跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(2600:1f28:365:80b0:2119:b261:d24c:ce10) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 07:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳永崚
研究生(外文):Yung-leng Chen
論文名稱:消費者的公眾自我意識對於排隊等候的反應所帶來的影響-以愛買為例
論文名稱(外文):THE INFLUENCE OF CONSUMERS' PUBLIC SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS ON RESPONSES TO WAITING IN LINE— WITH GEANT AS AN EXAMPLE
指導教授:李賢哲李賢哲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsien-che Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大同大學
系所名稱:事業經營學系(所)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:111
中文關鍵詞:公眾自我意識排隊等候的反應
外文關鍵詞:PUBLIC SELF-CONSCIOUSNESSRESPONSES TO WAITING IN LINE
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:1415
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:382
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
近年來隨著台灣都市化程度越來越高,男女平權越受重視,人們的生活方式有所轉變。大賣場成為普遍的購物場所,以「一次購足,兼具購物、娛樂之功能」為號召,吸引了許多的消費者。排隊等候問題因而產生,等待時間被拉長,必有不利廠商的結果出現,然而,每個消費者的反應有所不同,這就牽涉到等候者心理層面的問題。Buss(1980)的研究中將公眾自我意識定義為一種人格特質,係指在意在他人面前所呈現出來樣子與他人的看法。因此,具公眾自我意識傾向的消費者,在他人面前會較敏感。而本研究想了解公眾自我意識傾向高低對消費者注意力集中於時間問題上、消費者的等候原因歸屬、消費者的服務品質評價以及消費者的抱怨行為等等候反應的影響。
本研究的研究對象為在「愛買」消費的消費群,本研究研究對象為在北市的兩家分店:景美店與忠孝店。於此兩門市外實地進行問卷調查,共取得332份的有效問卷樣本資料。
本研究採用統計軟體SPSS10.0進行分析。先以Pearson相關分析檢定公眾自我意識傾向與消費者注意力集中於時間問題上是否成正相關,以及在不同情境下,公眾自我意識對消費者抱怨行為、等候原因歸屬與服務品質評價是否有正向的關係,再以迴歸分析驗證自變數對應變數的影響,最後利用多變量分析方法檢定高度公眾自我意識與低度公眾自我意識的消費者間的平均數差異。
本研究的研究結果發現:(1)消費者的公眾自我意識傾向與消費者注意力集中於時間問題上並無顯著有關。(2)在衡量公眾自我意識傾向對於等候原因歸屬的影響、對於服務品質評價的影響及對於消費者抱怨行為的影響在四個情境中皆成立,且研究顯示高度公眾自我意識的消費者較低度公眾自我意識的消費者容易將等候原因可控制因素歸於外在因素、容易有負面的服務品質評價及容易採用負面口碑及不再使用服務來表現他們的不滿。
While the extent of urbanization in Taiwan is higher and higher, people's life condition has been transformed: Consequently, on weekends, the phenomenon of huge crowds of people in hypermarkets is usual. In other words, consumers have to wait in line for settling accounts. However, we know that waiting in line is time-consuming, so when the waiting time is prolonged, there must be negative effect on firms. But different consumers have different responses. This may be related to consumers’ psychology. As we know public self-consciousness refers to a characteristic concern with one's self as a social object of others’ attention and is associated with greater attention and responsiveness to standards or expectations by which one's behavior and personal attributes may be evaluated by others. Hence, the purpose of this research is to investigate how consumers’ public self-consciousness disposition may explain the variability in their responses to a waiting situation. In this research, these waiting responses include consumers’ attentional focus on time, consumers’ causal attribution for waiting, consumers’ evaluation of service quality, and consumer complaining behavior.
The research subjects of this study were people who consume in Géant. This study employed Pearson correlation coefficient to examine whether consumers’ public self-consciousness disposition has significant relationship with the four waiting responses. Secondly, by using the simple regression method, the effects of consumers’ public self-consciousness disposition on the four waiting responses respectively were analyzed. And then multivariate analysis method was used to test mean-difference between high public self-conscious and low public self-conscious subjects.
