　　Doctoral dissertation, Sloan of Management, Massachusetts 　　Institute of Technology, 1992(November).
Kambil, A. and Short, J. E., “Electronic Integration and 　　　　Business Network Redesign：A Roles-Linkage Perpective”, 　　　Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 10, No. 4, 　　1994, pp. 59-83.
Kaplan, S and M Sawhney, “E-hubs：the new B2B marketplaces”, 　　Harvard Business Review, May-June, 2000, pp. 97-103.
Lachman, R. & Aranya, N., “Job attitudes and turnover 　　　　　　intensions among professionals in different work 　　　　　　　settings,” Organization Studies, 1986, pp. 279-294.
Lacity, M. C. and Hirschheim, R., “The information System 　　　　Outsourcing Bandwagon,” Sloan Management Review, Fall 　　　　1993a, pp. 73-85.
Mahoney, J. T. and Rajendran, P. J., “The Resource-Based View 　　Within the Conversation of Strategic Management,” 　　　　　　Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, 1992, pp. 363-380.
Malone, T.W., “Modeling Coordination in Organizations and 　　　　Markets,” Management Science, Vol. 33, October 1987, pp. 　　1317-1332.
Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B., “Institutionalized organization：　　　　formal structure as myth and ceremony,” American Journal 　　of Sociology, 1977, pp. 340-361.
Oliver, C., “Determinants of Interorganizational 　　　　　　　　Relationships：Integration and Future Directions,” 　　　　　Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1990, pp. 　　　241-265.
Ouchi, William G., “Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans,” 　　　　　Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, 1980, pp. 129-　　　141.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik, “The External Control of 　　　　Organizations,” New York：Harper and Row, 1978.
Powell, Walter W., “Hybrid Organizational Arrangements：New 　　　From Transitional Development.” California Management 　　　　Review, 1987, pp. 67-87.
Reddy, M. & Rao, M., “The industrial market as an interfirm 　　　organization,” Journal of Management Studies, 1990, pp. 　　　43-58.
Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B., “Transaction Cost Analysis 　　　Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of 　　　　　Marketing, 61, October, 1997, pp. 30-54.
Robertson, T.S. & Gatignon, H., “Technology development mode：　　A transaction cost conceptualization,” Strategic 　　　　　　Management Journal, Vol.19, 1998, pp. 515-531.
Robins, J. A., “Organizational Economics：Note On the Use of 　　Transaction Cost Theroy in the Study of Organizations,” 　　　Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, 1987, pp. 68-86.
Simon, H., “Models of Man,” New York：Wiley, 1957.
Scott, W. R., “the adolescence of institutional theory,” 　　　　Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1987, pp. 493-511.
Scott, W.R. & Meyer, J.W., “The organization of societal 　　　　Sectors,” In J.W. Meyer & W.R. Scott(Ed.), organizational 　　environments：ritual and rationality, Beverly Hills, CA 　　　Sage, 1992, pp. 129-153.
Scott, W.R., & Christensen, S. (1995) The institutional 　　　　　Construction of Organizaions-international and 　　　　　　　　Longitudinal Studies, SAGE Publications.
Sengupta Sanjit. Robert E. Krapfel and Michael A. Pusateri, 　　　“Switching Costs in Key Account Relationships,” Journal 　　of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.17(Fall), pp. 　　9-16.
Srinivasan et al., ”Impact of Electronic Data Interchange 　　　　Technology on JIT Shipments”, Management Science, Vol. 　　　40, No. 10, 1994,pp.1291-1304.
Venkatraman, N. and Kambil A., “The Check’s Not in the Mail：　　Strategies for Electronic Integration in Tax Return 　　　　　Filing”, Sloan Management Review, 32(Winter), 1991, pp. 　　　33-44.
Venkatraman N. and Zaheer, A., “Electronic Integration and 　　　Strategic Advantage：A Quasi-Experimental Study in the 　　　　Insurance Industry,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 　　　1, No. 4, 1990, pp. 377-393.
Walker, G. and D. Weber, “A transaction cost approach to make-　　or-buy decisions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 　　29, 1984, pp. 373-391.
Werbach, K, “Syndication：the emerging model for business in 　　the internet era,” Harvard Business Review, May-June, 　　　　2000, pp. 85-93.
Williamson, O. E., “Market and Hierarchies：Analysis and 　　　　Antitrust Implication,” New York：Free Press，1975.
Williamson, O. E., “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism：　　Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting,” New York：Free 　　　Press, 1985.
Williamson, O. E., “The logic of economic organization,” 　　　　Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol.4, No.1, 　　　1988, pp. 65-93.
Williamson, O., “Comparative Economic Organization：the 　　　　　Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” 　　　　　　　Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, 1991, pp. 269-　　　296.
Williamson, O., “The Mechanisms of Governance,” Oxford 　　　　　University press, 1996, pp. 16.
Williamson, O., “Chester Barnard and the Incipient Science of 　　Organization,” in O. Williamson(Ed.)Organization Theory：　　From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, Oxford 　　　　University Press, 1990, Reprinted in Oliver E. Williamson, 　　The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford University Press, 　　　　1996, pp. 29-53.
Zaheer, A. and Venkatraman N., “Determinants of Electronic 　　　Integration in the Insurance Industry：An Empirical 　　　　　Test”, Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 5, 1994, pp. 549-　　566.
Zucker, L. G., “The role institutionalization in cultural 　　　　persistence,” American Sociological Review, 42, 1977, pp. 　　726-743.
Zucker, L. G., “Where do institutional patterns come from？ 　　　organization as actors in social system,” in L. G. Zuker　　　(Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations, 　　　　　　　Cambridge, MA：Ballinger, 1988, pp. 23-51.