The research findings are (1) consumers’ public self-consciousness disposition is not related significantly to consumers’ attentional focus on time. (2) consumers’ public self-consciousness disposition has positive significant relationship with consumers’ causal attribution for waiting, consumers’ evaluation of service quality, and consumer complaining behavior in each scenario, and this study shows high public self-conscious consumers have greater effects on these three waiting responses.
ABSTRACT IN CHINESE……………………..….………………………………….i
ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH…………………………..…..………….…………….…iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………….………..v
TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………..…vi
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………viii
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………….………...ix
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………...…1
1.1 Research Background and Motives ………………………………………….1
1.2 Research Objectives………………………………………………………….3
1.3 Research Procedure……………………………………………………….….4
II LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………...5
2.1 Public Self-Consciousness…………………………………………………...5
2.2 Consumers’ Attentional Focus on Time……………………………………...7
2.3 Consumers’ Causal Attribution for Waiting………..…………….…………11
2.3.1 The Factors of Causal Attribution….………………………………...12
2.3.2 The Mood-Attribution Relationship………………………………….14
2.4 Consumers’ Evaluation of Service Quality………………………………….16
2.4.1 The Concept and Definition of Service Quality………………...……16
2.4.2 The Measurement of Service Quality………………………………...17
2.4.3 Waiting and Service Quality………………………………………….19
2.4.4 The Concept and Measurement of Service Quality Model……...…...20
2.5 Consumers’ Complaining Behavior…………………………………………23
III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY……………………………………………….29
3.1 Research Framework…….……………………………………...………….29
3.2 Research Hypotheses………………………………………………………..30
3.3 Operational Definitions of Variables………………………………………..35
3.3.1 Consumers’ Public Self-Consciousness……………………………...35
3.3.2 Consumers’ Attentional Focus on Time……………………………..35
3.3.3 Consumers’ Causal Attribution for Waiting…………………………36
3.3.4 Consumers’ Evaluation of Service Quality………………………….36
3.3.5 Consumers’ Complaining Behavior………………………………….36
3.4 Measurement of Variables………………….………………………………..37
3.5 Sampling Design and Data Collection………………………………………39
3.6 Questionnaire Design………………………………………………………..39
3.7 Analysis Method…………………………………………………………….40
IV DATA ANALYSIS AND EXPLANATION……………………………………42
4.1 Description of Data………………………………………………………….42
4.2 The Reliability of the Survey Instrument……………………………………43
4.3 Correlation Analysis of Independent and Dependent Variables.…………….45
4.4 Testing the Hypotheses………………..……………………………………..47
V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS…………..…………………………56
5.1 Research Findings…………………………………………………………...56
5.2 Implications and Suggestions for Management……………………………..59
5.3 Limitations and Future Research……………………………………………60
5.3.1 Limitations…………………………………………………………...60
5.3.2 Directions for Future Research……………………………………….61
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………62
APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………………..68
VITA………………………………………………………………………………….72
Bearden, William and Jesse E. Teel. “Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports.” Journal of Marketing Research 20, no.1 (1983): 21-28.

Bitner, M. J. “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses.” Journal of Marketing 54, no.2 (1990): 69-82.

______and A. R. Hubbert. “Encounter Satisfaction versus Overall Satisfaction versus Quality: The Customer's Voice.” In Service Quality - New Directions in Theory and Research, ed. R. T. Rust and R. L. Oliver, 72-94. California: Sage, 1994.

Brehm, J. W. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. NY: Academic Press, 1966.

Buss, A. H. Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980.

Cash, T. F. and A. S. Labarge. “Development of the Appearance Schemas Inventory: A New Cognitive Body-Image Assessment.” Cognitive Therapy and Research 20 (1996): 37-50.

Chebat, J.C. and P. Filiatrault. “The Impact of Waiting in Line on Consumers.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 11 (1993): 35-40.

______,______, C. Gelinas-Chebat, and A. Vaninski. “Impact of Waiting Attribution and Consumer's Mood on Perceived Quality.” Journal of Business Research 34, no. 3 (1995): 191-196.

Cheek, J. M. and S. R. Briggs. “Self-consciousness and Aspects of Identity.” Journal of Research in Personality 16 (1982): 401-408.

Choi, Jong Pill. “The Influence of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase intentions at Fitness Clubs in South Korea.” PhD. diss., The University of New Mexico, 2001.

Crie, Dominique. “Consumers' Complaint Behavior. Taxonomy, Typology and Determinants: Towards a Unified Ontology.” Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management 11, no.1 (2003): 60-80.

Cumby, J. and J. Barnes. “How We Make Them Feel: A Discussion of the Reactions of Customers to Affective Dimensions of the Service Encounter.” American Marketing Association (June 1997): 140-152.

Day, R. and E. Jr. Landon. “Toward a Theory of Consumer Complaining Behavior” In Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, ed. Sheth Woodside and Bennett, 425-437. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1997.

Day, R. L. “Modeling Choices Among Alternative Responses to Dissatisfaction.” Advances in Consumer Research 11 (1984): 496-499

______, K. Grabicke, T. Schaetzle, and F. Staubach. “The Hidden Agenda of Consumer Complaining.” Journal of Retailing 57, no. 3 (1981): 86-106.

Duval, S. and R. A. Wicklund. A Theory of Objective Self-Awareness. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

Flipp, S. H., P. Aymanns, and W. Braukmann “Coping With Life-Events: When the Self Comes Into Play.” In Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation, ed. F. Schwarzer, 87-109. NJ: Erlbaum Lawrence, 1986.

Folkes, V. S. “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (1988): 548-565.

.______.“The Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk.” Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988): 13-23.

.______. “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach.” Journal of Consumer Research 10 (1984): 398-409.

______, S. Koletsky, and J. Graham. “A Field Study of Causal Inference and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1987): 534-539.

Forgas, J. P., G. H. Bower, and S.J. Moylan. “Praise or Blame? Affective Influences on Attribution for Achievement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990): 809-819.


Fornell, C. and B. Wernerfelt. “Defensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research 24, no. 4 (1987): 337-346.

Franzoi, S. L. and L. C. Brewer. “The Experience of Self-Awareness and Its Relations to Level of Self-Consciousness: An Experimental Sampling Study.” Journal of Research in Personality18, (1984): 522-540.

Hass, R. G. “Perspective Taking and Self-Awareness: Drawing an Eon you forehand.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984): 788-798.

Hirschman, A. O. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

Houston, M.B., L.A. Bettencourt, and Wenger S. “The Relationship Between Waiting in a Service Queue and Evaluations of Service Quality: A Field Theory Perspective.” Psychology and Marketing 15, no. 8 (1998): 735-753.

Jacoby, J. and J. J. Jaccard. “The Sources, Meaning and Validity of Consumer Complaining Behavior; A Psychological Review.” Journal of Retailing 57, no. 3 (1981). 4-24.

Katz, Karen L., Blaire M. Larson, and Richard C. Larson. “Prescription for the Waiting in Line Blues: Entertain, Enlighten, and Engage.” Sloan Management Review 32, no. 2 (1991): 44-53

Landon, E. Laird Jr.“A Model Model Model of Consumer Complaint Behavior.” In Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, ed. R. L. Day, 31-35. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press,1997.

______. “The Direction of Consumer Complaint Research.” Advances in Consumer Research 7 (1980): 335-338.

Mann, L. “Queue Culture: The Waiting Line as a Social System.” In Sociology Full Circle 4th, ed. Feigelman W., 411-423. New York: Winston, 1985.

Miller, L. C. and C. L. Cox. “For Appearances’ Sake: Public Self-Consciousness and Makeup Use.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8 (1982): 748-751.

Mooradian, T. A. and J. M. Olver. “I Can't Get No Satisfaction: The Impact of Personality and Emotion on Postpurchase Processes.” Psychology and Marketing 14, no.4 (1997): 379-393

Nasby, W. “Private and Public Self-Consciousness and Articulation of the Self-Schema.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1989): 117-123.

Nunnally, J. and I. Berntein, Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1994.

Parasuraman, A. “Measuring and Monitoring Service Quality.” In Understanding Services Management: Integrating Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource management, ed. W.J. Glynn and J.G. Barnes, 143-177. New York: Wiley, 1995.

______, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality.” Journal of Retailing 64, no.1 (1988): 12-46.

______,______, and______.“A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing 49, no. 3(1985): 41-50

Patterson, P. G. and L.W. Johnson.“Disconfirmation of Expectations and the Gap Model of Service Quality: An Integrated Paradigm.” Journal of Retailing 64, no. 3 (1993): 12-40.

Resnik, Alan J. and Robert R. Harmon. “Consumer Complaints and Managerial Response: A Holistic Approach.” Journal of Marketing 47, no.1 (1983): 86-97.

Richins, Marsha L. “Consumer Complaining Process: A Comprehensive Model.” In New Dimensions of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior, ed. R. L. Day and H. Keith Hunt, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1979, 30-34.

Russell, D. “The Causal Dimension Scale: A Measure of How Individuals Perceive Causes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982): 1137-1145.

Ryan, R. M. and R. Kuczkowsk. “The imaginary audience, self-consciousness, and public individuation in adolescence.” Journal of Personality 62 (1994): 219-238.

Schaffer, B. Easiness of Access: A Concept o f Queues. England: University of Sussex Press, 1972.

Scheier, M. F. and C. S. Carver. “The Self-Consciousness Scale: A Revised Version for Use with General Populations.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology15 (1985): 687-99.

Schlenker, B. R. and M. F. Weigold. “Self-Consciousness and Self-Presentation: Being Autonomous Versus Appearing Autonomous.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59 (1990): 820-828.

Schwartz, B. Queuing and Waiting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.

Singh, J. “Consumer Complaint Intentions and Behavior: Definitional and Taxonomical Issues.” Journal of Marketing 52, no.1 (1988): 93-107.

______and Roy D. Howell. “Consumer Complaining Behavior: A Review and Prospectus.” In Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, ed. H. Keith Hunt and Ralph L. Day, 41-49. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1985.

Solomon, M. R. and J. Schopler. “Self-Consciousness and Clothing.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8 (1982): 508-514.

Stafford, M. “How Customers Perceive Service Quality.” Journal of Retail Banking 17 no. 2 (1994): 29-37.

Sullivan, M. and M. Conway. “Dysphoria and Valence of Attributions for Others' Behavior.” Cognitive Therapy and Research 15 (1991): 273-282.

Taylor, S. A. “Waiting for Service: The Relationship Between Delays and Evaluations of Service.” Journal of Marketing 58(1994): 56-69.

______. “The Effects of Filled Waiting Time and Service Provider Control Over the Delay on Evaluations of Service.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23, no.1 (1995): 38-48.


Turner, R. G., L. Gilliland, and, H. M. Klein. “Self-consciousness, evaluation of physical characteristics, and physical attractiveness.” Journal of Research in Personality 15 (1981):182-190.

Weiner, B. “Spontaneous Causal Thinking.” Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985): 74-84

______. “An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion.” Psychological Review 92 (1985): 548-573.

______. “Searching for the Roots of Applied Attribution Theory.” In Attribution Theory: Applications to Achievement, Mental Health, and Interpersonal Conflict, ed. S. Graham and V. Folkes, 1-13. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.

Woodruff Robert B., Ernest E. Cadotte and Roger L. Jenkins. “Charting a Path for CS/D Research.” In International Fare in Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior, ed. Ralph L. Day and H. Keith Hunt, Bloomington, 118-123. IN: Indiana University Press, 1983.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top